What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Personal Finance Advice and Education! (5 Viewers)

That's not necessarily true.  By that logic, buying anything doesn't make sense because every dollar spent could be saved instead.

A 0% loan is better than paying cash since the money paid in year 3, 4, 5 are worth less than they were when the car was purchased.
My last car loan (3 years ago) was offering $500 cash to take the loan through the dealership.  2.75% 4 year, if I remember right.  I financed the minimum (10k), pocketed the cash, and paid the loan off after a year.  $300 profit.

No absolutes.  Cash flow is king - keep increasing that over the long term and stuff works out fine.

 
That's not necessarily true.  By that logic, buying anything doesn't make sense because every dollar spent could be saved instead.

A 0% loan is better than paying cash since the money paid in year 3, 4, 5 are worth less than they were when the car was purchased.
He didn't say anything about 0%.  I'm all for borrowing money for free, unlike Dave R.

 
I made the payments with the rent check.  

I COULD afford the car.  I just used my cash on something that made more sense.


Is the rental cash flow minus the car payment interest positive?  Cap rate after this expense?  If you really got a good deal then this should still be accretive (and well beyond the Dave Ramsey "all debt is bad" pontifications)
True, but my point is that Dave is right if he could have paid cash for a $5,000 car instead of going in debt for a $30,000 new car.

 
Is the rental cash flow minus the car payment interest positive?  Cap rate after this expense?  If you really got a good deal then this should still be accretive (and well beyond the Dave Ramsey "all debt is bad" pontifications)
I guess.  Rent is 750.  Car payment was 500.  I have yet to find as good of a deal on another rental in the 4-5 years since.

 
True, but my point is that Dave is right if he could have paid cash for a $5,000 car instead of going in debt for a $30,000 new car.
We could go into a long discussion about the economics of buying a car these days, but I've been where he is and wouldn't buy a 5k car for the kid hauler.  In my family my wife has gotten the newer vehicles and I've always limped along with low dollar econo ####boxes.  It works.

In ghost's case he chose to buy cashflow and essentially took on some debt to boost FCF.  Leverage isn't all bad and moderate leverage can be quite accretive (which this is unless he bought a 20k house  :P ).  Without seeing all the numbers it's hard to judge, but if he did get a screaming deal on the property and can rent it out at a high cap rate he made the right choice.

 
True, but my point is that Dave is right if he could have paid cash for a $5,000 car instead of going in debt for a $30,000 new car.
So could anyone.  I max out my 403b.  I dont keep cash laying around.  

I bought a new car from my brother in law who worked at the dealership at the lowest price around (yes I checked) at 0.9% interest 

There are more ways to afford things than to just pay it off in cash.  Had I saved the cash to pay off the car I would not have been able to invest, and would not be in nearly as good of shape as I am right now.

I get the general rule and agree with the general philosophy.  Ramsey calls it an absolute rule.  I disagree with his take.

 
We could go into a long discussion about the economics of buying a car these days, but I've been where he is and wouldn't buy a 5k car for the kid hauler.  In my family my wife has gotten the newer vehicles and I've always limped along with low dollar econo ####boxes.  It works.

In ghost's case he chose to buy cashflow and essentially took on some debt to boost FCF.  Leverage isn't all bad and moderate leverage can be quite accretive (which this is unless he bought a 20k house  :P ).  Without seeing all the numbers it's hard to judge, but if he did get a screaming deal on the property and can rent it out at a high cap rate he made the right choice.
Bought condo for 40k.  Put 5k into it.  Bank was only taking cash offers.  Had it rented out a month after buying.  Rents for 750.  My monthly expenses of condo fees and insurance are 250 per month.

Van payment was 500.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bought condo for 40k.  Put 5k into it.  Bank was only taking cash offers.  Had it rented out a month after buying.  Rents for 750.  My monthly expenses of condo fees and insurance are 250 per month.

Van payment was 500.
Rent is 750 -250 (Condo fees and insurance) = 500. Van payment is 500, which means you are at net zero as long as the rent is being paid. What happens if the rental sits vacant for 3 months? Or repairs? 

 
Rent is 750 -250 (Condo fees and insurance) = 500. Van payment is 500, which means you are at net zero as long as the rent is being paid. What happens if the rental sits vacant for 3 months? Or repairs? 
How is that net zero? He also had a new van.

