rockaction
Footballguy
Okay, so what say you about voting for Trump?
Do you now? How will she govern? please tell us because I don't know if we get 70's hillary getting fired from watergate for unethical behavior. Or 80's Hillary laughing about getting a rapist she knew was guilty freed. Or racist 90's Hillary calling black youths super predators who need to brought to heel. Or 2000 hillary who voted for the iraq war than said she was against it that started the Obama is a Muslim movement.
YOU HAVE NO CLUE BECAUSE HILLARY DOESN'T KNOW UNTIL SHE GETS THE HIGHEST BIDDER TO TELL HER WHAT TO DO!!!
This is a legitimate criticism. I still think that voting for Hillary is something that is more in keeping with conservatism that voting Trump and Putin.Do you now? How will she govern? please tell us because I don't know if we get 70's hillary getting fired from watergate for unethical behavior. Or 80's Hillary laughing about getting a rapist she knew was guilty freed. Or racist 90's Hillary calling black youths super predators who need to brought to heel. Or 2000 hillary who voted for the iraq war than said she was against it that started the Obama is a Muslim movement.
YOU HAVE NO CLUE BECAUSE HILLARY DOESN'T KNOW UNTIL SHE GETS THE HIGHEST BIDDER TO TELL HER WHAT TO DO!!!
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-releases-list-of-names-of-potential-united-states-supreme-c - list of people Trump would strongly considerI can call myself a conservative because I don't know who Trump will nominate. I know how Hillary will govern; that's a conservative point of view. As for Trump, he's three sheets to every wind that happens. I don't know that he'll stand athwart history yelling "stop!"
If I believed one iota in Hillary Clinton, I don't think they would either. But, alas, the indefensible is sometimes indefensible on a Friday night.rockaction vs Dexter. Don't think they'd even put that one on the board in Vegas.
This Dexter cat is both, a troll, and completely unhinged. Politifact has already debunked every single one of those lies.
at politifactYou probably think that Snopes and the Onion are legit unbiased credible news sources too.This Dexter cat is both, a troll, and completely unhinged. Politifact has already debunked every single one of those lies.
Again. Willful ignorance. Cognitive dissonance. Troll.at politifact
What is it with conservatives and fact checking sites like Politifact or Snopes? Do the facts have a liberal bias?Again. Willful ignorance. Cognitive dissonance. Troll.
What is it with conservatives and fact checking sites like Politifact or Snopes? Do the facts have a liberal bias?
Snopes documents their fact checking with links so you verify yourself if you doubt their findings. It all is pretty straightforward.
You really believe this ####, don't you?https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-releases-list-of-names-of-potential-united-states-supreme-c - list of people Trump would strongly consider
- Hillary will govern for her donors.
- Hillary will continue to feed the cops are racist narrative
- Hillary will continue to leave our borders unprotected and legalize every illegal, thus making it impossible for a Republican to win in the near future. Not to mention leaving our borders open make it easy for drugs to come into our country as well.
- Hillary will bring in the same Refugees that Germany has brought in and if you do a little research you'll see they have an absurd amount of rape and 99 percent unemployment.
- Hillary will push strange social issues like Tranny Bathroom rights
- Hillary will appoint liberal judges at the Supreme court level, and they will vote against our constitutional rights.
- Hillary has a history of bad judgement
- Hillary isn't healthy
- Hillary is most likely to get into WW3 with Russia.
Thanks! Found this in less than 10 seconds:A ten second google search will answer all of your questions.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/14/heres-how-two-twitter-pranksters-convinced-the-world-that-pepe-the-frog-meme-is-just-a-front-for-white-nationalism/?utm_campaignThanks! Found this in less than 10 seconds:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/26/how-pepe-the-frog-became-a-nazi-trump-supporter-and-alt-right-symbol.html
How Pepe the Frog Became a Nazi Trump Supporter and Alt-Right Symbol
Daily Caller? What, was the Breitbart site down?
It explains how the Olivia Nuzzi's article you linked was based on a troll and not true at all.TLDR
Hello my baby, hello my honey....I'm no Trump supporter by a longshot, but I do question Hillary's campaign strategy of pitting herself against a cartoon frog.
this is why people can't stand (most) liberals. you have to be ####### joking with this.What is it with conservatives and fact checking sites like Politifact or Snopes? Do the facts have a liberal bias?
Snopes documents their fact checking with links so you verify yourself if you doubt their findings. It all is pretty straightforward.
