***Official Super Bowl Game Thread*** (1 Viewer)

[greenroom]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

A muffed snap

 

[17seconds]

DOES SIMMS EVER SHUT THE EF UP

no

 

[bostonfred]

I bet Clark wishes he could have that one back.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

muff

 

[shakeybarn]

Staying out there for posturizing with the red flag out...

 

[On The Rocks]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

Muffed,.... the rain was coming down by then.

so..that isn't considered a missed Extra Point?

 

[Doctor Detroit]

 

[bostonfred]

I bet Clark wishes he could have that one back.

Apparently Dungy does, too.

 

[RoarinSonoran]

Retroactive penalties? WTF??

 

[j3r3m3y]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

Muffed,.... the rain was coming down by then.

so..that isn't considered a missed Extra Point?

No, the ball was never kicked.

 

[bostonfred]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

Muffed,.... the rain was coming down by then.

so..that isn't considered a missed Extra Point?

Hunter Smith bobbled the hold, so it was a botched two point conversion. But realistically, the Colts are 1-2 on extra point attempts and 1-2 on FGA.

 

[Serenity Now]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

Muffed,.... the rain was coming down by then.

so..that isn't considered a missed Extra Point?

Vinatieri never got a foot on it, so they said it was recorded as a muffed 2 point conversion rather than a missed kick.

 

[bostonfred]

Retroactive penalties? WTF??

12 men on the field is not a judgement call, so it's reviewable.

 

[shakeybarn]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

What the hell was that challenge? That was terrible.

 

[flapgreen]

Whew

 

[shakeybarn]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

It's the Superbowl... obviously he had NOTHING to do with the play.

 

[17seconds]

Is he going to challenge whether the ball has laces now?

 

[On The Rocks]

so i don't have to search the thread...can someone tell me what happened with the Colts not getting an PAT after thier first TD? Did they try for two? Or a muffed snap on an extra point?

Muffed,.... the rain was coming down by then.

so..that isn't considered a missed Extra Point?

Hunter Smith bobbled the hold, so it was a botched two point conversion. But realistically, the Colts are 1-2 on extra point attempts and 1-2 on FGA.

the reason i ask is that i have Vinetiari in a Playoff FF league. And it is -5 for missed PAT's. Thanks for the clarificaton.

 

[flapgreen]

What the hell was that challenge? That was terrible.

I've never heard of that in my life.

 

[bostonfred]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

If there weren't a penalty, then defenses could substitute at virtually any time. This puts the control back in the hands of the offense.

 

[flapgreen]

Is he going to challenge whether the ball has laces now?

 

[flapgreen]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

If there weren't a penalty, then defenses could substitute at virtually any time. This puts the control back in the hands of the offense.

BF=anti bears fan

 

[Doctor Detroit]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

It's the Superbowl... obviously he had NOTHING to do with the play.

Only Norwood can consistently do this and it be funny. Just letting you know.

 

[shakeybarn]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

If there weren't a penalty, then defenses could substitute at virtually any time. This puts the control back in the hands of the offense.

Nah... he's running off... and 20 yards away from the ball... I get your point.... but likewise, the "spirit of the rule" isn't for offenses to take advantage of it.

 

[bostonfred]

That commercial did not make it even .0001% more or less likely that I'd buy a Coke.

 

[RoarinSonoran]

Coke's commercials and the pregame show have a lot in common.

 

[j3r3m3y]

That commercial did not make it even .0001% more or less likely that I'd buy a Coke.

I wonder why coke an pepsi even have commercials anymore. Nothing I see on TV would make me switch to Pepsi, I like the taste of Coke better.

 

[shakeybarn]

Over/under on FGs is 3.5, BTW. (see sig)

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Update:

I'm pretty drunk

Back to your regularly scheduled programming.

 

[RoarinSonoran]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

If there weren't a penalty, then defenses could substitute at virtually any time. This puts the control back in the hands of the offense.

The ref missed it, too bad so sad. They'll catch it the next 99 times.

 

[ChrisCooleyFan]

That commercial did not make it even .0001% more or less likely that I'd buy a Coke.

I wonder why coke an pepsi even have commercials anymore. Nothing I see on TV would make me switch to Pepsi, I like Coke better.

So does Mike Tyson

 

[shakeybarn]

Update:I'm pretty drunkBack to your regularly scheduled programming.

How'd the conversation end?

 

[Pygmy Marmoset]

R. Grossman 6/8 32 1

and a fumble.

Big game from the Rexinator. He'd better step it up a bit.

 

[bostonfred]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

If there weren't a penalty, then defenses could substitute at virtually any time. This puts the control back in the hands of the offense.

BF=anti bears fan

Not really. I'm rooting against both teams in this one, so I'm almost rooting for the Bears by default because they're the underdog. I just think 12 men on the field is an important rule that prevents the defense from making constant adjustments. Otherwise the no-huddle offense would be much less effective.

 

[Iron Mike Tomczak]

Commercials = suck

Game = good

Anyone who thinks the commercials are the best part is obviously a woman.

 

[RoarinSonoran]

Wow, Bears' offense has been off the field for an hour.

 

[shakeybarn]

Commercials = suckGame = goodAnyone who thinks the commercials are the best part is obviously a woman.

Have caught very few.... when I think of it... I glance up... see some loathsome car commercial... and turn the corner to fart or __________

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Update:I'm pretty drunkBack to your regularly scheduled programming.

How'd the conversation end?

Pretty good. She has always been a favorite.

 

[ChrisCooleyFan]

Grossman safe at 2nd

 

[Serenity Now]

Wow, Bears' offense has been off the field for an hour.

Well, they should be well-rested.

 

[RoarinSonoran]

First sack of the game.

Umm, and second.

 

[bostonfred]

What a TERRIBLE technicality if someone who is obviously trying to get off the field.. penalizes in this situation. Awful.

If there weren't a penalty, then defenses could substitute at virtually any time. This puts the control back in the hands of the offense.

The ref missed it, too bad so sad. They'll catch it the next 99 times.

There's no reason to make it unreviewable, because it's an observable fact and not a judgement call. There's a good reason to make it reviewable, because the offense may try to get the quick snap while the 12th player is on the field and then make a bad play specifically because the refs didn't catch it. Very reasonable to review it in those cases.

 

[ChrisCooleyFan]

Bears offense

 

[flapgreen]

O Boy

 

[Kip Dynamite]

Put Griese in!

 

[shakeybarn]

Well... Grossman can't do it.. time for the Bear D to win this (as they know how)

 

[bullitt]

Hello bad Rex.

 

[j3r3m3y]

Man, Grossman really sucks.

How's that working out for you Bullitt? the guy couldnt even walk on that drive.

 

[flapgreen]

Pass on 2nd and 1, huh? Brilliant!