What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (49 Viewers)

12 team 0.5 PPR SF.  Not involved

Daniel Jones

for

Gus Edwards, D. Booker, '22 2nd
I'll take Edwards and the pick in a 12-team league.  Jones is barely startable in a league this small and has almost zero upside.  Edwards has a path to a RB1 season and the 2nd may end up being a great pick.

 
I'll take Edwards and the pick in a 12-team league.  Jones is barely startable in a league this small and has almost zero upside.  Edwards has a path to a RB1 season and the 2nd may end up being a great pick.
SF gives him value. 

I’m holding Jones until he has a full compliment of receivers + Saquan. Hopefully he strings together a decent game or 2.

then I’ll sell.

 
12 team 0.5 PPR SF.  Not involved

Daniel Jones

for

Gus Edwards, D. Booker, '22 2nd
This is pretty close to normal offers for my D Jones in SF and he’ll just stay as my 4th QB until better comes along.  I assume the guy selling Jones feels he’s a contender, but I’d probably rather add something to Danny to get better than a 1yr RB rental

 
Oh, yes - that seems to be a logical disconnect. Holy crap how’d I miss that?!   :lol:  


I get that.  My question is why is there 12 picks in each round in a 10 team league?


I can't read apparently.  But it's ESPN's fault.  It's worded confusingly.  

Anywhose I was completely wrong on what the deal is.

The ACTUAL trade:  

Team A gives:

1.01

Team B gives

Mostert/1.02

Which seems much more "fine."  I don't now what the long term value of Mostert is.  Maybe you can move him for something else while he has value.  But 1.01 vs 1.02 with Chase/Najee/Pitts to choose from seems like solid move to trade back 1 spot.

 
FFPC 

I gave Z Moss, Fuller
I got Rountree, Jacob Harris, Brevin Jordan

Just shuffling bottom of my roster around. I need upside TEs now that Irv went down. I have zero faith in Moss or Fuller and I think Rountree might sneak into the #2 role in LA since both Kelley and JJax are terrible.

ETA this is my worst orphan rebuild, but I like it a lot more than I did 6 months ago when I bought it 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't read apparently.  But it's ESPN's fault.  It's worded confusingly.  

Anywhose I was completely wrong on what the deal is.

The ACTUAL trade:  

Team A gives:

1.01

Team B gives

Mostert/1.02

Which seems much more "fine."  I don't now what the long term value of Mostert is.  Maybe you can move him for something else while he has value.  But 1.01 vs 1.02 with Chase/Najee/Pitts to choose from seems like solid move to trade back 1 spot.
Nope, still a terrible deal for the team overpaying for Mostert. :lol:  

 
Buckna said:
Engram may already be hurt again, surprised anyone would give up something of value for him at this point.


I was toying with the idea of cutting him. Just that fear that I'll drop him and he'll do something next year. Never happening with the Giants but I have that hope that he goes somewhere else and it clicks. Seems unlikely though.

 
I was toying with the idea of cutting him. Just that fear that I'll drop him and he'll do something next year. Never happening with the Giants but I have that hope that he goes somewhere else and it clicks. Seems unlikely though.
Get out of my brain! 

This has literally been my exact thought process the last 2 years.  I just want him to play a couple games and show something so I can move him! 

 
jm192 said:
Not involved:  10 team 1/2 PPR:

Team A gives:

Mostert

Team B gives:  1.12/2.12
Can't get a darned thing for Mostert in a full rebuild...resigned to the fact that I will have to wait until he has some good games to deal him for any value.  Offered him for a 2nd to the whole league and nada.  Nice deal for you here.

 
Wow, some crazy moves for Edwards. He's a one real rental player imo.
I don't understand this line of thinking.  Edwards had solid value even before the Dobbins injury.  2 weeks ago, he was worth a 2nd and was better than the nominal starters the likes of HOU & NYJ.  Come this time next year he still should be worth a 2nd, barring his own injury.  He's a good back on a great running team.

 
Jonesin For Some Football said:
I am high on Mixon this year but I'd take CEH here if it was offered to me for him and I am a Mixon owner.
I like both, but I see Mixon getting more of a lion's share of touches compared to CEH + DWill

I would have held onto Mixon. 

 
I don't understand this line of thinking.  Edwards had solid value even before the Dobbins injury.  2 weeks ago, he was worth a 2nd and was better than the nominal starters the likes of HOU & NYJ.  Come this time next year he still should be worth a 2nd, barring his own injury.  He's a good back on a great running team.


I don't think he's worth more than a second now, he certainly wasn't worth that 2 weeks ago imo.

 
I like both, but I see Mixon getting more of a lion's share of touches compared to CEH + DWill

I would have held onto Mixon. 
I agree with this, for this year. 

I also completely understand the Mixon owner wanting to cut bait after so many less than great seasons. There's a lot of buzz about Mixon this year - Bernard gone, receptions up, etc. And I am even buying into it as he's my RB2 in redraft & I think he's due for a monster season. 

But i can also totally see that as a reason the Mixon owner would sell while all the news is positive. He was supposed to have a  big year last year with a good QB & receivers, and he hurt his foot early and was never seen again. 

So I get the sell. I like CEH & think he has a bright future, so I don't mind this deal from either side. 

 
I can't read apparently.  But it's ESPN's fault.  It's worded confusingly.  

Anywhose I was completely wrong on what the deal is.

The ACTUAL trade:  

Team A gives:

1.01

Team B gives

Mostert/1.02

Which seems much more "fine."  I don't now what the long term value of Mostert is.  Maybe you can move him for something else while he has value.  But 1.01 vs 1.02 with Chase/Najee/Pitts to choose from seems like solid move to trade back 1 spot.
Lol.  That is a big difference.  Much better trade and makes more sense now.

 
FFPC 

I gave Z Moss, Fuller
I got Rountree, Jacob Harris, Brevin Jordan

Just shuffling bottom of my roster around. I need upside TEs now that Irv went down. I have zero faith in Moss or Fuller and I think Rountree might sneak into the #2 role in LA since both Kelley and JJax are terrible.

ETA this is my worst orphan rebuild, but I like it a lot more than I did 6 months ago when I bought it 


sorr,y i really hate the return for what you gave up.

 
FFPC 

I gave Z Moss, Fuller
I got Rountree, Jacob Harris, Brevin Jordan

Just shuffling bottom of my roster around. I need upside TEs now that Irv went down. I have zero faith in Moss or Fuller and I think Rountree might sneak into the #2 role in LA since both Kelley and JJax are terrible.

ETA this is my worst orphan rebuild, but I like it a lot more than I did 6 months ago when I bought it 
Not sure I understand the thinking here, but I guess if they were the disposable part of your roster, sure... but on a REBUILD?  ZMoss is a young RB who is RB1 in a RBBC for a moderately heavy running team.  I think this was a big undervalue deal for you.  I can understand doubting Fuller (injury & Mia passing game)...  but I think either alone would have accomplished the same package in return.  

I think Roundtree could sneak up to #2 NEXT YEAR...  Sony is a 1 year purchase and they want to spend that $ and get his worth.  

I realize on a rebuild you need to determine how to shape & build it, but I just think this was giving away more than you got.  

 
  ZMoss is a young RB who is RB1 in a RBBC for a moderately heavy running team. 
The Bills were among the more pass happy teams in the NFL last season. Moss will split with Singletary and maybe even Breida. I think the main issue though is that Buffalo has (unsuccessfully) looked into upgrading at RB a few different times already.

 
SF, TEP(2pt), Devy, 24 teams w/ 2x player pool - QB, RB, WR, TE, 5 Flex, 1 SF

Not involved but I own the other Saquon and 🤢

Team A gets: Barkley, Saquon NYG RB

Team B gets: Jones, Mac NEP QB; Mariota, Marcus LVR QB; Parham, Donald LAC TE; Year 2022 Round 2 Rookie / Devy Draft Pick (probably late, so 40-48 overall)

 
SF, TEP(2pt), Devy, 24 teams w/ 2x player pool - QB, RB, WR, TE, 5 Flex, 1 SF

Not involved but I own the other Saquon and 🤢

Team A gets: Barkley, Saquon NYG RB

Team B gets: Jones, Mac NEP QB; Mariota, Marcus LVR QB; Parham, Donald LAC TE; Year 2022 Round 2 Rookie / Devy Draft Pick (probably late, so 40-48 overall)
I don't play SF for Dynasty but this seems like an absolutely terrible trade.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top