bigmiiiiike
Footballguy
A lot of discussion on here lately about taking Rodgers with a mid 1st. Peyton Manning can be had in the mid-2nd or later and that is a steal compared to Rodgers or Brees (or Romo/Brady/Schaub if selected in the late 2nd).
In 2009, Manning had 4500 yards and 33 TDs. AND WAS SHUT DOWN IN THE SECOND HALF OF WEEK 16 AND ALMOST ALL OF WEEK 17. The total numbers he posted are great, but not so great as to lock up the #1QB off the board status for 2010. If he plays the full 2009 season competitively he puts up 4850 and 36 EASILY.
The Colts show no signs of "committing to the run" more in 2010, and their receiving corps is as good as ever. Is there any reason people aren't sky high on Manning at his price point in the mid 2nd, especially compared to other QBs going in the first two rounds? Do we really expect Rodgers and/or Brees to outperform 4850 and 36???
In 2009, Manning had 4500 yards and 33 TDs. AND WAS SHUT DOWN IN THE SECOND HALF OF WEEK 16 AND ALMOST ALL OF WEEK 17. The total numbers he posted are great, but not so great as to lock up the #1QB off the board status for 2010. If he plays the full 2009 season competitively he puts up 4850 and 36 EASILY.
The Colts show no signs of "committing to the run" more in 2010, and their receiving corps is as good as ever. Is there any reason people aren't sky high on Manning at his price point in the mid 2nd, especially compared to other QBs going in the first two rounds? Do we really expect Rodgers and/or Brees to outperform 4850 and 36???