What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (21 Viewers)

12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR -TE - FL

Team A gave up Amendola, Danny MIA WR; Woods, Robert LAR WR

Team B gave up Drake, Kenyan MIA RB; Smith, Jonnu TEN TE

 
I like woods when he gets volume and is playing well, but I don't think he'll always play as well as he did in short spurts last year and he could get screwed if the rams bring in obj or draft another stud wr.

I like drake when he gets volume and is playing well, but I don't think he'll always play as well as he did in short spurts last year and he could get screwed by Gore or if the dolphins draft another stud rb.

If both get screwed I'd slightly prefer woods, if neither gets screwed I'd greatly prefer drake. 

And jonnu > amendola.

 
I like woods when he gets volume and is playing well, but I don't think he'll always play as well as he did in short spurts last year and he could get screwed if the rams bring in obj or draft another stud wr.

I like drake when he gets volume and is playing well, but I don't think he'll always play as well as he did in short spurts last year and he could get screwed by Gore or if the dolphins draft another stud rb.

If both get screwed I'd slightly prefer woods, if neither gets screwed I'd greatly prefer drake. 

And jonnu > amendola.
IMO, the odds of the Rams bringing in somebody that impacts Woods is greater than the Gore/draft risk to Drake. If the Dolphins acquire CJA, the story changes.

 
12 team PPR TE premium

Team A gives OJ Howard, Mike Williams, 2.06

Team B gives Tevin Coleman, Demaryius Thomas
I’ll take Coleman (contract year, could hit fa next year) and DT (still a stud wr with a better qb than last year). 

Its fair being te premium but Howard took a hit with brate getting a nice deal. I wasn’t high on Williams and his injury riddled rookie year hasn’t warmed me any. 

 
Dr. Octopus said:
12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR -TE - FL

Team A gave up Amendola, Danny MIA WR; Woods, Robert LAR WR

Team B gave up Drake, Kenyan MIA RB; Smith, Jonnu TEN TE
With Cooks in town probably Drake but don't mind it.

14 teams, super flex, ppr

Gave: Garoppolo, 2.04

Got: AB
That's a tough one imo. Assuming the team trading Antonio is building I like it for him. Assuming you're contending and have good QB depth, I like it for you.

 
12 team full PPR

Team A got Marvin Jones

Team B got TY Hilton

I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.

 
12 teams, superflex, ppr

Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon

Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10

I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts? 

 
12 teams, superflex, ppr

Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon

Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10

I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts? 
If you had to split up the KC and CLE duos, I would have moved Landry and Watkins.

 
I would've but they're tough to move right now. Watkins is polarizing and isn't someone I want to sell low on. Landry's perceived value is low due to him being traded to CLE. 
I think Watkins has way more believers than you think and after this season, where he's the 3rd or 4th option in the passing game you may end up selling even lower.

I get that Landry's trade value likely went down - but I would have just kept both he and Gordon and saw what happened.

Adams is a good get, but I think Tannehill could be replaced as early as this season if a QB falls the 13 (or the Phins trade up). I guess Gordon does have his risks so moving him wasn't such a terrible idea (although his upside is better than Adams'), but I would have shopped Watkins around or just kept the duos for a while and saw what happened.

 
12 team full PPR

Team A got Marvin Jones

Team B got TY Hilton

I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.
That's interesting. Hilton has the greater perceived value, so I'm surprised Team A didn't maneuver for Marvin+. But they're the same age and Marvin proved to be very efficient per target last year. I could see this going either way. Really depends on Luck's arm and Marvin's target share. 

 
FFPC, post cutdown

David Njoku

for

Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
After the draft, whoever gave up Njoku is going to hate themselves when Collins has to compete with a guy they take in the 3rd.  I like Crowder enough to have him on my roster, but he's a WR3 replaceable guy and those are easy to come by in FFPC.  

 
IMO, the odds of the Rams bringing in somebody that impacts Woods is greater than the Gore/draft risk to Drake. If the Dolphins acquire CJA, the story changes.
You made this post before the Cooks trade I believe. I still don't agree after that trade. Only one RB at a time can play, I don't think WR's are usually killed during draft the way RB's can be. I don't think the risk is close, much heavier on Drake's side.

 
That's coffee-spittin' stuff right there.  Either because of how bad it is, or because of how bad it is that superflex makes it fair.
Serious question here because I don't know the answer.  If Big Ben suddenly retired tomorrow and Pitt had a need at QB, do you think they'd be willing to trade AB for Garropolo if they could?

 
16 team ppr 

Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks 
Cooks for me by quite a bit.

