****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (39 Viewers)

[gruecd]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

 

[Mingooch]

Not sure that would get you 1.1

 

[gruecd]

Not sure that would get you 1.1

I'm not, either. Which is crazy.

 

[Big Nate]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

What else could you get for 1.06 and 1.10 and keep your first next year for something mid-season if you need it. And if things go south (injuries etc.) you still have your first.

Do you need an RB or just like the idea of getting Jeanty? 6 and 10 could get you a young stud and the closer to your draft this year the more the value.

Now having said that - if you stand pat you could get Judkins at 6 which I don't mind and then flip 1.10 for a proven player.

How much do you like Hampton? 1.06 and 1.10 for 1.02? Or if that isn't enough then maybe a 2nd added on for 1.02? It really depends on your league.

Or if you are a PPR and like Henderson maybe 1.06 + something to move up a spot or two to get Henderson.

I love Jeanty but the pay to acquire him is a lot.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

I've seen Jeanty goes for three 1's so it's going to probably cost that. How bad is the team with the first pick?

 

[gruecd]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

I've seen Jeanty goes for three 1's so it's going to probably cost that. How bad is the team with the first pick?

3-11 last year. Not much under contract besides Jefferson and Nabers.

 

[TVT 0 N S T A]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

I've seen Jeanty goes for three 1's so it's going to probably cost that. How bad is the team with the first pick?

3-11 last year. Not much under contract besides Jefferson and Nabers.

If it's me... I would strongly consider multiple 1sts over Jeanty given the situation you just presented.

 

[JoeSteeler]

16 team PPR, 1 QB, IDP dynasty. I won the league but not super strong at WR so wanted Lamb. I still have the 1.01.

•Spears, Tyjae TEN RB •Lamb, CeeDee DAL WR •Year 2026 Round 3 Draft Pick

•Shaheed, Rashid NOS WR •Wilson, Michael ARI WR •Year 2025 Draft Pick 1.05 •Year 2025 Draft Pick 1.16

 

[JohnnyU]

16 team PPR, 1 QB, IDP dynasty. I won the league but not super strong at WR so wanted Lamb. I still have the 1.01.

•Spears, Tyjae TEN RB •Lamb, CeeDee DAL WR •Year 2026 Round 3 Draft Pick

•Shaheed, Rashid NOS WR •Wilson, Michael ARI WR •Year 2025 Draft Pick 1.05 •Year 2025 Draft Pick 1.16

Cheap for Lamb. Borderline criminal.

 

[JohnnyU]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

I've seen Jeanty goes for three 1's so it's going to probably cost that. How bad is the team with the first pick?

3-11 last year. Not much under contract besides Jefferson and Nabers.

If it's me... I would strongly consider multiple 1sts over Jeanty given the situation you just presented.

As a general rule end your rebuild with RBs, not start it. However, timing may not be conducive to that strategy any given year based on available talent.

 

[Big Nate]

16 team PPR, 1 QB, IDP dynasty. I won the league but not super strong at WR so wanted Lamb. I still have the 1.01.

•Spears, Tyjae TEN RB •Lamb, CeeDee DAL WR •Year 2026 Round 3 Draft Pick

•Shaheed, Rashid NOS WR •Wilson, Michael ARI WR •Year 2025 Draft Pick 1.05 •Year 2025 Draft Pick 1.16

Cheap for Lamb. Borderline criminal.

I agree, a bunch of roster clogger WRs AND get back Spears. This is a smash.

 

[Hurl Bruce]

12 Team SF, TEP - Contender

Was offered Mahomes, Pickens, and Freiermuth for my Nix, Laporta, and Ray Davis.

It feels tempting and fairly even, but I don't know if I need to do this. I don't know how much of an improvement moving from Nix to Mahomes really is. Other team has Jake Ferguson, but I don't know if exchanging Freiermuth and him makes any difference. I have James Cook, so Ray Davis is nice to have as a handcuff.

 

[JohnnyU]

12 Team SF, TEP - Contender

Was offered Mahomes, Pickens, and Freiermuth for my Nix, Laporta, and Ray Davis.

It feels tempting and fairly even, but I don't know if I need to do this. I don't know how much of an improvement moving from Nix to Mahomes really is. Other team has Jake Ferguson, but I don't know if exchanging Freiermuth and him makes any difference. I have James Cook, so Ray Davis is nice to have as a handcuff.

I’d rather have the Nix, LaPorta side.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

12 Team SF, TEP - Contender

Was offered Mahomes, Pickens, and Freiermuth for my Nix, Laporta, and Ray Davis.

It feels tempting and fairly even, but I don't know if I need to do this. I don't know how much of an improvement moving from Nix to Mahomes really is. Other team has Jake Ferguson, but I don't know if exchanging Freiermuth and him makes any difference. I have James Cook, so Ray Davis is nice to have as a handcuff.

