This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
They are playing for all their rounds picks so if they still own their 2nd or 3rd or whatever picks they still get the 2.01, ect. So there is still motivation clearly not as much as if they owned their 1st. Also Karma is a ##### if you don't try for someone else pretty sure someone will take note and pay you back in kind.tkrull said:
That was about my reaction as well. I have seen AJ Green go very low this off-season. Then there is this deal. He seems to vary widely in value.
I take Ingram/1.10 here and it isn't particularly close. Not a fan of Drake that much and especially if a RB slips to 1.10 then it's a no brainer. Most of the drafts I've been a part of so far have had Freeman drop to 1.10 or a little later so assuming I can grab a RB, I take that side.
First - really like it for you.
Wasn't he injured for most of his rookie season. It's not like he paid a ton to acquire him.
Second - I don't have a lot of confidence in Williams; just haven't written him off. Perhaps I'm a bit down on Howard, but Williams actually has the higher ADP post-Brate signing. Prefer the positional value with Williams, and think Howard will take some patience.
Well he didn't see the guy ahead of him get signed to a surprise extension, likely guaranteeing a good bit of bench time at least in the near future.
Because of my browser, I initially read this trade as Cooper for Freeman and was horrified by the ride the new Freeman owner was taken on. Then I scrolled down, exhaled a sigh of relief, then face palmed at the nickel and penny that were added to make that trade "fair"Skeletore Eh said:
I saw this as essentially Thompson for Bryant and I much prefer the upside of Bryant. But perhaps I’m writing Ingram off too soon.
He took Wilkins with the first pick and Jordan Akins with the second. His team is good and deep at WR but a little light at RB and old at TE so seems like a position based trade. At the time the trade was made some solid veteran WR's like Garcon and Hurns were available, I was leaning on drafting Garcon since I was not looking for a long term keeper and since keeping Martavis won't be easy for me to keep long term it could have been the better move, but I'd rather chase the upside.
I guess for me this would be hugely roster dependent, but i probably lean Nuk ever so slightly if my qbs werent trash
I think when you swap two top 5 players for your format, its almost always going to come down to your roster to justify the move. I like it for both of you
That's a decent haul. In non-PPR it's fair in my eyes. I'd be looking to trade Parker for picks as soon as it went thru
Yes, 10 teamer. Gives team A the starting line up (with 2 flex spots) of Aaron Roders, Fournette, Hunt, Melvin Gordon, A Brown, K Allen and H Henry (along with a solid IDP defense). And still solid depth after that (Brees, Cam, Ingram, C Hyde, JuJu, Landy, J Gordon, Jeffery). Ah, 10 team leagues.....
Do you still believe Miller will be a full workload guy? I'd rather take the chance with Martavis pretty easily here. Miller is a J.A.G. that people get their hopes up for every year and he disappoints.That's a decent haul. In non-PPR it's fair in my eyes. I'd be looking to trade Parker for picks as soon as it went thru
12 team, ppr
Gave: Martavis
Got: Lamar Miller
I'm happy about this trade. I could see it going either way in a years time.
Foreman is coming off a nasty injury and Miller was doing well when Watson was QB. If Watson doesn't come back, and Foreman heals up, then there's a good chance I lose the trade. I'm betting on high-end RB2 production.
1.10 in a 1QB league. He hasn't proven enough for me to want to spend a 1st rd pick on. I've been selling everywhere I own Watson this offseason.
In my 0.5 PPR league, Lamar Miller has been RB16, RB19, RB5 the last three years. He's also had relatively consistent production from game to game. I think he's a bit better then a J.A.G. He's a decent to solid RB2. He's reliable but also doesn't have a ton of upside.
Most years I'd take the 1.10, but not this year and I don't really see this as cashing in on Watson's hype given the weak depth in this class (Goff was traded for the 2.02 in one of my leagues and I would take Watson over him by a ton.) But I am extremely down on these lackluster WR prospects. After the top 8 RBs and Moore, I don't see much difference between the 1.10 and the 2.04. I'm sure someone will eventually emerge, but I don't see most of the guys after the top 8~9 picks becoming more than a fantasy WR2 or WR3 even if they hit.
If Miller has disappinted an owner it means that owner over drafted Miller. In ppr firmat Miller has finished inside the top 20 RBs the past 3 years. If your drafting Miller as a RB1 you will likely be disappointed. If you are drafting him as your RB2, you will be satisfied with his production.
I think people drafting him as a RB2 will be disappointed too. The dude was benched for Alfred Blue last year. Alfred Blue. Why is everyone just shrugging that off?
