DropKick
Footballguy
I'll take the picks.12 team SF 0.5 PPR
gave 1.02, 2.02
got DK Metcalf, 2.10
I'll take the picks.12 team SF 0.5 PPR
gave 1.02, 2.02
got DK Metcalf, 2.10
Seems very cheap for Watson.FFPC standard league rules but private league with 2 extra roster spots so QB's tend to be just a little more valuable.
Gave: 1.8, 2.10, 3.8
Got: 1.10, Deshaun Watson
I have Kyler so no need really but at same time if I need to bury Watson for a year as is my expectation it's no big deal. I still have a few second round picks and don't like what I'm seeing as options at 2.10.
I know it's your joke, and all credit to you down to when to use it, but you could have also said, and it's just an observation, "SayWhaaaaaaaaaaaat?"Brian Flores, is that you?
Wow. Metcalf side fairly easily at first blush. Somebody needed a running back, huh?12 team SF 0.5 PPR
gave 1.02, 2.02
got DK Metcalf, 2.10
Or a QB..Wow. Metcalf side fairly easily at first blush. Somebody needed a running back, huh?
I like the concept, especially if you don't like your current options. However, I think the 1.12 should be enough for a future pick.DWFC league draft in progress traded 1.12 and 3.12 for a future 1st from the team that has the 6th pick this year.
Oh, drat. I didn't see the SF. Disregard my comment. I might want to try reading the post next time. I think it's later in the afternoon and I'm a bit tired.Or a QB..
The definition of buying low.FFPC standard league rules but private league with 2 extra roster spots so QB's tend to be just a little more valuable.
Gave: 1.8, 2.10, 3.8
Got: 1.10, Deshaun Watson
I have Kyler so no need really but at same time if I need to bury Watson for a year as is my expectation it's no big deal. I still have a few second round picks and don't like what I'm seeing as options at 2.10.
Wow. Metcalf side fairly easily at first blush. Somebody needed a running back, huh?
He tried trading the pick (1.02) while on the clock; no takers. Ended up drafting Chase, then R. Bateman at 2.02. Trade ends up Chase/Bateman for DK Metcalf/Rondale MooreOr a QB..
Wow, I'm impressed with that much movement. None of my leagues are that active. Turning later picks into Lance & Waddle seems like quite a trick.Just finished up my first ever rookie draft in my first ever devy league with some trades to try and help build my QB spot. 24 Team, SF, TEP, Best Ball. You can only draft one of the copies as devy so at least one of all players available as rookies, sometimes two. I liked it alot, may not go back to redraft.
Started the Rookie/Devy Draft holding the 1.11, 1.17, 2.14, 3.14 (all taken in dispersal draft).
- Traded the 1.11 and 1.17 for 1.03, 3.04, 3.23
- Traded the 1.03 for 1.04 and 2.24
- Drafted Trey Lance at
1.031.04 (fixed this for you)
- Traded 2.24 and Laviska Shenault for 2.01
- Drafted Jaylen Waddle at 2.01
- Traded 2.14 for Kedon Slovis
- Drafted Jerrion Ealy at 3.04
- Drafted Malik Willis at 3.14
- Drafted Desmond Ridder at 3.23
Just got done watching Bateman highlights. That's quite even, then, in my book. I can dig Bateman at 2.02, even in SF, even in Baltimore.He tried trading the pick (1.02) while on the clock; no takers. Ended up drafting Chase, then R. Bateman at 2.02. Trade ends up Chase/Bateman for DK Metcalf/Rondale Moore
I have a team taking over a very weak orphan this year and plan on doing some type of supplemental draft to allow the incoming team to get onto a competitive playing field with established teams.In the 6 year history of the league Team A has had the 1st pick 3 times and the 2nd, 4th and 5th pick once each.
Team B took over an orphan team.
Team A consistently overvalues his players in trade talks. Last season he was selling Agholor and Lazard each for a 2nd round pick. He wanted a 1st round pick plus for D Parker.
I was willing to take the pick side of that deal and felt that, depending on roster, Harris/Chase/Lawrence could be comparable to Metcalf. I also valued the early rather than later second rounder, with some chance of a QB falling.Just got done watching Bateman highlights. That's quite even, then, in my book. I can dig Bateman at 2.02, even in SF, even in Baltimore.
Yeah, I missed that it was SuperFlex at first, and now knowing who each picked, it seems closer than it could have been. I do indeed really like Bateman as a player. His landing spot did knock him down a bit with me, but not out of that range of picks. Analytics guys love him, and I think his game will translate well to the pros. I'd still take the Metcalf side, but it's not as lopsided as I thought at first blush. If I were higher on Rondale Moore, I'd really like the Metcalf side.I was willing to take the pick side of that deal and felt that, depending on roster, Harris/Chase/Lawrence could be comparable to Metcalf. I also valued the early rather than later second rounder, with some chance of a QB falling.
I'll have to do some more research some Bateman; perhaps I let landing spot knock him down too much.
I wouldn't give up Murray for that. Murray should be a multiple year top QB, RJ is a 20-25 RB. I think you could have gotten a better deal.kyter1 said:12 TM PPR QB, 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, 1-2 TE
Gave: K. Murray
Got: 2022 1s, 2022 2nd and Ronald Jones
not super close to me12tm 2QB 2TE (not that it matters in this one)
Denzel Mims, 2.06 (ended up Terrace Marshall)
FOR
Tyler Lockett
Tough. Fair. If Pitts is generational then it's his side. If you need production right now ETN and Kupp could be a difference maker. Brown is almost waiver fodder.FFPC SF
Marquise Brown, 1.04 (Turned into Kyle Pitts)
FOR
Cooper Kupp, 1.07 (Turned into Travis Etienne)
If not for the 2.04 I would take CEH but there had to be someone better than Wilson there.12tm 1QB
Joe Mixon, 2.04 (Turned into Zach Wilson)
FOR
Clyde Edwards-Helaire
I don't think Monty is getting the love he deserves even though I don't think there is anyway he is the RB he was in the last 5-6 games of last season (was RB1 in that time). I like this move personally. Nothing there is too much to give for a young RB with talent left to give.dmac37 said:Gave
1.10 + 2.3 + Watkins
Get
Montgomery
Was hoping for Serman at 1.10, once he was gone I decided to offer this trade, I'm kinda deep at WR. I think Monty is for real, especially with Fields in town.
Seems ok in non SF12 Team Superflex PPR
Gave 1.04, 2022 First, 3.03
Got AJ Brown
You like Etienne better than CEH, huh?FFPC Superflex
I gave CEH, 2.06, 2022 2nd
I got ETN, 2.02 OTC, 2022 3rd took Terrace Marshall
Nice ROI!! Looks like a worthy move.Had to catch a falling star...the only RB I had on my roster was Nick Chubb.
Zealots IDP PPR
Gave: 2.10, 2022 1st & 2nd
Got: 1.7 - Javonte Williams
Kind of switched to win now mode. My core is now Chubb/J Will/Tyreek/Lamb/McLaurin.
I'd make that trade every day if possible. Good move.12 team PPR dynasty
I traded what is highly likely to be a very late 2022 2nd and 2023 3rd round pick for the 2.5 in this year's draft to take R. Moore. Mighty mouse in the house!
I'm not huge on Sanders but if you need RB help this isn't a terrible trade with getting the extra 1st.12 team ppr QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL
Team A gave up
Pitts, Kyle ATL TE;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 3.02
Team B gave up
Sanders, Miles PHI RB;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 2.12;
Year 2022 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team B (late-ish)
With a gun to my head I like CEH better but I think it's about a wash. But I love Terrace Marshall enough to do the deal. And I'm bigger on a 2nd year Bryan Edwards than most.You like Etienne better than CEH, huh?
Ah, so that had something to do with it. Best of luck. I dumped Edwards this off-season. Yes, it wasn't enough time to properly assess him, but I don't really trust the dumpster fire that is the Raiders personnel decision-making crew of Gruden and Mayock. Who knows who will be starting there? Plus, Waller absolutely dominates that team's touches and just eats. Every day all day.Realized I forgot to add B Edwards in the OP
He was a throw in and didn't really sway anything in this deal. I do like him, though. There isn't any reason he shouldn't start on the Raiders. On rosters where I did keep him he is like my 6th WR. I feel like I just got paid to move up and take my guy (Marshall).Ah, so that had something to do with it. Best of luck. I dumped Edwards this off-season. Yes, it wasn't enough time to properly assess him, but I don't really trust the dumpster fire that is the Raiders personnel decision-making crew of Gruden and Mayock. Who knows who will be starting there? Plus, Waller absolutely dominates that team's touches and just eats. Every day all day.
Yeah, I'm not being snarky when I say this, and there are data-driven guys still convinced he'll break out, but there's a reason you got him as a throw-in to entice you.He was a throw in and didn't really sway anything in this deal. I do like him, though. There isn't any reason he shouldn't start on the Raiders. On rosters where I did keep him he is like my 6th WR. I feel like I just got paid to move up and take my guy (Marshall).
We could debate the finer points of the verb/subject/object but I'm just gonna go . You're probably right. It's an inexpensive bauble he used to entice you, how's that?this term is an oxymoron
Nope. It was free. I was slamming accept long before he decided to add Edwards with no prompting on my part.We could debate the finer points of the verb/subject/object but I'm just gonna go . You're probably right. It's an inexpensive bauble he used to entice you, how's that?
I'm explaining his motivation for doing so, not yours. Do you think he knew you were accepting regardless and threw it in as solely a good faith gesture? No, it was to entice you. That's why the object or referent of the sentence is what I alluded to before. His motivations, not yours.Nope. It was free. I was slamming accept long before he decided to add Edwards with no prompting on my part.
I would have accepted it without him. He literally has zero bearing on the deal. I'm sorry I even brought it up. There was no "enticing" involved. It is what I call a freeroll. Anything he returns is a profit. And unless I cut someone else to make room for him, there is no risk. My expectations are unbelievably small.
I'm not as high on Smith as some are even though I like him so I think this was a really good move. 2.6 (even if you didn't get 4.1) isn't really a huge price to pay to move up for Pitts.I did this one in a Zealots PPR today:
Got 1.4 OTC (Pitts) and 4.1
Gave 1.6 (ended up D.Smith — I would have picked same if I stayed) and 2.6
...I thought TE was my weak spot of the core offensive positions (A.Rodgers, Chubb, Ekeler, M.Thomas, C.Lamb), as I otherwise just have Gronk and Ebron as options and wanted to secure the upgrade.