This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Never understood this...or, at the very least, never understood how it can be anyone's chief complaint about CLinton, yet can't see or acknowledge it in Trump, who, from every remotely objective measurement, lies both FAR MORE OFTEN and about FAR MORE TRIVIAL things. All politicians lie about stuff, Trump lies about pretty much everything as if it's just habit.
I don't consider myself a Republican, but I've pulled for their candidates in most years in the two-party contest. I'm definitely laughing right now. This implosion is exactly what this candidate and this party deserve right now.
Trump getting hammered should be a good thing. Though, some already turning hope to another tea party religious nut like Pence...so, that hope may not work out to well either.
When that same scumbag has been actively attacking the sexual morals of his opponent's husband, well.......that scumbag is a special kind of stupid
Hillary's campaign keeps bring up personal attacks. She is the one who does not want to keep the focus on policies.
Yeah sure. They are both bringing up personal attacks.
Exactly. It will not end well for her to talk about her policies.
Hillary would be fine focusing on policies, Trump has no policies except a wall. Focusing on policy in a debate would be a bloodbath for Clinton.
This kind of ridiculous talk is what creates the stupid political environment that we have right now and has given us two candidates who shouldn't even have been in contention.
How can you take a person seriously if they believe in hilariously foolish things like this planet only 6,000 years old? It's just a miserable starting point. This would be the guy that guides science funding for the country. People just don't want a leader that is completely divorced from science.
It's the best word they could come up with from their limited vocabulary. What they mean is 'deceitful' but that doesn't generate the clicks like 'corrupt' does.
...around Trump so he will quit grabbing women in the ##### and stop trying to #### our wives.
He's rich and famous...he's pulled more tail than any 5 FBGs.
I was saying this in the other thread. This is the psychology that leads people to vote for a true ####### like Trump.
If people on this board start getting on Trump because of what he said on Stern, I'm seriously going to larf.
I think Trump was comparing himself to one of those male breeding dogs who forcibly mounts a stationary female and mates with it.
I tend to agree with this, but the truth is that most Trump supporters can't be won over with policy discussions. It's unfortunate that modern politics has become all about attack rather than explaining one's own policies. TYpically, the overwhelming majority of attacks target the specific policies of the opponent...and here's where Hillary has a problem, because not only is Trump willing to use personal attacks, but his policies are either non-existent, or stated in simple terms and swallowed so whole-heartedly by Trump supporters that there is no way to succesfully attack those few policies that can actually be identified.
Stern isnt running for President.
Who was demonized for supporting Romney? Same with McCain prior to choosing Palin for VP.
I have no problem with what you're saying, but it just doesn't fly with me. People on this board using Trump/Stern highlights to disqualify Trump when we know what both Stern as interviewer does and what Trump as candidate doesn't pass the sniff test with me.
Romney was demonized as sexist for his "woman binder." McCain lost because McCain lost. But these charges have been leveled against innocent men and women for a long time because of policy questions, and we now see an authentic misogynist. (No, I'm not afraid to call him that.)
I expect more of a President than saying its fine for someone to say his daughter is a piece of ###.
No, that was a very real thing. Every media outlet harped on that. Let's not have amnesia in the wake of this. It was supposed to show how out of touch he was with women voters. It certainly wasn't about groping women.
