jchapman70
Footballguy
I was thinking today about what a beast Patrick Willis is. Does anyone know the rookie record for most tackles in a season? He has to be getting close.
Patrick Willis - 22 years oldDavid Harris - 23 years old2nd round pick rookie MLB David Harris from the NY Jets is more of a beast then Willis is.
Willis started all 13 games for SF this year and has 136 tackles, 1 sack, 1 FF, and 3 passes defended.
Harris in only 6 starts since Vilma went down has 100 tackles, 3 sacks, 1 FF, 1 FR, and 1 pass defended.
In Harris' 6 starts here are his tackle numbers:
17
24
11
6
8
9
Also, all 3 of his sacks came as a starter since he wasn't playing much at all until Vilma went down. So in Harris' 6 starts only his averages are:
12.5 tackles per game and 1 sack every other game.
Multiply those averages by the 13 games Willis has started and Harris' numbers would look as follows:
162.5 tackles and 6.5 sacks!!!!!!!!![]()
Kind of makes Willis' 136 tackles and 1 sack not so impressive, huh?
Please explain this further. Harris' numbers are DESTROYING Willis'. And, the Jets defense was a laughing stock (still is I guess) when the undersized Vilma was being tossed around in the middle. Harris is the revival of the unit as the Jets' defense has been night and day with him in there. Check Kerry Rhodes' production alone from the time Harris was put in to the time prior. Harris has totally changed the Jets front 7 by himself. They still stink compared to the great defenses in the league due to a lack of overall talent but Harris has changed everything. Gone are the days of running lanes the size a truck could fit through up the middle. Harris doesn't just compile tackle numbes .... he hits the ever living snot out of people.Patrick Willis - 22 years oldDavid Harris - 23 years old2nd round pick rookie MLB David Harris from the NY Jets is more of a beast then Willis is.
Willis started all 13 games for SF this year and has 136 tackles, 1 sack, 1 FF, and 3 passes defended.
Harris in only 6 starts since Vilma went down has 100 tackles, 3 sacks, 1 FF, 1 FR, and 1 pass defended.
In Harris' 6 starts here are his tackle numbers:
17
24
11
6
8
9
Also, all 3 of his sacks came as a starter since he wasn't playing much at all until Vilma went down. So in Harris' 6 starts only his averages are:
12.5 tackles per game and 1 sack every other game.
Multiply those averages by the 13 games Willis has started and Harris' numbers would look as follows:
162.5 tackles and 6.5 sacks!!!!!!!!![]()
Kind of makes Willis' 136 tackles and 1 sack not so impressive, huh?
Patrick Willis is not only younger but this year has been a rock for the 49ers. David Harris is good but Willis is a stud right now.
Harris' 162.5 wasn't pro-rated over the entire season .... just 13 games like Willis'.Harris would be at 162.5 right now! Not after 16 games like what you did for Willis.Davis had a hot start (17, 24, 11) but has tapered off. Willis has been getting better all year (18, 18, 8 last 3 games). Also, how can you pro-rate Harris's stats but not Willis? Willis is on pace for 167 tackles, which is better than your man Harris's prorated tackles at 162.5. But we're splitting hairs at this point - Willis has played all year and Harris has just jumped in during the middle of the year as teams are getting beat up, so he's more fresh. Doesn't seem like a fair comparison, but Willis still managed to be better despite playing all year. HTH.
Both are very good, but it really is dependent upon the other teams' game plans. If the opposition decides to throw 75+% of the time (as NE might this Sunday) a LB's numbers will suffer (I'm saying look elsewhere if you can rather than going with Harris). Willis and Harris are both benefitting from their teams being miserable. RBs consistently get past the front D-line and to the LBs, allowing both to make plays. That plus the fact that the defense is on the field way too much for both adds more chances.Harris' 162.5 wasn't pro-rated over the entire season .... just 13 games like Willis'.Harris would be at 162.5 right now! Not after 16 games like what you did for Willis.Davis had a hot start (17, 24, 11) but has tapered off. Willis has been getting better all year (18, 18, 8 last 3 games). Also, how can you pro-rate Harris's stats but not Willis? Willis is on pace for 167 tackles, which is better than your man Harris's prorated tackles at 162.5. But we're splitting hairs at this point - Willis has played all year and Harris has just jumped in during the middle of the year as teams are getting beat up, so he's more fresh. Doesn't seem like a fair comparison, but Willis still managed to be better despite playing all year. HTH.
Harris is pro-rated for an even 200 tackles after 16 games.
HTH.
Jeff - not sure how many Jet games you've seen, but Harris is an absolute monster. He is ALWAYS in on the play - he's just a fantastic football player. With that being said, I haven't seen much of the 9ers this year to compare to Willis, but Harris is an absolute force in the middle. I do not think this will dwindle long-term either.Both are very good, but it really is dependent upon the other teams' game plans. If the opposition decides to throw 75+% of the time (as NE might this Sunday) a LB's numbers will suffer (I'm saying look elsewhere if you can rather than going with Harris). Willis and Harris are both benefitting from their teams being miserable. RBs consistently get past the front D-line and to the LBs, allowing both to make plays. That plus the fact that the defense is on the field way too much for both adds more chances.Harris' 162.5 wasn't pro-rated over the entire season .... just 13 games like Willis'.Harris would be at 162.5 right now! Not after 16 games like what you did for Willis.Davis had a hot start (17, 24, 11) but has tapered off. Willis has been getting better all year (18, 18, 8 last 3 games). Also, how can you pro-rate Harris's stats but not Willis? Willis is on pace for 167 tackles, which is better than your man Harris's prorated tackles at 162.5. But we're splitting hairs at this point - Willis has played all year and Harris has just jumped in during the middle of the year as teams are getting beat up, so he's more fresh. Doesn't seem like a fair comparison, but Willis still managed to be better despite playing all year. HTH.
