Hopefully it works out for you but would for sure have kept Mixon.Zealots Field PPR
NOT sure if I screwed up.
Traded Mixon
Received 2018 1.10/3.10 and 2019 1st/2nd round rookie picks.
Hopefully it works out for you but would for sure have kept Mixon.Zealots Field PPR
NOT sure if I screwed up.
Traded Mixon
Received 2018 1.10/3.10 and 2019 1st/2nd round rookie picks.
Two of the top rb prospects from this year stayed in school and it's supposed to be a better wr class than this one so there's that.I have read that the 2019 draft class is projected to be a weak one, so just based on that I would have kept Mixon.
Landslide to Drake.12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR -TE - FL
Team A gave up Amendola, Danny MIA WR; Woods, Robert LAR WR
Team B gave up Drake, Kenyan MIA RB; Smith, Jonnu TEN TE
IMO, the odds of the Rams bringing in somebody that impacts Woods is greater than the Gore/draft risk to Drake. If the Dolphins acquire CJA, the story changes.I like woods when he gets volume and is playing well, but I don't think he'll always play as well as he did in short spurts last year and he could get screwed if the rams bring in obj or draft another stud wr.
I like drake when he gets volume and is playing well, but I don't think he'll always play as well as he did in short spurts last year and he could get screwed by Gore or if the dolphins draft another stud rb.
If both get screwed I'd slightly prefer woods, if neither gets screwed I'd greatly prefer drake.
And jonnu > amendola.
Drake12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR -TE - FL
Team A gave up Amendola, Danny MIA WR; Woods, Robert LAR WR
Team B gave up Drake, Kenyan MIA RB; Smith, Jonnu TEN TE
I’ll take Coleman (contract year, could hit fa next year) and DT (still a stud wr with a better qb than last year).12 team PPR TE premium
Team A gives OJ Howard, Mike Williams, 2.06
Team B gives Tevin Coleman, Demaryius Thomas
With Cooks in town probably Drake but don't mind it.Dr. Octopus said:12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR -TE - FL
Team A gave up Amendola, Danny MIA WR; Woods, Robert LAR WR
Team B gave up Drake, Kenyan MIA RB; Smith, Jonnu TEN TE
That's a tough one imo. Assuming the team trading Antonio is building I like it for him. Assuming you're contending and have good QB depth, I like it for you.14 teams, super flex, ppr
Gave: Garoppolo, 2.04
Got: AB
TY12 team full PPR
Team A got Marvin Jones
Team B got TY Hilton
I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.
That's coffee-spittin' stuff right there. Either because of how bad it is, or because of how bad it is that superflex makes it fair.14 teams, super flex, ppr
Gave: Garoppolo, 2.04
Got: AB
I'd rather spit coffee than to puke in my mouth. Even in superflex I don't think it is particularly close.That's coffee-spittin' stuff right there. Either because of how bad it is, or because of how bad it is that superflex makes it fair.
Gordon16 team ppr
Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks
agreeGordon
GordonGordon
If you had to split up the KC and CLE duos, I would have moved Landry and Watkins.12 teams, superflex, ppr
Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon
Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10
I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts?
I would've but they're tough to move right now. Watkins is polarizing and isn't someone I want to sell low on. Landry's perceived value is low due to him being traded to CLE.If you had to split up the KC and CLE duos, I would have moved Landry and Watkins.
I think Watkins has way more believers than you think and after this season, where he's the 3rd or 4th option in the passing game you may end up selling even lower.I would've but they're tough to move right now. Watkins is polarizing and isn't someone I want to sell low on. Landry's perceived value is low due to him being traded to CLE.
That's interesting. Hilton has the greater perceived value, so I'm surprised Team A didn't maneuver for Marvin+. But they're the same age and Marvin proved to be very efficient per target last year. I could see this going either way. Really depends on Luck's arm and Marvin's target share.12 team full PPR
Team A got Marvin Jones
Team B got TY Hilton
I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.
Cooks. Gordon will be forgotten by the time Cooks is 28.16 team ppr
Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks
After the draft, whoever gave up Njoku is going to hate themselves when Collins has to compete with a guy they take in the 3rd. I like Crowder enough to have him on my roster, but he's a WR3 replaceable guy and those are easy to come by in FFPC.FFPC, post cutdown
David Njoku
for
Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
Cutdown date just makes it worse that team giving up Njoku could not get more from team is was helping free up roster space. IMO Njoku worth more than those two plus saved a roster spot.FFPC, post cutdown
David Njoku
for
Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
TY in a landslide12 team full PPR
Team A got Marvin Jones
Team B got TY Hilton
I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.
