whoknew
Footballguy
This is all pure speculation but:1) I don't think its clear that they will keep MSU and Purdue. They had an out in the M contract - but it required them to give 3 games notice. So they had to give the notice before last Saturday's game. It was just a timing issue.2) As great as some of the M/ND battles have been, ND has a longer history with both Purdue and Michigan State. Or at least, they have played a lot more games against each other. M and ND didn't play from 1943-1978. (see #3)3) M and ND have always had an uneasy relationship - ever since M kept ND out of the Big Ten back in 19turnofthecentury. (see: Bo Schembechler "To Hell with Notre Dame!")why would nd keep msu and purdue but drop michigan?
Last edited by a moderator:

LSU can make a LOT of teams look bad, especially at home. Hell, they made the Ducks look bad on a neutral site. Alabama manhandled them in the championship game, but other than that, it's been a nice run of defensive dominance. Washington was way over matched.But it's a pretty big game for the Pac-12. Stanford needs a win here to keep pace with the Ducks. They weren't supposed to be USC, but they are heavy road favorites against the Huskies. This is a chance for Washington to wipe the purple and gold stains off their chinstraps and man up. They have the QB to do it, but that defense has been horrendous. I'm more interested in this game tonight than I am the NFL game.But I'm a Pac-12 honk, so I would understand if most of the nation ignored it.
Stanford
Name me 5 teams that are better than S. Carolina, Georgia, LSU and Bama.

It's week 5, WGAS? Oh and "IN" before the "the BCS and how it works makes me act this way" shtick.