What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unlike you, I don't try to mislead people claiming that I dislike both candidates when I am clearly partisan for one, as you are with Trump.

You claim you dislike both candidates, but you always attack Hillary or her supporters but never Trump or his supporters.

I asked you yesterday to show us a post of the last time where you criticized Trump or his supporters and you couldn't do it.

I don't claim to be indifferent as to who wins, but you do and it is obvious you favor Trump and there is nothing your postings to disprove that .
He's like the Bizarro Tim...... 

 
Unlike you, I don't try to mislead people claiming that I dislike both candidates when I am clearly partisan for one, as you are with Trump.

You claim you dislike both candidates, but you always attack Hillary or her supporters but never Trump or his supporters.

I asked you yesterday to show us a post of the last time where you criticized Trump or his supporters and you couldn't do it.

I don't claim to be indifferent as to who wins, but you do and it is obvious you favor Trump and there is nothing your postings to disprove that .
This appears to be another weak attempt by you to imply that I'm lying about not liking Trump.  I'm not sure why you're so intent on making #### up about people.  In your attempts to prove people as liars, you're the one who's actually doing the lying.  Could it be you're just trying emulate your Dear Leader and Queen Hillary?

It's clear in my numerous posts (in this thread and others) that I don't like either candidate.  I've said it a million times so I'm not sure why you need further validation.  I don't know what you can't understand about my repeated posts about both of them being "lying, corrupt POS".   So, in this very post you see that I'm calling both that.  That should be more than enough to satisfy you, no?

 
This appears to be another weak attempt by you to imply that I'm lying about not liking Trump.  I'm not sure why you're so intent on making #### up about people.  In your attempts to prove people as liars, you're the one who's actually doing the lying.  Could it be you're just trying emulate your Dear Leader and Queen Hillary?

It's clear in my numerous posts (in this thread and others) that I don't like either candidate.  I've said it a million times so I'm not sure why you need further validation.  I don't know what you can't understand about my repeated posts about both of them being "lying, corrupt POS".   So, in this very post you see that I'm calling both that.  That should be more than enough to satisfy you, no?
Yes, you keep saying but it never proving it by your postings. 

I can't find the last time you said anything negative about Trump or his supporters, yet you trash Hillary and her supporters every single day. 

You clearly prefer Trump over Hillary or you wouldn't be constantly beating the drum against Hillary but never against Trump.

If you indeed disliked both candidates equally there would be some proof of that in your postings, but I can't find it.

 
I love it that you keep coming back to this.  As if anyone is happy or laughing at this, they are laughing at you.
I keep coming back with it because it's true.  Keep laughing at the tragedy all you want but don't be surprised when you don't get the fawning "atta' boy" responses you crave.

 
Ha!  Americans dying is Hilarious.  
What is hilarious are the feeble attempts by the right to use it to discredit a candidate with so many other far more legitimate weaknesses. Outside of the true inner circle of derpitude, the rest of the world knows that Benghazi was a complete red herring. Even Congressional Republicans have admitted as much. Of course, the fact that people like you swallowed the hook so deeply that you're still bringing it up is proof that it worked.

 
Yes, you keep saying but it never proving it by your postings. 

I can't find the last time you said anything negative about Trump or his supporters, yet you trash Hillary and her supporters every single day. 

You clearly prefer Trump over Hillary or you wouldn't be constantly beating the drum against Hillary but never against Trump.

If you indeed disliked both candidates equally there would be some proof of that in your postings, but I can't find it.
Man, you're reaching so hard for something that isn't there.

 
gaming commissions in states where he had casinos like - *coughcough* - NJ he had to submit tax returns, apparently. Christie's not to blame, of course, but Christie's the least popular man in Jersey though...
Marla Maples would have them since they filed jointly as well.

 
What is hilarious are the feeble attempts by the right to use it to discredit a candidate with so many other far more legitimate weaknesses. Outside of the true inner circle of derpitude, the rest of the world knows that Benghazi was a complete red herring. Even Congressional Republicans have admitted as much. Of course, the fact that people like you swallowed the hook so deeply that you're still bringing it up is proof that it worked.
Sure, we can pretend nothing happened if you want.  If that puts you in your safe space then go for it. :thumbup:

 
I literally told you a few posts up.  You telling me you can't even find that?  Wow. 
You told me you dislike both candidates but you always criticize Hillary and her supporters (like today with Benghazi) but never Trump and his supporters (like today with the taxes).

Provide one post that you specifically attacked Trump or his supporters outside of the "I dislike both of them" posts. There are literally hundreds of postings where you trash Hillary and/or her supporters but I haven't been able to find any that are similar about Trump or his supporters.

 
So Americans didn't die?
You're being obtuse here.

