What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Official 2015 College Football Thread *** (1 Viewer)

I guess I haven't watched the correct Missouri games this year. I get a different impression of that team. They've had some decent wins, but a really crappy loss to Indiana that I keep forgetting about. That said, I doubt Tenn is in the top 50 of anything notable. Missouri is really a dog in that game?
Since UT made the switch to Dobbs at QB, they've beaten South Carolina and Kentucky. Nothing earth-shattering, but he looks like the real deal.
Certainly seems like it, but it seems to me that Missouri's just a bit better than those schools. They beat S Carolina and Kentucky too right?
Being @ UT is probably the deciding line factor. Both are coming are big wins actually.

 
Why isn't there an early signing period for CFB??

MSU recruit's scholarship pulled and not happy about it

Is it classless or a sign Mullen's headed somewhere else?? :popcorn:

ETA: To be fair....they asked him to grayshirt...didn't pull it right out from under him. It's a dubious distinction, but one I know the FFA will focus on...just clearing the air at the start.
Business as usual in the SEC when you take 35 commitments every year knowing you can't sign them all.
But this version makes it sound worse when supposedly Miss St pushed him to graduate early and enroll only to pull his scholly

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2275867-mississippi-state-pulls-qb-chason-virgils-scholarship-16-days-before-graduation

Again, maybe this goes on all of the time but given the HS coach reaction it seems somebody was done wrong

 
What did you want them to do, exceed their limit and lose future scholarships?
Honor their commitment to the young man? Not really that complicated :shrug: Or, if that's too difficult, be honest with him on where he stands with the program. That's probably too difficult as well. Guess they should just keep screwing kids over with no recourse.
You do realize that of every program only offered the number of scholarships they had, less kids would get scholarships right?
At some point before it's kind of a "point of no return" it's a #### move to ask a kid to grey shirt or outright pull a scholarship. Less than two weeks before the kid is set to graduate and enroll at your school is a pretty late hour to be telling him he's not to set foot on campus for another year. It's the same thing as if this happened in mid-January.

And, since the kid is an early enrollee, his enrollment is not going to make them exceed their limit. It's taking the kid after him in February that will cause that to happen.

I have no problems with telling a kid he's no longer in your plans, but you can't let it get this far and then flip your stance on him. This goes on at a bunch of schools, though, including UCLA. But, it usually happens right around now through New Year's Day. This is the time when a bunch of kids will suddenly open up their recruitments and usually just say that they wanted to look around. The truth is that a lot of them are being told that their school had guys higher on their board who have indicated that they are likely to choose them and there is no longer room at the inn, so to speak.

UCLA benefited from this two years ago when Southern Cal told Eldridge Massington they didn't have an early enrollee spot for him any longer, but that he could come in during the Fall. He was open about it, decommitted, and then committed to UCLA. He's now probably the second best WR on the team.

 
What did you want them to do, exceed their limit and lose future scholarships?
Honor their commitment to the young man? Not really that complicated :shrug: Or, if that's too difficult, be honest with him on where he stands with the program. That's probably too difficult as well. Guess they should just keep screwing kids over with no recourse.
You do realize that of every program only offered the number of scholarships they had, less kids would get scholarships right?
WTF?

 
Would be pretty awesome to see OSU blow out Indiana tomorrow and then watch Mizzou run the table and win the SEC championship game. JoeT's head would explode.

 
Would be pretty awesome to see OSU blow out Indiana tomorrow and then watch Mizzou run the table and win the SEC championship game. JoeT's head would explode.
:goodposting:

I don't know if my head would explode because I actually root for chaos at the end of the season which is almost a guarantee anyway. Unlikely at it is, I still like your scenario just for the mayhem.

I think a more likely scenario is that four or so teams in the top 6 lose over the next few weeks as is the norm and a team like Ole Miss slips into the playoffs and everyone continues to ##### about an SEC bias. We haven't even had the annual Oregon crap the bed week yet. I could see Baylor, Oregon, Mississippi State, and Ohio State all losing in the coming weeks and have a final four of something like Bama, FSU, TCU, Ole Miss.

Like I said, I hope for chaos and more #####ing by the anti-SEC honks. :thumbup:

 
I hadn't realized football outsiders had NCAA stats until earlier this week when someone posted a link. Just kind of browsing this morning, I came upon this. Check out who's number 1 :coffee:

 
What did you want them to do, exceed their limit and lose future scholarships?
Honor their commitment to the young man? Not really that complicated :shrug: Or, if that's too difficult, be honest with him on where he stands with the program. That's probably too difficult as well. Guess they should just keep screwing kids over with no recourse.
You do realize that of every program only offered the number of scholarships they had, less kids would get scholarships right?
WTF?
It's really not that complicated chief.

 
What did you want them to do, exceed their limit and lose future scholarships?
Honor their commitment to the young man? Not really that complicated :shrug: Or, if that's too difficult, be honest with him on where he stands with the program. That's probably too difficult as well. Guess they should just keep screwing kids over with no recourse.
You do realize that of every program only offered the number of scholarships they had, less kids would get scholarships right?
WTF?
It's really not that complicated chief.
No, it's dumb. So your theory is that if School A had 20 scholarships and offered them to 20 kids but 3 of those kids went to different schools on signing day School A would just sit on those 3 scholarships rather than offering them to other kids? You do realize that there are more kids than scholarships, right?

 
Been saying this for about 10 years. Looks like coaches want 8 team playoff as well.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11915335/fbs-coaches-prefer-eight-team-playoff-espn-poll-shows
I think most people assumed it'd eventually get to this. With five power conferences and only 4 teams making it, at least one conference was always going to be left out.

The trick becomes how do you do this? My initial guess would be that they take the conference champs, highest ranking nonP5 team (if ranked above a conference champ) and two/three at-large teams.

The biggest complaint I have is expanding things really starts to open the door for questions about teams that possibly shouldn't have playoff complaints. Right now people talk about MSU, Baylor, TCU, and Ohio State on the bubble. In that scenario, you're talking more about Ole Miss, Georgia, and UCLA. I, personally, prefer the former. If you lose at all, you run the risk of not getting in.

I'd be curious to others' thoughts on a six team playoff? Imagine P5 conference champs and one at-large. Give the top two seeds a bye during the conference title weekend. Play 3-6, 4-5 at the higher ranked site that weekend and have the final four play as they do with the current playoff configuration.

 
Jayded said:
jurb26 said:
Been saying this for about 10 years. Looks like coaches want 8 team playoff as well.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11915335/fbs-coaches-prefer-eight-team-playoff-espn-poll-shows
I think most people assumed it'd eventually get to this. With five power conferences and only 4 teams making it, at least one conference was always going to be left out.

The trick becomes how do you do this? My initial guess would be that they take the conference champs, highest ranking nonP5 team (if ranked above a conference champ) and two/three at-large teams.

The biggest complaint I have is expanding things really starts to open the door for questions about teams that possibly shouldn't have playoff complaints. Right now people talk about MSU, Baylor, TCU, and Ohio State on the bubble. In that scenario, you're talking more about Ole Miss, Georgia, and UCLA. I, personally, prefer the former. If you lose at all, you run the risk of not getting in.

I'd be curious to others' thoughts on a six team playoff? Imagine P5 conference champs and one at-large. Give the top two seeds a bye during the conference title weekend. Play 3-6, 4-5 at the higher ranked site that weekend and have the final four play as they do with the current playoff configuration.
This might actually work as well as an 8 teamer. Instead of just trying to "get in" there would be extra incentive to get one of the top 2 spots ,like the NFL does with playoff byes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
siap, but a 4* top recruit in Texas (class of 2017) decommitted from MissSt, and his dad indicated that it has something to do with that other kid getting his scholarship pulled.

 
Jayded said:
jurb26 said:
Been saying this for about 10 years. Looks like coaches want 8 team playoff as well.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11915335/fbs-coaches-prefer-eight-team-playoff-espn-poll-shows
I think most people assumed it'd eventually get to this. With five power conferences and only 4 teams making it, at least one conference was always going to be left out.The trick becomes how do you do this? My initial guess would be that they take the conference champs, highest ranking nonP5 team (if ranked above a conference champ) and two/three at-large teams.

The biggest complaint I have is expanding things really starts to open the door for questions about teams that possibly shouldn't have playoff complaints. Right now people talk about MSU, Baylor, TCU, and Ohio State on the bubble. In that scenario, you're talking more about Ole Miss, Georgia, and UCLA. I, personally, prefer the former. If you lose at all, you run the risk of not getting in.

I'd be curious to others' thoughts on a six team playoff? Imagine P5 conference champs and one at-large. Give the top two seeds a bye during the conference title weekend. Play 3-6, 4-5 at the higher ranked site that weekend and have the final four play as they do with the current playoff configuration.
This might actually work as well as an 8 teamer. Instead of just trying to "get in" there would be extra incentive to get one of the top 2 spots ,like the NFL does with playoff byes.
I like it because it still preserves the regular season but keeps the conferences happy. If it expands to 8 teams as-is, the 8-9 debate most years would be between two and three loss teams. I just find it hard to justify their inclusion for the playoff.

Running with my scenario and current standings, you'd have:

1. Alabama - Bye

2. Oregon - Bye

3. Florida State - vs. 6. Mississippi State

4. Ohio State - vs. 5 Baylor

I presumed Baylor over TCU currently assuming both win out and Baylor wins the conference due to the head to head matchup.

 
I figured there would be a surprise game or two on this otherwise lame day, but Ohio? Nope. Didn't see that coming. Go Hoosiers! :popcorn:

 
Can we please stop the silly OSU playoff talk?
Well that's not likely to happen. This game reminded me an awful lot of the Kansas/TCU game. Or even the OAK/KC game in the nfl.

It's really the "JT Barrett is special" talk that needs to settle down. He must watch a lot of Giants games.

 
I'm taking my 12 year old daughter to her first UCLA-USC game. She's not a football fan at all, but I want her to experience the pageantry.

Sunny day in Pasadena; we"ll get there around 2, going to a Bruin picnic with some friends.

 
When they play like they are capable of, OSU deserves to be in the discussion. The crap in between makes me pull my hair out.

 
Game's in Columbus.

I really think people, including the Buckeyes have been selling the Hoosiers short. They did beat a decent Mizzou team and Coleman is maybe the most underrated back in the country.

The 34 point spread threw people off, IMO.

 
Game's in Columbus.

I really think people, including the Buckeyes have been selling the Hoosiers short. They did beat a decent Mizzou team and Coleman is maybe the most underrated back in the country.

The 34 point spread threw people off, IMO.
the team with Sudfeld beat Missouri, the team with this guy hasn't beaten anybody. Don't spin this, this is just bad.

 
Game's in Columbus.

I really think people, including the Buckeyes have been selling the Hoosiers short. They did beat a decent Mizzou team and Coleman is maybe the most underrated back in the country.

The 34 point spread threw people off, IMO.
the team with Sudfeld beat Missouri, the team with this guy hasn't beaten anybody.Don't spin this, this is just bad.
Right. They are on like the 8th string QB in Diamont.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top