@ghostguy123 Dont bother explaining it. I understand. You made a smart decision with you cash and amazingly enough it’s actually okay to enjoy yourself. Life can be too short to just skimp and save for the future. If you are comfortable and not living way above your means enjoy a little bit. I know my wife and I could save more than we do but we certainly enjoy life with our kids. We make well more than average so we can but some of these replies amaze me. Saying that if your rental is occupied means you have a free new car is seen as a bad thing? I don’t want to be stranded on any of the long road trips I make. Oh well. 

 
How is that net zero? He also had a new van.

@ghostguy123 Dont bother explaining it. I understand. You made a smart decision with you cash and amazingly enough it’s actually okay to enjoy yourself. Life can be too short to just skimp and save for the future. If you are comfortable and not living way above your means enjoy a little bit. I know my wife and I could save more than we do but we certainly enjoy life with our kids. We make well more than average so we can but some of these replies amaze me. Saying that if your rental is occupied means you have a free new car is seen as a bad thing? I don’t want to be stranded on any of the long road trips I make. Oh well. 
He's net zero each month. Yes, he has the new van. As someone else mentioned already, it's about cash flow. I'm going to guess that Ghost has enough to cover the car payment should the income stream from the rental shut off. The concern there is that he can't stop paying the condo fees, insurance, or the car payment if that happens. 

Everyone has their own comfort level. But, these are the things that I wonder about when there are government shutdowns and people are struggling to make ends meet. A six month emergency fund should cover things for ghost and others.

 
He's net zero each month. Yes, he has the new van. As someone else mentioned already, it's about cash flow. I'm going to guess that Ghost has enough to cover the car payment should the income stream from the rental shut off. The concern there is that he can't stop paying the condo fees, insurance, or the car payment if that happens. 

Everyone has their own comfort level. But, these are the things that I wonder about when there are government shutdowns and people are struggling to make ends meet. A six month emergency fund should cover things for ghost and others.
He’s net zero pure cash, but I’d bet he’s happier with his new van and he might be above net zero based on maintenance costs if you want to get technical. A 5k car more than likely needs work and has higher maintenance at higher miles. Either way, we all already know he’s clearly thinking smartly about money and this isn’t a New BMW to impress friends. 

 
You said "cheap" which I assumed included zero, or less than inflation loans.  :shrug:  


So could anyone.  I max out my 403b.  I dont keep cash laying around.  

I bought a new car from my brother in law who worked at the dealership at the lowest price around (yes I checked) at 0.9% interest 

There are more ways to afford things than to just pay it off in cash.  Had I saved the cash to pay off the car I would not have been able to invest, and would not be in nearly as good of shape as I am right now.

I get the general rule and agree with the general philosophy.  Ramsey calls it an absolute rule.  I disagree with his take.
Save money to invest while you have a loan for 1%?  That’s not how math works.

Fine. 0%, 1% you just bought something that depreciated $7,000 as soon as you drove it off the lot. This is one thing I’m more strict than Dave. He says not to do it until your net worth is over 1 mil. Me personally I’m never buying a brand new car. A car looses over 50% of its value in the first 4 years. There are enough people that think they need the newest car I’ll just wait a couple years and get it for have as much. Invest the difference and Im way more money ahead. 

 
Rent is 750 -250 (Condo fees and insurance) = 500. Van payment is 500, which means you are at net zero as long as the rent is being paid. What happens if the rental sits vacant for 3 months? Or repairs? 
The condo was worth 60k right after I bought it and put the work into it.   Maybe more.  It's worth 70 now based on a couple other sales over the past year.

As for vacancies, these condos have a waiting list for tenants.

 
Save money to invest while you have a loan for 1%?  That’s not how math works.

Fine. 0%, 1% you just bought something that depreciated $7,000 as soon as you drove it off the lot. This is one thing I’m more strict than Dave. He says not to do it until your net worth is over 1 mil. Me personally I’m never buying a brand new car. A car looses over 50% of its value in the first 4 years. There are enough people that think they need the newest car I’ll just wait a couple years and get it for have as much. Invest the difference and Im way more money ahead. 
That's a whole other topic.  I hate buying new cars.  I have bought used cars my whole life in some cases selling them for more than I paid for them.

