Going to need to score 50 points a game. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...-star-pass-rusher-trey-hendrickson-seek-trade
That's rough. Next man up.Going to need to score 50 points a game. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...-star-pass-rusher-trey-hendrickson-seek-trade
Makes some sense. He's 30 and probably wants 30+ a year. He's very good, but he's more of a top 10 EDGE than top 5, and the defense wasn't great even with him. If trading him makes it easier to keep BOTH Chase and Higgins long term, I can see the appeal. Especially if they can pull a late 1st.Going to need to score 50 points a game. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...-star-pass-rusher-trey-hendrickson-seek-trade
Problem is they don't have a next man.That's rough. Next man up.Going to need to score 50 points a game. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...-star-pass-rusher-trey-hendrickson-seek-trade
I know what you mean, last year was awful, but there's always a next man, and a lot of times they surprise.Problem is they don't have a next man.That's rough. Next man up.Going to need to score 50 points a game. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...-star-pass-rusher-trey-hendrickson-seek-trade
Who would be a few guys we would love to get with the #17 pick? Like guys not expected to be there, but with an outside shot.
I would expect at least one of the top OL's Campbell, Membou, Banks to be there.
EDGE's Mike Green, Shemar Stewart, or Mykel Williams would have a shot to be there.
CB's Barron or Johnson, decent chance one of them is left.
I like the idea of trading back. We need every dart throw we can get to see if any cheap rookies can pan out on defense.There will be a good player at 17 for sure, but I wonder if moving back and gaining future picks might not be the right path to take, especially if we are signing Trey.
We will need to rely on good drafts in the future, and acquiring multiple players might be a good idea, especially to replace those we will not be able to afford later.
This all feels very un-Bengali, if that makes sense.
Speaking from a fantasy owner bias, I was shocked how little time Burrow seems to have on a lot of passing plays. I know you guys need defense, but this guy is your franchise and needs to be protected. Maybe a first round OL and the rest of the draft on defense?Who would be a few guys we would love to get with the #17 pick? Like guys not expected to be there, but with an outside shot.
I would expect at least one of the top OL's Campbell, Membou, Banks to be there.
EDGE's Mike Green, Shemar Stewart, or Mykel Williams would have a shot to be there.
CB's Barron or Johnson, decent chance one of them is left.
That is exactly what I hope happens. And it's not like we haven't made efforts to improve the o-line since the atrocity we had in the Super Bowl season. We've signed several free agents who were supposed to be pretty decent. It's better, but it still seems like we're just treading water on that front. At least one OL in the first three rounds I certainly expect, and I hope it's the first round.Speaking from a fantasy owner bias, I was shocked how little time Burrow seems to have on a lot of passing plays. I know you guys need defense, but this guy is your franchise and needs to be protected. Maybe a first round OL and the rest of the draft on defense?Who would be a few guys we would love to get with the #17 pick? Like guys not expected to be there, but with an outside shot.
I would expect at least one of the top OL's Campbell, Membou, Banks to be there.
EDGE's Mike Green, Shemar Stewart, or Mykel Williams would have a shot to be there.
CB's Barron or Johnson, decent chance one of them is left.
This is what I was talking about - being very un-Bengal-like. However, we are in a different situation than usual for our Bengals. We could be in a perfect spot for a team to move back up to get a quarterback. Maybe Sanders or Dart falls. A QB-needy team wants to trade back in and get in front of the Steelers to get Sanders or Dart. We could get a decent haul for a situation like that. I think there is a good chance that Quarterbacks go earlier than expected this year, even with a Quarterback class that is not highly thought of. People are going to remember the Falcons taking Penix earlier than expected. It should be a fun first round, the later it gets in the first round.Mykel Williams no longer on the list of in-person attendees. Not sure if that means he is sliding but found that interesting.
Feels like the first and second round would be some combo of D-line and O-line. Unless an inexplicable talent fell that makes them go best on board.
Moving around the board is very unlike us for sure. Not sure how much they would like to move behind a division rival like Pittsburgh but if the value lines up I don't think I would mind and long at it isn't a Steven Jackson/Chris Perry redux
Would like to see them sign Risner to open up the possibilities in the draft a little more
-QG
Shemar Stewart already disputing contract details
In other shocking news, the sun rose again today ...
