goldenchild
Footballguy
Get your popcorn ready!
Last edited by a moderator:
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
***Official Pack @ SF*** (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter goldenchild
- Start date
The Westin
Footballguy
Smith will be back as well for SF, which will make things more difficult for GB. It certainly didn't go well for GB's offense last time these two played. It's a long season though, and both of these teams are different than they were during week 1.Biggest differences from last time they played:Obviously Kaepernick. It's his first playoff game. How will he respond? Also, Green Bay's run game is much improved. Will be interesting to see if their offense can get something going, which they couldn't in their first matchup.
Last edited by a moderator:
Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
No chatter? Banter is for cocktail parties.
goldenchild
Footballguy
Fixed
strykerpks
Footballguy
Chatter? Banter? It doesn't matter, if sho nuff shows up it will just degenerate into poop.
Eviloutsider
Footballguy
I would be ok with a 90/10 pass to run split for the Packers. Look at the NE comeback as a plan. Short throws and a lot of them.
goldenchild
Footballguy
Riversco
Footballguy
Don't let the Raider Fan push you around. If you want to have some cocktails, I say go for it.Fixed
sho nuff
Footballguy
Just like I talked about the actual game...as I did in the vikings thread... y ou are the one slinging poo...as you did in the vikings thread after the game.Grow up.
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
Not quite as porous as it once was...Rodgers still takes some sacks...but few er due to bad oline play and more due to him holding the balltrying to make plays downfield.
Ghost Rider
Footballguy
In all fairness, the Packer were gifted a TD on that punt return where they picked up the flag on what should have been a penalty nullifying the runback.
Chicago Hooligan
Footballguy
In Week 1, GB was obviously confounded by not being able to just score 80-yard TDs at will like in 2011. Now they've played through a bunch of games that they had to win with guts (or gootz, as Morrissey would say) and defense and making plays in the middle of the field in the passing game.
SF is a tough draw and Harbaugh will have some more inventive looks on offense. Packers' defense needs to show up this time.
GB - 23
SF - 19
SF is a tough draw and Harbaugh will have some more inventive looks on offense. Packers' defense needs to show up this time.
GB - 23
SF - 19
packseasontix
Footballguy
49er fans can't even make a topic correct...'goldenchild said:Fixed'Raider Nation said:
packseasontix
Footballguy
Personally week 1 has nothing to do with this game. That was basically last season. The play calling, personnel on both sides, and current thought process by both teams is very different, I know on the Packers side it is.'Ghost Rider said:
Eviloutsider
Footballguy
I wish Alex Smith was still starting from a Packer fan's perspective.
packseasontix
Footballguy
Nah, I think the Packers are much more likely to get into Kaep's head to get a turnover than if Smith was out there. Can he also make possibly bigger plays with his feet? Yes, but I think with the limited experience of Kaep is the biggest benefit for the Packers.Also a little stat for you on first time starting QBs
ost Merger 1970 (all stats are from pro-football-reference)Quarterbacks (first 3 years of career) entering first playoff game starting:Record: 36-66Home Record: 24-22 (52%)All Teams since 1970Home Record: 252-132 (66%)
goldenchild
Footballguy
SF is missing Manningham, William, Hunter, and will be fielding a one-armed Justin Smith. Saying SF is very different this time around is an understatement.
Last edited by a moderator:
Stinger Ray
Footballguy
'strykerpks said:
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
I like the part where GB's defense holds SF to 17 at home.
mad sweeney
Footballguy
What about Davis? Is he still having head issues?
packseasontix
Footballguy
St. Louis - 24 (17 in 4th)Bears - 32 (5 in 4th)Dolphins - 27 (14 in 4th)Cardinals - 27 (10 in 4th)Since Kaep took over your looking at a team who entered the 4th under 17 points in 3 out of the 4 home games. If the Packers were up 33-17 at that point you could see possibly a scoreless 4th quarter as the 49ers pressed and the Packers ran down the clock.I like the part where GB's defense holds SF to 17 at home.
Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
Okay.St. Louis - 24 (17 in 4th)Bears - 32 (5 in 4th)Dolphins - 27 (14 in 4th)Cardinals - 27 (10 in 4th)Since Kaep took over your looking at a team who entered the 4th under 17 points in 3 out of the 4 home games. If the Packers were up 33-17 at that point you could see possibly a scoreless 4th quarter as the 49ers pressed and the Packers ran down the clock.I like the part where GB's defense holds SF to 17 at home.
packseasontix
Footballguy
He played in week 17 but only caught 1 pass for 5 yards. Packers are no strangers to the injury list but at least its not as bad in past years. Lost a couple defensive playmakers in Perry, Worthy, and Bishop but we just got Woodson, Matthews, Nelson, and Jennings so its a huge help now going into the SF game.
packseasontix
Footballguy
He was wondering how the Packers could hold the 49ers to 17 points at home. I explained how it could potentially happen. I never stated the game was over after 3 quarters so quite trying to be to snarky. If the packers were up by 2 or 3 scores after 3 quarters I could potentially see the 49ers being out of their comfort zone being pass happy and being shut out in the final frame of the game.
Since the Packers haven't scored 33 points in the first 3 quarters of any road game this season, why are we thinking they will all of a sudden do it in SF?St. Louis - 24 (17 in 4th)Bears - 32 (5 in 4th)I like the part where GB's defense holds SF to 17 at home.
Dolphins - 27 (14 in 4th)
Cardinals - 27 (10 in 4th)
Since Kaep took over your looking at a team who entered the 4th under 17 points in 3 out of the 4 home games. If the Packers were up 33-17 at that point you could see possibly a scoreless 4th quarter as the 49ers pressed and the Packers ran down the clock.
Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
I was?
packseasontix
Footballguy
Never said they would, that was Icon's prediction.As for 30+ points it could be 33-17 before the 49ers get the ball in the 4th with a 26-17 lead and Packers drive to start off the 4thSince the Packers haven't scored 33 points in the first 3 quarters of any road game this season, why are we thinking they will all of a sudden do it in SF?St. Louis - 24 (17 in 4th)Bears - 32 (5 in 4th)I like the part where GB's defense holds SF to 17 at home.
Dolphins - 27 (14 in 4th)
Cardinals - 27 (10 in 4th)
Since Kaep took over your looking at a team who entered the 4th under 17 points in 3 out of the 4 home games. If the Packers were up 33-17 at that point you could see possibly a scoreless 4th quarter as the 49ers pressed and the Packers ran down the clock.
Packers 35-17 14:48 4th (@Houston) - when Houston was rolling along earlier in the year when they didnt give up over 30 points except to the packers in the first 9 games
Again I am only explaining why I would think the Packers could hold the 49ers to 17 or less points in the game. If they are up by 2 or 3 scores.
mad sweeney
Footballguy
Not only was it his prediciton, but it was for the whole game, not 3 quarters.Even in RN's post, the use of the word "if" is pretty key to understanding what was being said.Never said they would, that was Icon's prediction.As for 30+ points it could be 33-17 before the 49ers get the ball in the 4th with a 26-17 lead and Packers drive to start off the 4thSince the Packers haven't scored 33 points in the first 3 quarters of any road game this season, why are we thinking they will all of a sudden do it in SF?St. Louis - 24 (17 in 4th)Bears - 32 (5 in 4th)I like the part where GB's defense holds SF to 17 at home.
Dolphins - 27 (14 in 4th)
Cardinals - 27 (10 in 4th)
Since Kaep took over your looking at a team who entered the 4th under 17 points in 3 out of the 4 home games. If the Packers were up 33-17 at that point you could see possibly a scoreless 4th quarter as the 49ers pressed and the Packers ran down the clock.
Packers 35-17 14:48 4th (@Houston) - when Houston was rolling along earlier in the year when they didnt give up over 30 points except to the packers in the first 9 games
Again I am only explaining why I would think the Packers could hold the 49ers to 17 or less points in the game. If they are up by 2 or 3 scores.
benson_will_lead_the_way
Footballguy
When do you guys think that Sho Nuff admits his alias is packseasontix?
smackdaddies
Footballguy
packseasontix
Footballguy
http://www.whatifsports.com/x.asp?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whatifsports.com%2FNFL%2Fboxscore.asp%3FGameID%3D8409750%26teamfee%3D-1%26theme%3D-1%23.UOnXsuwbit4.custom.ptitle=WhatIfSports.com%3A+Fantasy+Sports+Simulation+--+Football+BoxscoreThought you would enjoy this as I simulated the Packers vs 49ers game.