Wife wanted one nice family car for the 4 of us.  It's a one time purchase.  I had to live with it.  It was easy knowing I can AFFORD it, just not based on the Ramsey rules.

 
Save money to invest while you have a loan for 1%?  That’s not how math works.

Fine. 0%, 1% you just bought something that depreciated $7,000 as soon as you drove it off the lot. This is one thing I’m more strict than Dave. He says not to do it until your net worth is over 1 mil. Me personally I’m never buying a brand new car. A car looses over 50% of its value in the first 4 years. There are enough people that think they need the newest car I’ll just wait a couple years and get it for have as much. Invest the difference and Im way more money ahead. 
🤷‍♂️ I didn't buy a brand new car, I bought a 2018 with 24,000 miles on it, cheapest I could find for a comparable vehicle. Then I checked, my bank offered 3.5% financing. 

I took the loan but then decided I'd rather not have debt outside of the mortgage (which is 3.25, if the car loan were lower I'd have kept it and paid more on the mortgage). So I paid it off. 

Cost me $1 in interest for the short loan, but the wire payment would have cost me $20, so it paid off kinda. 

If my Roths and TSP weren't already getting maxed I probably would have kept the loan to max those first. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's a whole other topic.  I hate buying new cars.  I have bought used cars my whole life in some cases selling them for more than I paid for them.

Wife wanted one nice family car for the 4 of us.  It's a one time purchase.  I had to live with it.  It was easy knowing I can AFFORD it, just not based on the Ramsey rules.
Yep

We bought a new Odyssey back in 2011 for the family. My cars are used. Son's is my old 08. 

 
I see we are back on the every 10 page "financing a car is for morons that hate money"

*Full disclosure both my cars are paid off 

 
There's probably an inflection point where buying new makes sense. Buy a "used" car that's only one or two or three years used, and you end up with some of the depreciation anyway and pay close to what a slightly lesser "new" car would be. Buy a used car that's five/six/seven years old and the reliability and shorter length of ownership put you reaching back into your pocket sooner than expected. 

I bought a new car in 2005 and am still driving it and hopefully will get another 5-6 years out of it. Pretty much doing routine oil changes only, not having to put much into repairs at all. Maybe next year the wheels start falling off but for now I'm happy having bought it new if it's lasted 15 years without any major expense. Most I've ever had to 'unexpectedly' shell out one-time on it has been for new tires. If it goes 20, 25 years it's well worth buying new at some point.
Not sure I agree. But, everyone's experience is different. In the last 10 years we have had one vehicle lease. (current lease is $230 a month) We want one newer car for the reliability. Our current Subaru lease has been to California and North Carolina twice. I wouldn't trust an older vehicle. My wife drives a 1998 Oldsmobile that we got for $3400 about 6 years ago. It was rarely driven by a little old lady. We've only had to recharge the AC, new battery and regular oil changes. My daughter drives a 1999 Subaru. A local Subaru shop put a new motor in right before we bought it for $4000. In the 4 years that we've had it, it's had to have a new catalytic converter, brakes, and regular oil changes. My son drives a 2007 Focus that we bought brand new. It was originally a lease and got caught in a hail storm. Insurance claim allowed us to acquire it for half the buyout. It's had nothing but regular maintenance, brakes, and a battery. My other son has my former 1997 Ford F150 in NC. It was bought 9 years ago with 97k miles on it. (currently has 135k) It's had a new coil pack, battery, tires and regular maintenance. 

I'm currently looking for a 2005-2010 Honda CRV for around $10k to take the place of my wife's Olds and become our tow vehicle when we buy a motor home to travel next year. 

 
The condo was worth 60k right after I bought it and put the work into it.   Maybe more.  It's worth 70 now based on a couple other sales over the past year.

As for vacancies, these condos have a waiting list for tenants.
Equity is like stocks, you only get the gains when you sell (or in this case take out a mortgage). If you were to get laid off , a mortgage may not be possible. The only option is to sell the rental to pay for your van. 

Waiting lists are fine, but things happen. I see rentals as a business. Cash flow allows you to weather unexpected storms. 

