So Ryan says something and that means we aren't deporting any illegals now? lol?Dishonest media.
The art of the deal...So Ryan says something and that means we aren't deporting any illegals now? lol?
As for the wall Trump always said he would only have the wall at specific spots and not the entire border.
AND LASTLY remember Trump always goes for the most extreme positions and settles on what he really wanted to begin with. That doesn't mean he lied to his voters because we didn't take everything he said literally
Example: Muslim Ban turned into Extreme vetting from certain countries
,He'd be on at least his 4th alias![]()
Excellent point. I forgot he already had his aliai! Good ol' John Miller/Baron. Just another crazy thing on the list of crap donald has.,TheRealDonaldTrump,John Barron,John Miller, LHUCKS
Glad to see you back.Dishonest media.
No one is glad to see you back, is this a Master of Orion alias? Even Rove!/Sam Quentin/Flapjacks is blushing right now. We really avoided a bullet with HillaryExcellent point. I forgot he already had his aliai! Good ol' John Miller/Baron. Just another crazy thing on the list of crap donald has.
That's right, our President, once acted like another person to brag about many chicks he could bang in People magazine. Then he lied about it when busted![]()
We're doomed.
http://madworldnews.com/chance-pic-hillary-woods-history/Was this on Hillary's facebook page or something?We really avoided a bullet with Hillaryhttp://madworldnews.com/chance-pic-hillary-woods-history/
Geez. I heard that report of meeting her on CNN. Unbelievable.We really avoided a bullet with Hillaryhttp://madworldnews.com/chance-pic-hillary-woods-history/
May have missed it. Didn't hear anything about a path. Just not aggressively deporting them. Regardless, it sounds like he'll be reasonable even if a path isn't given. But that rhetoric was extremely missing in the election. I'd love to see a path bc I want that but also to see Trump supporters react.60 minutes hasn't aired here yet, but, hearing on #3 he's pretty much proposing exactly what I suggested, deporting violent criminals and giving the rest a path to citizenship. Is that accurate?
I can't believe they'll continue to protest a guy who's virtually granting amnesty.
That article is trash. Do you even read the stuff you're linking?
Yaknow what when the transcript is up we will do a direct quote, ok?That article is trash. Do you even read the stuff you're linking?
Um that is what he said to 60 Minutes. Do you feel betrayed?That article is trash. Do you even read the stuff you're linking?
The article leaves out context because it is trash.Um that is what he said to 60 Minutes. Do you feel betrayed?
That is fine. I think most rational people agreed this was the way to do it. Give them a path but also don't make it easier than the traditional path.I'm sure there will be more details tomorrow, but I can't wait to see @timschochet 's head explode if Trump ends up proposing a policy he's been arguing for for years. From what I heard, the deal is the worst violent criminals get deported, the law-abiding can apply for visas and can become citizens in 10 years if they complete the requirements.
I've always said that is the way to do it.
Shoot the messenger while your illusion slowly crumbles.That article is trash. Do you even read the stuff you're linking?
I don't know if he ever said 'all of them', criminal or not. I'm positive that was what the media tried to put in his mouth by quoting him out of context, and what other people with agendas reported him as saying.
So as he normally does, he backtracks at the end and ends up refuting himself.“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”
Head explode? I'd be ecstatic. Love to see it.I'm sure there will be more details tomorrow, but I can't wait to see @timschochet 's head explode if Trump ends up proposing a policy he's been arguing for for years. From what I heard, the deal is the worst violent criminals get deported, the law-abiding can apply for visas and can become citizens in 10 years if they complete the requirements.
I've always said that is the way to do it.
No I heard him say directly "they all have to leave, then some of them can come back." But if he changes his mind I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.I don't know if he ever said 'all of them', criminal or not. I'm positive that was what the media tried to put in his mouth by quoting him out of context, and what other people with agendas reported him as saying.
He said he was considering work visas while their immigration status pends.May have missed it. Didn't hear anything about a path. Just not aggressively deporting them. Regardless, it sounds like he'll be reasonable even if a path isn't given. But that rhetoric was extremely missing in the election. I'd love to see a path bc I want that but also to see Trump supporters react.
I'll give the orange man a thumbs up for this.President Trump say he isn't taking a salary. Required by law to take $1 per year. Agrees.
3rd Pres in history not to take a salary!
