timschochet
Footballguy
Any reasonable person can weigh in on your posts and find that the knowledge was dropped at some point before you wrote them.The dude with 1,000 + posts on the greatness of Hillary Clinton weighs in on me?
Any reasonable person can weigh in on your posts and find that the knowledge was dropped at some point before you wrote them.The dude with 1,000 + posts on the greatness of Hillary Clinton weighs in on me?
No safe space needed. But I've called this out even before the election ... I've noticed that this is used when posters have no response, or are unable to articulate a response.![]()
You are so uptight. If you don't see the irony in Tim posting what he did then sorry I can't help you. Perhaps you need more time in your safe space?
I'm really curious if there is an objection in the actual movie. Could be some serious projection going on there, no double entendre intended...Some Trump supporters threaten to boycott Star Wars:
https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/12/09/trump-supports-threaten-to-boycott-star-wars.html?client=safari
After the success of the Hamilton boycott, why not?
I get a ton of stuff wrong, and I admit it all the time.![]()
You are so uptight. If you don't see the irony in Tim posting what he did then sorry I can't help you. Perhaps you need more time in your safe space?
This has been written about you often.Just amazing how many things you get wrong.
If that dude from Girls is back again as the new Darth Vader, it might be worth a boycott.I'm really curious if there is an objection in the actual movie. Could be some serious projection going on there, no double entendre intended...
Don't think you understandNo safe space needed. But I've called this out even before the election ... I've noticed that this is used when posters have no response, or are unable to articulate a response.
It's ok, though. Perhaps you need more time to finish your high school education?![]()
but carry onYour posts reek of someone cloistered in some sheltered liberal academia world with zero experience in the real world and no idea how anything actually works. You obviously have incredible amounts of free time to make over 100k posts to mostly shove your agenda down people's throats.Any reasonable person can weigh in on your posts and find that the knowledge was dropped at some point before you wrote them.
I'll drop this hereDon't think you understandbut carry on
.
Shostu? The similarities are striking.He's the new cstu. All he needs to do now is skate on $2500 worth of bets
Do you let everything get under your skin so easily?I'll drop this here.
and here![]()
and one more![]()
I seriously doubt it, other than the projection you mention. It's harder to find a movie that doesn't have a message opposing authoritarianism, discrimination, oligarchy and/or kleptocracy.I'm really curious if there is an objection in the actual movie. Could be some serious projection going on there, no double entendre intended...
I've noticed that certain conservatives, the ones who aren't too bright, always fall back on a couple of consistent points whenever they're pressed for argument:Your posts reek of someone cloistered in some sheltered liberal academia world with zero experience in the real world and no idea how anything actually works. You obviously have incredible amounts of free time to make over 100k posts to mostly shove your agenda down people's throats.
I hate to break this to you, but you aren't the smartest guy in the room. Apparently, just the one with the most free time.
What seems to be happening is that he will delegate more day to day to Pence than previous Presidents, maybe moreso than any President. He will be involved with hiring and firing decisions, that's obviously in his wheelhouse. He seems to be paying close attention to what individual companies are doing, which is different and seems like it will continue. He has what he stands for, that he tweets out, but he moves on quickly and I don't see any one true passion from him yet. He was about winning & beating Hillary Clinton, and he did that. It's hard to see him engaging enough to drive home any one issue anyway, he's obviously delegating to friends and cronies, people that he trusts or that donated a lot of money to him. Maybe he builds some kind of a wall. He probably doesn't care that much.Trump's Presidency is Shaping Up to Be an American Tragedy
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/trumps-presidency-is-shaping-up-to-be-an-american-tragedy-w454640
No. I'm definitely not a TrumplethinskinDo you let everything get under your skin so easily?
Of course not, they're just protesting "Hollywood" and need a new target. After Star Wars, it'll be something else. It's almost comical, if this MO wasn't also the same one spreading all the fake news.I'm really curious if there is an objection in the actual movie. Could be some serious projection going on there, no double entendre intended...
I hope you are happy, you just made me sick. Darth Lenham sitting in the black sphere, the top pulls up and we see the scarred back of her hideous head, then plop...plop flush.If that dude from Girls is back again as the new Darth Vader, it might be worth a boycott.
Winning everywhere. The whole civilized world is getting on board with Trump. Markets across the planet are steamrolling ahead. He's bringing everyone with us. He's showing the world how to run a govt. efficiently.What seems to be happening is that he will delegate more day to day to Pence than previous Presidents, maybe moreso than any President. He will be involved with hiring and firing decisions, that's obviously in his wheelhouse. He seems to be paying close attention to what individual companies are doing, which is different and seems like it will continue. He has what he stands for, that he tweets out, but he moves on quickly and I don't see any one true passion from him yet. He was about winning & beating Hillary Clinton, and he did that. It's hard to see him engaging enough to drive home any one issue anyway, he's obviously delegating to friends and cronies, people that he trusts or that donated a lot of money to him. Maybe he builds some kind of a wall. He probably doesn't care that much.
On the bolded- why isn't anyone talking about the McMahon appointment?What seems to be happening is that he will delegate more day to day to Pence than previous Presidents, maybe moreso than any President. He will be involved with hiring and firing decisions, that's obviously in his wheelhouse. He seems to be paying close attention to what individual companies are doing, which is different and seems like it will continue. He has what he stands for, that he tweets out, but he moves on quickly and I don't see any one true passion from him yet. He was about winning & beating Hillary Clinton, and he did that. It's hard to see him engaging enough to drive home any one issue anyway, he's obviously delegating to friends and cronies, people that he trusts or that donated a lot of money to him. Maybe he builds some kind of a wall. He probably doesn't care that much.
I've noticed that certain conservatives, the ones who aren't too bright, always fall back on a couple of consistent points whenever they're pressed for argument:
1. Anybody who disagrees with them is obviously liberal, and this word is used as a slur with no further explanation needed.
2. Liberals have no idea of how the world "actually works". This argument allows for anti-intellectualism and is usually an excuse for ignorance.
You get called out all the time for using a broad brush to describe people that you don't agree with.I have an MBA, CPA and I am a powerful fiscal position that oversees billions. I like to bust b@lls on condescending progressives that think they have a monopoly on intelligence and anyone that disagrees is a caveman. Fortunately, I am getting a subscription to New Republic for Christmas. Hopefully we can speak intelligently in 2017.I've noticed that certain conservatives, the ones who aren't too bright, always fall back on a couple of consistent points whenever they're pressed for argument:
1. Anybody who disagrees with them is obviously liberal, and this word is used as a slur with no further explanation needed.
2. Liberals have no idea of how the world "actually works". This argument allows for anti-intellectualism and is usually an excuse for ignorance.
Rolling Stone? Seriously Rolling Stone? Besides the fact that an article like this is beyond predictable from them but after what just happened at UVA do you really expect anyone to take this outfit seriously?Trump's Presidency is Shaping Up to Be an American Tragedy
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/trumps-presidency-is-shaping-up-to-be-an-american-tragedy-w454640
Oh come on Timmy...be honest...you think all conservatives "aren't bright"...I've noticed that certain conservatives, the ones who aren't too bright, always fall back on a couple of consistent points whenever they're pressed for argument:
1. Anybody who disagrees with them is obviously liberal, and this word is used as a slur with no further explanation needed.
2. Liberals have no idea of how the world "actually works". This argument allows for anti-intellectualism and is usually an excuse for ignorance.
Oh. So this is fake news then?Rolling Stone? Seriously Rolling Stone? Besides the fact that an article like this is beyond predictable from them but after what just happened at UVA do you really expect anyone to take this outfit seriously?
Your most recent post in this thread before this was a link to a Howie Carr column piece, which you generously called an "article." Among many other sins (including publishing regularly scheduled troll jobs and just generally being a racist POS) Carr's newspaper once had to pay a $2 million libel claim to a judge after Carr falsely accused him of disparaging a rape victim.Rolling Stone? Seriously Rolling Stone? Besides the fact that an article like this is beyond predictable from them but after what just happened at UVA do you really expect anyone to take this outfit seriously?
A publication that does not make this up this fake news:Oh. So this is fake news then?
