****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (33 Viewers)

[Blick]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

There should be at least a 1.08 in there too, IMO.

Almost like team 1.01 didn’t know how much it was worth.

Not trying to justify, but 1.01 guy needs a QB in the worst way. This gives them that chance with a 2nd round kicker. Apparently there hadn't been much in the way of offers for the 1.01 yet and there hasn't been much chatter in the league this year so far.

Unless he's on the clock, there's no reason to make this trade.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

There should be at least a 1.08 in there too, IMO.

Almost like team 1.01 didn’t know how much it was worth.

Not trying to justify, but 1.01 guy needs a QB in the worst way. This gives them that chance with a 2nd round kicker. Apparently there hadn't been much in the way of offers for the 1.01 yet and there hasn't been much chatter in the league this year so far.

Unless he's on the clock, there's no reason to make this trade.

At least wait until Bijan’s draft spot is known so there’s a (psychological) bump in value.

I mean, it’s unlikely but say Falcons at 7 or Eagles at 10. Someone in your league is likely to wildly overpay in the right circumstance.

 

[Boston]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

There should be at least a 1.08 in there too, IMO.

Almost like team 1.01 didn’t know how much it was worth.

Not trying to justify, but 1.01 guy needs a QB in the worst way. This gives them that chance with a 2nd round kicker. Apparently there hadn't been much in the way of offers for the 1.01 yet and there hasn't been much chatter in the league this year so far.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

There should be at least a 1.08 in there too, IMO.

Almost like team 1.01 didn’t know how much it was worth.

Not trying to justify, but 1.01 guy needs a QB in the worst way. This gives them that chance with a 2nd round kicker. Apparently there hadn't been much in the way of offers for the 1.01 yet and there hasn't been much chatter in the league this year so far.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

Exactly. By accepting the 2.04 it’s just leaving a ton of value on the table.

Borders on criminal.

 

[Birdie048]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

Looking for an opinions.....12 team, .05 PPR, 1 QB and getting a lot of interest in Waddle (my WRs are Jeffers/Waddle/Ridley/Evans in start 2 and the others aren't worth noting). Great win now team that is deep at RB, Kelce at TE, and Dak at QB.

What would you need on top of Adams or Jeudy to part with Waddle. The Adams team has some 7 picks in the top 16 and the Jeudy owner has some future capital but nothing this year until 2.01.

 

[InDitkaWeTrust]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

The way I look at it, Bijan's (pick 1.01) value can only go up between now and your rookie draft. The only way I see his value going down even slightly is if he's drafted behind someone like King Henry or Saquon....and that ain't gonna happen without the vet RB being traded. I'd hold until the right offer came along between now and your rookie draft day.

 

[Jayded]

Danced around a deal centered on Hall/ETN that just wouldn’t materialize. Went cheaper and centered on opportunity and handcuff:

Team A gets : Samaje Perine (owns Williams), Rashid Shaheed, Kamren Curl
Team B gets : John Metchie, Julian Love

 

[Blick]

Looking for an opinions.....12 team, .05 PPR, 1 QB and getting a lot of interest in Waddle (my WRs are Jeffers/Waddle/Ridley/Evans in start 2 and the others aren't worth noting). Great win now team that is deep at RB, Kelce at TE, and Dak at QB.

What would you need on top of Adams or Jeudy to part with Waddle. The Adams team has some 7 picks in the top 16 and the Jeudy owner has some future capital but nothing this year until 2.01.

I guess I value Adams slightly higher than Jeudy, but probably close enough that it would take a late'ish 2023 1 to move off of Waddle from a value perspective. The bigger question is why would you make this trade? The only reason to do this trade is that you're looking to add depth. Since its only a start 2 league, I don't think you need it. For this deal to work in your favor, this year's production from either Adams or Jeudy would have to equal Waddle's. Further, if you took the Adams side, you'd have to consider his age and decline. This means that you have to hit on the pick, biggly.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

Looking for an opinions.....12 team, .05 PPR, 1 QB and getting a lot of interest in Waddle (my WRs are Jeffers/Waddle/Ridley/Evans in start 2 and the others aren't worth noting). Great win now team that is deep at RB, Kelce at TE, and Dak at QB.

