What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
A. You're defending her in this very post

B. Yes she did. "Corey Lewandowski, who aggressively tried to pull me to the ground."

C. Pulling someone back isn't acting like security. It's pulling someone back. It's it's not even close to pulling someone to the ground. BTFO!!!!

10 FEET HIGHER!!! YOU AND THE REST OF THE LIARS CAN BE SOUTH OF THAT WALL FOR ALL I CARE!!!
A.  Correcting your incorrect stance is not defending her.

B. Tried to pull me to the ground is now equal to pull me to the ground?  Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

C. He had zero business even touching her.  There was trained security there.

The only liar here is you.  Just like your boy Trump.

 
A.  Correcting your incorrect stance is not defending her.

B. Tried to pull me to the ground is now equal to pull me to the ground?  Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

C. He had zero business even touching her.  There was trained security there.

The only liar here is you.  Just like your boy Trump.
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH Did you even watch the video? You're defending a straight up liar WITH VIDEO ####### PROOF! 

 
Really you must live in one heck of a place to see all those flags. I think I have seen one Union Jack flying in my lifetime from the east to west coast along the southern states. 
Uhm, yeah, you know it's just a typical area, you're right, not too much diversity or immigrant heritage or pride here. Things like this where 10,000 Irishmen died digging a huge canal. Maybe the biggest point of immigrant disembarkations outside NYC & Boston in US history, 3 different colonial powers, typical.

 
Not once has Obama ever denied there are negatives to uncontrolled illegal immigration but if you had actually paid attention you would have heard him say that it provides some benefits to the economy. 
Oh well it provides some benefits to the economy. So does slavery but that doesn't make it okay. BREAKING THE LAW IS WRONG!

 
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH Did you even watch the video? You're defending a straight up liar WITH VIDEO ####### PROOF! 
You are struggling with reading comprehension of what I have stated.

And you are the one defending the liar/fake security guard

 
You are struggling with reading comprehension of what I have stated.

And you are the one defending the liar/fake security guard
Of course I'm defending corey lewandowski. He didn't do anything wrong.  See unlike, you who will defend a liar and then punk out and say you're not defending her I'm will to stand up to liars like you and Michelle Fields. 

 
Wow a photo of a place with two flags. Unless Saints is delivering candy bars to the united nations there's no way he see that many flags. I've spent my last few post exposing the lies the left tells. So this is nothing new.

BUILD THE WALL!!!
Jesus. This is really something.

My mistake for engaging in this :wall: 'ing.

 
A.  Didn't defend her.

B. She never claimed she was thrown to the floor.

C. None of that has to do with him acting as security and putting his hands on anyone.  There was security there...he is not security.  HTH
 so only security can protect a presidential candidate.

 
The businessman also suggested that as president he'd put a sweeping ban on military officials in his administration from answering questions publicly on television.

“I don't want our generals on television,” Trump said. 

“I will prohibit them — I don't want them saying things like, 'Our nation has never been so ill-prepared,’” he continued, adding generally, “I don't want them going on television.”

“You think Gen. George Patton or Gen. Douglas MacArthur, you think they'd be on television saying about how weak we are?” Trump asked.

“Number one, they wouldn't be on television because they'd be knocking the hell out of the enemy, they wouldn't have time,” he said. 
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/278443-trump-rips-clintons-bad-judgment

- Tough guy who faked a medical condition to stay out of the military.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dude don't be a white night and embarrass yourself. She was asked to step back and she refused so the CM made it happen. She then lied about what really happened. She is a reporter and should report the truth, but of course we know how that really works. 

The only story here is she lied and got BTFO. 
I think I have moved so far past the facts and the events and well into the realm of figuring out why this matters so much to Trump and his followers, because it really, really does.

However the 'campaign manager had to protect the president in waiting from this hot chick from the sycophantic publication because maybe she had a pen bomb and he could save him but the Secret Service couldn't' thing is just plain funny.

 
How do you know what security had a problem with..Security is always far outnumbered...
Well, they were right there and didn't feel the need to move her or touch her.

I'd say that is pretty decent proof they were not too worried about her.

Again this has little to do with the point that was made that the people he surrounds himself with are pretty questionable.

 
I think I have moved so far past the facts and the events and well into the realm of figuring out why this matters so much to Trump and his followers, because it really, really does.

However the 'campaign manager had to protect the president in waiting from this hot chick from the sycophantic publication because maybe she had a pen bomb and he could save him but the Secret Service couldn't' thing is just plain funny.
I wasn't the one who brought this up. Your buddy did. So NO you can't lay this on us.

 
Most of the news seems to think that the poll showing Trump ahead by 15 points is accurate. 

The overwhelming consensus also seems to be that if Trump wins in Indiana, it's over. Cruz won't concede this and vows to campaign on, but it's hopeless. 

 
I wasn't the one who brought this up. Your buddy did. So NO you can't lay this on us.
I just posted a couple pics making fun of the whole Agent 99 Assassin From Breitbart theme.

Btw, I am sure Donald & the Trumpites will not be taking responsibility for anything when this all over. I'm awaiting the conspiracy theory.

 
I just posted a couple pics making fun of the whole Agent 99 Assassin From Breitbart theme.

Btw, I am sure Donald & the Trumpites will not be taking responsibility for anything when this all over. I'm awaiting the conspiracy theory.
The only reason you posted those picture was because your buddy brought it up. Don't pretend you're not part of it either, but go ahead just like the animals who flip over cop cars and hit people with hammers that's trump fault too.

