What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (23 Viewers)

12tm, superflex, ppr

Gave: Tyreek, Zeke, Jameis

Got: 1.11, 2.11, 3.09, '23 1st (early-mid), '23 2nd (early-mid)

------------------------------------------

I'm a middling team and am hitting the eject button before these guys lose more value. Lots to be determined before I'll know if it ends up being good. I'm hoping the '23 picks end up being top three. That team is heavy vets, heavy RB, only two QB's, and has no picks in '22/23. Gambol gambol

 
It wasn't eye-popping. Zeke for the 2.01, 3.02, and Drue Tranquill while giving up the 4.02. Nine offensive starters, Nine defensive starters, so it makes the 3.02 different than it would be. 
Ah. I see. I skipped commenting on that since I don’t play IDP. Sorry 

 
12tm, superflex, ppr

Gave: Tyreek, Zeke, Jameis

Got: 1.11, 2.11, 3.09, '23 1st (early-mid), '23 2nd (early-mid)

------------------------------------------

I'm a middling team and am hitting the eject button before these guys lose more value. Lots to be determined before I'll know if it ends up being good. I'm hoping the '23 picks end up being top three. That team is heavy vets, heavy RB, only two QB's, and has no picks in '22/23. Gambol gambol
nice haul for a rebuild imo. 

 
12tm, superflex, ppr

Gave: Tyreek, Zeke, Jameis

Got: 1.11, 2.11, 3.09, '23 1st (early-mid), '23 2nd (early-mid)

------------------------------------------

I'm a middling team and am hitting the eject button before these guys lose more value. Lots to be determined before I'll know if it ends up being good. I'm hoping the '23 picks end up being top three. That team is heavy vets, heavy RB, only two QB's, and has no picks in '22/23. Gambol gambol
I like it for the start of a rebuild. Now you’ve got to identify any and all aging scraps that you could string together for picks & make 5 more trades before the week is up. Go! 

 
12tm, superflex, ppr

Gave: Tyreek, Zeke, Jameis

Got: 1.11, 2.11, 3.09, '23 1st (early-mid), '23 2nd (early-mid)

------------------------------------------

I'm a middling team and am hitting the eject button before these guys lose more value. Lots to be determined before I'll know if it ends up being good. I'm hoping the '23 picks end up being top three. That team is heavy vets, heavy RB, only two QB's, and has no picks in '22/23. Gambol gambol


Very nice deal for you...solid haul of picks...now is a good time to deal Hill as he is 28 and hard to believe he can put up numbers in Miami like he did in KC, Zeke is a diminishing asset and while Winston has more value in SF he has the makings of having a Fitz type of career where he will be somewhere between a high-end backup and sometime starter...you should be real happy with this!

 
12 team PPR 1QB 1RB 1WR 4FLEX

Team A trades:

C Sutton 

Team B trades:

1.06


Got no problem with either side...if you like Sutton and think being a year away from the injury and adding Wilson puts him over the top he is a nice addition...if you are not a big fan of Sutton this is an excellent cash-out...I am not a big Sutton guy so I would do the pick.

 
Got no problem with either side...if you like Sutton and think being a year away from the injury and adding Wilson puts him over the top he is a nice addition...if you are not a big fan of Sutton this is an excellent cash-out...I am not a big Sutton guy so I would do the pick.
Would you do that trade for the 2.01?  To me that’s where it gets interesting.  The 1.06 is a no brainer.   I personally believe Jeudy will be the biggest benefactor of the Wilson trade.

 
Would you do that trade for the 2.01?  To me that’s where it gets interesting.  The 1.06 is a no brainer.   I personally believe Jeudy will be the biggest benefactor of the Wilson trade.
No way I give away Sutton for 2.01   

I see Russ developing more into a dispersal QB since the OL is much improved compared to the last 5 years in SEA. 

I really like Jeudy.  I equate him close to Lamb for upper Tier WR potential, pending Offense & QB at the helm.  

 
12 Team PPR - QB, 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, 1-2 TE

Gave: 1.11, James Washington, 2023 3rd

Got: 2023 1st (1.06 this year)

I have his 1.06 and 1.12 (mine) still this year. 

 
No way I give away Sutton for 2.01   

I see Russ developing more into a dispersal QB since the OL is much improved compared to the last 5 years in SEA. 