What would you need on top of Adams or Jeudy to part with Waddle. The Adams team has some 7 picks in the top 16 and the Jeudy owner has some future capital but nothing this year until 2.01.

I guess I value Adams slightly higher than Jeudy, but probably close enough that it would take a late'ish 2023 1 to move off of Waddle from a value perspective. The bigger question is why would you make this trade? The only reason to do this trade is that you're looking to add depth. Since its only a start 2 league, I don't think you need it. For this deal to work in your favor, this year's production from either Adams or Jeudy would have to equal Waddle's. Further, if you took the Adams side, you'd have to consider his age and decline. This means that you have to hit on the pick, biggly.

I was thinking of doing it to regain some draft capital I gave up to get Jefferson. I'm not sold on making the trade and would have to get paid to do it. Got offered Jeudy/24 1st and 25 1st (both for sure to be in the top half) for Waddle/Mixon. Adams/2.01 was the other offer but was thinking I'd have to get at least 1.08 from that guy. Not sure I can pull the trigger but was just curious of others thoughts.

 

[jabarony]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

The way I look at it, Bijan's (pick 1.01) value can only go up between now and your rookie draft. The only way I see his value going down even slightly is if he's drafted behind someone like King Henry or Saquon....and that ain't gonna happen without the vet RB being traded. I'd hold until the right offer came along between now and your rookie draft day.

I'm not sure it could go higher. It's already sky high. I think it can only go down. Not saying it will, but it's possible if he goes to NEP, IND, and maybe a couple more spots.

 

[Blick]

Looking for an opinions.....12 team, .05 PPR, 1 QB and getting a lot of interest in Waddle (my WRs are Jeffers/Waddle/Ridley/Evans in start 2 and the others aren't worth noting). Great win now team that is deep at RB, Kelce at TE, and Dak at QB.

What would you need on top of Adams or Jeudy to part with Waddle. The Adams team has some 7 picks in the top 16 and the Jeudy owner has some future capital but nothing this year until 2.01.

I guess I value Adams slightly higher than Jeudy, but probably close enough that it would take a late'ish 2023 1 to move off of Waddle from a value perspective. The bigger question is why would you make this trade? The only reason to do this trade is that you're looking to add depth. Since its only a start 2 league, I don't think you need it. For this deal to work in your favor, this year's production from either Adams or Jeudy would have to equal Waddle's. Further, if you took the Adams side, you'd have to consider his age and decline. This means that you have to hit on the pick, biggly.

I was thinking of doing it to regain some draft capital I gave up to get Jefferson. I'm not sold on making the trade and would have to get paid to do it. Got offered Jeudy/24 1st and 25 1st (both for sure to be in the top half) for Waddle/Mixon. Adams/2.01 was the other offer but was thinking I'd have to get at least 1.08 from that guy. Not sure I can pull the trigger but was just curious of others thoughts.

Jeudy/24 1st and 25 1st for Waddle/Mixon doesn't sound to shabby. I could get behind that one. Having a shot at high 1sts for two years on a competitive team is a nice luxury.

 

[JoeJoe88]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

This is terrible.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

The way I look at it, Bijan's (pick 1.01) value can only go up between now and your rookie draft. The only way I see his value going down even slightly is if he's drafted behind someone like King Henry or Saquon....and that ain't gonna happen without the vet RB being traded. I'd hold until the right offer came along between now and your rookie draft day.

I'm not sure it could go higher. It's already sky high. I think it can only go down. Not saying it will, but it's possible if he goes to NEP, IND, and maybe a couple more spots.

