What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Patriots being investigated after Colts game (1 Viewer)

Percent of NFL teams actively trying to steal play sheets?

  • 0%

    Votes: 90 33.0%
  • 25%

    Votes: 91 33.3%
  • 50%

    Votes: 19 7.0%
  • 75%

    Votes: 16 5.9%
  • 100%

    Votes: 57 20.9%

  • Total voters
    273
parrot said:
yabahos said:
Maybe in the end it paid off for Cowher and the Steelers because they ended up winning the Superbowl in 2006. Maybe they decided to start changing their signals.
From the ESPN article:

Some of the Steelers' defensive coaches remain convinced that a deep touchdown pass from Brady to Deion Branch in the January 2005 AFC Championship Game, which was won by the Patriots 41-27, came from stolen signals because Pittsburgh hadn't changed its signals all year, sources say, and the two teams had played a game in the regular season that Walsh told investigators he believes was taped. "They knew the signals, so they knew when it went in what the coverage was and how to attack it," says a former Steelers coach.
https://youtu.be/HCwOPhsMScM?t=10m39s

Farrior: "Shea thought he had post help?"

Coach: "He does..."

Farrior: "Where the hell was he?"
So Polamalu bites on the underneath route - even though, by his own teammate and coach's admission, he is supposed to be giving deep help - Brady reads it and hits Branch RIGHT WHERE TROY IS SUPPOSED TO BE, but the Pats must have cheated. Talk about your salt. :lmao:
:sarcasm:

You might want to go back and read my posts. Basically started off by saying the Steelers were idiots for running the same set of signals for an entire season, hearing allegations that NE tapes signals, and then still rolling out the same old signals for the AFC Championship game. Essentially, they got what they deserved.
I understood you were being sarcastic, I was just using your statement about that Steelers and signals as a jumping in point.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Just more excuses. The only thing suspect about those 4 SB wins is the integrity of the losers making excuses and baseless cheating accusations. There's no shame in losing, until you start making excuses.
Exactly, win the game on the field... it's hard to do.
Exactly, this is what the rest of us are saying. Just play mano-a-mano for once without all the shenanigans and cheating. Its not that hard to do.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...

4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...

4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.
Right; and 4 SB wins which could easily have been zero. Cheating not withstanding.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...

4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.
Right; and 4 SB wins which could easily have been zero. Cheating not withstanding.
You guys are hilarious. Ok what team was better? Dominant.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...

4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.
Right; and 4 SB wins which could easily have been zero. Cheating not withstanding.
You guys are hilarious. Ok what team was better? Dominant.
Baltimore Colts

 
Ok Pats fans, let's say tonight I break into Belichick's house and steal a playbook he left in his home and hand it over to every one of their opponents for the 2015 season. In addition to this I'm going to video tape their defensive calls and offensive audibles and send them to the same teams. Let's also add I'm going to pump up Brady's footballs to the maximum allowable PSI and the opponent's balls to whatever they desire.

Fair?

And to the person who said the Seahawks/Pats Superbowl (and I assume the outcome) was suspect: no it wasn't. The Patriots won on a fantastic play that was probably lower probability than a coin toss for them to execute perfectly. That wasn't the result of inflated balls, video tapes, or the Madden curse or anything. It was just great football that I happened to be on the opposite side of. Had that gone the other way I suspect it would have been "the cheating Seahawks and their PEDs" instead I guess.

 
And to the person who said the Seahawks/Pats Superbowl (and I assume the outcome) was suspect: no it wasn't. The Patriots won on a fantastic play that was probably lower probability than a coin toss for them to execute perfectly. That wasn't the result of inflated balls, video tapes, or the Madden curse or anything. It was just great football that I happened to be on the opposite side of. Had that gone the other way I suspect it would have been "the cheating Seahawks and their PEDs" instead I guess.
The catch that got them in range was unreal. Seahawks were dead in the water prior to that.

Whatever, back to what you were trying to say....

 
Ok Pats fans, let's say tonight I break into Belichick's house and steal a playbook he left in his home and hand it over to every one of their opponents for the 2015 season. In addition to this I'm going to video tape their defensive calls and offensive audibles and send them to t he same teams. Let's also add I'm going to pump up Brady's footballs to the maximum allowable PSI and the opponent's balls to whatever they desire.

