What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (59 Viewers)

Not involved, but curious what the peanut gallery thinks.  12 team ppr

1.04 and Hunter Henry

For 

1.01

Both picks are 2017s. 
TE premium or lineup requirements?

First thought is I want the 1.04/Henry side because all my leagues are start 2TE minimum so I could be wrong for "normal" leagues. 

 
Rookie draft going on right now 12 team PPR start QRRWWWTFF (flex can be RB, WR or TE)

team A traded: Randall cobb

team B traded: 1.8 OTC

team A then chose John Ross

 
Rookie draft going on right now 12 team PPR start QRRWWWTFF (flex can be RB, WR or TE)

team A traded: Randall cobb

team B traded: 1.8 OTC

team A then chose John Ross
Cobb for me.  Not a fan of Ross and I think Cobb is under valued right now...

 
Give me 1.4 and Henry all day
If the draft was starting today, the 1.4/Henry side is by far and away the easy choice.

If the draft was right after the last preseason game, that side is still likely the easy choice unless 2 out of the top 4 RBs and Davis was to suffer some terrible injury or huge suspension or something weird.

 
I like Diggs a lot but give me other side
OMR - just wondering how you can make the statement you made regarding this trade. I also like Diggs a lot, and am sure that I would have been able to get my trading partner to throw in something else (like a player he might be cutting or a pick of some sort - now or in the future) to make the trade a bit closer to even. Yes, WR Cobb and WR Sanders does seem to tip the scales in their favor, but Diggs who will be turning 24 this season is a better long-term option at this stage of the game. And if push came to shove, I would have sent this pair of WRs for Diggs looking ahead, but would not have given up without a strong counter-offer negotiation attack.

 
OMR - just wondering how you can make the statement you made regarding this trade. I also like Diggs a lot, and am sure that I would have been able to get my trading partner to throw in something else (like a player he might be cutting or a pick of some sort - now or in the future) to make the trade a bit closer to even. Yes, WR Cobb and WR Sanders does seem to tip the scales in their favor, but Diggs who will be turning 24 this season is a better long-term option at this stage of the game. And if push came to shove, I would have sent this pair of WRs for Diggs looking ahead, but would not have given up without a strong counter-offer negotiation attack.
I actually offered the trade, and yes on reflection could have at least got a pick out of him (he dropped Agholor immediately after the trade), but getting deals done is real hard work in this league and I honestly expected the usual decline with no comments or counter.

Fwiw we start 2-4 WR and my WRs are now OBJ, Evans, Robinson, Watkins, Diggs, Marshall, Garcon, Gordon, Gabrial, Beasley, Reynolds, Zamora.

The extra roster spot is also useful.

 
OMR - just wondering how you can make the statement you made regarding this trade. I also like Diggs a lot, and am sure that I would have been able to get my trading partner to throw in something else (like a player he might be cutting or a pick of some sort - now or in the future) to make the trade a bit closer to even. Yes, WR Cobb and WR Sanders does seem to tip the scales in their favor, but Diggs who will be turning 24 this season is a better long-term option at this stage of the game. And if push came to shove, I would have sent this pair of WRs for Diggs looking ahead, but would not have given up without a strong counter-offer negotiation attack.
I try to keep everything in a 2-3 year window. I am very high on Diggs, but think I get more production from the pair in the next couple years. Of course Diggs could blow up this year and prove me wrong.

 
12 Team PPR: Not involved 

Give: Fournette, Prosise

Get: 4 2018 1's. Projected: 1 early, 2 mid, 1 late.

But startup so really hard to say other than the early who is the guy who is receiving back his 2018 1 and now only has Blount/Perrine/Sproles/CJ0K at RB (start 2) and has average WRs (Hilton, Decker,Crabtree, Maclin,Coco) and no TE1.

 
12 Team PPR. I'm not involved...

Team A trades Zeke Elliot

Team B trades Leonard Fournette, 2018 1st, 2018 2nd, 2018 2nd  

 
another draft trade, this one is one I made.

 12 team PPR start QRRWWWTFF

I traded: 2.9 and 2018 third

I got: 2.7 OTC and then took Cooper Kupp.

I like Kupp to be a decent PPR bye week fill in this year and hopefully gain a nice rapport with goff and then become a Landry type player that catches a bunch of passes. Really didn't like anyone else in this late second range that was left so jumped a couple spots to get my guy

 
jeaton6 said:
12 Team PPR:

Gave: Ingram, Sanders, 2018 6

Got: Jeffery, 2018 3
Alshon for me.  This seems like it would have been a decently fair trade before New Orleans hadn't just brought in a bunch of other RBs. 

 
jeaton6 said:
12 Team PPR: Not involved 

Give: Fournette, Prosise

Get: 4 2018 1's. Projected: 1 early, 2 mid, 1 late.

But startup so really hard to say other than the early who is the guy who is receiving back his 2018 1 and now only has Blount/Perrine/Sproles/CJ0K at RB (start 2) and has average WRs (Hilton, Decker,Crabtree, Maclin,Coco) and no TE1.
Even as someone very high on Fournette I will take the picks in a landslide.  Someone did a pretty good study on here a while back that no player is worth 4 random 1sts, and it's not like Fournette is some proven stud.  There's a pretty decent chance with some of the RBs likely to be in next year's draft that one of those picks will end up netting a player in similar value to Fournette, which would leave 3 bonus 1sts for the low low cost of CJ Prosise.