It could absolutely, easily go higher if the Bengals draft him, or if the Chargers deal Eke during the draft then take him. Or if the Falcons make him a top 7 pick (or the Eagles a top 10)

Not saying I believe those last 2 will happen, but the could.

There’s plenty of room for Bijan’s value to appreciate between now and draft day.

 

[ghostguy123]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

The way I look at it, Bijan's (pick 1.01) value can only go up between now and your rookie draft. The only way I see his value going down even slightly is if he's drafted behind someone like King Henry or Saquon....and that ain't gonna happen without the vet RB being traded. I'd hold until the right offer came along between now and your rookie draft day.

I'm not sure it could go higher. It's already sky high. I think it can only go down. Not saying it will, but it's possible if he goes to NEP, IND, and maybe a couple more spots.

There’s plenty of room for Bijan’s value to appreciate between now and draft day.

I do not agree. He's already top 3 overall. I think at this point the only way his value goes UP is if he has a high scoring rookie season and looks good doing it.

 

[TartanLion]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

There should be at least a 1.08 in there too, IMO.

Almost like team 1.01 didn’t know how much it was worth.

Not trying to justify, but 1.01 guy needs a QB in the worst way. This gives them that chance with a 2nd round kicker. Apparently there hadn't been much in the way of offers for the 1.01 yet and there hasn't been much chatter in the league this year so far.

I don’t mind moving down from 1 to 2 especially if QB is the need.

He just barely got anything to do it. 2.04 isn’t gonna be terrible, but it should have been much more profitable.

If the 1.02 team is crappy I’d have been asking for his ‘24 1st and is in fact one of the things I intend on trying with my 1.01 in a SF league. Gives you a lottery ticket for the likes of Caleb ,Drake Maye, Harrison etc next year. Maybe he doesn’t go for it, but I then would just move on to another deal or just select with my 1.01

 

[scottybo]

Received offer:
2024 1st round from lower end team.
2024 1st round from upper end team.
2024 2nd round from lower end team.

In exchange for Joe Burrow.

Have Love and Hurts. I still don't feel it's enough in Superflex. Maybe close, but not quite there. Nice knowing I have two top 5 caliber QBs for at least the next 5 years.

Thinking QB with #6 overall this year, but not sure if Young, Stroud or Richardson would make it.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Danced around a deal centered on Hall/ETN that just wouldn’t materialize. Went cheaper and centered on opportunity and handcuff:

Team A gets : Samaje Perine (owns Williams), Rashid Shaheed, Kamren Curl
Team B gets : John Metchie, Julian Love

I'm a big Love fan, and believe Metchie can be a solid FF WR2, so I prefer that side.

That said, it's very slight, and Perine should be a very serviceable FF RB, so if I need a RB & I'm good at WR, I'm on that side.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Received offer:
2024 1st round from lower end team.
2024 1st round from upper end team.
2024 2nd round from lower end team.

In exchange for Joe Burrow.

Have Love and Hurts. I still don't feel it's enough in Superflex. Maybe close, but not quite there. Nice knowing I have two top 5 caliber QBs for at least the next 5 years.

Thinking QB with #6 overall this year, but not sure if Young, Stroud or Richardson would make it.

Not enough. I paid just about that for Fields. Burrow = 3x 1sts, or 2x 1sts + a player worth a 1st.

 

[jabarony]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

The way I look at it, Bijan's (pick 1.01) value can only go up between now and your rookie draft. The only way I see his value going down even slightly is if he's drafted behind someone like King Henry or Saquon....and that ain't gonna happen without the vet RB being traded. I'd hold until the right offer came along between now and your rookie draft day.

I'm not sure it could go higher. It's already sky high. I think it can only go down. Not saying it will, but it's possible if he goes to NEP, IND, and maybe a couple more spots.

It could absolutely, easily go higher if the Bengals draft him, or if the Chargers deal Eke during the draft then take him. Or if the Falcons make him a top 7 pick (or the Eagles a top 10)

Not saying I believe those last 2 will happen, but the could.

