I think Baker and a random 2020 #1, so long as it's not a lead pipe late first lock, is equitable for Mahomes right now and as ChuckLiddel was referencing if Hill is suspended or Chiefs elect to not extend him after this season I'd take Baker and any 2020#1 for him. Mahomes is pretty special but I'm surprised in all the Tyreek Hill talk that more focus has not been put on the impact his potential absence would have on Mahomes, as if it's just an issue for Tyreek Hill owners if he is not playing with the Chiefs next year or long term. I think it's debatable which one helps the other more but the pairing is a match made in heaven.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (37 Viewers)
- Thread starter Gottabesweet
- Start date
Again, prefer getting the better players. Give me Woods and Njoku for essentially nothing and a draft dart throw every single time.
Small league or large league? If it's 12 or under, I think that's an amazing get for Mahomes, and I don't even like Baker very much.
Zyphros
Footballguy
In 2017 according to playerprofiler Kupp was #47 in air yards and #50 in target depth. The reason he did well is because of his quickness where he was #12 in YAC and #3 in Red Zone receptions. All of that points to a security blanket of underneath routes for Goff. Nothing wrong with that, but yes the Jarvis Landry comp is accurate.
He's a pumped up Jarvis Landry to me so yes I think of him when I think of Landry and put them in the "volume based" category in my mind. He's a more efficient player than Landry is but that is what he is. A glorified #2 who will come down to earth. Buy him if you want, but I don't see longevity here. I see solid production and an eventual downfall in a few years time. He'll have his moments to be a top WR but it won't last.
Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
What are you basing that on? I guess you could end up being right but Shepard has never come across that way - seems like a pretty level-headed and humble kid.
Birdie048
Footballguy
Based on him getting paid already. He got more $ than was necessary. If the NYG are not looking like contenders in next 2-3 years, or even have winning records.... he does not have to excel or put himself out there more than necessary. No sacrifice of the body necessary for team going no where. Yes, he does appear to be a level headed kid, but when you change the key person in your position (OBJ), and the key Def (L Collins), you cannot expect hims to show long term loyalty or commitment to the organization. He got paid. What does he do when Eli is replaced? I don't expect much... not much more than minimum anyway.
Sugar Huddle
Footballguy
This went down in my league today: 12 team 25 man roster ppr
team A gave TY Hilton and 2020 2nd round pick
team B gave CKupp, LMiller, and E St. Brown
team A gave TY Hilton and 2020 2nd round pick
team B gave CKupp, LMiller, and E St. Brown
kutta
Footballguy
I'd probably lean Dalvin because I'm a fan, but that's really not a bad return for him - 2 firsts and a pretty good starter.
Soulfly3
Footballguy
ffmail4me
Footballguy
Felt my team needed WRs more than Henry (although I do like Henry) so trying to keep an open mind come draft time but leading towards WRs. Current Roster (we start 1qb, 2rb, 3wr, 1te, 1flex)
Big Ben, Wentz, Darnold
Barkley, Guice, Lindsay, Gio, Lewis
AB, Mike Williams, Sutton, Pettis, Crowder, Samuel, Quinn
Howard, Cook, Gesicki
Picks 1.8, 1.10, 1.11, 2.2, 2.8
ffmail4me
Footballguy
Soulfly3
Footballguy
dont love this draft cuz i dont kno which wr will be solid in the nfl. if u tried to trade henry for a solid wr and got denied, then sure
jeaton6
Footballguy
Zyphros
Footballguy
Atomic Punk
Footballguy
This is the most I've seen Gurley go for since before the Super Bowl.
Last edited by a moderator:
fruity pebbles
Footballguy
Wasn’t there recently a video of Gurley still limping around? I don’t love the players but valuewise think that’s about as good as ur gonna get right now.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
12 team PPR. Start 1 QB, 1-3 RB, 1-3 WR, 1-2 TE (Total of 5 between RB, WR, TE), Kicker, Defense. 20 man rosters.
Team A gave: Sony Michel, R. Burkhead, D. Watson
Team B gave: 1.2, 2.01, 2.11, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, 2020 3rd
Startup was 1 month ago so hard to know where the 2020 picks will end up.
Team A gave: Sony Michel, R. Burkhead, D. Watson
Team B gave: 1.2, 2.01, 2.11, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, 2020 3rd
Startup was 1 month ago so hard to know where the 2020 picks will end up.
kittenmittens
Footballguy
12 Team tiered PPR Superflex start 11 - QRRWWWTSFFF
Cam Newton and 2.04
For
Will Fuller, 2020 1st (likely Mid) 1.09, and 2.09
Not involved
Cam Newton and 2.04
For
Will Fuller, 2020 1st (likely Mid) 1.09, and 2.09
Not involved
bostonfred
Footballguy
Interseptopus
Footballguy
That's a lot of picks for those players...some pretty nice picks too. It would depend what the rest of my roster is- if I needed wr and could afford to lose Michel.
I'd probably take the players
bostonfred
Footballguy
Not going to replace cam with two mid late firsts in a superflex, and pick 16 in sf is probably going to be a tier up from 2.9.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
12 team PPR
Team A gives Lindsay, 2.07
Team B gives Shepard, 2.01
I'd probably take Lindsay.
Team A gives Lindsay, 2.07
Team B gives Shepard, 2.01
I'd probably take Lindsay.
I don't see a problem with the value on this trade for Gurley but I'm just not a Henry guy. If you could sub out Henry for someone of comparable value I'd prefer that side.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
Would help if you say which way it is lopsided towards. Seems pretty even to me. May lean slightly towards picks IMO.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
With 2 people already in this thread stating they prefer the players I am not sure why you would just assume everyone "knows" the picks win and leave your post as ambiguous as possible.
Why you getting so snippy? I'm not a group think person and did not know I had to read other posts before responding. You asked me for clarification and I gave it, time to let it go.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
Didn't mean to get snippy. Just wanted to know your opinion.
It is ironic though that you don't subject yourself to group think, but you leave a post ambiguous because you think everyone will know which way you are thinking. I am not sure I understand.
Last edited by a moderator:
bostonfred
Footballguy
Team A gave: Sony Michel, R. Burkhead, D. Watson
Team B gave: 1.2, 2.01, 2.11, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, 2020 3rd
Michel and Watson are picks 30 and 31 in mfl adps, and 28 and 51 in fantasypros consensus rankings. Michel is rb13 in both, and Watson iis qb2.
We just had a discussion in which you said Jacobs was roughly rb20 in your estimation. https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/773469-josh-jacobs-dynasty-rb/?do=findComment&comment=21834873
So i think - by your valuation - michel is worth significantly more than 1.2, because Jacobs may not even be available at 1.2.
You won't be able to easily replace Watson with a random first round pick next year. You might get a highly regarded young qb but replacing the number 2 dynasty qb with a pick next year isn't something you should assume is possible.
Call burkhead the 2020 3rd.
So you're getting 2.1, 2.11 and a future 2nd to downgrade from rb13 to rb20 and from qb2 to a random future first.
That's not nearly enough. I think you either are low on Michel and Watson, or you've got rookie fever.
Interseptopus
Footballguy
this was how i looked at it. I am low on Watson and Michel but overall they have known value. The rookie picks are shots in the dark. And I'm very much a draft pick person. I also don't understand trading 2 players you can build a dynasty team around for draft picks... unless this team completely blew it at the start up draft and is going into rebuild mode right off the start
Last edited by a moderator:
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
The team that traded the players roster looks like this after the trade:
QB: Goff
RB: Kamara, Carson, Miller, I. Smith
WR: Cooper, DJ Moore, E. Sanders, D. Cain, R. Switzer
TE: H. Henry, J. Witten
Picks: 1.2, 1.07, 1.12, 2.01, 2.06, 2.11
(2) 2020 1sts, (2) 2020 2nds, (2) 2020 3rds
So I would say you are right in your assessment that they may have been playing for the future or screwed up the startup draft.
Last edited by a moderator:
Soulfly3
Footballguy
King of the Jungle
Footballguy
Watson is a strange guy to be low on. He is young and has performed extremely well when on the field. Last year he was missing Fuller the majority of the time and Coutee struggled with injury as well. They have a mediocre cast at TE and RB and their online has been terrible. Against these hurdles he played pretty darn well. I would be interested in what you see that you don’t like.
I understand Michel to a degree. NE is historically a massive split and Michel has some knee issues coming into the league.
No I value 1.2 over Michel
I don't value QB's that that highly and in a league I only need to start one RB I put even less value on Michel and I would suspect his overall value would also be less.
I don't think like this. I would not think I have to use that 2020#1 to replace Watson. I put that value of the 2020#1 on par with Watson, but does not mean that's what I need to replace him.
You can but I won't, I'd put his value as more like a 7th.
I answered all of your questions and comments I believe. Now I'll say how I saw the trade was this:
1.2/2020#1 slightly over Michel, Watson, Burkhead. Sligthly, would have graded that as a fairly even trade but would prefer the 1.2 and 2020#1 myself.
So for me it was free 2.1, 2.11, 2020#2 and 2020#3.
Interseptopus
Footballguy
I think Watson is a bit overvalued for a few reasons, especially if this is a 1qb league. I'd be glad to talk about it elsewhere
FreeBaGeL
Footballguy
Why would he be trying to replace Watson with the 2020 pick, especially in a one QB league?
If he's moving Watson I assume he has another competent QB (looks like he actually has Goff).
I also would take the picks but largely because I am not high on Sony. We saw how bad knees and lack of pass catching acumen quickly tanked the value of guys like Ajayi and Jordan Howard, and Sony has both of those issues before we even start talking about the Pats running game circus.
It's not like they just didn't use Sony as a receiver either, they tried multiple times and he was just really really bad at it. Between the college and NFL the dude now has 14 catches in his last 26 games. A lot of his value comes from a big playoff finish with an unsustainable pace in carries even for a guy without bad knees. I think he is a classic sell high right now.
Watson is a nice enough player but he's a non-transcendent QB in a one QB league. I'm not sure what the difference is in value between him and Wentz but just as an example I offered up Wentz for basically any 1st round pick in my league (I have Luck as well) and there wasn't even a shred of interest from anyone.
Last edited by a moderator:
kittenmittens
Footballguy
12 team superflex tiered ppr qrrwwwtsfff:
Nick Chubb
For
Godwin, Royce Freeman, 1. 09
Nick Chubb
For
Godwin, Royce Freeman, 1. 09
Last edited by a moderator:
ffmail4me
Footballguy
Chubb side but if the other side had a player of value in place of Freeman I would call it a lot closer.
