What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Patriots being investigated after Colts game (1 Viewer)

Percent of NFL teams actively trying to steal play sheets?

  • 0%

    Votes: 90 33.0%
  • 25%

    Votes: 91 33.3%
  • 50%

    Votes: 19 7.0%
  • 75%

    Votes: 16 5.9%
  • 100%

    Votes: 57 20.9%

  • Total voters
    273
In the end each of us must decide (a) how feel about the things the Pats have done, (b) the things that the league and other teams have done, and © what the respective fand have said and done. It is unlikely we will all come together and sing kubaya. Thats cool. Its certainly been interesting though. Long live the NFLE, Roger Mcmahon, and wrestling foils known as the Patriots.

 
In the end each of us must decide (a) how feel about the things the Pats have done, (b) the things that the league and other teams have done, and © what the respective fand have said and done. It is unlikely we will all come together and sing kubaya. Thats cool. Its certainly been interesting though. Long live the NFLE, Roger Mcmahon, and wrestling foils known as the Patriots.
Now will they just quit cheating so we don't have to ever do this again.

 
Wow. SeniorVBD seems to be having a mental breakdown. Feel free to switch allegiance to one of the other 31 teams if the Pats constant cheating is getting to you.

 
When the Manning family flew to New Orleans after Katrina, Dad and Peyton handed out emergency supplies to those in need. Eli refused to get off the plane. Google it.
There is literally a picture of him unloading stuff from the plane in the current issue of SI. :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just got back from the grocery store. I'm wearing my SB48 t-shirt I picked up when I was there. From behind me I hear in a thick Boston accent "What you're not wearing a Superbowl 49 shirt?" I roll my eyes at him. He says "Wait, so you didn't think that was a fantastic game just because your team lost?"

I look at him and said "Was the Giants beating you guys in the last second to ruin your perfect season a great game?"

As he started getting all worked up I smiled and walked off.

 
biju said:
Just got back from the grocery store. I'm wearing my SB48 t-shirt I picked up when I was there. From behind me I hear in a thick Boston accent "What you're not wearing a Superbowl 49 shirt?" I roll my eyes at him. He says "Wait, so you didn't think that was a fantastic game just because your team lost?"

I look at him and said "Was the Giants beating you guys in the last second to ruin your perfect season a great game?"

As he started getting all worked up I smiled and walked off.
OMG, that's amazing!!!!!!!!

 
100 articles out there about the possible outcomes.

If either side appeals, the appeals court will either take till the end of this year or the middle of next year.

All depends on specifically how the judge rules. Either way in any case of appeal Brady will seek an injunction to play.

 
Who knows but maybe there's an end to this nonsense. Let's say 1 game, small fine, no admission of guilt. At this point the NFL is looking like a spoiled 5 year old, they are so stupid but who cares when you're rolling in money and ego.

 
BigSteelThrill said:
AngryPatriot said:
no admission of guilt.
That's the trigger.

Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?

Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.

I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.

I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.

From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.

In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BigSteelThrill said:
AngryPatriot said:
no admission of guilt.
That's the trigger.

Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?

Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.

I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.

I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.

From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.

In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?

As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).

 
ProFootballTalk ‏@ProFootballTalk 2m2 minutes ago

John Mara shows up for Brady hearing after Judge Berman "requests" (i.e., demands) it http://wp.me/p14QSB-9Q09

Day 5000: In which we learn that there's an NFL Management Council, and that John Mara is its president...

“Requested” is probably putting it mildly. The case filed by the league in Judge Berman’s court listed only one party as the plaintiff: The National Football League Management Council. Mara, not Commissioner Roger Goodell, is the chairman of the NFL Management Council. So Judge Berman has every right to not request but to demand that Mara attend.

Edit: More Twittering:

Stephanie Stradley ‏@StephStradley 12m12 minutes ago

Yes. Berman seemed interested in a previous hearing about the distinction between NFL/NFL Management Council.

CMadatMe @CMadatMe @StephStradley He's also Chair of the NFL Management Council. That council brought the case to Berman's court. #addedpressure

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BigSteelThrill said:
AngryPatriot said:
no admission of guilt.
That's the trigger.

Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?

Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.

I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.

I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.

From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.

In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?

As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.

 
BigSteelThrill said:
AngryPatriot said:
no admission of guilt.
That's the trigger.

Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?

Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.

I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.

I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.

From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.

In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?

As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.
So you agree the investigation and "evidence" doesn't create the basis for a suspension.

 
BigSteelThrill said:
AngryPatriot said:
no admission of guilt.
That's the trigger.

Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?

Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.

I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.

I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.

From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.

In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?

As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.
So you agree the investigation and "evidence" doesn't create the basis for a suspension.
No. What I am saying is that in the case of a settlement, the NFL would likely want some form of admission of guilt from Brady or at the very least an acknowledgment that he didn't "fully cooperate".

 
It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.

I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it. Every thing I've heard form this judge speaks to a rational mind and good objective look at the whole situation, all favoring Brady. Who knows how it will go, but I think it'll favor Brady because he's nevery been proven guilty.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.

I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it.
Let's be real here. Most people watching NFL games could care less or are oblivious to what is going on. The only fan base that actually "cares' is NE. Nobody here in WI is talking about Brady, Goodell or deflategate. We will still have a sold out stadium and a waiting list for season tickets that stretches the state. This doesn't hurt the NFL's bottom dollar at all.

 
BigSteelThrill said:
AngryPatriot said:
no admission of guilt.
That's the trigger.

Drop that demand and accept it like Kraft did and you might have a bargain.
Since the NFL has no proof, they need an admission to appear they were in the right?

Why is that the dealbreaker for the NFL?
It is impossible to really know what either the NFL or Brady would require to settle (if anything). At this point the one thing for certain is they haven't been able to agree to one.

I don't think the NFL cares if they appear to be in the right or not. Apparently they believe Brady cheated and are not willing to let him off the hook unless he admits to it.

I am not sure if Brady truly feels he didn't cheat or not but it is very clear he has no intention of admitting to it and is willing to risk a 4-game suspension to protect his image.

From what I have read, no matter how the judge rules there will likely be an appeal by the losing side. I'm not sure if Brady would be permitted to play during that appeal process but my guess is that he would be able to.

In any case I think the odds of Brady playing week 1 is really good -- probably 90% or better.
But this is the main question I'm asking. What does Brady's admission do for the NFL, other than give relevance and validity to the process and investigation?

As I see it, the NFL has nothing material to gain from his admission. This demand appears to be one more instance of a long line of PR battles the NFL is trying to win in this case. Hinging a settlement on it seems absurd ( which is perfect for the issue at hand ).
Without an admission of guilt of any kind then I am not sure what they could say would be the basis of any suspension.
So you agree the investigation and "evidence" doesn't create the basis for a suspension.
No. What I am saying is that in the case of a settlement, the NFL would likely want some form of admission of guilt from Brady or at the very least an acknowledgment that he didn't "fully cooperate".
Sorry, I had to. ;)

I'd be surprised if the NFL offered a settlement that included only acknowledgement that he didn't "fully cooperate" that there would be an agreement in place now.

Hopefully, the judge rules in the next couple of days, and this can more or less go away. Its time for football :football: .

 
Little prediction here. I think that while whomever the judge rules against will immediately appeal, I predict that that appeal will be quietly dropped in a few months. They'll want to move on.....like me.

 
It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.

I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it.
Let's be real here. Most people watching NFL games could care less or are oblivious to what is going on. The only fan base that actually "cares' is NE. Nobody here in WI is talking about Brady, Goodell or deflategate. We will still have a sold out stadium and a waiting list for season tickets that stretches the state. This doesn't hurt the NFL's bottom dollar at all.
Oh yeah, I agree. But it is a national story, still all over ESPN, waning. That's surely part of the reason the NFL doesn't settle, they feel they can't fail, money keeps raining in. They're an invincible force. But why not go hard against child abuse, domestic violence instead of an equipment violation that IN THE RULES constitutes a 25K fine? There's parts of this that are baffling but don't talk to us about ".. the most important thing is the integrity of the game..." blah blah blah. Don't take us for stupid (which they probably do behind closed doors).

 
It'll be interesting to see how Judge rules, my understanding is he has the power to go any which way. I would be surprised if he cut the suspension, still think it'll be either in favor of the NFL (based on the CBA) or in favor of Brady, possibly based on the weak initial proof or lack thereof. Brady will continue to play pending appeals etc. Believe it of not this clown show may go on into 2016, lol. The NFL is sticking to their CBA power, Brady is hoping for the judge to look at the facts in light of burden of proof and precedent.

I think it's safe to say the NFL takes a worse PR hit every day this goes on but I'm sure the Brady haters would disagree. My take is that Brady never told them to under inflate the footballs below the legal limit. He likes his footballs on the softer side, some like them harder. Brady's failing is how he just didn't come out and talk about it in a normal fashion but seemingly got some poor counsel and followed it. Every thing I've heard form this judge speaks to a rational mind and good objective look at the whole situation, all favoring Brady. Who knows how it will go, but I think it'll favor Brady because he's nevery been proven guilty.
I believe the judge has only three options. Vacate the suspension, uphold the suspension, or order another appeal hearing with a third party arbitrator. I do not believe he can impose a reduced suspension.

 
Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?

 
Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?
Not definite, but I thought there had to be a player agreement to go on that list. It was pitched as a win-win for the league an player where the league doesn't suspend a player but keeps them off the field / out of the spotlight, and the player continues to get paid.

I found this

Players must consent before being placed on the list, allowing the NFL Players Association to call Peterson's placement a "voluntary leave with pay."
 
Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?
I read a few weeks ago that one of the recourses, should the NFL lose, is that they could appeal and that is something that might compel the Brady side to agree to a compromise because the NFL could lose, appeal, and then win and then make Brady unavailable in the playoffs or at a more critical time.

 
Does anyone know if the league can do an end around and put Brady on the Commissioner's Exempt List if they lose like they did with other players last year, essentially paying Brady but not allowing him to play while the appeal was heard?
I read a few weeks ago that one of the recourses, should the NFL lose, is that they could appeal and that is something that might compel the Brady side to agree to a compromise because the NFL could lose, appeal, and then win and then make Brady unavailable in the playoffs or at a more critical time.
I think there are good reasons for both parties to want to avoid a decision and probable appeal. Whether or not that will be enough for them to reach a settlement remains to be seen. It hasn't happened yet but we're getting close to the end of the line, at least for this round.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@garymyersNYDN

NFL never made formal settlement offer, but indicated willing to cut suspension to 3 games if Brady admitted DeflateGate guilt. No deal.
Not surprised by this at all. Its come out now three times that the league offered to knock a single game off if he just admitted guilt lmfao.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@garymyersNYDN

NFL never made formal settlement offer, but indicated willing to cut suspension to 3 games if Brady admitted DeflateGate guilt. No deal.
Not surprised by this at all. Its come out now three times that the league offered to knock a single game off if he just admitted guilt lmfao.
Brady has painted himself into a corner on this one whether he is guilty or not. It isn't shocking to me he's taking this stance but I actually applaud the NFL for forcing him to admit culpability.

 
I heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who heard it from another the suspension will be lifted.

He can't confirm it because "another" destroyed his cell phone where he kept the info,but he's "pretty sure"

the suspension will be lifted and the judge in the case will be leaving the bench and getting a gig on

ESPN's Sunday pre-game show.

 
I have no idea why anyone would be applauding or supporting any part of how the NFL has handled this, but mercifully, it's almost over (pending appeals). Hope the thread hits the 300-page mark by then.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have no idea why anyone would be applauding or supporting any part of how the NFL has handled this, but mercifully, it's almost over (pending appeals). Hope the thread hits the 300-page mark by then.
I understand that some people would prefer the NFL to scoot this under the rug for the pats, much like they did with spygate, but to have no idea why a large portion of the fanbase with loyalties outside New England would support the NFL trying to clean up the game regardless of what team it is or how much easier it would be just to ignore it, seems pretty closed minded.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top