 
Equity is like stocks, you only get the gains when you sell (or in this case take out a mortgage). If you were to get laid off , a mortgage may not be possible. The only option is to sell the rental to pay for your van. 

Waiting lists are fine, but things happen. I see rentals as a business. Cash flow allows you to weather unexpected storms. 
Unemployment would cover all my costs.  Wife works also.

But, if something crazy did happen like that, I could sell the condo for a profit and either pay off the van or just let them repo it.  

If you are going to try and tell me I should have paid cash for the van and not bought the condo, you would just be wrong.  It's not even an argument.

 
Unemployment would cover all my costs.  Wife works also.

But, if something crazy did happen like that, I could sell the condo for a profit and either pay off the van or just let them repo it.  

If you are going to try and tell me I should have paid cash for the van and not bought the condo, you would just be wrong.  It's not even an argument.
I'm not telling you what to do. It's just a conversation. Everyone has different levels of risk. It's not a right or wrong conversation. (We paid off our house instead of investing) 

If I was going to nit pick about anything, it sounds like you're operating without an emergency fund since you mentioned the following options:

1 - Unemployment - Won't replace your entire paycheck. If you're healthcare was through work, premiums could increase. And unemployment isn't a permanent solution. 

2 - Sell the condo for a profit - If you don't have an emergency fund, then you would have to sell it quickly, and probably for cash. Which is how you bought it. That is likely to eat into those potential profits.

3 - Repo the van - What will your wife drive? 

 
1 - Unemployment - Won't replace your entire paycheck. If you're healthcare was through work, premiums could increase. And unemployment isn't a permanent solution. 

2 - Sell the condo for a profit - If you don't have an emergency fund, then you would have to sell it quickly, and probably for cash. Which is how you bought it. That is likely to eat into those potential profits.

3 - Repo the van - What will your wife drive? 
1- My wifes income, unemployment, and the rent checks would more than cover our bills and living expenses.

2- I wouldn't have needed to sell the condo, but if I did it wouldnt be hard to wait a few months before seeing the money.  No need for a panic firesale.  Even if I did a panic firesale it would sell for more than I put into it.  Only problem is the tenant and laws related to that.  But, I wouldn't have has to sell so it's a moot point anyway 

3- my wife would drive my current vehicle, and I would drive my crappy truck I bought cheap a few years ago that I dont drive that often.

 
I think Ramsey's advice is good for the general public as stats show they are stupid.  We are fbgs, and better than general public, so while the general guidelines may apply we have the $$, intelligence, and self control to go outside of those guidelines.

 
I think Ramsey's advice is good for the general public as stats show they are stupid.  We are fbgs, and better than general public, so while the general guidelines may apply we have the $$, intelligence, and self control to go outside of those guidelines.
Yeah, the thing to remember about a good Dave Rant is that they generally come after a string of callers just called in needing advice on how to get out of the debt they created after years of terrible decisions. Every once in a while gets frustrated and just has to let loose. 

He's not talking about the typical FBG. His typical caller has about an $80,000 household income, $50,000 in car debt along with probably another $70,000 in CC and student loan debt. Maybe also a $2500 mortgage payment in the mix.

He's mentioned before that purposefully goes overboard because many of the people he is talking too need a shock to the system.

For somebody that just paid cash for a good rental property and took a car loan at the same time, he may not agree with the timing or would've done it a little differently, but it would be an interesting discussion where he certainly wouldn't lose his mind over it. 

 
His general guidelines on cars are that the cost of all vehicles should not be more than half of your annual income, and that the vehicles should not be so expensive that they prevent you from being debt-free within 2 years (other than the mortgage).

Pretty reasonable.

Though I think there might be a third guideline about no new cars until your net worth is over $1 million (or basically, whenever you reach the point that a car losing half its value in 4 years has no impact on you).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think "dont buy a new car ever" isnt a bad rule, but I would need a "never get married" rule to go along with it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
(or basically, whenever you reach the point that a car losing half its value in 4 years has no impact on you).
Anecdotally at least, the cars I’ve looked at and purchased over the last few years don’t depreciate that fast anymore. For that reason, my last couple purchases have been new (where I used to only buy used).  I wonder how true this is of the market generally - I think the BMWs and similar luxury cars still depreciate like you say. 

