This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This isn't terrible and I get your thinking. Plus, I think Gallup could go somewhere else next year and get more looks. I also am not as high on Gibson as some of the others here but I think I'd lean slightly that way. I think it is close though and don't see a problem either way. Maybe Harris will start off with a couple of good games and you can throw him in another trade for something.
Burrow and it is not remotely close...Burrow has a chance to be a difference-making QB and you got him for practically nothing...Miller is pretty close to being a non-factor in fantasy so not sure what is gained there...at 2.11 there are some nice prospects but that is peanuts to give up for Burrows...I really don't understand what the other guy is thinking here.
In fairness, it is a start 1 QB, typical QB scoring PPR league, so QB value is not strong, and he has Mahomes. But I agree this trade was good value. Miller might have been a cut at roster cutdown time.
He's still 24 year old potential stud...keep him as your backup to Mahomes and you won't have to deal with the QB position for at least a decade...if you want to deal him than wait till there are a few injuries during the season and someone is in need of a QB and at least get more back...as stated above, I just don't understand what the other guy is thinking...(as you said) Miller is a potential cut and the draft pick is almost a third rounder...this is just giving away a quality asset.
Agree with this...if Fuller was still with Watson and the Texans train-wreck I would be higher on him because I don't think his ceiling is the same with the Dolphins...I would rather roll the dice on Carter turning into a legit fantasy RB as it will be tougher to find that than what I believe you will get from Fuller in Miami (although he is only signed for 1 year).
I like Team B's side and will break it down in three phases...Dynasty-wise Lamb is a big upgrade over Evans...Taylor has the potential to be a big-time stud but Dobbins is no slouch and the gap here is not even close to the gap between Lamb and Evans IMO...Mattison and a #2 for Moss is another win for Team B...you gotta give up a lot to acquire someone like Taylor but there is no reason to make this deal.
Completely agree, Team B by a good amount. The JT hype is over the moon... Montgomery's value is shredded based on a weak end of the year schedule, but where's the narrative on JT's equally cakewalk finale? I like JT, but I'm not sure he's a better RB or even in a better situation to the point where they shouldn't be equally valued.
I'm very high on Taylor but this is B by a landslide. Lamb is a big asset over Evans and Dobbins is good as well. I'd say the 2nd being on the other side might even this out a little and then you could make the argument on the other side if trying to win right now. I'd still go B but that would make it mostly ok.
I agree about 99% but *if* I liked Taylor that much more than Dobbins and *if and only if* I were already super strong at WR I would consider this the other way. I also think Moss could easily shoot up in value this year. I don't think the gap between JT and Dobbins is large enough for me to ever do this though.
I think Lamb is one of the premiere dynasty assets there is and even if this guy is strong at WR I think he would really regret that part of the deal.
I agree with you too but top 5 RBs are a great thing to build your team around. Just hard to find, hard to predict, and they don't stay there long. Just don't know why they had to give Mattison and a 2nd back too.
Not sure I like it. Wilson is a bit of fool's gold, IMO. With Akers, I would think you'd have been able to get a younger and probably better option than Wilson.
Kind of what I was thinking...I get the strategy (i.e. you don't want to be chasing QBs in a SF because you usually are dealing from weakness/need), especially with his current group of QBs, but I would have liked the deal to be for a younger QB...that being said when it comes to SF there were probably only a few teams in his league that could give up a legit QB so Wilson may have been the best option.
Russ has 7 top 12 finishes and 4 top 6 finishes so to me you are banking high level production with a very safe floor. He is 33 and qb's are just aging differently now, I honestly wouldn't want the more iffy profile of guys going ahead of him besides Mahomes Dak and then probably Josh Allen. Rodgers is a better producer but 4 years older and has some drama, then Watson is much better with age but drama. After that the profiles of guys like Murray and Burrow aren't as solid as Wilson. Lawrence has no track record it is all projection. Lamar if he gets a mega contract from Baltimore will be safer then and Herbert definitely looked the part but only has 1 year of a track record. I just like the safe floor and solid ceiling. For me anytime you can get a locked in top 12 qb you move almost any RB and Akers looked great to end the year but we have no track record for a full season yet.
If more than 2 td is the standard Murray is the same and had as many or more 0’s in 2020 and only had 1 rushing td after week 11. Herbert had only two games over 2. Burrow didn’t play the whole year. Lawrence has never played. Lamar had the best finish of the group and has slipped in ado from last year.
I agree with you that Russ is a solid option. I think I would have tried for Murray personally but Herbert/Burrow/Lawrence aren't as safe at all so if that is what you want then he isn't a bad option. Akers is hard to give up but in SF you have to have at least one solid option at QB. Plus, maybe you get lucky and they trade for Julio.
Yes, and I bailed on Murray too.
Agreed it’s a terrible 1 qb league trade. Play qb by committee there and hold onto rb 1s like gold.
I agree. It's also a good buy I think for a win now team who is worried about Sanders production this year.
Yup...if you still think Zeke has gas left in the tank and you're close that side makes sense as well.
I think I wouldn't have made that move if I had 1 QB I liked and others I could play but I don't play SF in dynasty (only redraft). Gibson (I'm lower on than most in here) and a 1st seems a bit pricey for your QB2 but they are gold in SF so it could still definitely work out for you.
I think Zeke still has 2 good years left in him and if I'm trying to win (which I usually am), I'd go with that side. However, if looking to sell Zeke then this isn't a bad cash out. I'd have really pushed that 2nd to be a 1st, even if I had to wait until 2023 though. Fair trade though as I'm sure both got what they wanted.
That is the cheapest you will see Lamb go. After this year he will be untouchable (provided stays healthy).
lol. Username checks out, boy-o.
