This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I’m getting railed for this on a separate forum lol. It’s fine, I mostly expected that. I’m happy with it.
I rarely use calculators, but just out of curiously I plugged it into KTC after the fact. It has me winning it just barely, with all the 23’ picks entered as late.
With the team being that bad I would take the pick too and hope for a top pick in a great draft. This is why bad teams stay bad.
In 10 team superflex/te premium, picks 15 and 16 aren't bad this year. Let's say it goes 4 qbs, 3 rbs, 6 wrs, and 1 te through 14 picks... you should still have a couple good prospects.
I think that is way too many picks in one round. I don't care how good the draft is there will be more busts than hits. It is always that way. I would be looking to move some of those picks for proven talent as the draft approaches. Three picks would be the max I would want to actually use.
Yeah, for sure. I still have 2.03 so I’m glad I was able to hang onto that. May try and snag a Howell, Corral or Ridder there.
2020 the only busts that really come to mind are CEH and maybe Ruggs? If he was even a 1st in most leagues. I guess if you wanted to say Tua? Too early to county Jeudy as a miss imo with Russ now in town. I don’t think Jalen Reagor was a 1st in most leagues, at least he wasn’t in mine.
Even if all of the first round become serviceable there will be slow starters or guys that won't really "hit" until the 2nd or 3rd year. Having that many guys at the same level of NFL experience is a detriment in my opinion. You need a build that has a variety of year level to be and stay relevant. Rookies are shiny and new and have all the potential in the world. Having too many is a detriment, IMO.
Yeah, this is definitely a multi-year rebuild. I have 4 1sts in 2024 as well. And these 2023 picks are only going to continue getting hyped and gain value leading up to next years draft, so I’m sure I’ll start getting offers for them. If an opportunity presents itself and I can move a couple for established, young players you bet I will.
I don't think you are robbing him. CMC is easily worth 2 1sts (I just gave 3 for him but they will all be way late). You are also including Evans. Some people are way higher on Gabe Davis than others.
This seems really dumb for the other owner honestly but good move for you. That is a lot to put in to the 23 draft. I do like it a lot but a lot can happen between now and then and experts can be wrong so if that draft disappoints, you may have sold way to hard for that draft and would set you back for years but I like this move a lot for you.
It depends on how you look at it too. Akers/Dobbins haven't been amazing for more than a few games really due to injury and light usage early on. Jeudy definitely hasn't been a stud by any means. CEH/Tua/Reagor/Ruggs all went close so depends on the league.
In a vacuum I take the Pittman side but as some one that recently “overpaid” for Gibson I know there always a RB tax.
And my roster could afford to take the hit at WR as I still have McLaurin, Godwin, Diontae Johnson, Mike Evans, DeVonta Smith, Crowder, Cedrick Wilson, Campbell, etc...
I agree. I prefer Pittman straight up, but it’s a small move in terms of picks and RB’s are hard to pry loose.
Most years I'd say that is great value for Davis (and it really is, regardless). As we get closer to the draft though, I have a solidifying top 3 and can definitely see the merits of trading out of 4, getting whatever slides to 12 + a high upside/young WR.
Gibson side. RB is so scarce. That's a really, really good price and value for Gibson. Well done, IMO.
1.12 is Pickens, Dotson, Moore, Watson.
I would want the ‘22 1.01 & ‘23 early 1st side + GDavis, but it isn’t a bargain. That’s a lot of present day capital to pay - CMC still a top RB so long as healthy, Evans a legit WR1 in a great offense for at least a year, Harris is…uh…Harris (I got nuthin)TVT 0 N S T A said:
Depends on the draft, but yes, a % will be busts. 2023 is being compared by some to 2017 & 2015 . The top 3 picks in 2015 1-QB were (in some order) Gurley, Gordon & Amari Cooper. They all worked out pretty well. 2/3 are still kicking, and Gurley was a superstar before the bottom dropped out. There are quite a few misses in that draft as well (top 2 QBs were Winston & Mariota, for example).Gally said:
I want to say Gibson but with WAS bringing in Hall, Walker and Spiller as part of their top 30 visits I'm scared to buy him right now. Now sure what I'd do if I got this offer for Pittman and 12 but I know if Gibson survives the draft without an addition of the magnitude of those 3 RB's I'd jump on this offer.
Holy moly now THAT'S a trade. I just can't fathom that someone would be willing to give up Chase AND three firsts. If Chase is worth 3 himself then you're selling 6 firsts.
I just wonder what was there before. To garner all those picks there had to be some talent before. That is a lot of seasons to pay for while the rebuild happens.Gally said:
Thanks, man. And now I have 1.06, 1.08, 2.08 this year, and 3 2023 first rounders and 2 2023 second rounders. So I'm in real good shape!
Offer someone with a late ‘23 pick your 2022 1.08 & 2.08 & some scraps for their ‘23 late 1st.
There are contract factors in the trade but still on Tyreek side. Cooks is 1 concussion away from retirement.
Kyler Murray, Russell Wilson, Ryan Tannehill, Derrick Henry, Aaron Jones, George Kittle. It sounds like a sick squad on paper, but at the midpoint of last season I had just went 0-2(we play two games per week) and dropped to 7th place in the league. I had a decision to make-either remain middling and maybe squeak into the playoffs as a 6 seed, or tear it down. I went with the latter. And I decided to do this just in the nick of time because the very next week after I sold Henry he went down with injury. I moved all the above players save Kittle in like a 1 week span.
