massraider said:
Jercules said:
massraider said:
So this cheating was "minor" too?
Not a major advantage?
Let me ask: How many times can you go back to the well for that response when the team is caught cheating?
This would make TWO.
Four? Six?
Just wondering.
Interesting hypothetical. How many speeding tickets can you get before they throw you in jail?
What if it's not a speeding ticket?
It's certainly comfortable to casually refer to illegally altering footballs (for an undetermined amount of time) as a speeding ticket. When was it decided that this was no big deal?
The NFL certainly doesn't think so. Brady certainly didn't think so. Let me repeat that last bit:
BRADY certainly didn't think so. He clearly didn't think so, or he wouldn't have had team employees engaging in CLEARLY illegal activities for
months. He clearly thought it was worth the risk.
Do we all know how big or small a deal illegally inflated footballs are more than Tommy Small Hands? I know I don't pretend to know that better than Brady. Do you?
It might have been no big deal to another QB, or EVERY other QB. But to this QB, to this one guy, it was a big deal. It was important.
Bayhawks said:
Jercules said:
Jercules said:
I have been involved with youth football since 5 years pre-Spygate, so I would have to say that there is no correlation.
Maybe where I live is just a bigger collection of hoodlums, gangbangers, and thieves. Maybe the rest of the country is filled with do gooders, former choir boys, and people that drive the speed limit and don't cheat on their taxes. Maybe no other team in the NFL other than New England has ever broken the rules. But somehow I doubt it.
But I do hope there are less people in my area accepting cheating and saying it is just minor so let it go with a slap on the wrist.
If it is minor then you do let it go with a slap on the wrist. Such a basic, simple concept...
Another simple concept is that if that "slap on the wrist" doesn't prevent repeat offenses (or other minor offenses), the next time the consequence is more severe.
Absolutely!
A $50,000 fine would have been a whopping 100% increase over the
NFL's own prescription for ball tampering. Of course, some might call that a bit extreme, given their horrid 'first offense' was having a camera man in the wrong place seven years ago...
You keep saying this. I wonder if you initially thought this was a fact, or you have just repeated it, SO MANY TIMES, that you have deluded yourself into believing it.
The $25,000 is A MINIMUM. The league can (and has) go above and beyond it. Because the Patriots have pushed the limits of what the rules allow (as virtually ALL Pats fans in this thread have acknowledged), and because they had a public "slap on the wrist" previously (and I'd imagine a number of private "warnings") to avoid it, and because Brady made a very public "study the rulebook," comment just prior to this instance, and because Kraft and Brady acted like self-righteous douchebags after the story 1st broke, and because they refused FULL cooperation, (as is required by the NFL & promised by the Pats), and because Brady outright lied during the aftermath of the story breaking/during the investigation, the punishment went above the minimum. I still think it was too harsh, but only a fool, or someone who has their head in the sand continues to pretend, "it should only have been $25,000!!!!"
The minimum is an obvious indication of how seriously the NFL takes ball tampering. The rulebook clearly prescribes a punishment 'including, but not limited to' a fine of $25,000. You can be as obtuse as you want, it doesn't take a genius to realize if the NFL thought this was a crime worthy of six-figure fines and docked draft picks, the minimum would reflect that.
(In fact, if you really want to know how seriously they take ball tampering, read the Wells report. All sorts of gauges, from all sorts of places--none of them league-approved. Sometimes the refs do it, sometimes they delegate--nothing is recorded. Then they leave the balls alone in a public area for 15-20 minutes while they go do their pregame. [Keep in mind, this was the protocol for a playoff game before which
the refs had been alerted to the possibility of ball tampering, as in, "guys, if you're ever gonna do it properly and professionally, do it now!"]
It's hilarious to read how lazy and haphazard this whole this was, and then see people on here like moleculo pretending the Pats orchestrated some sort of Italian Job to get the balls deflated.)
But I digress. In the real world, where things actually matter, we have courts to prevent this kind of chicanery. Ideally, evidence is collected through strict protocols, examined by an impartial and rational party, and a decision is delivered that ignores the will of the mob.
But the NFL is a business, and the massive public tidal wave of Patriots fatigue and hatred affects business, so nobody can afford to be serious about these things.
My great fear is in seven more years, when we're caught using cleats that are 0.5 inches longer than what's stipulated by some rule from the 1940's, we lose our whole draft, 50 million dollars, and Johnathan Kraft is dragged to the village square and shot.