Sidewinder16
Footballguy
Hardly.Look, whatever "side" anyone comes down on in this matter is probably a reflection on how they view the type of relationship a player (or, at the very least, a QB) and a coach should have. But if anyone thinks the fault lies entirely on one side or the other is missing the fact that any good and successful player/coach relationship has to have some amount of give and take from both sides. No matter where you fall on that spectrum of who has to give/take more or less, both parties have a hand in the success or failure of the relationship.Dexter gets it. This is on McNabb and McNabb only.Ummm no. McNabb refused to get in and out of the huddle quickly. McNabb refused to run the offense at the tempo that the qb needs to in Kyle's offense. McNabb refused to wear the wristband. Etc. There's a reason that the offense looked and ran much better with Grossman in there, because he actually did what Kyle coached him to do.
At this point it's pretty clear that McNabb was basically a lesser (and much more team friendly) version of Haynesworth with regards to doing what he wanted and not listening to the coaches.
Had McNabb acted like a professional, and actually did what the coaches wanted him to do, the "experiment" would of probably worked.![]()
Personally, I believe a good (i.e. successful) NFL coach should have complete authority over his roster but shouldn't wield that authority without any regard to what his roster gives him to work with. Meaning, ultimately it's his ship to run, but his players are going to have strengths and weaknesses so some amount of concessions against "his way" will have to be made at some point in order to put his players in the best positions for them to be successful.
I haven't heard much about either side, McNabb or the coaching staff, giving back to the other in the relationship. Both seem to have tried to force whatever, and only what, they want. If that truly is the case, then I believe both sides are equally at fault for the failed relationship.