The only thing I thought was odd about the texts was the Deflator comment. But that was months before the AFCCG, and if you follow the time line, Brady didn't know there was a minimum PSI until after a midseason game when a referee had over inflated some of the Pats balls beyond the maximum and Brady snapped on Jestremski (and that information was relayed to Mcnally). After he found out it wasn't the Pats responsible for the balls being over inflated that game he told Jestremski to find the rule in the rule book and make sure the officials are informed not to inflate them past 12.5 in the future.
This is a start to having a civilized conversation about the matter at hand. So the text therefore shows that Brady in turn does communicate with Jestremski about ball pressure correct? I am not fishing just simply trying to show it from a neutral fan that perhaps Brady is not so innocent in this saga. That he in turn does tell the ball boys what the pressure should be. Now how far he communicated with those ball boys about bending the rules is what is up for argument.
If you don't believe there was any ball tampering at all then you are not thinking logically. Two of the ball boys have been suspended by the team. Thinking logically it is clear to see that move by the Pats shows that they feel these guys are the ones to blame.
Again I am not out to get Brady and think this whole mess is getting blown out of proportion. Brady will still go down as one of the greatest to play the game. Bellicheck is easily the best coach in the league and it could be argued that he is the best coach in sports right now (he and Popovich in the NBA).
I think the only defense that Kraft and Brady will have is that Brady did talk with the ball boys about making sure the balls were deflated, but not to cheat to do so or go to means that would cause the team a punishment. The punishment comes out and bam the Pats fire these guys.
Who knows how long these guys were doing this prior to getting caught. Goodell obviously felt Brady played a large enough part to warrant a suspension. He then also felt that the Pats were not forth right with how it all went down and punished them as well. All of this again is debatable, but failing to acknowledge that there was at least some level of ball tampering is not logically thinking this whole fiasco out.