What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (27 Viewers)

Yes, standard means not superflex.
It was a really strong offer but this is my first year taking over an orphan and QB(Allen) is basically the only position I'm solid at. If they were top 3-5 picks instead of 8th I may have done it.
RB- Mixon ,Swift, Dowdle
WR- Evans,Shakir,Coleman, Ridley
TE- Likely, Henry
 
Yes, standard means not superflex.
It was a really strong offer but this is my first year taking over an orphan and QB(Allen) is basically the only position I'm solid at. If they were top 3-5 picks instead of 8th I may have done it.
RB- Mixon ,Swift, Dowdle
WR- Evans,Shakir,Coleman, Ridley
TE- Likely, Henry
Yeah, that's quite the orphan so I get not taking the offer. Might be better served shopping around or announcing to the rest of the league, see if you can get some better picks or pieces in exchange for Allen in this case if you decide to move him. Love trading Fields away for those other picks
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one

If single QB I would have taken that 1st offer and if you didn't have a good backup to step in shopped around with the extra picks for a cheaper QB that may not give all of Allen's points but get you most of the way there. If SF not enough though.
Yeah, I'd have accepted the Allen offer as fast Weasel rejected it.
 
Two trades for 26 1sts in 1qb FFPC (corrected, team1 finished 12th)

Team1 finished 12th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for the 2025 2.1 and 2.10. (February trade)

Team2 finished 8th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for C. Olave. (last week)

Before I provide the rosters of each team, any thoughts?

My 2 cents - I wish I were team 3 and regardless of strength of roster I'm not giving a future 1st for Olave.

For the 2.1 and 2.10, maybe if I felt I was a contender.
 
Last edited:
Two trades for 26 1sts in 1qb FFPC

Team1 finished 7th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for the 2025 2.1 and 2.10. (February trade)

Team2 finished 8th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for C. Olave. (last week)

Before I provide the rosters of each team, any thoughts?


My 2 cents - I wish I were team 3 and regardless of strength of roster I'm not giving a future 1st for Olave.

For the 2.1 and 2.10, maybe if I felt I was a contender.
I'd have kept the future first in both deals.

Would not consider the 2.1 and 2.10 unless it was OTC or at minimum after the NFL draft I knew for sure 13 players were worth it.

Olave's had to many brain injuries, massive QB concerns and not enough upside to trade a future first with those concerns.

As a general rule I detest giving up my future firsts this time of year. I've seen multiple teams over the years that look like league favorites woefully underperform, some who would go on to win the draft playoffs and win 1.1. Even I'm a contender I'd rather sit on that pick and if I want to use it later it's a nice draw to a team that gets out of the gate poorly and has player that can help me win now, that's when I'm more open to dealing my future first.
 
Two trades for 26 1sts in 1qb FFPC

Team1 finished 7th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for the 2025 2.1 and 2.10. (February trade)

Team2 finished 8th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for C. Olave. (last week)

Before I provide the rosters of each team, any thoughts?

My 2 cents - I wish I were team 3 and regardless of strength of roster I'm not giving a future 1st for Olave.

For the 2.1 and 2.10, maybe if I felt I was a contender.
I'd have kept the future first in both deals.

Would not consider the 2.1 and 2.10 unless it was OTC or at minimum after the NFL draft I knew for sure 13 players were worth it.

Olave's had to many brain injuries, massive QB concerns and not enough upside to trade a future first with those concerns.

As a general rule I detest giving up my future firsts this time of year. I've seen multiple teams over the years that look like league favorites woefully underperform, some who would go on to win the draft playoffs and win 1.1. Even I'm a contender I'd rather sit on that pick and if I want to use it later it's a nice draw to a team that gets out of the gate poorly and has player that can help me win now, that's when I'm more open to dealing my future first.
I agree with this, I want no part of Olave at that price. One more concussion could end his career and now we know Carr will be out to start the year.
I would take the 1st for the two 2nds but not the other way around .
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one

If single QB I would have taken that 1st offer and if you didn't have a good backup to step in shopped around with the extra picks for a cheaper QB that may not give all of Allen's points but get you most of the way there. If SF not enough though.
Yeah, I'd have accepted the Allen offer as fast Weasel rejected it.
Agreed. Especially seeing the rest of the roster. He needs to get younger now, and three firsts for Allen in a 1 QB league is exactly what you look for in those situations.
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one

If single QB I would have taken that 1st offer and if you didn't have a good backup to step in shopped around with the extra picks for a cheaper QB that may not give all of Allen's points but get you most of the way there. If SF not enough though.
Yeah, I'd have accepted the Allen offer as fast Weasel rejected it.
Agreed. Especially seeing the rest of the roster. He needs to get younger now, and three firsts for Allen in a 1 QB league is exactly what you look for in those situations.
If the 1sts were earlier I might have done it but I picked up this orphan because it had Allen to build around. If I'm circling the drain mid season I may move him then but want to at least see how my first year goes before blowing it up.
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one

If single QB I would have taken that 1st offer and if you didn't have a good backup to step in shopped around with the extra picks for a cheaper QB that may not give all of Allen's points but get you most of the way there. If SF not enough though.
Yeah, I'd have accepted the Allen offer as fast Weasel rejected it.
Agreed. Especially seeing the rest of the roster. He needs to get younger now, and three firsts for Allen in a 1 QB league is exactly what you look for in those situations.
If the 1sts were earlier I might have done it but I picked up this orphan because it had Allen to build around. If I'm circling the drain mid season I may move him then but want to at least see how my first year goes before blowing it up.
I did not want to pile on but when I first commented that I'd have taken Allen it was before I saw you post your roster. After seeing it I was, similar to Buckna, even more convinced you should have taken it.

I know it's an orphan but made me wonder what are your goals? Did you buy the team to make one last run with Mixon and Evans? That's not impossible if you make a few good moves but that looks like a really tough task. I know some people buy these older orphans super cheap with no long term goals but the price was cheap enough to take a stab at contending. I don't know if this is your idea behind it, no judgement if so, and in that sense I undersand wanting to keep Allen. But if it's not it just looks ripe for a rebuild/teardown and that return on Allen was an oustanding start to me.
 
That team finished 3rd last season (2nd in points) so I was thinking I'd try to win for at least this season before blowing it up. If I actually put Allen on the block may even get a better return.
This is my first year of dynasty so I'm still learning and appreciate all the feedback.
 
Two trades for 26 1sts in 1qb FFPC

Team1 finished 7th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for the 2025 2.1 and 2.10. (February trade)

Team2 finished 8th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for C. Olave. (last week)

Before I provide the rosters of each team, any thoughts?

My 2 cents - I wish I were team 3 and regardless of strength of roster I'm not giving a future 1st for Olave.

For the 2.1 and 2.10, maybe if I felt I was a contender.
I'd have kept the future first in both deals.

Would not consider the 2.1 and 2.10 unless it was OTC or at minimum after the NFL draft I knew for sure 13 players were worth it.

Olave's had to many brain injuries, massive QB concerns and not enough upside to trade a future first with those concerns.

As a general rule I detest giving up my future firsts this time of year. I've seen multiple teams over the years that look like league favorites woefully underperform, some who would go on to win the draft playoffs and win 1.1. Even I'm a contender I'd rather sit on that pick and if I want to use it later it's a nice draw to a team that gets out of the gate poorly and has player that can help me win now, that's when I'm more open to dealing my future first.
I think most agree on not giving a 1 for Olave and when you look at the Team2 roster after the trade I like it less. Team screams rebuild to me.

Team2 (gave 26 1st, got Olave)
Aaron Rodgers, Goff, J.J. McCarthy
Derrick Henry, Jaylen Wright, Rachaad White, Nick Chubb
Chris Olave, Stefon Diggs, George Pickens, Dontayvion Wicks, Hollywood Brown, DeAndre Hopkins
Travis Kelce, Isaiah Likely - 25 Draft Picks: 2.4, 2.6, 3.4, 3.6, 5.4, 6.4, 7.4

Team1 (gave 26 1st, got 25 2.1 and 2.10)
Mahomes, Purdy
James Conner, Travis Etienne, Braelon Allen, Rhamondre Stevenson
Nacua, McConkey, McLaurin, Waddle, Metcalf, Keon Coleman
Hunter Henry, Kyle Pitts
25 Draft Picks: 2.1, 2.5, 2.10, 4.5, 5.5, 5.7, 6.5, 7.5

Team1 is a younger stronger team that needs help at rb and te, but should be able to compete this yr.