 
Most of the news seems to think that the poll showing Trump ahead by 15 points is accurate. 

The overwhelming consensus also seems to be that if Trump wins in Indiana, it's over. Cruz won't concede this and vows to campaign on, but it's hopeless. 
Well the one showing Don down looks like an outlier at this point, if Cruz pulls it off that will be significant, but right now IMO with or without IN it looks like Donald can win it in CA anyway, and he's pulling away there too. The Fiorina VP selection seems bizarre right now and the Kasich non-aggression pact indeed seems to have backfired and played into voters fears of being told what to do and how to vote.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm for border security...wall, fence or other...in fact we have a very well trained military that we pay..rather pay them to secure our borders than securing a foreign country...

I'm for controlled immigration...it's a privilege to come here, we choose when, where and how...and we cut it off as necessary for secuirity... including financial security

I'm for trade that benefits our workforce...Time to manufacture our own goods for our own use..

I'm for the end of Unions dictating wages...You know what the wage is before you take the job...you don't like it we'll find someone else to do your job.

I'm for the Keystone pipeline..don't want to hear all the so called environmental impacts..The Alaskan pipeline has been no problem..

I'm pro cop and anti dirt bag criminal....You do the crime you may get your ### handed to you.....Time to take our streets back for the law abiding, property tax paying citizens.

I'm for the Middle East solving their own problems...I'm also for letting Israel off their chain..Why should we be tying their hands..they have to live next to these a-holes.

Just to name a few...Tear me apart liberals...You wanted some policy talk...Whoever is closest to these gets my vote.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't the one who brought this up. Your buddy did. So NO you can't lay this on us.
You brought up the situation, I brought him up as an example f Trumps poor judgment in who he surrounds himself with since you all seem to think everyone else will make decisions for him.

 
Well, they were right there and didn't feel the need to move her or touch her.

I'd say that is pretty decent proof they were not too worried about her.

Again this has little to do with the point that was made that the people he surrounds himself with are pretty questionable.
Hillary surrounds herself with Bill...nobody is more questionable than him...

 
George Will: 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434768/donald-trump-republican-nomination-victory-would-cause-tremendous-damage

Were he to be nominated, conservatives would have two tasks. One would be to help him lose 50 states — condign punishment for his comprehensive disdain for conservative essentials, including the manners and grace that should lubricate the nation’s civic life. Second, conservatives can try to save from the anti-Trump undertow as many senators, representatives, governors, and state legislators as possible.
 

 
George Will: 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434768/donald-trump-republican-nomination-victory-would-cause-tremendous-damage

Were he to be nominated, conservatives would have two tasks. One would be to help him lose 50 states — condign punishment for his comprehensive disdain for conservative essentials, including the manners and grace that should lubricate the nation’s civic life. Second, conservatives can try to save from the anti-Trump undertow as many senators, representatives, governors, and state legislators as possible.
This at the beginning...

...Republican quislings...

...These collaborationists...
...is the wrong tack. It's too much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hillary Clinton’s optimal running mate might be Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, a pro-labor populist whose selection would be balm for the bruised feelings of Bernie Sanders’s legions.


I have no idea how popular Brown is in OH but the Republicans should just go jump off a cliff if this happens. Or get drunk `til December, or something like that. They had Kasich.
 
Why does Trump keep lying about being "always against the war in Iraq". He just repeated it again on Hannity. Trump was against it after things started going bad. Obama and Sanders were always against the war. In Chicago on October 2, 2002, Obama said: "I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars." 

 
How about Vichy Republicans? I kinda like that one. 

Seriously though, moderate or centrist Republicans who know better are betraying their principles if they proceed to support this embarrassment. 
Ha. Same thing, right? I dunno, the language just feeds the paranoia and it reflects some in Will too. Not sure we have ever seen him really angry in a piece like this. - eta - Anyway Trump supporters are not traitors, which is what he is saying here, it's unfair.

On the second part I agree. I don't know if we have seen any stars with a future climbing aboard. We see some has-beens and we see some power-mongers, like Boehner and McConnell, basically getting with the program.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does Trump keep lying about being "always against the war in Iraq". He just repeated it again on Hannity. Trump was against it after things started going bad. Obama and Sanders were always against the war. In Chicago on October 2, 2002, Obama said: "I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars." 
Because big lies told often stick. And Donald needs to show something on foreign policy, so he does this and the bit on the 2001 attacks to show he is some super-wise character or something to his followers.

I've given Sanders more credit on this than Obama, it's tough to actually represent a state and know you will have to show up at election time in what was then looking like an eventual popular cakewalk. Obama though he was the first one right in the 08 election but in 2002 he was a state senator from a safe district IIRC. Back then at most he expected to run for a Congressional district at that point and that stance was probably pretty popular where he was.

eta - But I see your bigger point, yeah Obama and Sanders both came out publicly and obviously against the war, Donald never did.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does Trump keep lying about being "always against the war in Iraq". He just repeated it again on Hannity. Trump was against it after things started going bad. Obama and Sanders were always against the war. In Chicago on October 2, 2002, Obama said: "I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars." 
I wonder if Sean Hannity still believes, as he stated in 2004, that anyone who was opposed to the Iraq War was a "traitor to the United States"? 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top