I don't expect them to go searching for all illegal immigrants and deport them but they need to close the border, let Border Patrol do their job. Deport all illegals that commit a crime not just violent crimes, even traffic violations. If your name comes up for any reason cya.Also, as I wrote earlier, I have no problem with deporting violent felons who are illegal immigrants. But Trump asserts there are 2-3 million of these, and other sources say less than 300,000. I suspect the lesser number is more correct but one way or the other, I don't know how we are going to "round up" these people (the ones who are not already in prison) without violating all sorts of individual liberties. I hope it's all talk.
Also, as I wrote earlier, I have no problem with deporting violent felons who are illegal immigrants. But Trump asserts there are 2-3 million of these, and other sources say less than 300,000. I suspect the lesser number is more correct but one way or the other, I don't know how we are going to "round up" these people (the ones who are not already in prison) without violating all sorts of individual liberties. I hope it's all talk.
Nice move. I'm not surprised JFK was one of the other two but I'm guessing not many would have thought of Hoover.President Trump say he isn't taking a salary. Required by law to take $1 per year. Agrees.
3rd Pres in history not to take a salary!
This would make for a pretty good comedy. An ambitious but clueless guy stumbles into the presidency, and suddenly realizes that he's in way over his head. Hijinks ensue.
As a former co-worker said to me once - "I may be hung like a grasshopper but I move my butt like a sewing machine"Now, hang on. I'm the best of the best. You can't just jump right to the top like that, you'll get hurt. @James Daulton should start small and build his way up. I offer you as a start.
As a former co-worker said to me once - "I may be hung like a grasshopper but I move my butt like a sewing machine"
![]()
That's awesome.The interesting thing about judging Trump's behavior now is that the voting public was clearly lying to the pollsters to some degree during the 2016 election. So you might try to judge Trump and build a case for or against him moving into the 2020 election, but you no longer can be confident that it is working. You're running blind now. That makes analytics almost impossible. How can you determine what matters? What should be the focus of conversation and what should be ignored? You can no longer make those decisions.Head explode? I'd be ecstatic. Love to see it.
I think you have me really wrong, Walking Boot. I don't like Donald Trump because of some of the terrible things he said. But from this point forward I'll be judging him for what he does. Let's see how it plays out.
Something that came out of WikiLeaks is that apparently Chelsea is friends with the Bush girls. And apparently she is good friends with Ivanka as well. It's rarefied air, not too many people to relate to. Barron is going to have a ridiculously massive ego, he looks like mini-Donald but instead of just being raised the scion of a Manhattan real estate tycoon he will be the scion of The One. Hopefully his siblings and the staff keeps his head tied down.Being the first family can't be easy, just ask Chelsea or those Bush twins or the Obama girls, nothing about living in the spotlight like that sounds like any fun and for a kid it just can't be easy.
Hard to do when you have drank a half gallon of gut rot gin every morning.Does this Bannon guy ever shave or comb his hair?
I have no idea what this means. Analytics?The interesting thing about judging Trump's behavior now is that the voting public was clearly lying to the pollsters to some degree during the 2016 election. So you might try to judge Trump and build a case for or against him moving into the 2020 election, but you no longer can be confident that it is working. You're running blind now. That makes analytics almost impossible. How can you determine what matters? What should be the focus of conversation and what should be ignored? You can no longer make those decisions.
:/Arsenal of Doom said:and the national polls were still ultimately pretty accurate.
Steve Bannon will also be a pretty big problem for Trump when it comes to working with the establishment Republicans in Congress.If Donald Trump is trying to show a gentler side, unite the country, start the healing, etc, then Steve Bannon is a problem.
The consensus of national polls was a narrow Clinton preference (2-3% range) and the popular vote margin will end up with Clinton 1-2% ahead. State level polls, particularly in the blue states that Trump ended up winning was obviously off and probably under-polled.
You got that right. Especially the man who Trump needs to work with the most, Paul Ryan.Steve Bannon will also be a pretty big problem for Trump when it comes to working with the establishment Republicans in Congress.
Tell that to Las VegasThe consensus of national polls was a narrow Clinton preference (2-3% range) and the popular vote margin will end up with Clinton 1-2% ahead. State level polls, particularly in the blue states that Trump ended up winning was obviously off and probably under-polled.