Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Chi D = stock upMia D = stock downAin't I a jeenyus?
.I'll believe it when I see it's official though...
I forgot about that aspect. Grrrr!From the looks of your Survivor draft...no.
There's something new every day in the NFL. I can't cope! 
LOL
Any Terrell hype has nothing to do with pre-season play, and everything to do with if Booker leaves.
IDP wise.... there goes the Michael Haynes value. Or do you think Haynes will still get some playing time?Terrell's value just Skyrocketed! He went from totally worthless to possibly useful.
I don't know about that.He's gotten good reviews this preseason and is set to start alongside Booker right now.I HAVE to believe that if the Bears weren't confident that they can replace Booker's production, they wouldn't consider dealing him. Considering that Terrell was set to be the other starter, I have to believe the Bears have liked what they've seen out of him.The talent is there. Maybe he's got his head on straight now.
Generally speaking the WR#2 will steal targets if he is comparable to the WR#1. One could counterargue that Chambers will see looser coverage but I think in general that is not as strong of an argument.This has been debated about once a month on this board for years. For the record I'm in the camp that says this hurts Chambers' value slightly...not significantly, but slightly.
I think this improves Alex Brown's value as the bookend to O-Gun. O-Gun probably stays about the same. He is most likely going to lead the team in sacks.
Seems to me they would have been better off acquiring A-Train.
I (on the other hand) think this would hurt Brown's value. O-Gun would be a 3-down DE, while Haynes will be used a run-stuffer and Brown will be used as a pass-rusher. How do you say "DE by committee..." DEBC??
I agree. Booker is a good WR and he'll alleviate the pressure Chambers was otherwise going to receive from defenses. If you had downgraded Chambers after the Boston injury, I'd move him back up to where you had him originally -- and maybe even a little higher if you like Booker more than you liked Boston coming into this season. If this trade goes through, the Dolphins' offense clearly has gotten better. Booker's value obviously takes a hit since he goes from being the clear No. 1 WR to a No. 2 in Miami. I was hoping he'd be a nice late-round value pick. He's still going to go in the late rounds, but the value isn't as strong. But I think he still has respectable value as a WR3. The Bears' passing game could be dreadful this season. They lack a proven WR and obviously Grossman isn't proven at QB. If anything, this could help Thomas Jones because with Booker gone and no proven WRs, Grossman could end up throwing even more often to Jones out of the backfield. Desmond Clark could see an increase in value as well At WR,I'd upgrade Terrell on the basis that he'll likely be the No. 1, but he's flamed out before and so I wouldn't upgrade him too much. Gage remains an end-of-the draft flyer. Grossman should remain undrafted in non-dynasty leagues.
Most defensive lineman are by committee in the NFL. Every team has some sort of rotation. In Chicago Brown is more like to be an every down player than his comrades on the D-line. O-Gun is clearly the better pass rusher and Haynes is the better runstopper. They would probably be subbing for each other in most cases.
I think this deal helps both teams. There were rumors that Booker wasn't a great fit for the Chicago Offense. Also, Chicago was/is deep at WR as Wade is a great talent and will fill in nicely at the #3 spot. Chicago needed defensive help and O-Gun is definitley an improvement. I like the deal for both teams.
Merritt-3 catches for 50 yards 0TDs. 19 career receptions.Wade 12 catches for 137 yards 0TDs. 12 career recepts.Terrell 43 catches for 361 yards (8.3 avg) 1 TD. 86 career receptions for 903 yards and 8 TDs.Gage 17 catches for 338 yards 2 TDs. 17 career receptions.Daryl Jones 8 catches for 90 yards in 2002 with NYG.Berrian, Boone, Elliot, and Forde=no experience.Where is this depth? 75 receptions coming back from last year for 886 yards and 3 TDs.
Hey, wait a minute. Yeah, I have Booker in Survivor, but I just realized I have the Bears D too.*dancin' again*From the looks of your Survivor draft...no.Chi D = stock upMia D = stock downAin't I a jeenyus?
No chance Buffalo trdes Henry to the Dolphins.
What you are saying is that Thomas is comparable to a 3rd round pick. I don't believe that to be the case. Anthony has a bit of talent but for some reason does not fit into what Chicago is trying to do offensively. In other words, Miami would have to part with more than just O-Gun for the pair you mentioned imo.
They probably tried, but Chi isn't ready to give up Thomas so fast. Just my guess.
Ogun in the Beloved Orange and Blue. I've been drooling over this since the first rumor appeared. 
Thomas prolly isn't part of this deal because Angelo doesn't really want to trade him... or at least thats what I have always read. I think Angelo is probably hedging his bets against the Jones signing.This is a A+ deal for Angelo if it goes through. Booker was not a fit in the offense and even though he would have been an ideal security blanket for Grossman, you have to keep in mind the type of (and quality of) recievers that KC has. If the Bears truely plan to run a KC type system, this makes sense. In fact, it makes even more sense with all of the talk I have heard about L. Smith wanting to continually rotate his DLineman.I think you can bump up T.Jones stock a little more, although you may not see dividends from Jones until next year.Now if only Jerry could figure out a way to iron out all the question marks in my 2nd tier of RB's for this year....
Couch Potato,I would like to personally thank you for dropping Terrell in Misfits III dynasty league allowing me to snatch him up for nothing.Yours truly,CHEESEHEAD