There’s plenty of room for Bijan’s value to appreciate between now and draft day.

There’s going to be 3 athletic QBs drafted in the top 5 of the NFL draft. And Bijan is still the consensus #1 in SF. Not sure you can increase much from there.

 

[joey]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

took me around 20 posts back and forth about this trade to realize it was the 1.02 and TWO.04 that was traded for the 1.01. I just subliminally read “1.02 + ONE.04” in my head. Ooof.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

12 team SF

Gave 1.02 + 2.04
Got 1.01

Another trade I don't understand.

Just a criminally low price to move from 2 to 1.

I definitely get the 1.1 to 1.2 if you need a QB...but you have what is by all accounts a generational talent at RB in Bijan so you have to get more than just the 16th overall pick in the draft.

As 1.01 owner shopping the pick, the best offer I have received was WR Lamb + 1.12 Fair offer, but not sufficient in my view. Several Calc have it overpay by a late 3rd, but I see 1.01 as worth more.
I guess that is why I still have the pick.

The way I look at it, Bijan's (pick 1.01) value can only go up between now and your rookie draft. The only way I see his value going down even slightly is if he's drafted behind someone like King Henry or Saquon....and that ain't gonna happen without the vet RB being traded. I'd hold until the right offer came along between now and your rookie draft day.

I'm not sure it could go higher. It's already sky high. I think it can only go down. Not saying it will, but it's possible if he goes to NEP, IND, and maybe a couple more spots.

It could absolutely, easily go higher if the Bengals draft him, or if the Chargers deal Eke during the draft then take him. Or if the Falcons make him a top 7 pick (or the Eagles a top 10)

Not saying I believe those last 2 will happen, but the could.

There’s plenty of room for Bijan’s value to appreciate between now and draft day.

There’s going to be 3 athletic QBs drafted in the top 5 of the NFL draft. And Bijan is still the consensus #1 in SF. Not sure you can increase much from there.

My statement above was relative to his trade value against all FF players, not only his draft pick peers. Some 1.01s are worth more than others.

Again: If he is drafted by the Bengals or Chargers (assuming they move Eke in this hypothetical) , he will be worth more than he is today in FF trade.

If he goes to the Patriots, maybe he’s worth a little less.

His value will oscillate until he’s drafted. And it could easily rise based on what team drafts him - landing spot is going to be impactful. Not as much as many offensive players, but it still matters.

 

[Jayded]

Danced around a deal centered on Hall/ETN that just wouldn’t materialize. Went cheaper and centered on opportunity and handcuff:

Team A gets : Samaje Perine (owns Williams), Rashid Shaheed, Kamren Curl
Team B gets : John Metchie, Julian Love

I'm a big Love fan, and believe Metchie can be a solid FF WR2, so I prefer that side.

That said, it's very slight, and Perine should be a very serviceable FF RB, so if I need a RB & I'm good at WR, I'm on that side.

I’m team B. Originally thought I might get away with less with some initial back and forth but he added Shaheed at the end. I like Shaheed to continue to be solid, but my gut says go for Metchie’s upside. It’s also possible the Texans still end up with BY and they can continue the college connection.

 

[ghostguy123]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

 

[titusbramble]

Picks side. One of this year's first for Chubb seems about right. The other and the second for Etienne seems about right. Would rather have Marshall than OBJ. That leaves a future first we're just giving up

 

[barackdhouse]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

I still have concerns about ETN's foot and Chubb isn't getting younger so I probably lean picks but this is also not a horrible price for two stud RBs to put one over the top in 2023. The way I tend to roll in FFPC is to be dominant at WR/TE/QB and do my best at RB. So this is the kind of move that would potentially do it. I just generally don't like paying for RBs though. I tend to end up with surplus studs at other positions and then try to parlay them into stud RBs but this is right on that edge. Good trade.

