Prussian
Footballguy
Okay, so I am on the clock (third round 3.10 of 12) in a standard scoring league. (Although receptions also earn a point and it includes one flex position RB/WR/TE.
I have two RBs already and have these choices on the board ...
WR - Harrison, IND
WR - Chambers, MIA
WR - Ward, PIT
WR - Moss, WAS
TE - Gonzalez, KC
RB - Taylor, MN
RB - Green, GB
RB - Bell, DEN
RB - Foster, CAR
RB - Dillon, NE
RB - Rhodes, IND
It works out that I also pick again in three picks ... expecting the two teams in between to both take a RB. But then I do not pick for 22 more (serpintine) ...
Leaning toward Harrison and then Chambers ... thoughts?
Harrison's off-season injuries and marginal IND running game cause some concern.
Chambers is intriguing because he continues to be a quiet scorer and will eventually have Culpepper tossing him the rock.
Taylor could prove well though in MIN given the change in regime and the addition of Hutchison along with Birk returning on the O-line. One can never have enough RBs ...
I have two RBs already and have these choices on the board ...
WR - Harrison, IND
WR - Chambers, MIA
WR - Ward, PIT
WR - Moss, WAS
TE - Gonzalez, KC
RB - Taylor, MN
RB - Green, GB
RB - Bell, DEN
RB - Foster, CAR
RB - Dillon, NE
RB - Rhodes, IND
It works out that I also pick again in three picks ... expecting the two teams in between to both take a RB. But then I do not pick for 22 more (serpintine) ...
Leaning toward Harrison and then Chambers ... thoughts?
Harrison's off-season injuries and marginal IND running game cause some concern.
Chambers is intriguing because he continues to be a quiet scorer and will eventually have Culpepper tossing him the rock.
Taylor could prove well though in MIN given the change in regime and the addition of Hutchison along with Birk returning on the O-line. One can never have enough RBs ...
