I really don't want to join a "Hater" thread because I don't "hate" Donald Trump and I especially do not hate or disrespect his followers in any way. I believe in free expression, debate and open dialogue, I love democracy and to me that is its core value. So I am a lover, of free speech and opposing viewpoints.
- I will talk about whether people should be in walled threads or not though. - I started out in a sub-thread which was sort of a joke ribbing thread which had been abandoned, doing my thing. It's how I think, read, learn and discuss. People in the past have said they wished political or event threads were more about issues. Fine I enjoy that too. Sometimes I post things without comment because to me what candidates say and do say more than I ever could.
Anyway I was in that thread and I left the official "walled" thread 99% alone for my part. Then that thread got blown up by anger and trolling. Then a Romney thread from 2008 was converted, then that thread got blown up. Then everyone moved over to the abandoned thread where I had been quietly doing my thing mostly talking to myself. Then that thread got blown up by trolling and in the interim the very awesome Sanders thread dating to 2011 - which I
personally resurrected - almost got destroyed.
We're talking about an 8 year old thread destroyed and 5 year old thread almost destroyed, and two other threads killed. Other threads started by Sida got locked. IMO the FFA has a problem. Personally to me the mods could do a better job. I thought what Clayton did in the Sanders thread was
perfect. Call a timeout, lock it down temporarily, explain the situation, then release it after everyone has cooled off. It would also help if there was not so much reporting. In the Sanders thread Clayton said there were 23 reports against people speaking against Trump, 3 reports of people speaking for him. Take that however you want.
Personally, to me, people should talk. I enjoy the opposing view point which challenges my world view more than I do the people who agree with me. I think that debate and dialogue is an American principle. Trumpites talk about "Americans" - well to me being American starts with free speech, debate and rational discourse and argument. I think the "walled" thread is a TERRIBLE idea for the FFA. I thoroughly respected Sida's thread (except one time when I popped in to discuss what I thought was a major issue, which frankly had been posted by someone anti-Trump not a Trumpite and I emotionally reacted to
that. Otherwise I stayed out) and I thoroughly respect Sida wherever he may be.
The funny thing to me is how no one pro or con wants to use Em's thread. That is bizarre and strange but I guess is just the sheer dislike for Em. I would resume my article-posty ways there and let whoever wants to pop in do so but people seem to be reluctant to even touch that thread, it's just funny.
So, point is I object to single-minded clique threads and especially any "hate" thread. Thanks.
- eta - I do think this could be a good thread to hash out any "trolling" accusations in the main thread though. If anyone starts raising personal issues or slamming others tell them to bring it here to sort it out.