Fair?
Why be hypothetical when we already know how the Patriots, their fans and the league really reacted when they got cheated on a game, months before spygate?

The league did nothing, Belichick didn't complain and blamed his own team's execution, and in retrospect it probably cost them a superbowl but the fans barely mentioned it. No owners demanded an investigation, no make up calls were given, and no rules were changed.

 
Ok Pats fans, let's say tonight I break into Belichick's house and steal a playbook he left in his home and hand it over to every one of their opponents for the 2015 season. In addition to this I'm going to video tape their defensive calls and offensive audibles and send them to t he same teams. Let's also add I'm going to pump up Brady's footballs to the maximum allowable PSI and the opponent's balls to whatever they desire.

Fair?
Why be hypothetical when we already know how the Patriots, their fans and the league really reacted when they got cheated on a game, months before spygate?The league did nothing, Belichick didn't complain and blamed his own team's execution, and in retrospect it probably cost them a superbowl but the fans barely mentioned it. No owners demanded an investigation, no make up calls were given, and no rules were changed.
Well if we assumed everything that has been claimed about the pats over the years were true, even not doing that knowing how sensitive everyone, the league, the fans, everyone is to NE these days...they aren't stupid. They realize that would set off a firestorm for the league, and make themselves look like the ultimate hypocrite. That wouldn't have been an option for the pats to demand an investigation into cheating allegations against other team.

Likewise, just because the cheaters didnt demand anything, doesn't mean cheating is okay by anybody. Just because the best cheater got played and accepts it as part of the game doesn't mean it should be a part of the game.

 
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?

 
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?
yeah, the ineptitude is unbelievable, right? that these coaches didn't spend the extra time (which I'm sure they readily had) to stage cameras to catch the Patriots whom, because of their systematic cheating system already had time allotted for such things...is beyond me.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...

4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.
Right; and 4 SB wins which could easily have been zero. Cheating not withstanding.
You guys are hilarious. Ok what team was better? Dominant.
Maybe not for the length of time...but many teams were better than these Pats teams.

Their most dominant team was one that lost in the super bowl.

Impressive to have that length of winning...impressive to win that many.

Credit to Brady and BB. But dominance does not really come to mind as they never really dominated anything but their division.

 
Do Your Job on NFL Network right now, coming back from this break will be the beginning of the delfategate #### from inside the organization.

 
Im beginning to think the Patriots need to change their name to the New England Nazi Party....at least thats how it seems with the never ending hate from other teams fans

 
Do Your Job on NFL Network right now, coming back from this break will be the beginning of the delfategate #### from inside the organization.
The segment on the trick plays from the Ravens and Colts games is awesome. I was hammered and didn't understand/care during the game but seeing the breakdown of the strategy, preparation, and execution of those plays shows the genius of Belichick

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It just proves HobbsAB is a hater and that was a troll move putting some stupid poll up. In other news Pats looking to reinstate the 2 ball boys/locker room guys.
Nice :thumbup: :thumbup:

For the uninitiated, this thread was merged with one that had the poll.

I think it's brilliant that the Pats have pushed the reinstatement issue. NFL keeps lying and ESPN has to act confused as to why the Pats need to ask for permission.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.
Right; and 4 SB wins which could easily have been zero. Cheating not withstanding.
You guys are hilarious. Ok what team was better? Dominant.
Maybe not for the length of time...but many teams were better than these Pats teams.

Their most dominant team was one that lost in the super bowl.

Impressive to have that length of winning...impressive to win that many.

Credit to Brady and BB. But dominance does not really come to mind as they never really dominated anything but their division.
call it what you will, i would love for my Browns to have a Patriots period of "non dominance"
 
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?
yeah, the ineptitude is unbelievable, right? that these coaches didn't spend the extra time (which I'm sure they readily had) to stage cameras to catch the Patriots whom, because of their systematic cheating system already had time allotted for such things...is beyond me.
"Stage a camera"? Obviously you phrased it that way to give the impression that plugging in a videocamera and pointing it at the playbook sitting on the desk is an incredibly complicated task that opposing coaches couldn't possibly be expected to undertake. In other words, just more excuses.If an opposing coach truly believed the Pats were going to steal their playbook it would be unbelievably inept to not instruct someone on their staff to take 5 minutes to set up a camera and catch them in the act. Supposedly, opposing coaches took the time to set up fake playbooks, why not a camera? Even a simple iphone camera?

It's all B.S. plain and simple. Baseless accusations with zero proof from anonymous sources. But you all want to believe it so badly that you ignore obvious questions and make more excuses.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?
yeah, the ineptitude is unbelievable, right? that these coaches didn't spend the extra time (which I'm sure they readily had) to stage cameras to catch the Patriots whom, because of their systematic cheating system already had time allotted for such things...is beyond me.
"Stage a camera"? Obviously you phrased it that way to give the impression that plugging in a videocamera and pointing it at the playbook sitting on the desk is an incredibly complicated task that opposing coaches couldn't possibly be expected to undertake. In other words, just more excuses.If an opposing coach truly believed the Pats were going to stesl their playbook it would be unbelievably inept to not instruct someone on their staff to take 5 minutes to set up a camera and catch them in the act. Supposedly, opposing coaches took the time to set up fake playbooks, why not a camera? Even a simple iphone camera?

It's all B.S. plain and simple. Baseless accusations with zero proof from anonymous sources. But you all want to believe it so badly that you ignore obvious questions and make more excuses.
How do you know no one did, and the league ignored complaints?Besides, it wouldn't make any difference - Goodell would have destroyed any film evidence anyways.

 
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?
yeah, the ineptitude is unbelievable, right? that these coaches didn't spend the extra time (which I'm sure they readily had) to stage cameras to catch the Patriots whom, because of their systematic cheating system already had time allotted for such things...is beyond me.
"Stage a camera"? Obviously you phrased it that way to give the impression that plugging in a videocamera and pointing it at the playbook sitting on the desk is an incredibly complicated task that opposing coaches couldn't possibly be expected to undertake. In other words, just more excuses.If an opposing coach truly believed the Pats were going to stesl their playbook it would be unbelievably inept to not instruct someone on their staff to take 5 minutes to set up a camera and catch them in the act. Supposedly, opposing coaches took the time to set up fake playbooks, why not a camera? Even a simple iphone camera?

It's all B.S. plain and simple. Baseless accusations with zero proof from anonymous sources. But you all want to believe it so badly that you ignore obvious questions and make more excuses.
Well said sir. Here, have a cookie. The trolls will be along shortly to villify you.

 
Personally I think its silly that a playbook would even be left behind anyway. My issue is the expectation that all teams must waste their time and employ full-time counter-espionage tactics when playing the Patriots. Just ####### stop cheating.

 
Personally I think its silly that a playbook would even be left behind anyway. My issue is the expectation that all teams must waste their time and employ full-time counter-espionage tactics when playing the Patriots. Just ####### stop cheating.
I think it is silly that the Patriots have to waste their time disputing false cheating accusations from irrational, whiny Salty Haters.

Formation-gate, Waiver-gate, Kicking-ball Deflategate, Deflategate -- all of these were false/debunked accusations.

Just stop making false accusations.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/roger-goodell-greeted-boos-deflategate-hearing-article-1.2323018

"A skeptical Berman sounded unconvinced: "What is the evidence of a scheme or conspiracy that covers the Jan. 18 game? I'm having trouble finding it."

 
Maybe not for the length of time...but many teams were better than these Pats teams.

Their most dominant team was one that lost in the super bowl.

Impressive to have that length of winning...impressive to win that many.

Credit to Brady and BB. But dominance does not really come to mind as they never really dominated anything but their division.
The Patriots record in division games since 2001 is 67-19 (.779), their record in non-division games is 103-35 (.746). How high does a team's winning % have to be to be dominant?

 
Lol

ESPN had already rescinded part of that article. Specifically the part about a low level employee going into the locker room and stealing game plans.

 
JIslander said:
satch said:
There have been numerous dynasties throughout NFL history, but only one has been so thoroughly dominant that their opponents had to resort to convincing themselves that "they must be cheating".

Embrace it Pats fans. It's not easy being the greatest NFL dynasty of all time.....and they're not done yet.
Dominant? Cake division and 4 suspect SB wins by what 12 points total?
Put another way...

4 SB championships since 2002 which could have easily been 6 SB wins, yet the Patriots lost to the Giants in 2008 and 2012 by a total of 7 combined points and what amounts to, basically, one freakish play in each of those 2 games.