ETA I shouldn't judge him without knowing what it's about exactly, but I thought rookie contracts were usually pretty cut-and-dry.![]()
Now, however, the dispute has shifted toward contract language that appears to be materially different from deals given to Cincinnati's previous first-round picks. According to a source, the conflict stems from wording that could potentially affect the guaranteed money on the rookie deals, which would set a precedent for future Bengals contracts.
Last year, Bengals offensive tackle Amarius Mims participated in workouts without a signed contract. A source familiar with that negotiation indicated that Mims took on zero contractual risk before he signed with the team.
since the Bengals would be his employer and not the government, 1st amendment has nothing to do with anything. not sure who this Smathers person is, but now I know to not pay attention to them.Re-entering the draft isn’t a viable option for Shemar Stewart
...Whether that means Stewart eventually will blink and agree to the team’s new default language remains to be seen. If he’s going to do it, he needs to get any and all gripes about the team out of his system before he puts pen to paper.
After he signs, he’ll risk his future guarantees if he dares to “make any public comment . . . that breaches Player’s obligation of loyalty to Club and/or undermines the public’s respect for the Club, Club coaches, or Club management.”
So air your grievances now, Shemar. Once you’re under contract, the Bengals will be squatting on your First Amendment rights.
NFL Rookie Report: TreVeyon Henderson set to shine in Patriots' backfield
Not a good sign for Shemar Stewart
Bengals rookie Shemar Stewart might already have the team questioning whether they made a mistake taking him 17th overall in the 2025 NFL Draft. He’s one of the rare rookies refusing to sign an injury waiver while his contract gets finalized. That decision is reigniting the biggest red flag from his draft profile: how badly does he want to be great? Despite being one of the most gifted athletes in college football, Stewart never recorded more than 1.5 sacks in a season.
since the Bengals would be his employer and not the government, 1st amendment has nothing to do with anything. not sure who this Smathers person is, but now I know to not pay attention to them.Re-entering the draft isn’t a viable option for Shemar Stewart
...Whether that means Stewart eventually will blink and agree to the team’s new default language remains to be seen. If he’s going to do it, he needs to get any and all gripes about the team out of his system before he puts pen to paper.
After he signs, he’ll risk his future guarantees if he dares to “make any public comment . . . that breaches Player’s obligation of loyalty to Club and/or undermines the public’s respect for the Club, Club coaches, or Club management.”
So air your grievances now, Shemar. Once you’re under contract, the Bengals will be squatting on your First Amendment rights.
NFL Rookie Report: TreVeyon Henderson set to shine in Patriots' backfield
Not a good sign for Shemar Stewart
Bengals rookie Shemar Stewart might already have the team questioning whether they made a mistake taking him 17th overall in the 2025 NFL Draft. He’s one of the rare rookies refusing to sign an injury waiver while his contract gets finalized. That decision is reigniting the biggest red flag from his draft profile: how badly does he want to be great? Despite being one of the most gifted athletes in college football, Stewart never recorded more than 1.5 sacks in a season.
What an amazing week for the Bengals, even by their standards you have to stand back in awe of what is unfolding at the moment in Cincinnati
-First, let's start with the team cutting their Captain on Defense, and they could have released him much earlier in the off season and chose not to.
Regardless of your personal opinion and I'm sure Bengals' fans dismiss this move and don't think about it all that much but it sure sends a clear message to other players or anyone thinking of signing with this team...not that the NFLPA hasn't alerted everyone already
-Next! I could have saved Trey Hendrickson a lot of time and energy by simply pointing out how the Bengals made Burrow go thru August camps and injure his calf before they finally get his extension done, Hurts and Herbert were extended months prior to Burrow. Then you have Chase and Higgins, BOTH of them should have been extended at the 36 month timeline, 3 years after they signed their rookie deals, Higgins had to play on a franchise tag, Chase had to play on Year 4, as an example the Miami Dolphins extended Waddle in the same Draft class well before Chase, almost an entire year+
-Finally, and this one takes the cake. They put wording into rookie Shemar Stewart's deal that no other rookie had in their contract and now they have angered him to the point where he decides to RIP the front office a new one and says the leaders on that team support him...Burrow-Chase-Higgins-Hendrickson, they all must have told him you better get it up front or you won't get it.
