mr. furley
Footballguy
what in the holy #### goes on here?



Onslaughts. Please try to pay attention.what in the holy #### goes on here?![]()
![]()
![]()
Meresau has always been a personal fav of mine. Hes definitely off his rocker from time to time, but if you don't mind wading through some of the BS, you'll find a lot of brilliant thoughts.Corbin Meresau wrote about this maneuver in a gaming mag I saw in the bookstore a few weeks ago:
8
33
I've yet to try it in real-time play, but based on the way he described it's advantages, it seems like pure genius.
this was before your time. don't worry about it.huh?
Jwvdcw, I must say that while overall this looks solid, you have ignored Maloney's corrolary regarding the employment of the 23 array. I find this surprising, especially since you attempted the employment in your 42 man onslaught, when we all know this type of array is practically useless in onslaughts in the range of 10-60.
I gave tanner some slack for omitting the 23 array in his 84 man onslaught. But for you to blatantly ignore it here tells me you're fairly new to this, or just fishing us here.Shuke knows his onslaught
I hear he's back from retirement, playing under the name Jean Belivieu and bringing his bag of goodies to every tournament he enters.Meresau has always been a personal fav of mine. Hes definitely off his rocker from time to time, but if you don't mind wading through some of the BS, you'll find a lot of brilliant thoughts.Corbin Meresau wrote about this maneuver in a gaming mag I saw in the bookstore a few weeks ago:
8
33
I've yet to try it in real-time play, but based on the way he described it's advantages, it seems like pure genius.
See, I used to have a life. Then about a year and a half ago, I stumbled across this thread. Now I'm in at least three tourneys a month, and catch myself uttering phrases like, "You keep concentrating on non-primes in that array, and I will OWN your sorry ###." Thanks a lot for this. It's not quite as bad as when I discovered Werewolf, but it's close.I hear he's back from retirement, playing under the name Jean Belivieu and bringing his bag of goodies to every tournament he enters.Meresau has always been a personal fav of mine. Hes definitely off his rocker from time to time, but if you don't mind wading through some of the BS, you'll find a lot of brilliant thoughts.Corbin Meresau wrote about this maneuver in a gaming mag I saw in the bookstore a few weeks ago:
8
33
I've yet to try it in real-time play, but based on the way he described it's advantages, it seems like pure genius.
Week's up, GB.TannerBoyle said:I've got a couple of ideas brewing and I hope to have something posted this week.
Subscription to Onslaught Quarterly down?Week's up, GB.TannerBoyle said:I've got a couple of ideas brewing and I hope to have something posted this week.
Of course not, guy. Tanner's private onslaughts don't appear in the magazine.Subscription to Onslaught Quarterly down?Week's up, GB.TannerBoyle said:I've got a couple of ideas brewing and I hope to have something posted this week.
JUNE 06 DOWN????Of course not, guy. Tanner's private onslaughts don't appear in the magazine.Subscription to Onslaught Quarterly down?Week's up, GB.TannerBoyle said:I've got a couple of ideas brewing and I hope to have something posted this week.![]()
At first, I thought, "Well, the exclamation point screams 'newbie.' But then I saw the 279 variation following it and thought, "Maybe its a trap?" Not sure if you meant to do that or not, but pretty strong effort.Peyton Marino said:hi guys. first time onslaughter here. i've been working on this one for a little while, but not too long so it's not the best i have to offer. just wondering what you all think. so without further ado, here222792222 22 79 22 2 8,051!222279797922222 0444 5 5 222
I can't keep this charade going any longer-- the 279 was in there simply by incident. You can attribute the exclamation point to merely being too enamored in Rietche's third defense mechanism. Since this effort my onslaughts have greatly improved if i do say so myself.At first, I thought, "Well, the exclamation point screams 'newbie.' But then I saw the 279 variation following it and thought, "Maybe its a trap?" Not sure if you meant to do that or not, but pretty strong effort.hi guys. first time onslaughter here. i've been working on this one for a little while, but not too long so it's not the best i have to offer. just wondering what you all think. so without further ado, here222792222 22 79 22 2 8,051!222279797922222 0444 5 5 222![]()
Now we'll never see this Onslaught Tanner was working on.Week's up, GB.TannerBoyle said:I've got a couple of ideas brewing and I hope to have something posted this week.
Now we'll never see this Onslaught Tanner was working on.Week's up, GB.TannerBoyle said:I've got a couple of ideas brewing and I hope to have something posted this week.![]()
I had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
OK now I'm completely confused. Are you just making things up?I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
OK now I'm completely confused. Are you just making things up?I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
he might as well be.OK now I'm completely confused. Are you just making things up?I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
Not ringing any bells. Are you maybe thinking about werewolf?OK now I'm completely confused. Are you just making things up?I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
FTF aka Frank the frowner mods the frankus group
FIXEDI had a
1
227
15
8989![]()
51
going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!
93
000 010
21
![]()
FIXEDI had a
1
227
15
8989![]()
51
going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!
93
000 010
21
![]()
JimmyFromYellostone or East Side Dave ring any bells?Not ringing any bells. Are you maybe thinking about werewolf?OK now I'm completely confused. Are you just making things up?I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
FTF aka Frank the frowner mods the frankus group
I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
after taking a lengthy hiatus from the game I find it quite invigorating to jump back in.I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
People still play that?
I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
People still play that?
OK now I'm completely confused. Are you just making things up?I was playing Frankus rules versionI had a 122715898951 going for me until some straphanger #### in my hat & left me for chum wit this!93 00021
![]()
Are we talking about the same game? That didn't even make sense.
I actually got a request for a 19 man onslaught today. 19? I'm not even wasting my time.I got some requests for various onslaughts but had to decline.This onslaught was actually by request. I am not making this up.Glad to see all 100 fax requests that I put through today made it safely
Oh brother.Is this right?
2 5 8 19 27
1 7
33334
56
7
8
18
LMAOOh brother.Is this right?
2 5 8 19 27
1 7
33334
56
7
8
18![]()
I mean really...this makes no sense. Did you purposefully mix Zafarov's Construct with your basic outlay? I don't think that's legal is it?LMAOOh brother.Is this right?
2 5 8 19 27
1 7
33334
56
7
8
18![]()
oofI mean really...this makes no sense. Did you purposefully mix Zafarov's Construct with your basic outlay? I don't think that's legal is it?LMAOOh brother.Is this right?
2 5 8 19 27
1 7
33334
56
7
8
18![]()
I've been out of Onslaught for about a year so the rules may have changed....anybody have the rulebook?
Of course it's legal, noob. Just outright dumb.If you're going to do anything with a basic outlay, you need to incorporate at least 2 Zamonski sequences in the middle third and at least loosely follow the Wolfe outline.I mean really...this makes no sense. Did you purposefully mix Zafarov's Construct with your basic outlay? I don't think that's legal is it?LMAOOh brother.Is this right?
2 5 8 19 27
1 7
33334
56
7
8
18![]()