I have free beer and nachos.
Blame Janet's boob.What's really annoying is that NFL.com is two plays ahead of my "live" broadcast on NBC.
Fatties..
The "splitting time" Starks was in for the sack...Grant getting a bunch of reps. He can really pick up a blitz, which is good to see.
Starks is in there now, I do think they will split a bunch.The "splitting time" Starks was in for the sack...Grant getting a bunch of reps. He can really pick up a blitz, which is good to see.
I would quit worrying about benching him in week 1 and be happy you have him on your team likely as a RB4Ooof. I benched Grant because of rumors he would split time with James Starks. But it's all Grant so far. And he looks good, catching, running, and picking up the blitz. I highly doubt Starks will eat into his time this season. Grant looks back.
RB3, but it's a dynasty league. I took him in the fourth round last year.I would quit worrying about benching him in week 1 and be happy you have him on your team likely as a RB4Ooof. I benched Grant because of rumors he would split time with James Starks. But it's all Grant so far. And he looks good, catching, running, and picking up the blitz. I highly doubt Starks will eat into his time this season. Grant looks back.
It may have been the gameplan, but as most of the hawks knew already, Grant is a much better back than a guy who ran under 4 yards a carry with the best passing game keeping defenses honest. Starks is overrated. Grant is the real deal. He'll be getting 80% of the carries by week 2 or 3.Grant not out there after the time out. PRetty telling that these guys will split, no?
Lots of week 1 left to playPackers are unstopable