I said last year at this time that I wouldn't be surprised if Gordon was not the bellcow as soon as 2018 and after another year of bleh efficiency I still stand by that.  I could see LA drafting someone or giving more work to Ekeler.

 
Cutdown date just makes it worse that team giving up Njoku could not get more from team is was helping free up roster space.  IMO Njoku worth more than those two plus saved a roster spot.
That trade was after cutdowns so it only applies to the 20 player deadline in August, not the 16 player one from a few days ago.

 
Serious question here because I don't know the answer.  If Big Ben suddenly retired tomorrow and Pitt had a need at QB, do you think they'd be willing to trade AB for Garropolo if they could?
If the salaries worked I would say yes, the Steelers would make that trade. On flip side I think the 49'ers would have close to zero interest.

Cousins just got about $30M a guaranteed and he's middling. Giants seem distraught at paying Odell close to $20M a year and even if he's not the best WR in the league he's at least a transcendent talent. That in a nutshell is how the WR position is valued vs the QB position. Really more the point how the QB position is valued vs all others.

 
16 team ppr 

Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks 
Gordon and if you want to move him don't do it for the guy playing the Desean Jackson role. The Chargers OL has some nice new additions. A risk of injury or they draft legit comp but I'd take those risks, wait for him to gel with improved OL and I think his market will be considerably more robust.

 
12 team full PPR

Team A got Marvin Jones

Team B got TY Hilton

I always find same-position trades weird since it's not covering need/lineup issues.
Initial take TY. but really it's close.

16 team ppr 

Melvin Gordon just traded for Brandin Cooks 
Close enough that lineups matter. 

12 teams, superflex, ppr

Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon

Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10

I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts? 
Hill > Adams

Gordon slightly over Tanny but that's just because I don't particularly like Tannehill. Superflex makes it really close. 

Picks don't quite make up the difference but it's not a bad deal.

FFPC, post cutdown

David Njoku

for

Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
Njoku, fairly easily. 

Serious question here because I don't know the answer.  If Big Ben suddenly retired tomorrow and Pitt had a need at QB, do you think they'd be willing to trade AB for Garropolo if they could?
Yes. Partly because Antonio has acted like a prima Donna at times. Which is acceptable when you're paired with Ben and are the best (among anyway) receiver in football. But I don't think he performs nearly as well with Landry or a rookie. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPR TE premium

Team A gives OJ Howard, Mike Williams, 2.06

Team B gives Tevin Coleman, Demaryius Thomas
Howard side

12T PPR qrwwtffkddddddd

McCaffrey and 2019 2nd for Brandin Cooks, post trade to LA.
Looks fine to me. Don’t think the 2nd needs to be there but I like Cooks. Not a huge McCaffrey guy long term. 

FFPC, post cutdown

David Njoku

for

Alex Collins and Jamison Crowder
Made the same deal myself earlier this offseason giving Collins for Njoku. Easy win. 

12 teams, superflex, ppr

Gave: T. Hill/J. Gordon

Got: D. Adams/Tannehill/2.08/2.10

I have Landry and Watkins and wanted to diversify a little from CLE/KC offenses. I also wanted a cheap QB3 so I didn't have to spend the draft capital. Thoughts? 
Hill > Adams, Gordon > Tannehill despite format. I don’t think the 2nds make it worthwhile. I would have held. 

 
12 team ppr QB - 2RB - 3WR - TE - FL

Team A gave up Crowell, Isaiah NYJ RB; Year 2018 Draft Pick 3.03

Team B gave up Lewis, Dion TEN RB; White, James NEP RB

 
16 team, ppr

Kamara and Stefon Diggs were traded for Gurley.
Really close.  I've actually rewritten 3 times choosing either side.

12 team ppr QB - 2RB - 3WR - TE - FL

Team A gave up Crowell, Isaiah NYJ RB; Year 2018 Draft Pick 3.03

Team B gave up Lewis, Dion TEN RB; White, James NEP RB
I think the crow but in ppr Dion should be useful.

12tm idp ppr

Team A gave: P.Barber, 2018 3.09

Team B gave: Ty Montgomery, 4.04
Monty

 
You made this post before the Cooks trade I believe. I still don't agree after that trade. Only one RB at a time can play, I don't think WR's are usually killed during draft the way RB's can be. I don't think the risk is close, much heavier on Drake's side.
Maybe it's more of a risk/reward thing. If things bounce right for Drake, you have a starting RB. I see Woods as a WR2 at best with limited upside with the signing of Cooks and assumed development of Kupp.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top