What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pacman vs Henry (1 Viewer)

Who gets in trouble with the law first?

  • Pacman Jones - 16 games

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris Henry - 8 games

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
thats a tough call there. i'll have to go with the pacman. he's probably got some stuff lingering that he hasn't even been busted for yet.

 
From what I understand from Goodall's statement, if either gets arrested again they will be banned from the NFL permanantly.

It's very unfortunate for the Bengals and Titans, but the NFL had to start somewhere before things escalate like the NBA and in some instances, the NHL.

 
Here is something that is ironic about the situation...both players are from West Virginia! What are the chances? As a WVU fan I am ashamed. :lmao:

 
Here is something that is ironic about the situation...both players are from West Virginia! What are the chances? As a WVU fan I am ashamed. :bag:
Throw in the boneheaded Jerry Porter and you have to wonder if there's something in the water. Thank God they are getting their athletic program set right though by bringing in the law abiding Bob Huggins. As for the Henry-Pacman Debate I'm going with Henry for the simple fact that his shorter suspension would indicate that his violations were less agregious and thus affords him a little more latitiude. That means he can get into trouble a couple more times before they send him packing.
 
Voted Jones. This kid is clearly a street thug. He plays by a different set of rules. On top of that, he just does not "get it" either.

Henry is just a stupid kid.

 
Here is something that is ironic about the situation...both players are from West Virginia! What are the chances? As a WVU fan I am ashamed. :scared:
Throw in the boneheaded Jerry Porter and you have to wonder if there's something in the water. Thank God they are getting their athletic program set right though by bringing in the law abiding Bob Huggins. As for the Henry-Pacman Debate I'm going with Henry for the simple fact that his shorter suspension would indicate that his violations were less agregious and thus affords him a little more latitiude. That means he can get into trouble a couple more times before they send him packing.
It would be funny if it wasn't unfortunately true. Another black-eye for my Mountaineers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top