I really like Jeudy.  I equate him close to Lamb for upper Tier WR potential, pending Offense & QB at the helm.  
Well, one of them is going to disappoint and my money is on Sutton.  There's still those pesky Patrick and Hamler as well.  There is very good value at 2.01, especially at QB and WR in a start 1qb league.  Any of which could have more long term value than Sutton IMO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JohnnyU said:
Would you do that trade for the 2.01?  To me that’s where it gets interesting.  The 1.06 is a no brainer.   I personally believe Jeudy will be the biggest benefactor of the Wilson trade.


Not in this draft (especially since it is not SF)...I would rather roll the dice with Sutton and see what happens with him now that Wilson is onboard...worst case is he should be productive and best case is he blows up...anything is possible but 2.1 would be the 13th overall pick and without QBs having that much value due to the format I don't see the need to make that move.

 
Not in this draft (especially since it is not SF)...I would rather roll the dice with Sutton and see what happens with him now that Wilson is onboard...worst case is he should be productive and best case is he blows up...anything is possible but 2.1 would be the 13th overall pick and without QBs having that much value due to the format I don't see the need to make that move.
I don’t disagree with this but am not terribly excited about Sutton either. If there was room to get more I would look to move Sutton if I could. He is a bit older for his 2nd contract (will turn 27 this year), Denver will still be running the ball, they have numerous good targets in the passing game (Jeudy, Patrick, Hamler, Albert O….). Sutton looks like a sell high(er) to me. 

 
I don’t disagree with this but am not terribly excited about Sutton either. If there was room to get more I would look to move Sutton if I could. He is a bit older for his 2nd contract (will turn 27 this year), Denver will still be running the ball, they have numerous good targets in the passing game (Jeudy, Patrick, Hamler, Albert O….). Sutton looks like a sell high(er) to me. 


I am not a big fan of Sutton either but would want more than just the 2.1...would hate to deal him just for that and than have him go off...would want either a higher pick, another pick added in or another young player with upside.

 
Personally I value Sutton way higher than 2.01 on a weak draft. 

Maybe not quite 1.06 but close to that than 2.01.
Agree. At the least a wait & see. Sutton might take a value leap with Russ. Everyone has their theory on who the biggest beneficiary will be, but at this point I think it’s worth the wait to hold and see Vs selling for a 2nd.  Maybe I take a 2023 2nd. 

 
12 team ppr sf 

brady for the 2.03


Give me Brady...he can either help me contend for a title this year or if my team is not contending, I feel pretty strongly I can get at least this back and most likely more from a contender during the season.

 
joey said:
My trade was too fair and boring for this thread I think ;)  
I like the move.  Davis isn't worth much to me and the picks (as long as you got a 1st as you did in a deep draft) for Zeke then you did decently.  The other guy is is trying to win so this could be the rare win-win trade.

 
Too many people are looking at Davis' playoff game that was nuts.  I don't think he is worth this but could prove me wrong so if you are a true believer, this is the draft to make this move in.
I thought it was fair myself and I don't own a share of Davis.

Sure Davis went nuts in a playoff game but even if you took that away when he's put up 70/1,148/13 TD's on 125 career regular season targets that qualifies him as at bare minimum a high upside prospect especially when you factor he's plays with Allen and just turned 23 a few weeks ago.

One out of Wilson, Drake, Jameson or Burks(and strong chance one already gone)

or

Gabriel Davis and one of Pickens, Sky Moore, Dotson,Christian Watson or maybe a RB.

I just don't think any WR is such a great prospect in this draft they beat a 23 year old who has demonstrated high upside and another solid prospect. And should one of those high end WR's I just mention land in a place like GB or KC then the odds of them going 2 or 3 and lasting till pick 4 get slim.

 
dipandglide said:
12tm, superflex, ppr

Gave: Tyreek, Zeke, Jameis

Got: 1.11, 2.11, 3.09, '23 1st (early-mid), '23 2nd (early-mid)

------------------------------------------

I'm a middling team and am hitting the eject button before these guys lose more value. Lots to be determined before I'll know if it ends up being good. I'm hoping the '23 picks end up being top three. That team is heavy vets, heavy RB, only two QB's, and has no picks in '22/23. Gambol gambol
I don't play much SF (only redraft) but this is a pretty good cash out after seeing what others are getting for Hill/Zeke.

 
I thought it was fair myself and I don't own a share of Davis.

Sure Davis went nuts in a playoff game but even if you took that away when he's put up 70/1,148/13 TD's on 125 career regular season targets that qualifies him as at bare minimum a high upside prospect especially when you factor he's plays with Allen and just turned 23 a few weeks ago.

One out of Wilson, Drake, Jameson or Burks(and strong chance one already gone)

or

Gabriel Davis and one of Pickens, Sky Moore, Dotson,Christian Watson or maybe a RB.

I just don't think any WR is such a great prospect in this draft they beat a 23 year old who has demonstrated high upside and another solid prospect. And should one of those high end WR's I just mention land in a place like GB or KC then the odds of them going 2 or 3 and lasting till pick 4 get slim.
You aren't wrong but we will know more after the draft.  I just think 4 is too high.  I'm not a Davis believer in the fact that I think the top 5-ish guys in this draft will be better prospects.  Obviously they could bust but I'll take the real swing for the fences.  Especially with Diggs just signing that big deal so he isn't going anywhere for a while.  Granted....Sanders/Beasley won't be there so Davis should get looks.  I just think the hate for the 22 class has gone a little too far IMO.

 
You aren't wrong but we will know more after the draft.  I just think 4 is too high.  I'm not a Davis believer in the fact that I think the top 5-ish guys in this draft will be better prospects.  Obviously they could bust but I'll take the real swing for the fences.  Especially with Diggs just signing that big deal so he isn't going anywhere for a while.  Granted....Sanders/Beasley won't be there so Davis should get looks.  I just think the hate for the 22 class has gone a little too far IMO.
I agree with the bolded - it's actually become an annoying echo chamber - but with that said, you're discounting the 1.12 when you imply it's Davis for the 1.04.

Gabriel is younger than a few WRs in this draft - I think this draft is very deep at WR (albeit with no sure thing stud) so there's even an outside chance that the 1.12 could outperform the 1.04, let alone Davis potentially being able to do the same thing. It's a decent dice roll imo - but I am a Gabriel fan.

 
I agree with the bolded - it's actually become an annoying echo chamber - but with that said, you're discounting the 1.12 when you imply it's Davis for the 1.04.
Had not had a chance to respond yet but you did so for me.

I would not give up Davis for 1.4. But the way I view this trade is essentially Davis and WR 7-8 for WR2.

That's not so much poo poo'ing on this draft as it is acknowledging the difference in say WR2 vs WR8 is not so great that Davis can't make it up and having two shots instead of one.

As jonesin said I might feel differently after the draft but right now that's how I see it stacking up.

 
I agree with the bolded - it's actually become an annoying echo chamber - but with that said, you're discounting the 1.12 when you imply it's Davis for the 1.04.

Gabriel is younger than a few WRs in this draft - I think this draft is very deep at WR (albeit with no sure thing stud) so there's even an outside chance that the 1.12 could outperform the 1.04, let alone Davis potentially being able to do the same thing. It's a decent dice roll imo - but I am a Gabriel fan.
I don't have a problem with the trade.  Just my personal preference would be for 1.04.  Had this been 1.07-1.08 then I could get onboard.  I just personally am not high of the back end of round 1 in to round 2.  Just my personal preference and I do think there will be some top end talent in this draft still.  I have warmed to Davis though with Sanders/Beasley not coming back.

 
16 team league, IDP PPR 

I gave Max Jones for Corey Davis. I start Stafford, with Goff and Mariotta as back ups. Davis probably is my WR4 or flex now. Just trying to contend this year and while I really like Mac for the NFL, I don’t think he’s going to be a difference maker in FF. If I’m wrong I’ll be happy for the kid. 

 
16 team league, IDP PPR 

I gave Max Jones for Corey Davis. I start Stafford, with Goff and Mariotta as back ups. Davis probably is my WR4 or flex now. Just trying to contend this year and while I really like Mac for the NFL, I don’t think he’s going to be a difference maker in FF. If I’m wrong I’ll be happy for the kid. 
It's fine.  I assume the waiver wire is bare for WR's so without knowing if you will play your WR4 consistently or not it makes sense to pull the trigger.  I am also of the opinion Mac will be a better NFL QB than FF QB and with who you already have he really doesn't give you much value.  I am guessing Davis will give you more value (but not by much).  

 
Safleague scoring only start 10

I took over a $10 orphan and to me in that scoring you want two elite qb's and at least 1 elite TE.  The team had Dak and Mark Andrews.  My 2nd qb was Daniel Jones so I have been trying to get an elite 2nd qb.

I gave up a lot of parts, but I got one of the elite qb's.

Gave Metcalf, McLaurin, 1.12, Daniel Jones and my 23 1st

Got Josh Allen and Adam Trautman

I still have Dionate Johnson, Godwin and Gallup at WR.  1.12 and Jones did not hurt to part with, the 23 1st stings but in that scoring Allen Dak and Andrews can take you a long way.  