The point is that a Republican witch hunt trying desperately to put official blame on CLinton was completely unable to, yet the right won't move on and let it go, convincing millions that she is to blame for something that she wasn't

 
The thing I see the media overlooking is that he didn't put that money up but was able to write it off.  

I realize this is legal, but its stupid.  If I lose money on stocks I can only carry forward 3k in losses.  He puts nothing up on a bad deal and carries it all for decades. 
If his company buys a building for $2 billion and then when its value drops to $1 billion it's legal for him to write off $1 billion.

However, if he negotiated the debt down with the banks the banks wouldn't he have to report that amount as a gain?

 
Sure, we can pretend nothing happened if you want.  If that puts you in your safe space then go for it. :thumbup:
It's not me, guy. The shrill screaming about Benghazi and other nonsense has probably caused the legitimate questions about her judgement raised by the email issue and other past actions to blend in with the rest of the Fox News garbage in the minds of independents who don't pay attention to this stuff. Carry on though. Maybe the results in November will be the wake up call you (collectively) need to move away from the extremism and the Infowars crap.

 
It's not me, guy. The shrill screaming about Benghazi and other nonsense has probably caused the legitimate questions about her judgement raised by the email issue and other past actions to blend in with the rest of the Fox News garbage in the minds of independents who don't pay attention to this stuff. Carry on though. Maybe the results in November will be the wake up call you (collectively) need to move away from the extremism and the Infowars crap.
Not as long as Republicans make up a majority of governors and control Congress.

 
It's not me, guy. The shrill screaming about Benghazi and other nonsense has probably caused the legitimate questions about her judgement raised by the email issue and other past actions to blend in with the rest of the Fox News garbage in the minds of independents who don't pay attention to this stuff. Carry on though. Maybe the results in November will be the wake up call you (collectively) need to move away from the extremism and the Infowars crap.
Yeah, I get it: extremism = anything that doesn't jibe with the Liberal left.  Just like everyone is a racist, sexist, homophobe if they don't kowtow to the left.

 
There is always going to be political BS going. Political stunts, wasted energy and time, etc. Trump besides being a low life creep, has shown he has no clue about any policy or how the job works. He would get absolutely crushed by this process. He can't handle any level of criticism, it would be a total and complete #### show.

Clinton thrives in this crap.

 
Yeah, I get it: extremism = anything that doesn't jibe with the Liberal left.  Just like everyone is a racist, sexist, homophobe if they don't kowtow to the left.
He's not, in this instance, referring to your point of view on issues, Max. In this instance he's talking about your insistence on blaming Hillary Clinton for the deaths in Benghazi, despite nearly a dozen investigations which exonerated her. Personally I'm curious: have you studied those investigations at all? If you haven't, why haven't you? And if you have, what is it that causes you to disagree with the unanimous conclusions of bipartisan congressmen? They looked at every detail of this issue and found nothing to blame Hillary for. So why do YOU blame her? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You told me you dislike both candidates but you always criticize Hillary and her supporters (like today with Benghazi) but never Trump and his supporters (like today with the taxes).

Provide one post that you specifically attacked Trump or his supporters outside of the "I dislike both of them" posts. There are literally hundreds of postings where you trash Hillary and/or her supporters but I haven't been able to find any that are similar about Trump or his supporters.
You're a weirdo with your internet stalking.  Go get some sun today

 
You're a weirdo with your internet stalking.  Go get some sun today
It seems to me that the stalking is all on the other side. Several of you guys follow squistion from thread to thread attacking him, and it's intensely annoying. It's also very familiar to me. 

Nobody wants to read this stuff. If you have some thought to offer to the discussion at hand then please offer it. If not, kindly stay out of these threads. tia 

 
It seems to me that the stalking is all on the other side. Several of you guys follow squistion from thread to thread attacking him, and it's intensely annoying. It's also very familiar to me. 

Nobody wants to read this stuff. If you have some thought to offer to the discussion at hand then please offer it. If not, kindly stay out of these threads. tia 
:lmao:

Says the poster who was pretty much banned to his own thread at one point.  The only thing worse than your predictions is your ego.  Go pound sand and stop trying to be the board cop.

 
It's pretty clear trump leaked these tax stories and this is his way of controlling the story as much as possible.

Put his 2 favorite lap dogs are out there saying he is a genius for using these loop holes that are legal (Christie and Guilianni are so pathetic at this point, pretty sad to see actually).

Then in some weirdo alternate reality he can fix the pseudo-scams that he has run. They were legal but now it shouldn't be? He is essentially saying it's wrong I think? By "fixing" them isn't that raising taxes? 

If they get people to buy this then I don't really know what to say :lol:  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If his company buys a building for $2 billion and then when its value drops to $1 billion it's legal for him to write off $1 billion.

However, if he negotiated the debt down with the banks the banks wouldn't he have to report that amount as a gain?
I doubt he or any other shareholder in a company can deduct the company's losses in personal income. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top