I'm starting to think that people use this argument way too much on these boards. As far as talent goes, they are about equal. Sorry, for all those Jordan lovers or Morris haters, but Jordan and Morris are similar backs with similar talent levels, both better suited for backup roles.
Switz, when you say something I agree with it'll be the first time.Lamont Jordan: drafted #49, ran 4.57 at 230 pounds, 22.8 years old at the start of his rookie seasonSammy Morris: drafted #156, ran 4.58 at 220 pounds, 23.4 years old at the start of his rookie seasonThat alone should tell you all you need to know. But since I don't expect you'll believe that, here are some other measures with a basis beyond "Switz thinks it, therefore it is so!"Lamont Jordan: 97 games, 4586 yards, 27 TDs (47 yards/game from scrimmage, .28 TDs/game) - three year starter at RB when healthy (after being stuck behind Curtis Martin).Sammy Morris: 100 games, 2680 yards, 18 TDs (27 yards/game from scrimmage, .18 TDs/game) - never named first choice starterNow maybe there's some OTHER way of measuring talent that I'm not aware of. If so, please educate me. You got something more than opinion?