 
Safleague scoring only start 10

I took over a $10 orphan and to me in that scoring you want two elite qb's and at least 1 elite TE.  The team had Dak and Mark Andrews.  My 2nd qb was Daniel Jones so I have been trying to get an elite 2nd qb.

I gave up a lot of parts, but I got one of the elite qb's.

Gave Metcalf, McLaurin, 1.12, Daniel Jones and my 23 1st

Got Josh Allen and Adam Trautman

I still have Dionate Johnson, Godwin and Gallup at WR.  1.12 and Jones did not hurt to part with, the 23 1st stings but in that scoring Allen Dak and Andrews can take you a long way.  
Love it for you. It’s fair, but if QBs rule that seems a reasonable package you could afford. 

 
16 team league, IDP PPR 

I gave Max Jones for Corey Davis. I start Stafford, with Goff and Mariotta as back ups. Davis probably is my WR4 or flex now. Just trying to contend this year and while I really like Mac for the NFL, I don’t think he’s going to be a difference maker in FF. If I’m wrong I’ll be happy for the kid. 


Definitely Mac Jones...in a 16 team league there is a supply issue with QBs...you can get yourself into a jam if you are thin at that position...if I am giving up a QB that will be guaranteed to be an NFL starter for a decent period of time I would want much more than Corey Davis.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Safleague scoring only start 10

I took over a $10 orphan and to me in that scoring you want two elite qb's and at least 1 elite TE.  The team had Dak and Mark Andrews.  My 2nd qb was Daniel Jones so I have been trying to get an elite 2nd qb.

I gave up a lot of parts, but I got one of the elite qb's.

Gave Metcalf, McLaurin, 1.12, Daniel Jones and my 23 1st

Got Josh Allen and Adam Trautman

I still have Dionate Johnson, Godwin and Gallup at WR.  1.12 and Jones did not hurt to part with, the 23 1st stings but in that scoring Allen Dak and Andrews can take you a long way.  
That’s a baller move. Shocked the Allen side went for it. Nicely done. 

 
12 team superflex

gave 1.03, 1.11

got 1.07, ETN


A lot depends on what the other guy wants to do with the 1.3...if he is in big trouble at QB (this is SF) or has a legit top 3 I can see what he is doing...without knowing that I'll go with the 1.7 and Etienne.

 
A lot depends on what the other guy wants to do with the 1.3...if he is in big trouble at QB (this is SF) or has a legit top 3 I can see what he is doing...without knowing that I'll go with the 1.7 and Etienne.
he is taking over this team as an orphan, and is tearing it down

his only asset after moving ETN is trey lance (literally not another roster-able player)

he has 1.01, 1.03, 1.05, 1.11 after this deal

breece is likely gone at 1.01, whether he actually makes the pick or not, and the 1.02 has holes everywhere, so not sure if they will go willis or walker, but i dont love either more than ETN. Already have allen and herbert, and i think ETN is better than walker.

Also i get to stay in the range of picks where the top tier of wr will still be, and will most likely just take whichever one is left

 
Last edited by a moderator:
he is taking over this team as an orphan, and is tearing it down

his only asset after moving ETN is trey lance (literally not another roster-able player)

he has 1.01, 1.03, 1.05, 1.11 after this deal

breece is likely gone at 1.01, whether he actually makes the pick or not, and the 1.02 has holes everywhere, so not sure if they will go willis or walker, but i dont love either more than ETN. Already have allen and herbert, and i think ETN is better than walker.

Also i get to stay in the range of picks where the top tier of wr will still be, and will most likely just take whichever one is left


Good deal for both teams...I see what he is doing if he is in total rebuild mode...if Etienne hits this will be a great deal for you.

 
1.09

for

24 1st rounder - 22 4th rounder

Literally couldn't get a 23 first off anyone for that 1.09. Clear tier break for me at 1.06 and would rather gamble on what that 24 1st rounder could be. This dude doesn't have a 23 1st either so feels like it could be a good one. I appreciate 24 is a long way away but leaves me with 2 firsts in the top 6 this year, 2 firsts next year and now 2 in 24. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.09 for

24 1st rounder - 22 4th rounder

Literally couldn't get a 23 first off anyone for that 1.09. Clear tier break for me at 1.06 and would rather gamble on what that 24 1st rounder could be. This dude doesn't have a 23 1st either so feels like it could be a good one. I appreciate 24 is a long way away but leaves me with 2 firsts in the top 6 this year, 2 firsts next year and now 2 in 24. 
I like it. Would’ve obviously preferred the 23’ 1st, but everybody has caught on now and they’re nearly impossible to obtain at this point. Not a big fan of this draft after the first few picks so I would’ve pivoted here as well. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top