I don't care what division a team is in...there's nothing "cake" about it.
Right; and 4 SB wins which could easily have been zero. Cheating not withstanding.
You guys are hilarious. Ok what team was better? Dominant.
Baltimore Colts
Yeah, the 1961 Packers were a force too.

You may want to stop living in the past and acknowledge the best team over the last decade + in this salary cap era.

 
So the balls were not deflated and the patriots paid the money and a draft pick for nothing?

And still using the tired old salty haters schtick?

 
Maybe not for the length of time...but many teams were better than these Pats teams.

Their most dominant team was one that lost in the super bowl.

Impressive to have that length of winning...impressive to win that many.

Credit to Brady and BB. But dominance does not really come to mind as they never really dominated anything but their division.
The Patriots record in division games since 2001 is 67-19 (.779), their record in non-division games is 103-35 (.746). How high does a team's winning % have to be to be dominant?
Win more than one title in 10 years. And actually dominate in those title games rather than always squeaking them out.

Great teams...great accomplishment.

But not dominant teams.

Get it yet?

 
So the balls were not deflated and the patriots paid the money and a draft pick for nothing?

And still using the tired old salty haters schtick?
Correct and not for nothing, but for a manufactured punishment of a manufactured transgression to mollify a group of owners still pissed they can't beat them on the field and use the office of the commissioner to extract some measure of revenge.

 
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?
yeah, the ineptitude is unbelievable, right? that these coaches didn't spend the extra time (which I'm sure they readily had) to stage cameras to catch the Patriots whom, because of their systematic cheating system already had time allotted for such things...is beyond me.
"Stage a camera"? Obviously you phrased it that way to give the impression that plugging in a videocamera and pointing it at the playbook sitting on the desk is an incredibly complicated task that opposing coaches couldn't possibly be expected to undertake. In other words, just more excuses.If an opposing coach truly believed the Pats were going to stesl their playbook it would be unbelievably inept to not instruct someone on their staff to take 5 minutes to set up a camera and catch them in the act. Supposedly, opposing coaches took the time to set up fake playbooks, why not a camera? Even a simple iphone camera?

It's all B.S. plain and simple. Baseless accusations with zero proof from anonymous sources. But you all want to believe it so badly that you ignore obvious questions and make more excuses.
How do you know no one did, and the league ignored complaints?Besides, it wouldn't make any difference - Goodell would have destroyed any film evidence anyways.
How do I know no one videotaped the Patriots stealing playbooks? Because to this point there is zero evidence of that having happened.That's the difference between you and me. I like to see or hear actual evidence and/or proof before believing something. Not only are you willing to blindly believe something without evidence or proof, but you're more than happy to further propagate and embellish the baseless accusations by suggesting that the Patriots were caught on video stealing playbooks, and the video was then destroyed by the commissioner. With zero evidence or proof, of course. Might as well add that to the litany of lies, falsehoods, and baseless accusations against the Patriots. There are throngs of sheep just like yourself just waiting to be fed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Personally I think its silly that a playbook would even be left behind anyway. My issue is the expectation that all teams must waste their time and employ full-time counter-espionage tactics when playing the Patriots. Just ####### stop cheating.
Just stop wasting time worrying about all this "cheating" nonsense, stop making excuses, and start focusing on being better at football. Like the Patriots do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has anyone answered my question as to why the oposing coaches who allegedly planted fake playbooks for the Pats to steal didn't videotape it?
yeah, the ineptitude is unbelievable, right? that these coaches didn't spend the extra time (which I'm sure they readily had) to stage cameras to catch the Patriots whom, because of their systematic cheating system already had time allotted for such things...is beyond me.
"Stage a camera"? Obviously you phrased it that way to give the impression that plugging in a videocamera and pointing it at the playbook sitting on the desk is an incredibly complicated task that opposing coaches couldn't possibly be expected to undertake. In other words, just more excuses.If an opposing coach truly believed the Pats were going to stesl their playbook it would be unbelievably inept to not instruct someone on their staff to take 5 minutes to set up a camera and catch them in the act. Supposedly, opposing coaches took the time to set up fake playbooks, why not a camera? Even a simple iphone camera?