The wording involves $$$ and Stewart not getting all his guaranteed money if the Bengals were to release him in Year 2-3-4 whenever...no other rookie was asked to do this
![]()
Shemar Stewart Calls Out Bengals Front Office As Contract Clash Continues
Cincinnati and its first-round pick are in a standoff.www.si.com
SMH
-Traveling thru the Smokies, saw this unfold while I'm on the road and had to chime in
Good job Cincinnati!
"I understand the two sides of the situation in theory"It has been such a strange offseason. The Shemar Stuart contract, which I understand the two sides of the situation in theory, but I have no idea why the Bengals chose this player and this year to start wanting this language in the rookie contracts. Is there that much at risk in terms of guarantees in rookie contracts? Trey's situation is different for sure, but understandable. I also get both sides on this situation, but make a decision already. The Bengals could have traded Trey, but did not, which shows they want to keep him. I understand he signed his contract, but the market went crazy, and he has outplayed his contract, in my opinion. A player who is that unhappy most likely will be a problem either on the field or off if you keep him on his current deal. Trade him or give him a future for which to play. Trey worries he won't make it to free agency with the Bengals. I can see the fear of a tag down the line. Each year he gets older, the more he stands to lose. The Bengals feel he signed his deal, and that is the contract. What happened behind closed doors in negotiations will never be known.
As a fan, I do not like all the distractions, and I do not think this helps the Bengals with future free agents or even rookies. Just wait for a rookie to tell the Bengals. Do not draft me. I do not want to play for your team or your ownership.
Just put the best team on the field, as a Bengal fan, that is what I want.![]()
Explain because I don't understand and the Bengals tried to word something that 31 other 1st round picks did not have to endure or read thru on their contracts
I've said this before and I will post it again, the Bengals should not be given the benefit of the doubt any more, this is Joe Burrow entering Year 6?
You put Burrow on a lot of other teams that are run well and are good organizations and he might already have a ring or at least have a strong OL in front of him
The Bengals are just wasting time and years with Hall of Fame players
HoF track for Chase and Burrow , the QB and WR1 on an offense are both likely to make it when they are done in the NFL, maybe its too early but the Bengals are not taking advantage of it
They are squandering and watching that window close a little more with each and every season that passes.
And while I am making list of grievances, what is up with Zac Taylor, B2B 9-8 seasons, how long does he get to keep his job?
They let Marvin Lewis stay way too long and got very little in the way of results, Taylor did appear in a Super Bowl that likely makes him all but a lifer following Lewis and his run of mediocrity
First two quotes are from MoP's thread about the Bengals.The NFL needs to step in and create uniform contract language. The Bengals are a bush league organization trying to pull this crap on this kid.
Can someone verify what the truth is? Some people have some crow to eat if this article is correct.Stewart spoke candidly about his concerns with the contract during the final week of the team’s offseason workout program, when he said he just wants the language in his contract to mirror that of Cincinnati’s previous two first-round picks, Myles Murphy and Amarius Mims, who both went later than him in their respective draft years.
The language has to do with future guarantees that could be voided if he is suspended for on- or off-field issues. Cincinnati has not added such language in the past, but it has become standard with other teams around the league.
Or perhaps the other 50 writers that were publishing all this stuff earlier in the off season, it wasn't made up dungeons and dragonsWhat an amazing week for the Bengals, even by their standards you have to stand back in awe of what is unfolding at the moment in Cincinnati
-First, let's start with the team cutting their Captain on Defense, and they could have released him much earlier in the off season and chose not to.
Regardless of your personal opinion and I'm sure Bengals' fans dismiss this move and don't think about it all that much but it sure sends a clear message to other players or anyone thinking of signing with this team...not that the NFLPA hasn't alerted everyone already
-Next! I could have saved Trey Hendrickson a lot of time and energy by simply pointing out how the Bengals made Burrow go thru August camps and injure his calf before they finally get his extension done, Hurts and Herbert were extended months prior to Burrow. Then you have Chase and Higgins, BOTH of them should have been extended at the 36 month timeline, 3 years after they signed their rookie deals, Higgins had to play on a franchise tag, Chase had to play on Year 4, as an example the Miami Dolphins extended Waddle in the same Draft class well before Chase, almost an entire year+
-Finally, and this one takes the cake. They put wording into rookie Shemar Stewart's deal that no other rookie had in their contract and now they have angered him to the point where he decides to RIP the front office a new one and says the leaders on that team support him...Burrow-Chase-Higgins-Hendrickson, they all must have told him you better get it up front or you won't get it.
The wording involves $$$ and Stewart not getting all his guaranteed money if the Bengals were to release him in Year 2-3-4 whenever...no other rookie was asked to do this
![]()
Shemar Stewart Calls Out Bengals Front Office As Contract Clash Continues
Cincinnati and its first-round pick are in a standoff.www.si.com
SMH
-Traveling thru the Smokies, saw this unfold while I'm on the road and had to chime in
Good job Cincinnati!
"I understand the two sides of the situation in theory"It has been such a strange offseason. The Shemar Stuart contract, which I understand the two sides of the situation in theory, but I have no idea why the Bengals chose this player and this year to start wanting this language in the rookie contracts. Is there that much at risk in terms of guarantees in rookie contracts? Trey's situation is different for sure, but understandable. I also get both sides on this situation, but make a decision already. The Bengals could have traded Trey, but did not, which shows they want to keep him. I understand he signed his contract, but the market went crazy, and he has outplayed his contract, in my opinion. A player who is that unhappy most likely will be a problem either on the field or off if you keep him on his current deal. Trade him or give him a future for which to play. Trey worries he won't make it to free agency with the Bengals. I can see the fear of a tag down the line. Each year he gets older, the more he stands to lose. The Bengals feel he signed his deal, and that is the contract. What happened behind closed doors in negotiations will never be known.
As a fan, I do not like all the distractions, and I do not think this helps the Bengals with future free agents or even rookies. Just wait for a rookie to tell the Bengals. Do not draft me. I do not want to play for your team or your ownership.
Just put the best team on the field, as a Bengal fan, that is what I want.![]()
Explain because I don't understand and the Bengals tried to word something that 31 other 1st round picks did not have to endure or read thru on their contracts
I've said this before and I will post it again, the Bengals should not be given the benefit of the doubt any more, this is Joe Burrow entering Year 6?
You put Burrow on a lot of other teams that are run well and are good organizations and he might already have a ring or at least have a strong OL in front of him
The Bengals are just wasting time and years with Hall of Fame players
HoF track for Chase and Burrow , the QB and WR1 on an offense are both likely to make it when they are done in the NFL, maybe its too early but the Bengals are not taking advantage of it
They are squandering and watching that window close a little more with each and every season that passes.
And while I am making list of grievances, what is up with Zac Taylor, B2B 9-8 seasons, how long does he get to keep his job?
They let Marvin Lewis stay way too long and got very little in the way of results, Taylor did appear in a Super Bowl that likely makes him all but a lifer following Lewis and his run of mediocrity
First two quotes are from MoP's thread about the Bengals.The NFL needs to step in and create uniform contract language. The Bengals are a bush league organization trying to pull this crap on this kid.
Third quote from this thread.
This quote from a news article:
https://www.daytondailynews.com/spo...ds-to-be-in-camp/X42RPF4LERGLVGWFXNVEQ5LBTY/#
Can someone verify what the truth is? Some people have some crow to eat if this article is correct.Stewart spoke candidly about his concerns with the contract during the final week of the team’s offseason workout program, when he said he just wants the language in his contract to mirror that of Cincinnati’s previous two first-round picks, Myles Murphy and Amarius Mims, who both went later than him in their respective draft years.