 

[mcgoots]

hey all, first time poster, semi longtime dynasty player.... big boy trade, curious of the community's thoughts...

12tmSF, .5 PPR, start 9(noK/DST)

I gave kyler, olave, and garret wilson to receive

Josh Allen and Saquon

Surface context: I have chase, tyreek, hollywood. only aaron jones of significance but a lot of high end no 2 rbs. watson as my other qb.

Deeper context: I have always succeeded subscribing to the jordan mcnamara idea of get the elite qbs, walk into the playoffs and let the chips fall as they may. furthermore i typically paint by numbers at RB. i don't typically trade for them unless its late season for a playoff run, but the only piece that made sense on the other squad to even out the deal, considering this deal wasn't happening without both receivers involved, was saquon. My preference was to give kyler and garret straight for allen, but depth was the sticking point for my trade partner.

Even deeper context: I am not as high on garret as it seems the market is. i have more faith in the consistent staying power of olave than wilson, so it was harder to part with olave. With kyler, something just seems awry, if he totally returns to form with the rushing and is a consistent fantasy producer via his legs for years to come than i will get burned right there on this trade. But i have serious doubts about his ability to improve as a nuanced passer, coupled with the coaching/system change, its a business that i want to get out of if that means pivoting to a top 3 qb. wouldnt do this trade if it was full PPR. wouldnt do this trade in different team builds. but here we are

Anyways, just curious of what the community thinks about this one

 

[barackdhouse]

hey all, first time poster, semi longtime dynasty player.... big boy trade, curious of the community's thoughts...

12tmSF, .5 PPR, start 9(noK/DST)

I gave kyler, olave, and garret wilson to receive

Josh Allen and Saquon

Good trade IMO. I like Allen by a mile over Kyler even if he wasn't coming off injury and at least one of those two WRs to balance it out. I think a lot of people would still take Allen if it was Kyler+Wilson or Kyler+Olave so then it's the other WR for Saquon, which I would do in a heartbeat as RBs like him don't just get thrown into deals like this everyday. I think he showed he is back to his preinjury form though of course he is older and a RB so clearly not going the expected longevity of Olave or Wilson. But he is a league winning top tier RB where there are only a few.

 

[Boston]

hey all, first time poster, semi longtime dynasty player.... big boy trade, curious of the community's thoughts...

12tmSF, .5 PPR, start 9(noK/DST)

I gave kyler, olave, and garret wilson to receive

Josh Allen and Saquon

Surface context: I have chase, tyreek, hollywood. only aaron jones of significance but a lot of high end no 2 rbs. watson as my other qb.

Deeper context: I have always succeeded subscribing to the jordan mcnamara idea of get the elite qbs, walk into the playoffs and let the chips fall as they may. furthermore i typically paint by numbers at RB. i don't typically trade for them unless its late season for a playoff run, but the only piece that made sense on the other squad to even out the deal, considering this deal wasn't happening without both receivers involved, was saquon. My preference was to give kyler and garret straight for allen, but depth was the sticking point for my trade partner.

Even deeper context: I am not as high on garret as it seems the market is. i have more faith in the consistent staying power of olave than wilson, so it was harder to part with olave. With kyler, something just seems awry, if he totally returns to form with the rushing and is a consistent fantasy producer via his legs for years to come than i will get burned right there on this trade. But i have serious doubts about his ability to improve as a nuanced passer, coupled with the coaching/system change, its a business that i want to get out of if that means pivoting to a top 3 qb. wouldnt do this trade if it was full PPR. wouldnt do this trade in different team builds. but here we are

Anyways, just curious of what the community thinks about this one

I don't have an issue with either side...if you are going to acquire Allen you are going to have to pay a lot and you certainly did that...if I had to pick a side I would go with Murray-Wilson-Olave because I think those two WRs have a chance to be upper-echelon elite and while Murray has his warts I think he will always be a better fantasy QB than real QB.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

Gimme the picks. ETN is the only piece I like (dynasty-wise) on the players side.

30 y/o OBJ + soon to be 28 y/o Chubb - there are just too many picks on the other side to make up for their age.

It begs the question “fun for who”…or is it whom?

Sure, the picks are late-ish, but 1.07+1.08 could easily be flipped for a higher pick or players, and still leave them with a 2024 1st.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I still have concerns about ETN's foot

But why .gif?

I’ve read that there’s very little chance of re-injury at this point.

I mean, hey, I don’t love heights, so I won’t go telling you not to have a phobia.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

hey all, first time poster, semi longtime dynasty player.... big boy trade, curious of the community's thoughts...

12tmSF, .5 PPR, start 9(noK/DST)

I gave kyler, olave, and garret wilson to receive

Josh Allen and Saquon

Surface context: I have chase, tyreek, hollywood. only aaron jones of significance but a lot of high end no 2 rbs. watson as my other qb.

Top 2 QB in SF, and a true RB1 (though the franchise tag/contract issue suddenly looms large)

I’d say you made a shrewd investment. IMO the package you received is more valuable than the package you gave up.

Tons of uncertainty with Murray. I’d take your side for sure if you can spare the WR.

 

[Buckna]

Picks side. One of this year's first for Chubb seems about right. The other and the second for Etienne seems about right. Would rather have Marshall than OBJ. That leaves a future first we're just giving up

Can’t say I agree in the slightest that the 1.07 plus the 2.09 is going to pull ETN in the vast majority of leagues. I doubt the 1.02 plus the 2.09 would do it unless someone really loves Gibbs or JSN.

I’d call it a pretty even trade:

1.07 + 24 1st ~ ETN
1.08 + 2.09 ~ Chubb
Marshall ~ OBJ but really both these guys are just cheap fliers right now IMO.

 

[titusbramble]

Picks side. One of this year's first for Chubb seems about right. The other and the second for Etienne seems about right. Would rather have Marshall than OBJ. That leaves a future first we're just giving up

Can’t say I agree in the slightest that the 1.07 plus the 2.09 is going to pull ETN in the vast majority of leagues. I doubt the 1.02 plus the 2.09 would do it unless someone really loves Gibbs or JSN.

I’d call it a pretty even trade:

1.07 + 24 1st ~ ETN
1.08 + 2.09 ~ Chubb
Marshall ~ OBJ but really both these guys are just cheap fliers right now IMO.

I'd smash accept a mid first plus another first for Etienne, maybe my valuation of him is not as high as yours

 

[barackdhouse]

Speaking of Kyler, this just went down in an FFPC TriFlex

Team A gave Kyler
Team B gave Lance, 1.09, 2.07

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Can’t say I agree in the slightest that the 1.07 plus the 2.09 is going to pull ETN in the vast majority of leagues

I have ETN on my rebuild (rebuilt?) and that wouldn't come close to what I'd want for him.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Speaking of Kyler, this just went down in an FFPC TriFlex

Team A gave Kyler
Team B gave Lance, 1.09, 2.07

Is it possible to hate both sides of a trade?

No notes - I hope both teams are happy. I'm not. lol

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

I would go with the picks personally. Although if Standard scoring and no PPR at all then that makes RBs more valuable. This does almost feel like that 24 1st should have been kept. That being said, if you are a win now team and this puts you over the top, it isn't the worst trade out there. But definitely paid a premium to do it. Winning makes it all worth while. Ask the Rams right?

 

[barackdhouse]

I still have concerns about ETN's foot

But why .gif?

I’ve read that there’s very little chance of re-injury at this point.

I mean, hey, I don’t love heights, so I won’t go telling you not to have a phobia.

I had a handful of sports mechanics guys convince me that his technique/footwork is so poor that he is a high risk for any number of lower leg related injuries not necessarily having anything to do with the lisfranc previously. But there is also that. But I mean I'd certainly roster him to win and he is not on my avoid list per se. I just would have that asterisk in the back of my mind.