Ok, I 'm biased, Team1 is mine:sneaky: I don't like trading future firsts either, but I have loosened up a bit in my old age. If I'm a contender I am much more willing to do it now than I was in the past. Getting the use of an asset for the current season is more appealing to me now than it used to be.

Definitely riskay, but YOLO! If I make the playoffs I will consider it a win, but either way I will mark it and let you guys know next year if I crash and burn.
 
Two trades for 26 1sts in 1qb FFPC

Team1 finished 7th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for the 2025 2.1 and 2.10. (February trade)

Team2 finished 8th and gave their 26 1st (to team 3) for C. Olave. (last week)

Before I provide the rosters of each team, any thoughts?

My 2 cents - I wish I were team 3 and regardless of strength of roster I'm not giving a future 1st for Olave.

For the 2.1 and 2.10, maybe if I felt I was a contender.
I'd have kept the future first in both deals.

Would not consider the 2.1 and 2.10 unless it was OTC or at minimum after the NFL draft I knew for sure 13 players were worth it.

Olave's had to many brain injuries, massive QB concerns and not enough upside to trade a future first with those concerns.

As a general rule I detest giving up my future firsts this time of year. I've seen multiple teams over the years that look like league favorites woefully underperform, some who would go on to win the draft playoffs and win 1.1. Even I'm a contender I'd rather sit on that pick and if I want to use it later it's a nice draw to a team that gets out of the gate poorly and has player that can help me win now, that's when I'm more open to dealing my future first.
I think most agree on not giving a 1 for Olave and when you look at the Team2 roster after the trade I like it less. Team screams rebuild to me.

Team2 (gave 26 1st, got Olave)
Aaron Rodgers, Goff, J.J. McCarthy
Derrick Henry, Jaylen Wright, Rachaad White, Nick Chubb
Chris Olave, Stefon Diggs, George Pickens, Dontayvion Wicks, Hollywood Brown, DeAndre Hopkins
Travis Kelce, Isaiah Likely - 25 Draft Picks: 2.4, 2.6, 3.4, 3.6, 5.4, 6.4, 7.4

Team1 (gave 26 1st, got 25 2.1 and 2.10)
Mahomes, Purdy
James Conner, Travis Etienne, Braelon Allen, Rhamondre Stevenson
Nacua, McConkey, McLaurin, Waddle, Metcalf, Keon Coleman
Hunter Henry, Kyle Pitts
25 Draft Picks: 2.1, 2.5, 2.10, 4.5, 5.5, 5.7, 6.5, 7.5

Team1 is a younger stronger team that needs help at rb and te, but should be able to compete this yr.

Ok, I 'm biased, Team1 is mine:sneaky: I don't like trading future firsts either, but I have loosened up a bit in my old age. If I'm a contender I am much more willing to do it now than I was in the past. Getting the use of an asset for the current season is more appealing to me now than it used to be.

Definitely riskay, but YOLO! If I make the playoffs I will consider it a win, but either way I will mark it and let you guys know next year if I crash and burn.
I think Olave is worth a late 2025 1st in start 1 QB, but I recognize that I'm probably higher on him than most people are.

Personally I'm generally less inclined to trade my next years first simply because I've had so many times where I have what looks like a very strong team but everything goes wrong with injuries and bad beats and I end up missing the playoffs and getting the #1 or 2 pick the next year.
 
15 team SF TEP IDP

Team A(controlled draft 1-4-9-13-16-19-24-28-31-32-39) trades 9-24-58-2026 2nd(low to mid

Team B(2nd worst team) trades Baker Mayfield
 
FFPC Triflex

I gave 2026 1st, Ridley, 4.07
I got Tracy, 1.12, 2026 3rd

Win win trade IMO. I got rid of Ridley finally and my 2026 1st is projected late but obviously anything is possible.
I'm down on the 2026 draft so I find this an easy accept. Might change a little once the draft happens if the G-men take a RB in the top 3-4 rounds (I hope they don't as I like Tracy).
I think there is a very strong chance I get a stud multi year starter at 1.12. I like the way the board is shaping up.
 
12 team 1 QB IDP Dynasty not involved

CMC
for
1.07
Wow. I’m a little surprised CMC still commands a 1st. Optimism at its finest.

Of course this year’s class isn’t awesome, so 1.07 less valuable.

