NutterButter
Footballguy
Not sure what that extra 15% gets us, but just another option towards solvency. Whatever the final solution, I'm pretty certain it will include some way of having the wealthy pay more.SS benefits are 85% taxed at the top end, so not far from the 100% you note.
What these researchers are ignoring is that high earners contribute past the second bend point, which is accretive to SS; i.e. they pay in much more to support that first 90% slope. Their contribution to SS happens before retirement.
Also, it's important to point out that the SS actuarial tables are based on overall mortality rates. They don't discriminate by economic status, race, gender, etc. This is one area that treats all US citizens as equals - a laudable status.
for her friend...
just a tour de France.