It's all B.S. plain and simple. Baseless accusations with zero proof from anonymous sources. But you all want to believe it so badly that you ignore obvious questions and make more excuses.
How do you know no one did, and the league ignored complaints?Besides, it wouldn't make any difference - Goodell would have destroyed any film evidence anyways.
How do I know no one videotaped the Patriots stealing playbooks? Because to this point there is zero evidence of that having happened.That's the difference between you and me. I like to see or hear actual evidence and/or proof before believing something. Not only are you willing to blindly believe something without evidence or proof, but you're more than happy to further propagate and embellish the baseless accusations by suggesting that the Patriots were caught on video stealing playbooks, and the video was then destroyed by the commissioner. Might as well add that to the litany of lies, falsehoods, and baseless accusations against the Patriots. There are throngs of sheep just like yourself just waiting to be fed.
lol.

 
Personally I think its silly that a playbook would even be left behind anyway. My issue is the expectation that all teams must waste their time and employ full-time counter-espionage tactics when playing the Patriots. Just ####### stop cheating.
Just stop wasting time worrying about all this "cheating" nonsense, stop making excuses, and start focusing on being better at football. Like the Patriots do.
They also have some focus on cheating, obviously. Teams would do well to better their efforts in such areas if its gonna be such a frequent happenstance.

 
I don't know why you guys are talking about stealing playbooks. ESPN already rescinded that part of the article.
That won't stop the sheep from believing it. They still believe the Pats taped the Rams walk through for crying out loud. Did ESPN issue a formal apology to the Patriots?
 
Personally I think its silly that a playbook would even be left behind anyway. My issue is the expectation that all teams must waste their time and employ full-time counter-espionage tactics when playing the Patriots. Just ####### stop cheating.
Just stop wasting time worrying about all this "cheating" nonsense, stop making excuses, and start focusing on being better at football. Like the Patriots do.
They also have some focus on cheating, obviously. Teams would do well to better their efforts in such areas if its gonna be such a frequent happenstance.
I guess this is where we are. Its like the problem with gun violence. We just need more guns in our churches and schools. We just need more teams to cheat like the Pats and then the playing field will be leveled.

 
Lol

ESPN had already rescinded part of that article. Specifically the part about a low level employee going into the locker room and stealing game plans.
One of the few actually new things in the article. Go figure. All yesterday on the radio current and former nfl players were talking about how it would have been literally impossible.

Man ESPN really is a joke.

 
So the balls were not deflated and the patriots paid the money and a draft pick for nothing?

And still using the tired old salty haters schtick?
Go watch your sucky team lose all year and leave the winners alone
Hey BK bro... might wanna pop some nolvadex or aromasin. Just sayin'. :banned:
SARMS baby ;)
btw...im a raiders fan living in new england...im just playin along for fun

 
Lol

ESPN had already rescinded part of that article. Specifically the part about a low level employee going into the locker room and stealing game plans.
One of the few actually new things in the article. Go figure. All yesterday on the radio current and former nfl players were talking about how it would have been literally impossible.

Man ESPN really is a joke.
ESPN is an entertainment network - unfortunately many "news" organizations have become this whether they admit it or not.

Spygate, Deflategate, the Patriots, this stuff is GOLD for ESPN and (ratings-wise) The NFL.

The OTA story/article/video/content was probably one of their most clicked/viewed pieces - why would they care if anything is actually "true"? Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story that sells (a lot!).

The NFL now has even more emotion injected into its fanbases (both Pats and non-Pats) with Kennedy Assassination Levels of intrigue, conspiracy, paranoia.

And it's comical really - one of the networks ran a Kennedy Assassination Special (CBS, ABC?) a few years back - they essentially proved Oswald acted alone - but few people actually changed their mind - it was simply more fun to believe the conspiracy.

The same thing will happen with The Pats - people's minds are already made up regardless of what "facts" come out and there is so much info out there that either side can cherry-pick whatever already supports their opinion. In the end, this era of the New England Patriots is and will be forever the stuff of Legends.

 
So the balls were not deflated and the patriots paid the money and a draft pick for nothing?

And still using the tired old salty haters schtick?
Go watch your sucky team lose all year and leave the winners alone
Hey BK bro... might wanna pop some nolvadex or aromasin. Just sayin'. :banned:
SARMS baby ;)
btw...im a raiders fan living in new england...im just playin along for fun
I'll be at this Sundays Raider home opener, box seats and A.C. :) Though I may walk down amongst the neophytes. Hope they massacre the Bengals.

SARM of choice?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top