You made this post before the Cooks trade I believe. I still don't agree after that trade. Only one RB at a time can play, I don't think WR's are usually killed during draft the way RB's can be. I don't think the risk is close, much heavier on Drake's side.IMO, the odds of the Rams bringing in somebody that impacts Woods is greater than the Gore/draft risk to Drake. If the Dolphins acquire CJA, the story changes.
Serious question here because I don't know the answer. If Big Ben suddenly retired tomorrow and Pitt had a need at QB, do you think they'd be willing to trade AB for Garropolo if they could?That's coffee-spittin' stuff right there. Either because of how bad it is, or because of how bad it is that superflex makes it fair.
Huh?12T PPR qrwwtffkddddddd
McCaffrey and 2019 2nd for Brandin Cooks, post trade to LA.
Cooks for me by quite a bit.16 team ppr
Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks
That trade was after cutdowns so it only applies to the 20 player deadline in August, not the 16 player one from a few days ago.Cutdown date just makes it worse that team giving up Njoku could not get more from team is was helping free up roster space. IMO Njoku worth more than those two plus saved a roster spot.
If the salaries worked I would say yes, the Steelers would make that trade. On flip side I think the 49'ers would have close to zero interest.Serious question here because I don't know the answer. If Big Ben suddenly retired tomorrow and Pitt had a need at QB, do you think they'd be willing to trade AB for Garropolo if they could?
Ah yes, thanks, thus the word "post". So still bad for Njoku owner, just not as bad.That trade was after cutdowns so it only applies to the 20 player deadline in August, not the 16 player one from a few days ago.
Gordon and if you want to move him don't do it for the guy playing the Desean Jackson role. The Chargers OL has some nice new additions. A risk of injury or they draft legit comp but I'd take those risks, wait for him to gel with improved OL and I think his market will be considerably more robust.16 team ppr
Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks
Initial take TY. but really it's close.12 team full PPR
Team A got Marvin Jones
Team B got TY Hilton
I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.
Close enough that lineups matter.16 team ppr
Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks
Hill > Adams12 teams, superflex, ppr
Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon
Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10
I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts?
Njoku, fairly easily.FFPC, post cutdown
David Njoku
for
Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
Yes. Partly because Antonio has acted like a prima Donna at times. Which is acceptable when you're paired with Ben and are the best (among anyway) receiver in football. But I don't think he performs nearly as well with Landry or a rookie.Serious question here because I don't know the answer. If Big Ben suddenly retired tomorrow and Pitt had a need at QB, do you think they'd be willing to trade AB for Garropolo if they could?
Howard side12 team PPR TE premium
Team A gives OJ Howard, Mike Williams, 2.06
Team B gives Tevin Coleman, Demaryius Thomas
Looks fine to me. Don’t think the 2nd needs to be there but I like Cooks. Not a huge McCaffrey guy long term.12T PPR qrwwtffkddddddd
McCaffrey and 2019 2nd for Brandin Cooks, post trade to LA.
Made the same deal myself earlier this offseason giving Collins for Njoku. Easy win.FFPC, post cutdown
David Njoku
for
Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
Hill > Adams, Gordon > Tannehill despite format. I don’t think the 2nds make it worthwhile. I would have held.12 teams, superflex, ppr
Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon
Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10
I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts?
Gurley16 team, ppr
Kamara and Stefon Diggs were traded for Gurley.
Lewis and White12 team ppr QB - 2RB - 3WR - TE - FL
Team A gave up Crowell, Isaiah NYJ RB; Year 2018 Draft Pick 3.03
Team B gave up Lewis, Dion TEN RB; White, James NEP RB
Dion12 team ppr QB - 2RB - 3WR - TE - FL
Team A gave up Crowell, Isaiah NYJ RB; Year 2018 Draft Pick 3.03
Team B gave up Lewis, Dion TEN RB; White, James NEP RB
I can't see Barber playing meaningful snaps. Montgomery I can.12tm idp ppr
Team A gave: P.Barber, 2018 3.09
Team B gave: Ty Montgomery, 4.04
Really close. I've actually rewritten 3 times choosing either side.16 team, ppr
Kamara and Stefon Diggs were traded for Gurley.
I think the crow but in ppr Dion should be useful.12 team ppr QB - 2RB - 3WR - TE - FL
Team A gave up Crowell, Isaiah NYJ RB; Year 2018 Draft Pick 3.03
Team B gave up Lewis, Dion TEN RB; White, James NEP RB
Monty12tm idp ppr
Team A gave: P.Barber, 2018 3.09
Team B gave: Ty Montgomery, 4.04
Maybe it's more of a risk/reward thing. If things bounce right for Drake, you have a starting RB. I see Woods as a WR2 at best with limited upside with the signing of Cooks and assumed development of Kupp.You made this post before the Cooks trade I believe. I still don't agree after that trade. Only one RB at a time can play, I don't think WR's are usually killed during draft the way RB's can be. I don't think the risk is close, much heavier on Drake's side.