sho nuff
Footballguy
About when you ever admit to how much of a homer you are.BTW...I thought you left this place because people did not want to have actual discussions...then you come in this thread with this?Its funny the three people coming in here to criticize me (well, 2 and one just posting a smilie) have offered actually nothing when it comes to the topic at hand.Perhaps you need to quit blaming me for how things go to crap on this board and look in the mirror.
sho nuff
Footballguy
LOL @ Crosby making 4 FGs
benson_will_lead_the_way
Footballguy
Packseasontix can't let things go just like you.Packseasontix posts a nasty response to me in this thread, then deletes it.Then you show up and criticize.Finally, you laugh at something he posts.
sho nuff
Footballguy
So basically again just admitting that your claim of why you did not post on here for a few months is a bunch of crap since that is all you are doing here is bashing and not even trying to discuss the topic? Thanks...thought so.Now go post about how looking forward to 2013 you are for the Bears...some teams still have some games to play.Packseasontix can't let things go just like you.Packseasontix posts a nasty response to me in this thread, then deletes it.Then you show up and criticize.Finally, you laugh at something he posts.
packseasontix
Footballguy
Fine I deleted it because I didn't want to be nasty. But since you asked for it, your a moron. Also not let things go? I was called out on what I said so I responded TO IT. I didn't randomly bring it up in another thread or days later.Also unlike you I was on topic to the forum, I know the only place you can be a bully is the internet without getting beat up but please take it elsewhere.Packseasontix can't let things go just like you.Packseasontix posts a nasty response to me in this thread, then deletes it.Then you show up and criticize.Finally, you laugh at something he posts.
benson_will_lead_the_way
Footballguy
Within a minute of each other.
Have I insulted? Called names? Look up bullying, i'll be here waiting
If you don't like someone being honest and calling you out, then go hide in a hole.
Have I insulted? Called names? Look up bullying, i'll be here waiting
If you don't like someone being honest and calling you out, then go hide in a hole.
packseasontix
Footballguy
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ycn-7249058
Packers vs 49ers history in the playoffs; hopefully we can add another Packers win onto the list
Packers vs 49ers history in the playoffs; hopefully we can add another Packers win onto the list
sho nuff
Footballguy
Cough...BS...CoughYou mean like you went to hide in a hole when you got mad that people called you out and strayed from the actual discussion?Within a minute of each other.
Have I insulted? Called names? Look up bullying, i'll be here waiting
If you don't like someone being honest and calling you out, then go hide in a hole.
Wow...hypocrisy...thy name is benson_will_lead_the_way...now back to worrying about the 2013 season for you.
benson_will_lead_the_way
Footballguy
Feel better continually insulting yet?I mention that I think you have an alias and now i'm a: moron, bully, homer, and cut down for discussing the Bears.Cough...BS...CoughYou mean like you went to hide in a hole when you got mad that people called you out and strayed from the actual discussion?Within a minute of each other.
Have I insulted? Called names? Look up bullying, i'll be here waiting
If you don't like someone being honest and calling you out, then go hide in a hole.
Wow...hypocrisy...thy name is benson_will_lead_the_way...now back to worrying about the 2013 season for you.
Yes I left the Shark Pool for months, it's been a waste of time. I had serious personal things come up that were more important than reading you're white noise. Also, surprised to see that I started an actual real discussion with the GB offseason and yet you still insult me. :Glass house:
Shawnky
Footballguy
Oh my god! Just what we need. A pissing contest between two of the gayest homers on these boards. Get a ####### room!
The Kerminator
Footballguy
Can we keep this thread on topic? Sho Nuff and Benson, GROW THE #### up!!! Take your schoolgirl fight elsewhere.
packseasontix
Footballguy
Amen and keep me out of it.
Mr.Pack
Footballguy
You too.This thread is going to end up a POS as usual.
Can't claim Jacobs off waivers for the playoffs.But smart money says the Seacheats are lining Jacobs' pockets with heavy bribes to get a hold of his playbook.