And it might be BS. These guys convinced me with tape that his footwork is horrible (he makes people miss and is elusive but he doesn't use feet in a "safe" way). I really have no freaking idea but it's just a nugget. Not a hill I'd come close to dying on. He's a quality back and producer.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

hey all, first time poster, semi longtime dynasty player.... big boy trade, curious of the community's thoughts...

12tmSF, .5 PPR, start 9(noK/DST)

I gave kyler, olave, and garret wilson to receive

Josh Allen and Saquon

Surface context: I have chase, tyreek, hollywood. only aaron jones of significance but a lot of high end no 2 rbs. watson as my other qb.

Deeper context: I have always succeeded subscribing to the jordan mcnamara idea of get the elite qbs, walk into the playoffs and let the chips fall as they may. furthermore i typically paint by numbers at RB. i don't typically trade for them unless its late season for a playoff run, but the only piece that made sense on the other squad to even out the deal, considering this deal wasn't happening without both receivers involved, was saquon. My preference was to give kyler and garret straight for allen, but depth was the sticking point for my trade partner.

Even deeper context: I am not as high on garret as it seems the market is. i have more faith in the consistent staying power of olave than wilson, so it was harder to part with olave. With kyler, something just seems awry, if he totally returns to form with the rushing and is a consistent fantasy producer via his legs for years to come than i will get burned right there on this trade. But i have serious doubts about his ability to improve as a nuanced passer, coupled with the coaching/system change, its a business that i want to get out of if that means pivoting to a top 3 qb. wouldnt do this trade if it was full PPR. wouldnt do this trade in different team builds. but here we are

Anyways, just curious of what the community thinks about this one

This is a decent price to pay but one I would pay for that return I think with the context thrown in. I would much prefer one of those WRs be Hollywood but I get not being able to get that done. Allen is too good in SF and Kyler may never be right again. This type of trade takes stones but I don't think both Wilson/Olave end up being WR1s for years to come anyways so it should work out fine.

 

[Buckna]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

I would go with the picks personally. Although if Standard scoring and no PPR at all then that makes RBs more valuable. This does almost feel like that 24 1st should have been kept. That being said, if you are a win now team and this puts you over the top, it isn't the worst trade out there. But definitely paid a premium to do it. Winning makes it all worth while. Ask the Rams right?

If it’s non-PPR then the RB’s all the way, I assumed standard meant non-SF since there have been so many SF posts. Wasn’t thinking non-PPR.

 

[joey]

I have ETN on my rebuild (rebuilt?) and that wouldn't come close to what I'd want for him.

Report back when the fantasy playoffs start and we’ll be the judge of that

 

[Buckna]

Picks side. One of this year's first for Chubb seems about right. The other and the second for Etienne seems about right. Would rather have Marshall than OBJ. That leaves a future first we're just giving up

Can’t say I agree in the slightest that the 1.07 plus the 2.09 is going to pull ETN in the vast majority of leagues. I doubt the 1.02 plus the 2.09 would do it unless someone really loves Gibbs or JSN.

I’d call it a pretty even trade:

1.07 + 24 1st ~ ETN
1.08 + 2.09 ~ Chubb
Marshall ~ OBJ but really both these guys are just cheap fliers right now IMO.

I'd smash accept a mid first plus another first for Etienne, maybe my valuation of him is not as high as yours

I sold him for basically that in one league last year just as he blew up mid-season. He had some consistency issues later in the year and cooled off some now so the truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Edit: makes me think I need to throw some offers out for him maybe

 

[phandango]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

I would go with the picks personally. Although if Standard scoring and no PPR at all then that makes RBs more valuable. This does almost feel like that 24 1st should have been kept. That being said, if you are a win now team and this puts you over the top, it isn't the worst trade out there. But definitely paid a premium to do it. Winning makes it all worth while. Ask the Rams right?