What do you take seriously so I can share in the future, an appropriate source?
I'm suitably impressed.I have an MBA, CPA and I am a powerful fiscal position that oversees billions.
I did not whine...I pointed out that Rolling Stone is not the publication to be quoting as a legit source...before we move are you disagreeing with that?Your most recent post in this thread before this was a link to a Howie Carr column piece, which you generously called an "article." Among many other sins (including publishing regularly scheduled troll jobs and just generally being a racist POS) Carr's newspaper once had to pay a $2 million libel claim to a judge after Carr falsely accused him of disparaging a rape victim.
And now you want to whine about someone posting a Rolling Stone piece?
![]()
So does that mean we can't post anything from sources like CNN or MSNBC, because it's all fake, right?A publication that does not make this up this fake news:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus
Interesting story (real news) but it sounds to me like DHS was testing them out.
Ones that do not totally make up a completely fabricated story,,,So does that mean we can't post anything from sources like CNN or MSNBC, because it's all fake, right?
I am trying to find sources that are not fake. Which do you recommend?
And I suspect Beavers and other will continue to post the articles that they find entertaining. If you want to disregard them you have every right, but if you want to complain about them I will continue to point out the hypocrisy of your position. And if you think your back to back posts weren't hilariously hypocritical, you and I (and you and the dictionary) will have to agree to disagree.I did not whine...I pointed out that Rolling Stone is not the publication to be quoting as a legit source...before we move are you disagreeing with that?
As for Howie I will continue to post his articles because I find them entertaining...if you want to disregard them (and I know you will because he does follow your ideology) because of that you have every right...but if you think what he did is anywhere close to what Rolling Stone did than you and I will have to agree to disagree...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howie_Carr
Which ones are those?Ones that do not totally make up a completely fabricated story,,,
Love the touch of arrogance...it's your strong suit...and you know what you do have a point about ignoring rather than pointing out...probably a better path to travel as pointing out what Rolling Stone is is probably a moot point right now (and yes, there are plenty of right-wing sites that are exactly the same)...And I suspect Beavers and other will continue to post the articles that they find entertaining. If you want to disregard them you have every right, but if you want to complain about them I will continue to point out the hypocrisy of your position. And if you think your back to back posts weren't hilariously hypocritical, you and I (and you and the dictionary) will have to agree to disagree.
Thanks, but I prefer to think of it as "snark"Love the touch of arrogance...it's your strong suit...and you know what you do have a point about ignoring rather than pointing out...probably a better path to travel as pointing out what Rolling Stone is is probably a moot point right now (and yes, there are plenty of right-wing sites that are exactly the same)...
A lot of sources report on rape stories. How do I know which one to trust?Ones that don't fabricate rape stories...
We can agree on that...there aren't many news sites/personalties without an agenda these days...and as I always say that does not bother me as long as they admit to who they are...Thanks, but I prefer to think of it as "snark"![]()
Yeah I generally just ignore the columns and stuff posted here from both sides. Sometimes there's great insight or a persuasive argument, but most of it is just red meat to true believers and/or intended to troll the other side. And there's already plenty of that in the actual news these days.
Be careful quoting our next president since he seems to like to stretch the truth some to make it appear he accomplishs more then he really does.Oh. So this is fake news then?
What do you take seriously so I can share in the future, an appropriate source?
BreitbartOh. So this is fake news then?
What do you take seriously so I can share in the future, an appropriate source?
On the one hand this continuing trend towards oligarchy is troubling.CNBC Now Verified account @CNBCnow
BREAKING: President-elect Trump picks Goldman Sachs president & COO Gary Cohn to be National Economic Council Director -
You'll get you're charter schools, bad environment, no medical coverage while the NYC bankers loot the country again. Seems like a win-win for all.Drain the swamp!
On the one hand this continuing trend towards oligarchy is troubling.
But on the other hand, on behalf of my fellow east coast "elitist" Jews .... HAHAHAHAHAHA. Also this
[Insert Sheriff's Badge here _______]Drain the swamp!
On the one hand this continuing trend towards oligarchy is troubling.
