'cr8f said:
'Sabertooth said:
Tough one to figure out. I mean, the odds of course are that they don't, since only two teams have ever done it. As a Lions fan, I would LIKE to say one of the two meetings with us.But outside of that...? MAYBE the Giants if everyone is back and healthy? Raiders if Palmer and everyone is firing on all cylinders? Bears?
I picked up McFadden in a trade with my favorite Green and Gold circled on the schedule. If he plays, he is going to shred that defense. 200+ rushing wouldn't shock anyone.
I think the defense is playing worse because the offense has been so good.
What the heck does that mean?? No offense, but that makes no sense. Typically, when an offense plays well, a defense plays better - for three reasons:1) They are rested (the offense keeps the ball = defense, especially D-line and cover guys, isn't wiped)2) They are often playing with a lead. Meaning they can typically focus on pass rushing.3) Even when an offensive drive doesn't end in a score, if they moved the ball, the other team usually is starting in less-than-ideal field position (meaning, the opposing team often has to go the length of the field).I think either the Lions or the Giants present some pretty interesting matchup problems for the Packers. The Lions will also get after Rodgers. Part of depends on which team is healthier - at 100%, the Giants are a little better then the Lions, imho. If the Giants defense can heal up (in the secondary) and Bradshaw is ready, their offense, especially their running game, can take the air out of the Packers pretty quick. They will limit the number of chances Rodgers gets by controlling the clock.