Nix LaPorta for me

 

[menobrown]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

I've seen Jeanty goes for three 1's so it's going to probably cost that. How bad is the team with the first pick?

3-11 last year. Not much under contract besides Jefferson and Nabers.

I probably don't grasp the league layout but I feel like if you gave me Jeanty and these two WR's, which is to say 3 of the top 10 players right now, I'd think I could build a team around them that could compete. But again that's probably just poor understanding of the league.

 

[FreeBaGeL]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

I think two late 1sts and (likely) Judkins is a price I'd be pretty happy to pay for Jeanty.

 

[mjb03003]

12 team PPR, 1QB

Team is a legit championship contender, so definitely in "win-now" mode. Am I crazy to offer 1.06, 1.10, AND next year's 1st in order to move up to 1.01 to get Jeanty? Seems like it would be a huge overpay based on all the "dynasty value charts" out there, but it also feels like what it's going to take...

What else could you get for 1.06 and 1.10 and keep your first next year for something mid-season if you need it. And if things go south (injuries etc.) you still have your first.

Do you need an RB or just like the idea of getting Jeanty? 6 and 10 could get you a young stud and the closer to your draft this year the more the value.

Now having said that - if you stand pat you could get Judkins at 6 which I don't mind and then flip 1.10 for a proven player.

How much do you like Hampton? 1.06 and 1.10 for 1.02? Or if that isn't enough then maybe a 2nd added on for 1.02? It really depends on your league.

Or if you are a PPR and like Henderson maybe 1.06 + something to move up a spot or two to get Henderson.

I love Jeanty but the pay to acquire him is a lot.

This is really good advice.

 

[kutta]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not invovled)

2026 1st
Amari Cooper
Adam Thielen
5.07
for
1.09

Was it on the clock?

 

[Birdie048]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not invovled)

2026 1st
Amari Cooper
Adam Thielen
5.07
for
1.09

So 1.09 for a gamble on 2026 1st. The rest is fodder / roster clogging

 

[Riddick02]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

 

[Dez]

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.09
2.03
for
2026 1st (Finished as 1.04 pick last year)

 

[Blick]

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.09
2.03
for
2026 1st (Finished as 1.04 pick last year)

Why would you pay extra for a pick swap?

 

[Boston]

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.09
2.03
for
2026 1st (Finished as 1.04 pick last year)

In a 16-team league where it is difficult to build depth I would go with the 1.9 and 2.3...especially since the other pick is a 2026.

 

[Dez]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.13
for
2.01
4.01

 

[mjb03003]

10 team Superflex and 1.75 TE Prem:
Not involved

Side A: Brock Bowers, De’Von Achane, Dak Prescott

Side B: Cam Ward, Kaleb Johnson, Emeka Egbuka, 2x 2026 1st (mid), 2026 2nd (mid)

 

[Boston]

10 team Superflex and 1.75 TE Prem:
Not involved

Side A: Brock Bowers, De’Von Achane, Dak Prescott

Side B: Cam Ward, Kaleb Johnson, Emeka Egbuka, 2x 2026 1st (mid), 2026 2nd (mid)

Give me Bowers-Achane-Prescott...there is no downside with that as you know what you are getting...getting Bowers in this format is beyond gold and both he and Achane are still very young...Prescott is also relatively young as far as QBs go as well...outside of unforeseen injuries all three players are safe with one being elite, another being high-end and the third being very valuable in the SF format...on the other side there is a lot of quality pieces coming back but I don't like that the whole haul is still an unknown...Ward, Johnson and Egbuka are all excellent Dynasty pieces but I think it is easy to see a scenario where none of them is nothing more than solid/good...the picks are a great addition but the fact that Bowers, Achane and Prescott all should have a lot more good seasons takes some of the shine off of them...I can definitely see a scenario/scenarios where this trade pays off or even pays off in a big way and I can see why it is was made but I think too much certainty was given up for uncertainty.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.13
for
2.01
4.01

Depends who is available at 1.13 but if you have one guy you love, giving up 4.01 is nothing and if you have a tier with 3 guys, add the extra bullet later on.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

10 team Superflex and 1.75 TE Prem:
Not involved

Side A: Brock Bowers, De’Von Achane, Dak Prescott

Side B: Cam Ward, Kaleb Johnson, Emeka Egbuka, 2x 2026 1st (mid), 2026 2nd (mid)

Bowers side for me but I'm not a big Cam Ward guy either. I think Bowers and Achane are the two most valuable assets in the deal by a lot.

 

[Mistakes Were Made]

10 team Superflex and 1.75 TE Prem:
Not involved

Side A: Brock Bowers, De’Von Achane, Dak Prescott

Side B: Cam Ward, Kaleb Johnson, Emeka Egbuka, 2x 2026 1st (mid), 2026 2nd (mid)

Bowers side for me but I'm not a big Cam Ward guy either. I think Bowers and Achane are the two most valuable assets in the deal by a lot.

I think I'd put Dak in there as the 2nd or 3rd most valuable asset in superflex. I can sort of see this through a rebuilding lense. I'd have wanted more for Brock in a 1.75 premium though. I think I'd grade BB out as worth like 3 1sts in a 10-teamer with premium.

TE is boosted and studs are boosted because of the shallow league. So egbuka and the 26 1sts. That makes the rest of the deal look not so good if you see it like I do.

 

[Dez]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

2.01
for
2.10
3.10

 

[mjb03003]

10 team Superflex and 1.75 TE Prem:
Not involved

Side A: Brock Bowers, De’Von Achane, Dak Prescott

Side B: Cam Ward, Kaleb Johnson, Emeka Egbuka, 2x 2026 1st (mid), 2026 2nd (mid)

Bowers side for me but I'm not a big Cam Ward guy either. I think Bowers and Achane are the two most valuable assets in the deal by a lot.

I think I'd put Dak in there as the 2nd or 3rd most valuable asset in superflex. I can sort of see this through a rebuilding lense. I'd have wanted more for Brock in a 1.75 premium though. I think I'd grade BB out as worth like 3 1sts in a 10-teamer with premium.

TE is boosted and studs are boosted because of the shallow league. So egbuka and the 26 1sts. That makes the rest of the deal look not so good if you see it like I do.

I agree either way these takes that the Bowers side is superior. Interestingly this deal was between two sharp owners who have both very obviously punted a year and intentionally loaded up on future year rookie picks to become immediate contenders the following year.

The guy giving up Bowers may be too obsessed with having the youngest team and the most future draft capital, in my opinion. I wonder at what point he ever goes all in on trying to win because he already traded out of a bunch of startup (2023) picks for 2024 rookie picks, many of which hit (I.e. Bowers) only to then kinda re-roll it with this deal.

 

[Buckna]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

 

[Dez]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

 

[Buckna]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

 

[Dez]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

The guy at 1.09 is still on the board who I took at 1.06 in the other the tier is same from 1.06 to 1.10 so the 1.06 vs 1.09 is basically same pick.

While the 2.03 and 3.02 is a huge difference. Hardly any guys taken in the 3rd round of these leagues ever pan out and that is with a taxi squad.

Also you want to talk about protest worthy Tua and a 2026 2nd from one of the best teams for a 2026 1st from one of the worst teams that proclaimed he was rebuilding.

Now that is veto worthy if there is ever a trade to veto.

What if you veto a trade that invovles a future 1st and that guy ends up with 1.01 pick next year ? You would have to quit as a commish because you can't do that to someone.

 

[JohnnyU]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone trading the 1.06 and 3.02 for a 2026 1st if the person getting the 2026 1st thinks it could be 1.01. I don’t see the fuss, but I didn’t read all of these posts. Too much clutter.

 

[Dez]

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.12
5.16
for
2.03
2.04

 

[Dez]

This has to be painful for

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.09
2.03
for
2026 1st (Finished as 1.04 pick last year)

This has to be ultimate pain for this guy who traded away that 1.09.

In my other league he took Hunter at the 1.04 he must have assumed there was no chance Hunter makes it to the 1.09 but he just paid the price of not waiting to find out.
The guy who got this trade just took Hunter 1.09

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (not involved)

1.12
5.16
for
2.03
2.04

Expensive move up but need to know rosters and situation to accurately judge

 

[Rockchild]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

The guy at 1.09 is still on the board who I took at 1.06 in the other the tier is same from 1.06 to 1.10 so the 1.06 vs 1.09 is basically same pick.

While the 2.03 and 3.02 is a huge difference. Hardly any guys taken in the 3rd round of these leagues ever pan out and that is with a taxi squad.

Also you want to talk about protest worthy Tua and a 2026 2nd from one of the best teams for a 2026 1st from one of the worst teams that proclaimed he was rebuilding.

Now that is veto worthy if there is ever a trade to veto.

What if you veto a trade that invovles a future 1st and that guy ends up with 1.01 pick next year ? You would have to quit as a commish because you can't do that to someone.

I think the only time a trade should be vetoed is if collusion is proven. We all value picks and players differently.

 

[Buckna]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone trading the 1.06 and 3.02 for a 2026 1st if the person getting the 2026 1st thinks it could be 1.01. I don’t see the fuss, but I didn’t read all of these posts. Too much clutter.

Might be understandable if that was the case but I believe he bought the 1st for DK from a playoff/contender team and flipped it. He mentioned he planned to try to retrade the pick targeting for a pick this year to get a RB in the draft but he deleted the previous post with the rest of the details... Maybe @Riddick02 remembers better and can set me straight though....

 

[Dez]

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone trading the 1.06 and 3.02 for a 2026 1st if the person getting the 2026 1st thinks it could be 1.01. I don’t see the fuss, but I didn’t read all of these posts. Too much clutter.

Might be understandable if that was the case but I believe he bought the 1st for DK from a playoff/contender team and flipped it. He mentioned he planned to try to retrade the pick targeting for a pick this year to get a RB in the draft but he deleted the previous post with the rest of the details... Maybe @Riddick02 remembers better and can set me straight though....

Yes I traded DK for the guy who was the 1.01 pick but he made some good trades so looks like he will be a solid team but no one knows where anyone will finish.
I had a team last year finish as last place after being the #2 seed the year before.
Anyway while 95% of people would want more for the trade this guy didn't he just wanted a future 1st he didn't like anyone left at 1.06 (he already took players at 2,4,5)
The 3.02 is a shot in the dark 90% of 3rd round picks do not pan out.

 

[Dez]

Ah the art of the double trade

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (the results of the same owners double trade)

Guy who traded his 1.09 and 2.03 to get a future 1st just traded his 1.13, 2.14, 4.03, 5.03 to get back the 1.11

End result

He moves down from the 1.09 to the 1.11
and gets a 2026 1st for the 1.13, 2.03, 2.14, 4.03, 5.03

 

[Blick]

Ah the art of the double trade

16 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE (the results of the same owners double trade)

Guy who traded his 1.09 and 2.03 to get a future 1st just traded his 1.13, 2.14, 4.03, 5.03 to get back the 1.11

End result

He moves down from the 1.09 to the 1.11
and gets a 2026 1st for the 1.13, 2.03, 2.14, 4.03, 5.03

Still eh.

 

[Riddick02]

You don't pay for weaker future firsts.

14 team 1 QB PPR 1.5 TE

I gave up

2026 1st round pick of the one I just got from DK trade
for
1.06
3.02

Now I need to take the right RB (Took Henderson)

Why would someone pay for a future pick?

Original post got deleted? Either way, made zero sense for the team giving up this years picks, protest worthy IMO.

Not protest worthy not even close

Another team traded 1.09 and 2.03 for a future 1st you would have to protest all trades at this point

That one is bad too but at least it could be slightly defended since you said that owner had the 1.04 this year that gave up the future 1st.

Edit: actually apples and oranges, paying 1.09 and the 17th overall for a shot at an early pick next year is one thing (still probably a bad move for the team giving up their future 1st), but paying the 6 plus a pick on top for a teams 1st next year in a substantially weaker class? c'mon man, you know that was robbery on your part...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone trading the 1.06 and 3.02 for a 2026 1st if the person getting the 2026 1st thinks it could be 1.01. I don’t see the fuss, but I didn’t read all of these posts. Too much clutter.

Might be understandable if that was the case but I believe he bought the 1st for DK from a playoff/contender team and flipped it. He mentioned he planned to try to retrade the pick targeting for a pick this year to get a RB in the draft but he deleted the previous post with the rest of the details... Maybe @Riddick02 remembers better and can set me straight though....

Yes I traded DK for the guy who was the 1.01 pick but he made some good trades so looks like he will be a solid team but no one knows where anyone will finish.
I had a team last year finish as last place after being the #2 seed the year before.
Anyway while 95% of people would want more for the trade this guy didn't he just wanted a future 1st he didn't like anyone left at 1.06 (he already took players at 2,4,5)
The 3.02 is a shot in the dark 90% of 3rd round picks do not pan out. He paid extra for a pick that has a good probability of being later than 1.06 in a weaker draft class (if not SF).

 

[osiriskid]

12 team SF, TEP
Team A gets: Lamar and breece.
Team B: Brock purdy, CMC, 2026 first, 2027 first.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

12 team SF, TEP
Team A gets: Lamar and breece.
Team B: Brock purdy, CMC, 2026 first, 2027 first.

Lamar side if I can win now and Purdy side if I'm not a top 3-4 team in the league.

 

[Raging weasel]

My craptastic FFPC orphan was offered this-
My Shakir for J Jennings and J McMillan - so I took it. Doesn't really improve me much on paper but gives me an extra option. Have Keon Coleman in this league so hopefully he gets a bigger share this season so I'll still have a piece of the Bills offense.

 

[mzkp54]

12 team SF PPR. Reigning champ.

Gave: BTJ/ late 26 1st
Got: Justin Jefferson

 

[joey]

12 team SF PPR. Reigning champ.

Gave: BTJ/ late 26 1st
Got: Justin Jefferson

I think I’d need another 1st to consider it.