But on the other hand, on behalf of my fellow east coast "elitist" Jews .... HAHAHAHAHAHA. Also this
Now you know where that $50 donation you threw at the Trump campaign instead of maybe getting something nice for yourself or the family went! Well played.Donald Trump’s presidential campaign sent Donald Trump’s businesses $2.9 million in the final days prior to and the weeks following his election.
Trump’s Miami golf club, where he staged an Oct. 25 news conference to showcase his employees who like him, received $13,015. Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas received $176,933 for lodgings from his presidential campaign and $60,442 more from a joint fundraising committee for Trump and the Republican National Committee.
Trump Tower in Manhattan, meanwhile, received a whopping $462,011 in rent, including $283,500 on Nov. 28 – nearly $114,000 more than the campaign had been paying for its headquarters space for the previous several months.
The president-elect’s transition team did not respond to a Huffington Post query regarding the higher rent payment.
The figures are contained in new filings Thursday night by the campaign and related committees with the Federal Election Commission. The filings cover the six weeks from Oct. 20 to Nov. 28
The burst of spending brings to more than $12 million the total Trump has funneled back to his businesses since the start of the campaign. It continues his pattern of choosing to spend donors’ money at his own properties for events and on his own airplane for travel, even though it meant spending considerably more than comparable alternatives.
Trump paid his West Palm Beach, Florida, golf resort $29,715 in May following a “victory” party he held there March 5. He sent $35,845 to his club in nearby Jupiter after a March 8 party. In both cases, the attendees were mainly dues-paying members of the clubs rather than campaign staff or volunteers. And in both cases he could have held his party at the West Palm Beach Marriott for less than half of what he spent.
Also in May, Trump paid his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach $423,372 in campaign funds even though he had held only two victory parties and a news conference there two months earlier.
Trump similarly chose to rent office space at New York’s Trump Tower at about $100 per square foot ― about three times the rate the Clinton campaign had been paying for its headquarters in Brooklyn. Trump’s rent ― $169,758 a month ― jumped nearly five times higher once he secured the nomination and was spending donor money rather than his own.
I know you live in DC. Are you a federal employee?Also in the category of Congratulations You Played Yourself ...
Trump Pays His Own Businesses $3 Million in Days Surrounding Election
Now you know where that $50 donation you threw at the Trump campaign instead of maybe getting something nice for yourself or the family went! Well played.
I'm honestly kind of excited for four years of laughing at how badly Trump supporters got scammed and will continue to get scammed. Normally I would never laugh at such a thing, I hate scams and especially those that prey on the poor and middle class and old people, as the Trump campaign did. But there were millions of people screaming "YOU'RE GETTING SCAMMED" at the top of their lungs and you didn't seem to care, so #### it. Maybe shoot him an email about that donation you made and see if he'll invite you to one of the golf clubs it got funneled to as a thank you.
Perhaps a bit mean-spirited, but true. Not saying Donald's necessarily a bad guy preying on these people, they sort of asked for it, look at all the knob-slobbing that goes on in this thread. They didn't want to know, maybe they hated Hillary more, probably Barack a bit too. I see it as a F U to Hillary, a bit to Obama, and then not seeing that Trump is a con-man, as many don't want to believe they were duped. Many of us were pointing out stuff about the Don. Again, not the racist click bait stuff: it's the money, people. Trump's going to go after more of it, it's who he is. Keep believing he's some genius billionaire though, this is how he makes his money.Also in the category of Congratulations You Played Yourself ...
Trump Pays His Own Businesses $3 Million in Days Surrounding Election
Now you know where that $50 donation you threw at the Trump campaign instead of getting something nice for the family went! Well played.
I'm honestly kind of excited for four years of laughing at how badly Trump supporters got scammed and will continue to get scammed. Normally I would never laugh at such a thing, I hate scams and especially those that prey on the poor and middle class and old people, as the Trump campaign did. But there were millions of people screaming "YOU'RE GETTING SCAMMED" at the top of their lungs and you didn't seem to care, so #### it. Maybe shoot him an email about that donation you made and see if he'll invite you to one of the golf clubs it got funneled to as a thank you.