If I’m a CMC shareholder I probably just ride him into retirement at this point, but I guess it’s fair.
I was just offered CMC
16 team 1 QB IDP
CMC for
1.7, 2.2, and 2.15
Rejected that offer
Too steep for me
 
12 team SF TEP (QB, RB, WR, TE, SF, F, F, F, F, F) large benches

Gave: Puka, Javonte, 2026 2nd
Got: MHJ, M Andrews

Needed a TE in the worst way and thought this was an OK tier down at WR.
 
Been shopping Darnold in a 16-team SF PPR IDP TEP league. Not sure how happy I am to get a deal done.

For context, I was the 1-seed last year & LCG loser. Had 9 starters out for the LCG. I paid Howell+a LB2 for Darnold after dealing for JJM last preseason, before the JJM injury. So not a lot invested.

It’s a start 11/11 format, and very flexy, so you can start up to 6 WR.

• QBs Darnold, JJM, and Herbert
• WR Lamb, Nico, AJB, Diggs, then a motley crew of Palmer, Bateman, Gabe Davis, Lockett
• RB Jacobs, Chuba, Chase Brown, RS, Warren

Having a WR4 who’s 31 coming off ACL had me a little nervous so I’ve been floating offers. One was finally accepted by the team with ARich as their QB2.

I gave: Darnold+Warren+Bateman
I rec’d: Addison+2.14


I had only a 7th round pick, so it’s nice to get a little draft capital (IDP, so 30th overall is borderline for offense but rich for LB/DE) and it helps to clear a couple roster spots. Also have a taxi, so I can taxi the rookie.

I like Addison - feel like he’s slightly undervalued, but he’s also a bit of a knucklehead, which I generally try to avoid. In a 16 team league he’s arguably a top 25/WR, which is what I was hoping to get as return.

Still - I feel like the dog who finally caught the car. I kinda wanted to wait for Darnold to build some value, but that would also likely mean Warren losing value. It does get me younger/deeper at WR, which I do think was very much needed for BYE/injury.

They accepted with no counter which always makes me second guess things. lol
 
Last edited:
12 team SF TEP (QB, RB, WR, TE, SF, F, F, F, F, F) large benches

Gave: Puka, Javonte, 2026 2nd
Got: MHJ, M Andrews

Needed a TE in the worst way and thought this was an OK tier down at WR.
I like taking a shot at MHJ. This deal hinges on whether he breaks out. IMO there’s a much greater than zero chance he passes up Puka, especially given the question mark at QB in LA & Puka’s stated desire to only play 6 more seasons.

I’m a bit concerned about what you’ll get from Andrews, and for how long.
 
Been shopping Darnold in a 16-team SF PPR IDP TEP league. Not sure how happy I am to get a deal done.

For context, I was the 1-seed last year & LCG loser. Had 9 starters out for the LCG. I paid Howell+a LB2 for Darnold after dealing for JJM last preseason, before the JJM injury. So not a lot invested.

It’s a start 11/11 format, and very flexy, so you can start up to 6 WR.

• QBs Darnold, JJM, and Herbert
• WR Lamb, Nico, AJB, Diggs, then a motley crew of Palmer, Bateman, Gabe Davis, Lockett
• RB Jacobs, Chuba, Chase Brown, RS, Warren

Having a WR4 who’s 31 coming off ACL had me a little nervous so I’ve been floating offers. One was finally accepted by the team with ARich as their QB2.

I gave: Darnold+Warren+Bateman
I rec’d: Addison+2.14


I had only a 7th round pick, so it’s nice to get a little draft capital (IDP, so 30th overall is borderline for offense but rich for LB/DE) and it helps to clear a couple roster spots. Also have a taxi, so I can taxi the rookie.

I like Addison - feel like he’s slightly undervalued, but he’s also a bit of a knucklehead, which I generally try to avoid. In a 16 team league he’s arguably a top 25/WR, which is what I was hoping to get as return.

Still - I feel like the dog who finally caught the car. I kinda wanted to wait for Darnold to build some value, but that would also likely mean Warren losing value. It does get me younger/deeper at WR, which I do think was very much needed for BYE/injury.

They accepted with no counter which always makes me second guess things. lol
I think this is a fair deal. However, I prefer the security of a 3rd starting QB in SF if you're a contender. Otherwise, your 1 injury away from missing the fantasy playoffs. I'm also concerned about Addision's role in the offense with JJM at the helm. Can JJM process quickly? Will the Vikes decide to run the ball more than usual? I'm not sure it affects Justin Jefferson much, but it does draw concerns for me about the WR2 (Addison) in that system.

Full disclosure: I'm higher on Darnold than consensus and lower on JJM.
 
Full disclosure: I'm higher on Darnold than consensus and lower on JJM.
Fair. I’m also high on Darnold and he’s my QB2 in another 16 team SF.

I'm also concerned about Addision's role in the offense with JJM at the helm. Can JJM process quickly? Will the Vikes decide to run the ball more than usual? I'm not sure it affects Justin Jefferson much, but it does draw concerns for me about the WR2 (Addison) in that system.
Also fair, but the talent is there and I never mind gambling on talent.

Of the 4 teams that needed a QB, one has the 1.02, and the other 2 wanted way too much + Darnold (e.g. they were not high on Darnold)

Sometimes ya get what you can get due to league interest/fit. :shrug:
 
12 team SF TEP (QB, RB, WR, TE, SF, F, F, F, F, F) large benches

Gave: Puka, Javonte, 2026 2nd
Got: MHJ, M Andrews

Needed a TE in the worst way and thought this was an OK tier down at WR.
I don't have a problem with this move at all since MHJ was the best non-QB in the draft last year so he could break out. Andrews might not be the best option with his age and the Ravens being non-committal on his future there. Not a bad deal though but you could still be looking for another TE next year.
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Rome was a top three pick in most leagues last year. Chicago now has beefed the oline and has an offensive minded coach. I see his value continuing upwards and would have hung on at least another year personally.
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
What’s PPC in this context? Point per catch? Point per completion? Point per carry?

Sorry, I’ve always seen it as completion but since you’re talking about a receiver or the 1.06 I’m confused.

I probably would have held onto Rome, but I think it’s fair. And in BB having another player in the “lineup” helps.
 
12 team SF TEP (QB, RB, WR, TE, SF, F, F, F, F, F) large benches

Gave: Puka, Javonte, 2026 2nd
Got: MHJ, M Andrews

Needed a TE in the worst way and thought this was an OK tier down at WR.
I don't have a problem with this move at all since MHJ was the best non-QB in the draft last year so he could break out. Andrews might not be the best option with his age and the Ravens being non-committal on his future there. Not a bad deal though but you could still be looking for another TE next year.
Yep, the idea is to grab one of Warren/Loveland in this draft to supplement Andrews.
 
15 team SF TEP IDP

Team A(controlled draft 1-4-9-13-16-19-24-28-31-32-39) trades 9-24-58-2026 2nd(low to mid

Team B(2nd worst team) trades Baker Mayfield
Same league

Team A trades 13-31
Team B trades Jordan Addison(Was their WR7)
 
12 team SF TEP (QB, RB, WR, TE, SF, F, F, F, F, F) large benches

Gave: Puka, Javonte, 2026 2nd
Got: MHJ, M Andrews

Needed a TE in the worst way and thought this was an OK tier down at WR.
I like it but still a huge believer in Harrison. Andrews for 26 2nd seems very cheap at this point. Williams is fodder
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Not sure I like your side. Why "reroll" a player that showed upside and is in an improving situation?
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Rome was a top three pick in most leagues last year. Chicago now has beefed the oline and has an offensive minded coach. I see his value continuing upwards and would have hung on at least another year personally.
Is he looking at Hunter, Sanders, Henderson, Loveland in this scenario. (Assume Jeanty, Ward, Warren, Hampton gone) and 2.5 being a Taylor, Arroyo, Burden, Sampson, Dart, Milroe type of player( 8 listed gone plus Tet, Golden, Judkins, Johnson, Egbuka)

I like in the end. Moore still in Chicago. Is Odzune limits Jameson Williams and Moore is St. Brown. I kind of split that some. Gives you flexibility now, adds to team
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
What’s PPC in this context? Point per catch? Point per completion? Point per carry?

Sorry, I’ve always seen it as completion but since you’re talking about a receiver or the 1.06 I’m confused.

I probably would have held onto Rome, but I think it’s fair. And in BB having another player in the “lineup” helps.
0.25 points per carry
 
0.25 points per carry
Ah ok, so I assume you’re targeting a RB, which is why that’s relevant?