The language has to do with future guarantees that could be voided if he is suspended for on- or off-field issues. Cincinnati has not added such language in the past, but it has become standard with other teams around the league.
Sounds like the Bengals are not doing anything other teams have not done. https://www.cincyjungle.com/2025/7/...cutive-sides-with-bengals-amid-rookie-holdoutOr perhaps the other 50 writers that were publishing all this stuff earlier in the off season, it wasn't made up dungeons and dragonsWhat an amazing week for the Bengals, even by their standards you have to stand back in awe of what is unfolding at the moment in Cincinnati
-First, let's start with the team cutting their Captain on Defense, and they could have released him much earlier in the off season and chose not to.
Regardless of your personal opinion and I'm sure Bengals' fans dismiss this move and don't think about it all that much but it sure sends a clear message to other players or anyone thinking of signing with this team...not that the NFLPA hasn't alerted everyone already
-Next! I could have saved Trey Hendrickson a lot of time and energy by simply pointing out how the Bengals made Burrow go thru August camps and injure his calf before they finally get his extension done, Hurts and Herbert were extended months prior to Burrow. Then you have Chase and Higgins, BOTH of them should have been extended at the 36 month timeline, 3 years after they signed their rookie deals, Higgins had to play on a franchise tag, Chase had to play on Year 4, as an example the Miami Dolphins extended Waddle in the same Draft class well before Chase, almost an entire year+
-Finally, and this one takes the cake. They put wording into rookie Shemar Stewart's deal that no other rookie had in their contract and now they have angered him to the point where he decides to RIP the front office a new one and says the leaders on that team support him...Burrow-Chase-Higgins-Hendrickson, they all must have told him you better get it up front or you won't get it.
The wording involves $$$ and Stewart not getting all his guaranteed money if the Bengals were to release him in Year 2-3-4 whenever...no other rookie was asked to do this
![]()
Shemar Stewart Calls Out Bengals Front Office As Contract Clash Continues
Cincinnati and its first-round pick are in a standoff.www.si.com
SMH
-Traveling thru the Smokies, saw this unfold while I'm on the road and had to chime in
Good job Cincinnati!
"I understand the two sides of the situation in theory"It has been such a strange offseason. The Shemar Stuart contract, which I understand the two sides of the situation in theory, but I have no idea why the Bengals chose this player and this year to start wanting this language in the rookie contracts. Is there that much at risk in terms of guarantees in rookie contracts? Trey's situation is different for sure, but understandable. I also get both sides on this situation, but make a decision already. The Bengals could have traded Trey, but did not, which shows they want to keep him. I understand he signed his contract, but the market went crazy, and he has outplayed his contract, in my opinion. A player who is that unhappy most likely will be a problem either on the field or off if you keep him on his current deal. Trade him or give him a future for which to play. Trey worries he won't make it to free agency with the Bengals. I can see the fear of a tag down the line. Each year he gets older, the more he stands to lose. The Bengals feel he signed his deal, and that is the contract. What happened behind closed doors in negotiations will never be known.
As a fan, I do not like all the distractions, and I do not think this helps the Bengals with future free agents or even rookies. Just wait for a rookie to tell the Bengals. Do not draft me. I do not want to play for your team or your ownership.
Just put the best team on the field, as a Bengal fan, that is what I want.![]()
Explain because I don't understand and the Bengals tried to word something that 31 other 1st round picks did not have to endure or read thru on their contracts
I've said this before and I will post it again, the Bengals should not be given the benefit of the doubt any more, this is Joe Burrow entering Year 6?
You put Burrow on a lot of other teams that are run well and are good organizations and he might already have a ring or at least have a strong OL in front of him
The Bengals are just wasting time and years with Hall of Fame players
HoF track for Chase and Burrow , the QB and WR1 on an offense are both likely to make it when they are done in the NFL, maybe its too early but the Bengals are not taking advantage of it
They are squandering and watching that window close a little more with each and every season that passes.
And while I am making list of grievances, what is up with Zac Taylor, B2B 9-8 seasons, how long does he get to keep his job?