If it’s non-PPR then the RB’s all the way, I assumed standard meant non-SF since there have been so many SF posts. Wasn’t thinking non-PPR.

FFPC is PPR (with 1.5PPR for TEs). Ghostguy just says "standard" to mean "1 QB head-to-head," which is the standard format (as opposed to best ball or superflex).

 

[menobrown]

Fun one
FFPC standard

1.07, 1.08, 2.09, 2024 1st (could be anywhere), and Terrace Marshall

For

Travis Etienne, Nick Chubb, and OBJ

Equitable but I'd take the picks. It's very rare for me to give up my future #1 even when it projects late, very down on giving it up when it could be anywhere. And I'm generally not a buyer of older RB's and/or RB's that are not big factors in the passing game. If broken up I would tend to view it as:

1.8 over Chubb
1.7, 2.9, 2024#1 by a little over ETN.

Both of those above are fairly close and can see if other people viewed it differently.

Don't care about the WR's.

 

[Birdie048]

I still have concerns about ETN's foot

But why .gif?

I’ve read that there’s very little chance of re-injury at this point.

I mean, hey, I don’t love heights, so I won’t go telling you not to have a phobia.

I had a handful of sports mechanics guys convince me that his technique/footwork is so poor that he is a high risk for any number of lower leg related injuries not necessarily having anything to do with the lisfranc previously. But there is also that. But I mean I'd certainly roster him to win and he is not on my avoid list per se. I just would have that asterisk in the back of my mind.

And it might be BS. These guys convinced me with tape that his footwork is horrible (he makes people miss and is elusive but he doesn't use feet in a "safe" way). I really have no freaking idea but it's just a nugget. Not a hill I'd come close to dying on. He's a quality back and producer.

Valuable info to share.... I had not heard this and I was targeting him in a deal last week that fell thru.

 

[menobrown]

Can’t say I agree in the slightest that the 1.07 plus the 2.09 is going to pull ETN in the vast majority of leagues. I doubt the 1.02 plus the 2.09 would do it unless someone really loves Gibbs or JSN.

I tried turning ETN into 1.2 in two different leagues. Went 0-2.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I have ETN on my rebuild (rebuilt?) and that wouldn't come close to what I'd want for him.

Report back when the fantasy playoffs start and we’ll be the judge of that

I mean, I don’t have anything left to trade, so it’s rebuilt! Whether or not it was successful remains to be seen (and also depends on the success of my 4x 1sts)

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I still have concerns about ETN's foot

But why .gif?

I’ve read that there’s very little chance of re-injury at this point.

I mean, hey, I don’t love heights, so I won’t go telling you not to have a phobia.

I had a handful of sports mechanics guys convince me that his technique/footwork is so poor that he is a high risk for any number of lower leg related injuries not necessarily having anything to do with the lisfranc previously. But there is also that. But I mean I'd certainly roster him to win and he is not on my avoid list per se. I just would have that asterisk in the back of my mind.

And it might be BS. These guys convinced me with tape that his footwork is horrible (he makes people miss and is elusive but he doesn't use feet in a "safe" way). I really have no freaking idea but it's just a nugget. Not a hill I'd come close to dying on. He's a quality back and producer.

That sounds extremely spurious - all I’ve ever heard about his footwork is that he’s elite when it comes to being evasive.

I’m deeply skeptical about that claim. I’m glad it wasn’t you making it.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Can’t say I agree in the slightest that the 1.07 plus the 2.09 is going to pull ETN in the vast majority of leagues. I doubt the 1.02 plus the 2.09 would do it unless someone really loves Gibbs or JSN.

I tried turning ETN into 1.2 in two different leagues. Went 0-2.

it’s very difficult to get anyone to deal 1.01, 1.02, or 1.03 in any format.

I’d be willing to bet you could get 1.04 for him.