#dixoutShamrockPride said:Here's the fact FFA: The only people making Pepe into some political controversy are old people. Millennials straight do not GAF about anything you're trying to make Pepe out to be.
Pepe is a f***ing internet meme, used for comedy purposes. The younger generation doesn't GAF for how its original purpose (comedy) is manipulated. People tried to politicize Harambe, and people fought back and took back control by overloading the internet with an infinite number of comedy memes, where Harambe is still running strong as possibly the most viral meme of all time. The point is...nobody GAF, and nobody is going to stop using Pepe as a meme because some losers tried to politicize it.
tfw when you're not the most viral meme of all time.ShamrockPride said:Here's the fact FFA: The only people making Pepe into some political controversy are old people. Millennials straight do not GAF about anything you're trying to make Pepe out to be.
Pepe is a f***ing internet meme, used for comedy purposes. The younger generation doesn't GAF for how its original purpose (comedy) is manipulated. People tried to politicize Harambe, and people fought back and took back control by overloading the internet with an infinite number of comedy memes, where Harambe is still running strong as possibly the most viral meme of all time. The point is...nobody GAF, and nobody is going to stop using Pepe as a meme because some losers tried to politicize it.
dadAlsoat Pepe being a racist symbol.
This election has it all. WATTBA
I've never seen a Harambe meme.ShamrockPride said:Here's the fact FFA: The only people making Pepe into some political controversy are old people. Millennials straight do not GAF about anything you're trying to make Pepe out to be.
Pepe is a f***ing internet meme, used for comedy purposes. The younger generation doesn't GAF for how its original purpose (comedy) is manipulated. People tried to politicize Harambe, and people fought back and took back control by overloading the internet with an infinite number of comedy memes, where Harambe is still running strong as possibly the most viral meme of all time. The point is...nobody GAF, and nobody is going to stop using Pepe as a meme because some losers tried to politicize it.
Roses are redI've never seen a Harambe meme.
ded##### out for Harambe.ShamrockPride said:Here's the fact FFA: The only people making Pepe into some political controversy are old people. Millennials straight do not GAF about anything you're trying to make Pepe out to be.
Pepe is a f***ing internet meme, used for comedy purposes. The younger generation doesn't GAF for how its original purpose (comedy) is manipulated. People tried to politicize Harambe, and people fought back and took back control by overloading the internet with an infinite number of comedy memes, where Harambe is still running strong as possibly the most viral meme of all time. The point is...nobody GAF, and nobody is going to stop using Pepe as a meme because some losers tried to politicize it.
And there's the problem with millennials in a nut shell, wasting a valuable resource for the betterment of humanity like the Internet to post stupid pictures of cartoon frogs.ShamrockPride said:Here's the fact FFA: The only people making Pepe into some political controversy are old people. Millennials straight do not GAF about anything you're trying to make Pepe out to be.
Pepe is a f***ing internet meme, used for comedy purposes. The younger generation doesn't GAF for how its original purpose (comedy) is manipulated. People tried to politicize Harambe, and people fought back and took back control by overloading the internet with an infinite number of comedy memes, where Harambe is still running strong as possibly the most viral meme of all time. The point is...nobody GAF, and nobody is going to stop using Pepe as a meme because some losers tried to politicize it.
Because many of the things they are checking are up for interpretation. And since the owners are liberal they tend to slant that way and in some cases really reach to a conculusion that isn't really there.squistion said:What is it with conservatives and fact checking sites like Politifact or Snopes? Do the facts have a liberal bias?
Snopes documents their fact checking with links so you verify yourself if you doubt their findings. It all is pretty straightforward.
Is this what you're arguing against:Because many of the things they are checking are up for interpretation. And since the owners are liberal they tend to slant that way and in some cases really reach to a conculusion that isn't really there.
For example. The Orlando terrorist is a registered Democrat with an active voter registration. His father has met with Hillary in the past and continues to support her. In the Snopes fact check they say his political party is unknown.
This is just one example of many instants of the things these "fact checkers" do that drive conservatives crazy and leads us to suspect many of the facts these websites check.
Good question BTW.
WHAT'S TRUE: Omar Mateen registered to vote as a Democrat in the state of Florida back in 2006.
WHAT'S Undetermined: His U.S. political affiliation (if any) at the time of the shooting is unknown.
I'm not arguing anything. I'm answering a question and giving an example.Is this what you're arguing against: