His tax increase on those making under 200,000 dollars is pretty minimal if you ask me. Especially if we are provided a better universal health care. Bernie's big stance is not letting large companies keep money over seas not subject to taxation. If there is the ability to tax that kind of money you'd probably be living a better quality of life as well. The rich just keep getting richer.Boils down to a probable increase in bridge cards if Sanders is prez.
This.With Hillary, its not so much that she's good in any way, its that she's the least ####ty of all the candidates with a realistic shot.
Hillary is like a mirror; she will reflect whatever views the person wants her to.On democratic issues why is Clinton better than Sanders. I just want to hear why you think HRC is the best choice. Just looking for HRC supporters POV. I will not debate anything. My vote is this Tuesday.
The bolded at least gets close to an actual position on something going forward. You should forward it to the Clinton campaign for review.Since you haven't received a serious answer yet from an actual Hillary fan, let me try.
Hillary calls herself a progressive who likes to get things done, which means she is a pragmatist. Many of her goals are the same as Bernie's, but he is an ideologue. She is willing to compromise; he is not. Bernie's votes against TARP and the immigration bill prove this.
Second, Hillary is an internationalist who wants to continue Obama's foreign policy. Bernie is much more of an isolationist.
Finally, while Hillary is no longer in favor of TPP she generally supports free trade ( though for political reasons she won't discuss this.) Bernie opposes free trade.
There's a few more reasons but for me these are the main ones.
This generally happens when she decides to take up 90% of his positions in some fashion. Problem is, and will always be, "stated positions".Ramsay Hunt Experience said:For all the talk of her speeches, Hillary has some very concrete proposals for Wall Street reform that many find more substantive than Sanders' (repealing Glass Steagall probably did not cause the 2008 financial crisis).
We might think Bernie is more likely to implement his plan because we find him more credible, but I don't think his actual plan to regulate Wall Street is more credible than Hillary's stated plan.
On stated positions, there is little to distinguish them. When I take one of those web thingies, I end up 97% compatible with Bernie. But I'm 91% compatible with Hillary.
Still doing this huh Tim? Bernie's against trade agreements that are harmful to the individual citizens of this country. He doesn't really give a #### about the companies in the scope of "trade" because he gets that this trickle down boondoggle isn't working and hasn't ever really worked.timschochet said:Since you haven't received a serious answer yet from an actual Hillary fan, let me try.
Hillary calls herself a progressive who likes to get things done, which means she is a pragmatist. Many of her goals are the same as Bernie's, but he is an ideologue. She is willing to compromise; he is not. Bernie's votes against TARP and the immigration bill prove this.
Second, Hillary is an internationalist who wants to continue Obama's foreign policy. Bernie is much more of an isolationist.
Finally, while Hillary is no longer in favor of TPP she generally supports free trade ( though for political reasons she won't discuss this.) Bernie opposes free trade.
There's a few more reasons but for me these are the main ones.
Even then, her stated positions on Wall St are very unspecificThis generally happens when she decides to take up 90% of his positions in some fashion. Problem is, and will always be, "stated positions".