What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Personal Finance Advice and Education! (3 Viewers)

SS benefits are 85% taxed at the top end, so not far from the 100% you note.

What these researchers are ignoring is that high earners contribute past the second bend point, which is accretive to SS; i.e. they pay in much more to support that first 90% slope.  Their contribution to SS happens before retirement.

Also, it's important to point out that the SS actuarial tables are based on overall mortality rates.  They don't discriminate by economic status, race, gender, etc.  This is one area that treats all US citizens as equals - a laudable status.  
Not sure what that extra 15% gets us, but just another option towards solvency.   Whatever the final solution, I'm pretty certain it will include some way of having the wealthy pay more.   

 
Not sure what that extra 15% gets us, but just another option towards solvency.   Whatever the final solution, I'm pretty certain it will include some way of having the wealthy pay more.  
IMO it will involve removing the income cap on contributions.  

 
ShaqAttaq said:
Raising the cap seems a helluva lot more politically feasible than outright removal 
There would be some push back from the high income earners for sure. But probably not a significant sway in voting.

Might even gain some votes if you're seen as a person who helped fix SS. 

I'd sure prefer it to adding a fee on stock trading.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ShaqAttaq said:
Raising the cap seems a helluva lot more politically feasible than outright removal 
I think they’ll end up doing that. It’s not a Trump thing but I could see it happen. It’s the easiest fix and is relatively the least painful. Someone making $1M has been paying 0.7% of their income while most everyone else pays 6.2%.

It’s annoying for me as I don’t make @Otis money but for most of my career I’ve had to pay an extra $200-300 every year for the increase. The limit keeps going up 3-4% so for the middle class the hit keeps going up but for the really high wage earners (who aren’t covered by hedge funds/capital gains where you don’t pay SS), it goes up by less than 1%.

If it’s a problem just rip the bandaid off and solve the problem. Medicare already doesn’t have a limit.

 
NutterButter said:
Yeah, that's what's being thrown out there.    As long as you keep the payout the same, accomplishing the same thing from the opposite end.   
This fix is one of the few that makes logical sense.  Lift the cap on payouts and the SS payroll tax cap limit.  The people at the top end put in much more than they get out at that point, so it's accretive to the SS system.  We just have to not be outraged that some lady in Albuquerque is getting a 10k SS check every month when she retires. 

I'd also argue that setting SS eligibility by using "average age of death - x years" instead of a set age also makes sense.  As lifespans grow or shorten the risk to the SS trust fund gets much easier to predict and manage.

 
Asking for a friend... 

What value / how do you decide how to value your personal property if you actually wanted an accurate assessment of net worth? 

Home equity, cars, some other stuff is fairly straight forward, but what about all your furniture, clothing, etc? 

I don't care all that much about NW, but the wife asked :oldunsure:  for her friend... 

Maybe it's time to start hiding money. 

 
Asking for a friend... 

What value / how do you decide how to value your personal property if you actually wanted an accurate assessment of net worth? 

Home equity, cars, some other stuff is fairly straight forward, but what about all your furniture, clothing, etc? 

I don't care all that much about NW, but the wife asked :oldunsure:  for her friend... 

Maybe it's time to start hiding money. 
Probably depends on who exactly is getting the values.  I think the easiest way would be to do replacement value.  This will be higher than the actual value (new bedroom set is obviously more than a used bedroom set) but it's a start.

If this was just for my personal assessment, I wouldn't sweat it too much.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Asking for a friend... 

What value / how do you decide how to value your personal property if you actually wanted an accurate assessment of net worth? 

Home equity, cars, some other stuff is fairly straight forward, but what about all your furniture, clothing, etc? 

I don't care all that much about NW, but the wife asked :oldunsure:  for her friend... 

Maybe it's time to start hiding money. 
We tried to sell our table set. No one wanted it. 
 

im guessing the market for my clothing is not high. 
 

assign a value of $-200 to hire movers to clear the stuff out of your house 

 
We tried to sell our table set. No one wanted it. 
 

im guessing the market for my clothing is not high. 
 

assign a value of $-200 to hire movers to clear the stuff out of your house 
This.   Other than jewelry, everything else we own wouldn't be worth my time to sell it. 

 
Was going to post the same. Despite ebay, craigslist, facebook marketplace, LetGo, etc. most used household goods aren't worth crap.

 
Asking for a friend... 

What value / how do you decide how to value your personal property if you actually wanted an accurate assessment of net worth? 

Home equity, cars, some other stuff is fairly straight forward, but what about all your furniture, clothing, etc? 

I don't care all that much about NW, but the wife asked :oldunsure:  for her friend... 

Maybe it's time to start hiding money. 
Zero, unless it includes a Picasso or some big rocks in the jewelry box.  Good tools may be worth something, but probably not enough to make an effort to account for.

 
We tried to sell our table set. No one wanted it. 
 

im guessing the market for my clothing is not high. 
 

assign a value of $-200 to hire movers to clear the stuff out of your house 
Yeah, and really as Hagen mentioned with jewelry, it's only smaller stuff that may have value (like guns). 

Anything that takes up space (furniture, appliances) can routinely be found for free for anyone willing to haul it off. Heck, most of the furniture and appliances in my house (which is comfortably furnished and has 4 fridges not counting the one I just gave away) were either free or came with the house. 

One of these days I might upgrade the couch (which was free). My concern is not the cost of a new one. It's the PITA of getting rid of the current one. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Property tax is my biggest expense.   Easily. 
Where? 

One nice thing I guess about living here, annual property taxes are less than our food budget for 2 months.  Almost equal to one month's principal and interest for the mortgage. 

 
Property tax is my biggest expense.   Easily. 
I put about 35% down, but (Property + School) > Mortgage by about $50 a month.

We are transitioning from double income to single income over the next six weeks. Never had to really budget because there was more than enough.

That has to change.

 
I never had an issue paying high property taxes in NJ.   In return we have some of the safest towns and best public schools; cops and teachers cost money.   Other than payroll taxes which for the most part you're getting back, with 2 kids in school, I think property taxes give me the highest ROI of all the taxes I pay.   

 
I pay just under $9,000 in property taxes.

Home value on auditors site is $315,000, taxable value is $110,000.  Zillow estimate is $390,000...which shows how different these things can be.

 
I pay just under $9,000 in property taxes.

Home value on auditors site is $315,000, taxable value is $110,000.  Zillow estimate is $390,000...which shows how different these things can be.
My taxable value is higher than Zillow.  Because Zillow can't seem to recognize when people are selling their lots vs their houses. 

 
Property taxes for me are around $4,500 on a $450,000 house.  I think IN is capped; I haven’t lived here too long and honestly can’t remember.  I do live in one of the best school districts in the state and one of the safest.  So I’m fine with it. 

 
There are NJ counties with property taxes that are easily triple, maybe up to 5x, taxes in eastern PA counties. Wages aren’t providing much of an offset in those situations. 
The highest property taxes (at least back in 2012 when I put a lot of time an effort into studying it) is NJ counties, then mix in NY counties followed by Illinois... then it starts getting mixed up pretty well. But NJ easily lwad the nation in highest property taxes.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top