 
A new Ramsey Rant probably coming soon.
One thing Dave absolutely gets right is that spending too much on cars is just a killer for retirement savings.  Even if you can afford it in cash, even if it is zero percent down you are buying a depreciating asset.  If you take $20k at age 30 and assume 8% return, you have almost $300k at age 65.  Buying a Lexus/Audi/BMW instead of Toyota/Honda/Nissan until you can fully afford the luxury is a costly decision.  One I see my coworkers make far too often.

 
One thing Dave absolutely gets right is that spending too much on cars is just a killer for retirement savings.  Even if you can afford it in cash, even if it is zero percent down you are buying a depreciating asset.  If you take $20k at age 30 and assume 8% return, you have almost $300k at age 65.  Buying a Lexus/Audi/BMW instead of Toyota/Honda/Nissan until you can fully afford the luxury is a costly decision.  One I see my coworkers make far too often.
Yes.  People who dont earn much, have much, and aren't good with money should not buy new cars.

 
There's probably an inflection point where buying new makes sense. Buy a "used" car that's only one or two or three years used, and you end up with some of the depreciation anyway and pay close to what a slightly lesser "new" car would be. Buy a used car that's five/six/seven years old and the reliability and shorter length of ownership put you reaching back into your pocket sooner than expected. 

I bought a new car in 2005 and am still driving it and hopefully will get another 5-6 years out of it. Pretty much doing routine oil changes only, not having to put much into repairs at all. Maybe next year the wheels start falling off but for now I'm happy having bought it new if it's lasted 15 years without any major expense. Most I've ever had to 'unexpectedly' shell out one-time on it has been for new tires. If it goes 20, 25 years it's well worth buying new at some point.
I read a fantastic article a while back (and of course can't find it again - doh!) that did the math on owning scenarios.  The two best were to buy new and drive for 16 years.  That was right at the same level as buying a 10 year old car and driving for 6 years.  From there a lot of the detail had to do with how good a deal, how much to insure, etc.

An article on how much car to buy.  It's a bit harsh, but for many is a good rule set to follow.

 
I’ve always felt Ramsey is too single minded on debt. Good debt is good. A very low interest rate car loan (under inflation) is objectively a good deal. I get that he’s shooting for clarity and simplicity but financial decisions are often a function of many, many variables, not just about debt.

 
Anecdotally at least, the cars I’ve looked at and purchased over the last few years don’t depreciate that fast anymore. For that reason, my last couple purchases have been new (where I used to only buy used).  I wonder how true this is of the market generally - I think the BMWs and similar luxury cars still depreciate like you say. 
I’ve found this as well. The old adage of cars losing a quarter of their value as soon as you drive them off the lot doesn’t seem to be true any longer, at least for well regarded brands. We’re getting ready to replace our 15 year old Honda SUV in the next year or so, and will likely buy new. When I research 2-3 year old used with reasonable mileage, the small savings from buying used doesn’t seem worth the risk and wear and tear. 

 
I’ve always felt Ramsey is too single minded on debt. Good debt is good. A very low interest rate car loan (under inflation) is objectively a good deal. I get that he’s shooting for clarity and simplicity but financial decisions are often a function of many, many variables, not just about debt.
His theories probably aren't for people who take time to look through personal finance threads and discuss this stuff with people.  

 
I'm not a huge Ramsey fan personally, b/c I have my #### well under control....but the fact is, the vast majority of the US needs someone like him to give in your face hard rules.  In fact, we would be much better off as an economy if we would really take personal finance seriously in our school system.

 
Anecdotally at least, the cars I’ve looked at and purchased over the last few years don’t depreciate that fast anymore. For that reason, my last couple purchases have been new (where I used to only buy used).  I wonder how true this is of the market generally - I think the BMWs and similar luxury cars still depreciate like you say. 
People that think new cars lose half their value in 4 years haven't shopped for 4 year old cars lately.  

 
1- My wifes income, unemployment, and the rent checks would more than cover our bills and living expenses.

2- I wouldn't have needed to sell the condo, but if I did it wouldnt be hard to wait a few months before seeing the money.  No need for a panic firesale.  Even if I did a panic firesale it would sell for more than I put into it.  Only problem is the tenant and laws related to that.  But, I wouldn't have has to sell so it's a moot point anyway 

3- my wife would drive my current vehicle, and I would drive my crappy truck I bought cheap a few years ago that I dont drive that often.
Again, not telling you what to do. It sounds like your debt to income ratio is well under control if your wife's income covers your expenses. 

Based on the information you've provided it looks like you had a $45k emergency fund. You were deciding whether to use that fund to purchase a new car. (which most professionals would say not to do). Then an opportunity arose to buy a house for cash, which you chose to use the emergency fund for instead. 

 
Again, not telling you what to do. It sounds like your debt to income ratio is well under control if your wife's income covers your expenses. 

Based on the information you've provided it looks like you had a $45k emergency fund. You were deciding whether to use that fund to purchase a new car. (which most professionals would say not to do). Then an opportunity arose to buy a house for cash, which you chose to use the emergency fund for instead. 
Correct.  I said that from the start (I think, maybe, I dont know)

 
Where is this a thing?
Northeast Ohio.  Believe it or not, nice town.  Nice school system, low crime.  Lot of homes with multiple acres.

My house is 2000 square feet on half acre with attached 2 car garage, deck, walk out basement, central air, paved driveway.  Good condition.  I paid 115k.  House was move in ready.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve found this as well. The old adage of cars losing a quarter of their value as soon as you drive them off the lot doesn’t seem to be true any longer, at least for well regarded brands. We’re getting ready to replace our 15 year old Honda SUV in the next year or so, and will likely buy new. When I research 2-3 year old used with reasonable mileage, the small savings from buying used doesn’t seem worth the risk and wear and tear. 
Agreed.  When I thought my car was totaled last year (it wasn't, I made out well on the deal) I looked at cars pretty heavily and ended up not looking much at cars between new and 7 years old.  They seemed to be expensive for what you got.

 
...third guideline about no new cars until your net worth is over $1 million (or basically, whenever you reach the point that a car losing half its value in 4 years has no impact on you
The 2nd part I'm on board, as it also includes that you keep the car a long time.  The net worth is a bit overboard unless you want to include the "cash value" of a pension. 

I’ve found this as well. The old adage of cars losing a quarter of their value as soon as you drive them off the lot doesn’t seem to be true any longer, at least for well regarded brands. We’re getting ready to replace our 15 year old Honda SUV in the next year or so, and will likely buy new. When I research 2-3 year old used with reasonable mileage, the small savings from buying used doesn’t seem worth the risk and wear and tear. 
I was looking at Toyota and Honda almost exclusively, you could save roughly 1/3 on a 2 or 3 year vehicle for most of what I wanted. 

I'm saving $10k on the 2018 RAV4, new it was just over $27k. But that's the best deal I found (with a clean Carfax). 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve always felt Ramsey is too single minded on debt. Good debt is good. A very low interest rate car loan (under inflation) is objectively a good deal. I get that he’s shooting for clarity and simplicity but financial decisions are often a function of many, many variables, not just about debt.
That’s true. We’ve got two newer cars but I’m thinking of getting another brand new car just to get a piece of that good debt 

 
I'm not a huge Ramsey fan personally, b/c I have my #### well under control....but the fact is, the vast majority of the US needs someone like him to give in your face hard rules.  In fact, we would be much better off as an economy if we would really take personal finance seriously in our school system.
Agree completely with the first sentence, disagree completely with the second (at least in the short term). Our economy is driven by people making terrible financial decisions, the cynic in me thinks that's precisely why it isn't taken seriously in our school system.

 
Agree completely with the first sentence, disagree completely with the second (at least in the short term). Our economy is driven by people making terrible financial decisions, the cynic in me thinks that's precisely why it isn't taken seriously in our school system.
I don't disagree at all.  

 
Agree completely with the first sentence, disagree completely with the second (at least in the short term). Our economy government is driven by people making terrible financial decisions, the cynic in me thinks that's precisely why it isn't taken seriously in our school system.
Agreed with your post, sadly my edit also works.

 
Agree completely with the first sentence, disagree completely with the second (at least in the short term). Our economy is driven by people making terrible financial decisions, the cynic in me thinks that's precisely why it isn't taken seriously in our school system.
I got that it's capatilism, but that still bothers me as a Christian.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top