Harris is pro-rated for an even 200 tackles after 16 games.
HTH.
Not saying both are not good - both of these guys are - but circumstances can dictate performances.
I'd take Willis over Harris long term, but that could also change if Singletary leaves the 49ers. Right now I think he's the engine driving that defense. He also shows better sideline-to-sideline and recovery speed than Harris.
+1.I always used to joke about Troy Polamalu and say that it looked like there was more then one of him out there. If there is a play made behind the line of scrimmage .... Troy was there. Sideline .... Troy was there. Secondary .... Troy was there. Etc, etc.Jeff - not sure how many Jet games you've seen, but Harris is an absolute monster. He is ALWAYS in on the play - he's just a fantastic football player. With that being said, I haven't seen much of the 9ers this year to compare to Willis, but Harris is an absolute force in the middle. I do not think this will dwindle long-term either.Both are very good, but it really is dependent upon the other teams' game plans. If the opposition decides to throw 75+% of the time (as NE might this Sunday) a LB's numbers will suffer (I'm saying look elsewhere if you can rather than going with Harris). Willis and Harris are both benefitting from their teams being miserable. RBs consistently get past the front D-line and to the LBs, allowing both to make plays. That plus the fact that the defense is on the field way too much for both adds more chances.Harris' 162.5 wasn't pro-rated over the entire season .... just 13 games like Willis'.Harris would be at 162.5 right now! Not after 16 games like what you did for Willis.Davis had a hot start (17, 24, 11) but has tapered off. Willis has been getting better all year (18, 18, 8 last 3 games). Also, how can you pro-rate Harris's stats but not Willis? Willis is on pace for 167 tackles, which is better than your man Harris's prorated tackles at 162.5. But we're splitting hairs at this point - Willis has played all year and Harris has just jumped in during the middle of the year as teams are getting beat up, so he's more fresh. Doesn't seem like a fair comparison, but Willis still managed to be better despite playing all year. HTH.
Harris is pro-rated for an even 200 tackles after 16 games.
HTH.
Not saying both are not good - both of these guys are - but circumstances can dictate performances.
I'd take Willis over Harris long term, but that could also change if Singletary leaves the 49ers. Right now I think he's the engine driving that defense. He also shows better sideline-to-sideline and recovery speed than Harris.
More like I haven't "endured" many Jets games. I will give you both the benefit of the doubt as I'm sure you've seen more than I have - but I have seen him (I try to erase as many Jets memories as I can). He's good. I just think Willis is better. Both have played at elite levels though so it's not much of an argument against either one.+1.I always used to joke about Troy Polamalu and say that it looked like there was more then one of him out there. If there is a play made behind the line of scrimmage .... Troy was there. Sideline .... Troy was there. Secondary .... Troy was there. Etc, etc.I swear to you all who unlike Patoons and I have never put yourself through the misery and torture that it is to watch an entire 2007 NY Jets game but that is exactly what you can say of Harris. Its uncanny that this kid is anywhere and everywhere the ball and play is every single time. Truely amazing.Jeff - not sure how many Jet games you've seen, but Harris is an absolute monster. He is ALWAYS in on the play - he's just a fantastic football player. With that being said, I haven't seen much of the 9ers this year to compare to Willis, but Harris is an absolute force in the middle. I do not think this will dwindle long-term either.![]()
As a Jets fan for over 20 years ..... so do I.More like I haven't "endured" many Jets games. I will give you both the benefit of the doubt as I'm sure you've seen more than I have - but I have seen him (I try to erase as many Jets memories as I can). He's good. I just think Willis is better. Both have played at elite levels though so it's not much of an argument against either one.+1.I always used to joke about Troy Polamalu and say that it looked like there was more then one of him out there. If there is a play made behind the line of scrimmage .... Troy was there. Sideline .... Troy was there. Secondary .... Troy was there. Etc, etc.Jeff - not sure how many Jet games you've seen, but Harris is an absolute monster. He is ALWAYS in on the play - he's just a fantastic football player. With that being said, I haven't seen much of the 9ers this year to compare to Willis, but Harris is an absolute force in the middle. I do not think this will dwindle long-term either.
I swear to you all who unlike Patoons and I have never put yourself through the misery and torture that it is to watch an entire 2007 NY Jets game but that is exactly what you can say of Harris. Its uncanny that this kid is anywhere and everywhere the ball and play is every single time. Truely amazing.![]()
Check this out (and I was luaghed at on draft day for going young) -We start 2 LBs and one flex. In addition to 2 DBs and 2 DLs.My LBs -Willis, Beason, DiGiorgio, HarrisThe one guy I missed was Poz, and he went one round ahead of where I targeted him.I am just giddy to have both Willis and Harris in my startup dynasty where you get 2 points per solo and 1 per ast.I have an offer out of my 2nd round pick (last 4 picks) for Poz.
??Limp Dogg Bizkits said:I am just giddy...