They let Marvin Lewis stay way too long and got very little in the way of results, Taylor did appear in a Super Bowl that likely makes him all but a lifer following Lewis and his run of mediocrity
First two quotes are from MoP's thread about the Bengals.The NFL needs to step in and create uniform contract language. The Bengals are a bush league organization trying to pull this crap on this kid.
Third quote from this thread.
This quote from a news article:
https://www.daytondailynews.com/spo...ds-to-be-in-camp/X42RPF4LERGLVGWFXNVEQ5LBTY/#
Can someone verify what the truth is? Some people have some crow to eat if this article is correct.Stewart spoke candidly about his concerns with the contract during the final week of the team’s offseason workout program, when he said he just wants the language in his contract to mirror that of Cincinnati’s previous two first-round picks, Myles Murphy and Amarius Mims, who both went later than him in their respective draft years.
The language has to do with future guarantees that could be voided if he is suspended for on- or off-field issues. Cincinnati has not added such language in the past, but it has become standard with other teams around the league.
Stewart is the one if I recall who had the ress conference and said it himself...now if he lied then that's on himSounds like the Bengals are not doing anything other teams have not done. https://www.cincyjungle.com/2025/7/...cutive-sides-with-bengals-amid-rookie-holdoutOr perhaps the other 50 writers that were publishing all this stuff earlier in the off season, it wasn't made up dungeons and dragonsWhat an amazing week for the Bengals, even by their standards you have to stand back in awe of what is unfolding at the moment in Cincinnati
-First, let's start with the team cutting their Captain on Defense, and they could have released him much earlier in the off season and chose not to.
Regardless of your personal opinion and I'm sure Bengals' fans dismiss this move and don't think about it all that much but it sure sends a clear message to other players or anyone thinking of signing with this team...not that the NFLPA hasn't alerted everyone already
-Next! I could have saved Trey Hendrickson a lot of time and energy by simply pointing out how the Bengals made Burrow go thru August camps and injure his calf before they finally get his extension done, Hurts and Herbert were extended months prior to Burrow. Then you have Chase and Higgins, BOTH of them should have been extended at the 36 month timeline, 3 years after they signed their rookie deals, Higgins had to play on a franchise tag, Chase had to play on Year 4, as an example the Miami Dolphins extended Waddle in the same Draft class well before Chase, almost an entire year+
-Finally, and this one takes the cake. They put wording into rookie Shemar Stewart's deal that no other rookie had in their contract and now they have angered him to the point where he decides to RIP the front office a new one and says the leaders on that team support him...Burrow-Chase-Higgins-Hendrickson, they all must have told him you better get it up front or you won't get it.
The wording involves $$$ and Stewart not getting all his guaranteed money if the Bengals were to release him in Year 2-3-4 whenever...no other rookie was asked to do this
![]()
Shemar Stewart Calls Out Bengals Front Office As Contract Clash Continues
Cincinnati and its first-round pick are in a standoff.www.si.com
SMH
-Traveling thru the Smokies, saw this unfold while I'm on the road and had to chime in
Good job Cincinnati!
"I understand the two sides of the situation in theory"It has been such a strange offseason. The Shemar Stuart contract, which I understand the two sides of the situation in theory, but I have no idea why the Bengals chose this player and this year to start wanting this language in the rookie contracts. Is there that much at risk in terms of guarantees in rookie contracts? Trey's situation is different for sure, but understandable. I also get both sides on this situation, but make a decision already. The Bengals could have traded Trey, but did not, which shows they want to keep him. I understand he signed his contract, but the market went crazy, and he has outplayed his contract, in my opinion. A player who is that unhappy most likely will be a problem either on the field or off if you keep him on his current deal. Trade him or give him a future for which to play. Trey worries he won't make it to free agency with the Bengals. I can see the fear of a tag down the line. Each year he gets older, the more he stands to lose. The Bengals feel he signed his deal, and that is the contract. What happened behind closed doors in negotiations will never be known.
As a fan, I do not like all the distractions, and I do not think this helps the Bengals with future free agents or even rookies. Just wait for a rookie to tell the Bengals. Do not draft me. I do not want to play for your team or your ownership.
