nightmare
Footballguy
At 292 pages and still going- relevency has left a long time ago.I think my comments are relevant though.
Last edited by a moderator:
At 292 pages and still going- relevency has left a long time ago.I think my comments are relevant though.
Now will they just quit cheating so we don't have to ever do this again.In the end each of us must decide (a) how feel about the things the Pats have done, (b) the things that the league and other teams have done, and © what the respective fand have said and done. It is unlikely we will all come together and sing kubaya. Thats cool. Its certainly been interesting though. Long live the NFLE, Roger Mcmahon, and wrestling foils known as the Patriots.
There is literally a picture of him unloading stuff from the plane in the current issue of SI.When the Manning family flew to New Orleans after Katrina, Dad and Peyton handed out emergency supplies to those in need. Eli refused to get off the plane. Google it.
I'll find the gif somewhere, but the thought was pretty common at the appeal. Hes a joke.Roger Goodell has become the Vince Mcmahon of the NFL. - Joe Thomas.
Good call! Huzzah Blake Bortles!Wow. SeniorVBD seems to be having a mental breakdown. Feel free to switch allegiance to one of the other 31 teams if the Pats constant cheating is getting to you.
Honestly, it's easy to like that kid. I'm rooting for him to succeed (while staying within the rules of the game).Good call! Huzzah Blake Bortles!Wow. SeniorVBD seems to be having a mental breakdown. Feel free to switch allegiance to one of the other 31 teams if the Pats constant cheating is getting to you.
OMG, that's amazing!!!!!!!!biju said:Just got back from the grocery store. I'm wearing my SB48 t-shirt I picked up when I was there. From behind me I hear in a thick Boston accent "What you're not wearing a Superbowl 49 shirt?" I roll my eyes at him. He says "Wait, so you didn't think that was a fantastic game just because your team lost?"
I look at him and said "Was the Giants beating you guys in the last second to ruin your perfect season a great game?"
As he started getting all worked up I smiled and walked off.
That's the trigger.no admission of guilt.
No deal. Sorry Charlie.That's the trigger.no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Exactly my point.No deal. Sorry Charlie.That's the trigger.no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Please stop talking.I think my comments are relevant though.
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.
I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.
From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.
In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
Constant? Lol.Wow. SeniorVBD seems to be having a mental breakdown. Feel free to switch allegiance to one of the other 31 teams if the Pats constant cheating is getting to you.
Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.
I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.
From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.
In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Interesting...Berman: "We did not reach a settlement. The parties tried quite hard I think."
So you agree the investigation and "evidence" doesn't create the basis for a suspension.Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.
I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.
From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.
In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Was that Len Burman or Cris Burman? At this point,either one could put an end to this circus today.Interesting...Berman: "We did not reach a settlement. The parties tried quite hard I think."
No. What I am saying is that in the case of a settlement, the NFL would likely want some form of admission of guilt from Brady or at the very least an acknowledgment that he didn't "fully cooperate".So you agree the investigation and "evidence" doesn't create the basis for a suspension.Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.
I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.
From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.
In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Let's be real here. Most people watching NFL games could care less or are oblivious to what is going on. The only fan base that actually "cares' is NE. Nobody here in WI is talking about Brady, Goodell or deflategate. We will still have a sold out stadium and a waiting list for season tickets that stretches the state. This doesn't hurt the NFL's bottom dollar at all.It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.
I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it.
Sorry, I had to.No. What I am saying is that in the case of a settlement, the NFL would likely want some form of admission of guilt from Brady or at the very least an acknowledgment that he didn't "fully cooperate".So you agree the investigation and "evidence" doesn't create the basis for a suspension.Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?BigSteelThrill said:That's the trigger.AngryPatriot said:no admission of guilt.
Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.
I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.
From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.
In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
You first.Please stop talking.I think my comments are relevant though.
Oh yeah, I agree. But it is a national story, still all over ESPN, waning. That's surely part of the reason the NFL doesn't settle, they feel they can't fail, money keeps raining in. They're an invincible force. But why not go hard against child abuse, domestic violence instead of an equipment violation that IN THE RULES constitutes a 25K fine? There's parts of this that are baffling but don't talk to us about ".. the most important thing is the integrity of the game..." blah blah blah. Don't take us for stupid (which they probably do behind closed doors).Let's be real here. Most people watching NFL games could care less or are oblivious to what is going on. The only fan base that actually "cares' is NE. Nobody here in WI is talking about Brady, Goodell or deflategate. We will still have a sold out stadium and a waiting list for season tickets that stretches the state. This doesn't hurt the NFL's bottom dollar at all.It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.
I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it.
I believe the judge has only three options. Vacate the suspension, uphold the suspension, or order another appeal hearing with a third party arbitrator. I do not believe he can impose a reduced suspension.It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.
I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it. Every thing I've heard form this judge speaks to a rational mind and good objective look at the whole situation, all favoring Brady. Who knows how it will go, but I think it'll favor Brady because he's nevery been proven guilty.
Not definite, but I thought there had to be a player agreement to go on that list. It was pitched as a win-win for the league an player where the league doesn't suspend a player but keeps them off the field / out of the spotlight, and the player continues to get paid.Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?
Players must consent before being placed on the list, allowing the NFL Players Association to call Peterson's placement a "voluntary leave with pay."
Does that count the $1M they got from Kraft after he accepted the penalties?Benjamin Allbright @AllbrightNFL 2m2 minutes ago Denver, CO
The NFL touts that it raised $3 million for breast cancer last October. To date it has spent $3.5 million on deflated footballs.
I read a few weeks ago that one of the recourses, should the NFL lose, is that they could appeal and that is something that might compel the Brady side to agree to a compromise because the NFL could lose, appeal, and then win and then make Brady unavailable in the playoffs or at a more critical time.Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?
I think there are good reasons for both parties to want to avoid a decision and probable appeal. Whether or not that will be enough for them to reach a settlement remains to be seen. It hasn't happened yet but we're getting close to the end of the line, at least for this round.I read a few weeks ago that one of the recourses, should the NFL lose, is that they could appeal and that is something that might compel the Brady side to agree to a compromise because the NFL could lose, appeal, and then win and then make Brady unavailable in the playoffs or at a more critical time.Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?
Not surprised by this at all. Its come out now three times that the league offered to knock a single game off if he just admitted guilt lmfao.@garymyersNYDN
NFL never made formal settlement offer, but indicated willing to cut suspension to 3 games if Brady admitted DeflateGate guilt. No deal.
Brady has painted himself into a corner on this one whether he is guilty or not. It isn't shocking to me he's taking this stance but I actually applaud the NFL for forcing him to admit culpability.Not surprised by this at all. Its come out now three times that the league offered to knock a single game off if he just admitted guilt lmfao.@garymyersNYDN
NFL never made formal settlement offer, but indicated willing to cut suspension to 3 games if Brady admitted DeflateGate guilt. No deal.
I understand that some people would prefer the NFL to scoot this under the rug for the pats, much like they did with spygate, but to have no idea why a large portion of the fanbase with loyalties outside New England would support the NFL trying to clean up the game regardless of what team it is or how much easier it would be just to ignore it, seems pretty closed minded.I have no idea why anyone would be applauding or supporting any part of how the NFL has handled this, but mercifully, it's almost over (pending appeals). Hope the thread hits the 300-page mark by then.