 
When are people going to realize Sammy is a bust?  
When healthy and on the field he has proven differently. Also being stuck in the anemic offense of Buffalo has not helped. I think his talent has been clear and hopefully he can put the injuries aside so we can see what a healthy year looks like. A bonus would be moving on to a different franchise. Calling him a bust from injury is a lot different than using performance IMO. Unless your able to predict he will continue to be injured I do not consider him a bust yet.

 
When healthy and on the field he has proven differently. Also being stuck in the anemic offense of Buffalo has not helped. I think his talent has been clear and hopefully he can put the injuries aside so we can see what a healthy year looks like. A bonus would be moving on to a different franchise. Calling him a bust from injury is a lot different than using performance IMO. Unless your able to predict he will continue to be injured I do not consider him a bust yet.
I mean relative to his hype of what people were claiming him as "the best WR to come out of college" and things like that.  He had 60 catches his best year... That was good for 50th in the league in 2015, and his yards of 1047 was good for 22nd.  He's a glorified WR2 at best with WR3 upside that's being treated like OBJ... 

 
jeaton6 said:
12 Team PPR: Not involved 

Give: Fournette, Prosise

Get: 4 2018 1's. Projected: 1 early, 2 mid, 1 late.

But startup so really hard to say other than the early who is the guy who is receiving back his 2018 1 and now only has Blount/Perrine/Sproles/CJ0K at RB (start 2) and has average WRs (Hilton, Decker,Crabtree, Maclin,Coco) and no TE1.
Picks in a landslide

 
Rookie draft going on right now 12 team PPR start QRRWWWTFF (flex can be RB, WR or TE)

team A traded: Randall cobb

team B traded: 1.8 OTC

team A then chose John Ross
1.8>Cobb>Ross.

I view Cobb closer to 1.8 than Ross being close to Cobb. Feel like Cobb is undervalued, Ross overvalued.

If team getting Cobb needed a WR this year I think 1.8 is reasonable.

drewd_21 said:
12tm idp ppr

Gave: Cobb, Sanders 

Got: Diggs
I like Diggs but to me he does not equal both of these WR's so I'd take Cobb/Sanders.

 
When are people going to realize Sammy is a bust?  
Because he's not. Injuries have limited his playing time, but with even bad QB play he is lights out on the field. 

Now he has at least a mediocre QB who throws a great deep ball, and may leave Buffalo after this year.

 
12 team, 0.5 PPR. Start 1/2/3/1

Draft day pick. Fournette, Mixon, Davis and Cook were off the board. 

Team A gives: 1.05 + 2018 2nd (probably mid)

Team B gives: 1.06 + Moncrief + Garoppolo

Team B picks McCaffrey then Team follows with Perine at 1.06. 

 
I sent Hyde

I received Ertz and a 2018 2nd, should be early. 

Ppr scoring. 

I am a contender and a little weak at tight end. I know this might be selling Hyde cheap, but I couldn't get any good offers at the draft and I just hate owning him. 

 
12 team PPR

Gave Tyreek Hill 

FA pick 2.12

Got Derrick Henry 

I own Murray and he was my #2 RB with no depth behind him.  I was deeper at WR with Julio, Evans, Jeffery, Kelvin, and rookies Kupp and Golladay.
I like Hill more than most here but still take Henry rather easily. You having Murray just makes it easier, although it could be a full rbbc and a headache if both stay healthy.

12 Team PPR: Not involved 

Give: Fournette, Prosise

Get: 4 2018 1's. Projected: 1 early, 2 mid, 1 late.

But startup so really hard to say other than the early who is the guy who is receiving back his 2018 1 and now only has Blount/Perrine/Sproles/CJ0K at RB (start 2) and has average WRs (Hilton, Decker,Crabtree, Maclin,Coco) and no TE1.
Picks easily. 

Team A gets Sammy Watkins and LB Darron Lee

Team B gets Michael Thomas and LB Reuben Foster
I actually think Watkins can be good but prefer Thomas. Also prefer Foster to Lee, slightly.

 
12 team, 0.5 PPR. Start 1/2/3/1

Draft day pick. Fournette, Mixon, Davis and Cook were off the board. 

Team A gives: 1.05 + 2018 2nd (probably mid)

Team B gives: 1.06 + Moncrief + Garoppolo

Team B picks McCaffrey then Team follows with Perine at 1.06. 
Andrew - I think that Team B wins the day here (and down the road as well), with the real outlier being QB Garoppolo (especially in this start 1 QB league). The probable feather in Team A's cap is WR Moncrief who does give him a WR#2 starter - but both he and Luck have to stay healthy for the Colts & Team A to have a successful season (NFL-wise & fantasy-wise). And knowing the rosters for each squad would have permitted a more accurate assessment/opinion of this trade. GL in 2017.

 
10 team PPR, Start 1-1-3-1-flex RB/WR/TE

Team A gives: Pryor, Walker, 3.8, 4.1

Team B gives: Reed, 1.9

Doing a price check on Reed, knowing that Team B is desperate for a WR3 with very little depth and only has Barnidge as a backup TE. Willing to move up draft pick in negotiation to 2 if that's what it ultimately takes. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top