Just put the best team on the field, as a Bengal fan, that is what I want.![]()
Explain because I don't understand and the Bengals tried to word something that 31 other 1st round picks did not have to endure or read thru on their contracts
I've said this before and I will post it again, the Bengals should not be given the benefit of the doubt any more, this is Joe Burrow entering Year 6?
You put Burrow on a lot of other teams that are run well and are good organizations and he might already have a ring or at least have a strong OL in front of him
The Bengals are just wasting time and years with Hall of Fame players
HoF track for Chase and Burrow , the QB and WR1 on an offense are both likely to make it when they are done in the NFL, maybe its too early but the Bengals are not taking advantage of it
They are squandering and watching that window close a little more with each and every season that passes.
And while I am making list of grievances, what is up with Zac Taylor, B2B 9-8 seasons, how long does he get to keep his job?
They let Marvin Lewis stay way too long and got very little in the way of results, Taylor did appear in a Super Bowl that likely makes him all but a lifer following Lewis and his run of mediocrity
First two quotes are from MoP's thread about the Bengals.The NFL needs to step in and create uniform contract language. The Bengals are a bush league organization trying to pull this crap on this kid.
Third quote from this thread.
This quote from a news article:
https://www.daytondailynews.com/spo...ds-to-be-in-camp/X42RPF4LERGLVGWFXNVEQ5LBTY/#
Can someone verify what the truth is? Some people have some crow to eat if this article is correct.Stewart spoke candidly about his concerns with the contract during the final week of the team’s offseason workout program, when he said he just wants the language in his contract to mirror that of Cincinnati’s previous two first-round picks, Myles Murphy and Amarius Mims, who both went later than him in their respective draft years.
The language has to do with future guarantees that could be voided if he is suspended for on- or off-field issues. Cincinnati has not added such language in the past, but it has become standard with other teams around the league.
Excellent news!
Fantastic! Cooler heads prevailing suddenly. Hopefully that means he is actually fully on board.Hendrickson is reporting tomorrow.
Probably just going to show up to avoid the $50K/day fine. We will see if he actually practices.Fantastic! Cooler heads prevailing suddenly. Hopefully that means he is actually fully on board.Hendrickson is reporting tomorrow.
Depends how much he's asking. If it's just unreasonable: next man up!This is such ham-fisted team management.
Where is John Malkovich when they need him most? (Bad Russian accent) “Pay that man his money”
Bengals need all the defensive help they can get. Pay your best defensive player. This ain’t rocket science.
That said, as a Ja’Marr Chase shareholder in one league and a Joe Burrow shareholder in another, by all means get into as many shootouts as humanly possible.
![]()
Depends how much he's asking. If it's just unreasonable: next man up!This is such ham-fisted team management.
Where is John Malkovich when they need him most? (Bad Russian accent) “Pay that man his money”
Bengals need all the defensive help they can get. Pay your best defensive player. This ain’t rocket science.
That said, as a Ja’Marr Chase shareholder in one league and a Joe Burrow shareholder in another, by all means get into as many shootouts as humanly possible.
![]()
No idea, I don't pay a lot of attention to contract amounts, other than star offensive players for fantasy implications. I also don't know what he's asking or if that's even public.Depends how much he's asking. If it's just unreasonable: next man up!This is such ham-fisted team management.
Where is John Malkovich when they need him most? (Bad Russian accent) “Pay that man his money”
Bengals need all the defensive help they can get. Pay your best defensive player. This ain’t rocket science.
That said, as a Ja’Marr Chase shareholder in one league and a Joe Burrow shareholder in another, by all means get into as many shootouts as humanly possible.
![]()
What's reasonable for a guy who led the league in sacks and was ranked 8th according to PFF grades for DEs?
Maxx got 3/106 with 62M guaranteedWhat's reasonable for a guy who led the league in sacks and was ranked 8th according to PFF grades for DEs?
Maxx got 3/106 with 62M guaranteedWhat's reasonable for a guy who led the league in sacks and was ranked 8th according to PFF grades for DEs?
At 30 maybe 80% of that on a 2-year? Like 2/60 with 28 guaranteed?
![]()