In that case I don’t mind the deal as much, though I may have held Rome one more year to see how he develops.

That said, I still think it’s a pretty fair deal, especially in context of league scoring.

Is it PPR?
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Rome was a top three pick in most leagues last year. Chicago now has beefed the oline and has an offensive minded coach. I see his value continuing upwards and would have hung on at least another year personally.
Top 3 in what format? Not SF. I traded up to 1.08 to get him last year:
Williams, MHJ, Jayden, Nabers, Bowers, JJM, Maye, Odunze
And I should have stayed put and taken BTJ at 1.09 instead of trading up for Odunze.
 
0.25 points per carry
Ah ok, so I assume you’re targeting a RB, which is why that’s relevant?

In that case I don’t mind the deal as much, though I may have held Rome one more year to see how he develops.

That said, I still think it’s a pretty fair deal, especially in context of league scoring.

Is it PPR?
0.5 PPR for QB, RB, WR
1 PPR for TE
0.25 PPC for all
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Not sure I like your side. Why "reroll" a player that showed upside and is in an improving situation?
...to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
 
0.25 points per carry
Ah ok, so I assume you’re targeting a RB, which is why that’s relevant?

In that case I don’t mind the deal as much, though I may have held Rome one more year to see how he develops.

That said, I still think it’s a pretty fair deal, especially in context of league scoring.

Is it PPR?
0.5 PPR for QB, RB, WR
1 PPR for TE
0.25 PPC for all
Give me the 6 and 2.05 in this format and scoring pretty easy. I mean I would prefer Odunze to any WR in this draft not named Hunter (but he may not play WR full time), but with this format I'd be targeting a QB/RB/TE at 6 much more than any WR. I wouldn't be surprised if the first rookie WR isn't drafted until after the 8 or 9 pick in this format for this class.
 
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Rome was a top three pick in most leagues last year. Chicago now has beefed the oline and has an offensive minded coach. I see his value continuing upwards and would have hung on at least another year personally.
Is he looking at Hunter, Sanders, Henderson, Loveland in this scenario. (Assume Jeanty, Ward, Warren, Hampton gone) and 2.5 being a Taylor, Arroyo, Burden, Sampson, Dart, Milroe type of player( 8 listed gone plus Tet, Golden, Judkins, Johnson, Egbuka)

I like in the end. Moore still in Chicago. Is Odzune limits Jameson Williams and Moore is St. Brown. I kind of split that some. Gives you flexibility now, adds to team
1.06 - Happy with any of Jeanty, Cam, Hampton, TreVeyon, Warren, Hunter, Tet, Burden, etc (NFL draft spot dependent).
2.05 (I also have 2.03 & 2.04) - Neal, Skattebo, Shedeur, Loveland…

I like the early 2nds with this deep RB class in this format.
 
Last edited:
SF, Best Ball, TEP, 0.25PPC, 12 Team

Sent: Rome Odunze
Received: 1.06 & 2.05

I view Rome and the 1.06 as pretty equal with the 0.25 PPC and TEP.
Figured it was worth the reroll to get an extra player that could contribute at 2.05 in best ball.
Rome was a top three pick in most leagues last year. Chicago now has beefed the oline and has an offensive minded coach. I see his value continuing upwards and would have hung on at least another year personally.
Top 3 in what format? Not SF. I traded up to 1.08 to get him last year:
Williams, MHJ, Jayden, Nabers, Bowers, JJM, Maye, Odunze
And I should have stayed put and taken BTJ at 1.09 instead of trading up for Odunze.
I apologize, missed the SF.
 
0.25 points per carry
Ah ok, so I assume you’re targeting a RB, which is why that’s relevant?

In that case I don’t mind the deal as much, though I may have held Rome one more year to see how he develops.

That said, I still think it’s a pretty fair deal, especially in context of league scoring.

Is it PPR?
0.5 PPR for QB, RB, WR
1 PPR for TE
0.25 PPC for all
Give me the 6 and 2.05 in this format and scoring pretty easy. I mean I would prefer Odunze to any WR in this draft not named Hunter (but he may not play WR full time), but with this format I'd be targeting a QB/RB/TE at 6 much more than any WR. I wouldn't be surprised if the first rookie WR isn't drafted until after the 8 or 9 pick in this format for this class.
Yeah, I’m with this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top