If this law stays in effect, I will either quit drinking milk or look for an illegal milk dealer (which would be nearly impossible down here in Southern California since all the good milk comes from NoCal).
Raw milk is already banned in a lot of states, but California had been one of the four states in the U.S. where you could walk into a grocery store and buy it legally.
The ban is purely for political reasons, not for health reasons. Raw milk from grass-fed cows is much healthier than any pasteurized milk. When people get sick from milk, it is always from pasteurized milk. (Raw milk has its own antibodies and beneficial bacteria that prevent harmful bacteria from ever getting a foothold. But if, say, some harmful e. coli gets into pasteurized milk, it will colonize there.)
The major dairies don't want competition since raw milk tastes way better and has been gaining market share here (despite the fact that it costs $18/gallon). So they pay politicians to get it banned.
It's gone down that way before in other states, but until now California had been able to resist any such attempts. (See The Untold Story of Milk by Ron Schmid.)
Raw milk is already banned in a lot of states, but California had been one of the four states in the U.S. where you could walk into a grocery store and buy it legally.
The ban is purely for political reasons, not for health reasons. Raw milk from grass-fed cows is much healthier than any pasteurized milk. When people get sick from milk, it is always from pasteurized milk. (Raw milk has its own antibodies and beneficial bacteria that prevent harmful bacteria from ever getting a foothold. But if, say, some harmful e. coli gets into pasteurized milk, it will colonize there.)
The major dairies don't want competition since raw milk tastes way better and has been gaining market share here (despite the fact that it costs $18/gallon). So they pay politicians to get it banned.
It's gone down that way before in other states, but until now California had been able to resist any such attempts. (See The Untold Story of Milk by Ron Schmid.)
Dear Friends of Real Food,
I believe in capitalism.
I believe that traditional foods are good for you, that farmers ought to have the right to sell them conveniently and hygienically, and that you ought have the right to buy and eat them.
I believe in regulation. I believe that a competent and decent government regulates all industry - including farming and food production - to protect the public from reasonable and avoidable risks.
I believe that traditional food should be regulated by objective criteria, which reflect nature (such as the nature of a cow gut on an industrial diet or a diet of grass, or the odds that a pathogen will survive human digestion and make you sick), methods of production specific to the food in question, and an accurate assessment of risks to farmers and to eaters.
For example, I believe that chickens should be tested for objective levels of dangerous E. coli. Grass-farmer Joel Salatin will tell you that his chickens, raised on pasture, have been tested and shown ZERO levels of dangerous E coli. It would be highly unlikely - probably impossible - for any industrial poultry farm or slaughter line to say the same. Industrial poultry are so ridden with dangerous E. coli, chicken is treated with chlorine to make it safe for you. (We got rid of the chlorine in our house long ago, and we certainly don't want to put it on our food.) Yet the state of Virginia wants to regulate the size and shape of his spanking-clean chicken processing unit, which I have seen with my own eyes and happens to be in the open air, rather than test for objective outcomes such as pathogen levels.
I believe that if regulators wished to be fair to traditional foods, they would regulate them fairly. That is not the case with a new California law, signed in early October, which purports to make raw milk safer.
The law requires that raw milk contain no more than 10 coliforms per milliliter. It is not a relevant standard because scarcely any milk can meet it. Some 80% of milk contains more than 10 coliforms per milliliter.
It will not make raw milk safer because it does not distinguish between benign, benefical, and pathogenic coliforms. The beneficial ones help your body make essential vitamins and aid digestion. The pathogenic ones can make you sick. Certain strains of coliform will crowd out, or kill, pathogenic strains.
A standard that limits levels of dangerous coliforms would be sensible.
This law does not protect you. It protects industrial milk.
I read about this sorry piece of legislation on Friday. We drank grass-fed, raw milk all weekend and will continue to drink it - and eat raw milk cheese - when ever we can get it from farmers and cheese-makers we trust. Happily, tomorrow we can collect a gallon of fresh raw milk from a trusted dairy, but in a pinch, we keep some raw milk in the freezer.
If you trust the farmer, you can trust the milk. But don't trust this law.
It's time to stand up for your right to buy real food.
I know this isn't going to be something that many people here care about, but I'm making a thread about it anyway because it's a big deal to me.New Law Will End Raw Milk Sales in California
On January 1, 2008, California raw milk producers will face new requirements for bacteria counts in the milk they sell to consumers. All raw milk must have 10 coliform bacteria or fewer per milliliter under the new law signed October 8th by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
“This new law limits the sale of perfectly healthy, pathogen-free milk,” says Mark McAfee, owner of Organic Pastures Dairy, the largest raw milk dairy in the United States. “Most batches of our milk will not comply with the new legislation. By about January 20th under the new law, our milk will be available to consumers intermittently at best. Thousands of our customers who visit 300 stores in California each week will be without a source of raw milk.”
Coliform bacteria are a diverse family of bacteria, the vast majority of which are non-pathogenic and do not cause illness. They are killed by pasteurization.
The pathogenic forms of coliform bacteria can be tested for independently. The new law requires no tests for pathogens.
“My customers’ choices are now being limited by a law that makes no sense. Why test for coliform bacteria when you can test for pathogenic bacteria directly?” McAfee asks. McAfee’s dairy already tests for E. coli 0157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes, the primary human pathogens in the food supply.
According to raw milk activist Sally Fallon, “Officials cite health risks to raw milk but once milk has been pasteurized, all the anti-microbial and immune-supporting components are reduced or destroyed.” Fallon is the founder of A Campaign for Real Milk, which promotes raw milk on its website http://www.realmilk.com .
Fallon adds that until the recent legislation, California has been a leader in providing consumers with choice at the supermarket. “The legislation is obviously aimed at getting rid of raw milk in California using standards that are unnecessary and impossible to meet.”
AB 1735, introduced to the State Assembly on March 15, 2007 and passed nearly seven months later, targets the raw milk industry specifically. During deliberations over AB 1735, legislative records show that legislators discussed raw milk dairies. However, raw milk producers were not consulted on the new legislation.
“Had they asked, I would have cited a 2004 study in the Journal of Dairy Science that shows 80% of raw milk would not meet this new law,” added McAfee. “That is a whole lot of perfectly good milk wasted that my consumers would want to buy. No one asked them about this legislation either.”
Section 35928f of the California Food and Agriculture Code protects raw milk with the statement “the state does not intend to limit or restrict the availability of certified raw milk.” AB 1735 appears to redefine the standards of milk sanitation so that most raw milk will not be considered “certified raw milk.” It will be illegal to sell healthful milk to consumers on January 1, 2008.
McAfee has begun a voice mail, email, and letter-writing campaign to state officials and has called for raw milk consumers and supporters to attend a press conference at the Fresno Farmer’s Market on Saturday October 27 at 11:00 a.m. (on the corner of Shaw and Blackstone).
Last edited by a moderator: