What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Peyton Manning's destination (1 Viewer)

'pghrob said:
What is so wrong with keeping him AND drafting Luck and letting Luck learn under the great Manning?
This would divide your city. There would be pro-Luck fans buying billboards in Indianapolis. Imagine the boo-birds after a loss. Neither Luck nor Manning want to be on the same team as each other. It would blow me away if this is the route Irsay decides on.
I disagree. If Manning is recovered and can play even at 90% his usual game, I can't see a backlash from Indy homers if he is playing for them with Luck on sideline. Does it make sense to do that? No. But Peyton is an icon and if healthy and playing well, no way fans turn on him and team if Luck needs to be future qb in waiting. Stands to reason that Colts will get more for Luck than Manning. If Manning can play, Irsay should take king's ransome for Luck and not look back.
I'm not sure on the backlash and all, but the team is undergoing a complete rebuild and investing 28M is a luxury with an incoming rookie QB. Making a decision to keep a QB in his late 30's with several neck surgeries over a rookie is not the way to turn the page, as they have done in every aspect this off season. They could keep Manning, but I'm not willing to wager a dollar with whatever odds that would be in my favor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Are-the-Cardinals-really-the-favorite-to-land-Peyton-Manning.html

Here's the rundown:

Arizona Cardinals: 17% (a $100 bet wins $250)

Miami Dolphins: 14.5% (a $100 bet wins $300)

Washington Redskins: 11.5% (a $100 bet wins $400)

Retire: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)

New York Jets: 8.5% (a $100 bet wins $600)

Kansas City Chiefs: 6.5% (a $100 bet wins $800)

Seattle Seahawks: 5% (a $100 bet wins $1,000)

Houston Texans: 3.5% (a $100 bet wins $1,500)

San Francisco 49ers: 3% (a $100 bet wins $2,000)

Denver Broncos: 2% (a $100 bet wins $3,000)

Tennessee Titans: 1.5% (a $100 bet wins $4,000)

Other Team: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)
I can say that I am surprised at the Arizona odds. Then I looked at Kolbs contract: (per rotoworld)
7/29/2011: Signed a six-year, $65 million contract. The deal contains $12 million guaranteed, including a $10 million signing bonus and Kolb's first-year base salary. Annual $500,000 workout bonuses are available throughout the contract's life. 2012: $1 million (+ $7 million option bonus due 3/17), 2013: $9 million (+ $2 million roster bonus due in March), 2014-2016: $10 million, 2017: Free Agent
It makes a little more sense knowing that Arizona doesn't have to pick up the 7 M option bonus on Kolb.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Manning shocks the world and goes to San Fran. It's his best shot to win a SB IMO. Best defense in the league, great running game, great TE, and serviceable WRs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Are-the-Cardinals-really-the-favorite-to-land-Peyton-Manning.html

Here's the rundown:

Arizona Cardinals: 17% (a $100 bet wins $250)

Miami Dolphins: 14.5% (a $100 bet wins $300)

Washington Redskins: 11.5% (a $100 bet wins $400)

Retire: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)

New York Jets: 8.5% (a $100 bet wins $600)

Kansas City Chiefs: 6.5% (a $100 bet wins $800)

Seattle Seahawks: 5% (a $100 bet wins $1,000)

Houston Texans: 3.5% (a $100 bet wins $1,500)

San Francisco 49ers: 3% (a $100 bet wins $2,000)

Denver Broncos: 2% (a $100 bet wins $3,000)

Tennessee Titans: 1.5% (a $100 bet wins $4,000)

Other Team: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)
I can say that I am surprised at the Arizona odds. Then I looked at Kolbs contract: (per rotoworld)
7/29/2011: Signed a six-year, $65 million contract. The deal contains $12 million guaranteed, including a $10 million signing bonus and Kolb's first-year base salary. Annual $500,000 workout bonuses are available throughout the contract's life. 2012: $1 million (+ $7 million option bonus due 3/17), 2013: $9 million (+ $2 million roster bonus due in March), 2014-2016: $10 million, 2017: Free Agent
It makes a little more sense knowing that Arizona doesn't have to pick up the 7 M option bonus on Kolb.
:goodposting: Doesn't hurt that Peyton recently had a nice luncheon with Fitz. Weaker division and conference than the Dolphins would be. Better shot at playoffs IMO. Fitz seems like the kind of player Peyton would want a fresh start with, not head case Brandon Marshall. Also, plenty of room to bring Wayne along. Just my 2 cents which are virtually worthless.
 
It's funny that there is only a 6.5% chance of him to KC from what I've heard on radio,

most in KC think he is starting for us week 1...including the Chiefs beat writer on the radio Friday who handicapped it as at worst 50/50 (assuming the Colts cut ties). The other option was Orton, he didnt think Cassell would be the guy regardless of what Manning does.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's funny that there is only a 6.5% chance of him to KC from what I've heard on radio, most in KC think he is starting for us week 1...including the Chiefs beat writer on the radio Friday who handicapped it as at worst 50/50 (assuming the Colts cut ties). The other option was Orton, he didnt think Cassell would be the guy regardless of what Manning does.
The Dolphins feel the same way. And Miami owner Stephen Ross will do anything to get Manning. Hes tried everything to sellout games so far and bringing in Manning would do just that. I think if it comes down to money, Miami will offer the most. But ultimately it will be up to Manning and he will choose between AZ and Miami IMO.
 
I think if it comes down to money, Miami will offer the most.
If the Redskins don't manage to get RG3, Snyder is the guy who loves to spend the most. Stephen Ross, while likely the second weathiest owner in the NFL could be bought and sold over and over again by Paul Allen, owner of the Seahawks. Pete 'Rah Rah' Carrol, could make a favorable argument for Manning if his O-line is heathy and he holds on to his two top TE's.
 
I can see the Dolphins definitely being a front runner. Decent defense. Offense has a few weapons at least. FA and the draft could build more around him. They don't

really have a QB right now that the top brass loves or isn't willing to give up on yet (see the Jets and Sanchez, the Ravens and Flacco, the Falcons and Ryan, etc.).

Manning in Washington would be an absolute waste. That offense is terrible. The defense is decent, but that team is going nowhere, and Peyton will want to play for a

contender, no matter how much money Snyder throws at him.

The more I think about it, the more I could actually see the Cardinals giving him a shot. A big part of me wants to say, "NO WAY!" due to the trade and big signing of Kolb.

Would they be willing to give him one year and give up on him already? I can't see them hanging on to his big contract + Peyton's when he signs. So they would have to

release Kolb or restructure (which he obviously would not do). But Manning to Fitz would be epic. And on top of that, his boy Reggie Wayne, along with several other

great WRs will be available in FA. Reuniting in AZ? Wayne + Fitz?! *faint*

 
Houston. Trade Shaub. Get picks. Win superbowl and build for the future. Win all the way around.

 
Where will Peyton Manning land if he leaves the Indianapolis Colts?

Clifton Brown Sporting News

With word coming Tuesday that Peyton Manning and the Colts are about to divorce, the next question is obvious: Where will Manning play next?

Manning’s future is the hottest story of the NFL offseason. Future Hall of Fame quarterbacks do not hit the open market often, even ones coming off serious neck surgery who turn 36 this month.

Here’s a handicap of the potential Manning sweepstakes, ranking the top seven places he could land:

1. Miami Dolphins

Why this fits: They have been searching for a franchise quarterback since Dan Marino retired. Owner Stephen Ross loves stars, and Manning is a big one. Imagine the buzz Manning would create in South Florida. You can almost picture Manning at a restaurant on South Beach, or courtside watching LeBron James and Dwayne Wade.

This makes sense on the field as well. Manning will only go where he believes he can win. A healthy Manning can win in Miami. Joining the Dolphins would unite Manning with a 1,000-yard wide receiver in Brandon Marshall and a 1,000-yard running back in Reggie Bush. New head coach Joe Philbin, coming from a dynamic passing offense with the Packers, would figure to click well with Manning.

The Dolphins gave up the fewest points in the AFC East last season, 19.6 per game. But they were also the lowest-scoring team in the division, averaging just 20.6 points per game to rank 20th in the NFL. Matt Moore did a nice job at quarterback after Chad Henne went down, but would you really go with Moore when you have a chance to get Manning? Philbin might prefer going after Packers backup quarterback Matt Flynn, who is expected to become a free agent. But which player would sell more season tickets for Ross, Flynn or Manning? Ross is the guy signing the checks and his sales pitch to Manning might sound too good to refuse.

2. Arizona Cardinals

Why this fits: Name a quarterback that does not want to play with Larry Fitzgerald. The Cardinals are still searching for Kurt Warner’s successor.

Kevin Kolb did nothing to prove he is ready to handle being a No. 1 quarterback. John Skelton has talent but he is raw. Another season of Kolb-Skelton could mean another season with no playoffs for the Cardinals.

Head coach Ken Whisenhunt has worked well with two elite quarterbacks—Warner with the Cardinals, and Ben Roethlisberger with the Steelers when Whisenhunt was their offensive coordinator. The warm weather and climate-controlled stadium conditions in Arizona are appealing. Moving to Arizona late in his career worked out pretty well for Warner. It could work out just as well for Manning.

3. New York Jets

Why this fits: Some believe Manning would never come to New York, where younger brother and two-time Super Bowl champion Eli Manning is king. The hype-a-minute nature of New York does not seem to fit Manning’s style, nor does bombastic coach Rex Ryan.

Maybe that’s true. But you could also view it this way. The Jets and Giants are in different conferences. Peyton might only face his brother once, if at all, before Peyton retires. The brothers and their families could spend more time together living near each other. Nothing seems to bother Eli, so having his brother play for the other team in New York might not be an issue.

The Jets’ locker room has been a mess. Getting Manning would help. Santonio Holmes is the main character in their locker room soap opera, but he’s still a quality wide receiver with a hefty guaranteed contract. The Jets appear stuck with Holmes, so it behooves them to get the most out of him. Manning can get more out of Holmes than Mark Sanchez.

Jets owner Woody Johnson could not resist courting Brett Favre. Hard to believe Johnson does not feel the same way about Manning.



4. Washington Redskins



Why this fits: Their starting quarterbacks last season were Rex Grossman and John Beck. Enough said.

The Redskins are going to bring in a different quarterback, via the draft, free agency or a trade. Might as well start the process by going after Manning. The Redskins are well under the salary cap, and owner Daniel Snyder has spent big bucks on free agents before, players with less impressive resumes than Manning’s. Coach Mike Shanahan and his son, offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan, may already be drooling at the thought of a Manning-run attack.

However, the interest in this potential marriage could be one-sided. The Redskins have not made the playoffs since 2007. They lack offensive playmakers and a reliable offensive line. Think Manning would join the NFC East, to face pass rushers like DeMarcus Ware, Jason Babin, Jason Pierre-Paul, Justin Tuck and Trent Cole on a regular basis? If he does, he’s a brave man.

5. Kansas City Chiefs

Why this fits: Romeo Crennel says it would be crazy for the Chiefs not to consider Manning. That’s hard to argue with. But does Manning return the affection? The Chiefs made the playoffs in 2010, and they have some nice young players. Maybe Manning looks this way if some other options fall through.



6. Seattle Seahawks

Why this fits: Tarvaris Jackson is the incumbent starter, and he’s no Manning. The Seahawks may be an upgrade at quarterback away from being contenders. Marshawn Lynch would give Manning a solid running back to work with. The Seahawks have a solid defense, and head coach Pete Carroll has built a young talent base that should continue to improve. Seattle loves its Seahawks, and their fans would love this move. If Manning wants to make this move west, the Seahawks would likely be willing to spend the money to make it worth his while.

7. Denver Broncos

Why this fits: John Elway said he wanted to bring in at least two quarterbacks to challenge Tim Tebow. If Elway brings in Manning, Tebow would lose his starting job, but he would also learn from being around one of the all-time greats. Probably won’t happen. But Elway figures at least to make the call.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seattle looks very very tempting at those odds.

still think he ends with the cardinals or phins. (Flushing your $$ away gambling on Washington)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where will Peyton Manning play in 2012?

By Will Brinson

Peyton Manning, by the end of the week, will no longer be a member of the Colts. It could happen as soon as Wednesday, but it's happening. It's the end of an era, and a new one is going to start soon.

But where? Manning is going to play somewhere and he's going to have his choice of a couple of nice spots. Let's break down where he might end up and why each of the potential landing spots does or does not make sense.

Arizona Cardinals

Arizona's always been my personal favorite landing spot for Manning, mainly because they did this same thing with Kurt Warner many moons ago and had great success. Also, you'd have to think they'd like to get out of having Kevin Kolb, and the Bidwell family isn't shy about grabbing big-name veterans.

Pros: Larry Fitzgerald. Also: Larry Fitzgerald. Did we mention Larry Fitzgerald? Seriously though, Fitz is one of the best receivers in the game and he's put up monster stats with mediocre quarterbacks. Arizona's got a defense that came on strong late last year. They play in a relatively weak division; regardless of San Fran's success in 2011, they would be the favorite to win the NFC West with a healthy Manning. Their running game is decent enough, especially if Ryan Williams can return. Reggie Wayne would make this offense hum too. Perhaps Arizona's biggest advantage? They have a domed stadium with natural grass.



Cons: Their offense line needs work, but that's where free agency and the draft comes in. They have a commitment to Kevin Kolb due on March 17, which means the window to land Manning is incredibly short. They can't risk whiffing on Peyton and coughing up Kolb.

Miami Dolphins

The Dolphins also make sense for a number of reasons (see: below), but primarily because they've desperately craved a quarterback since Dan Marino left town. It's the worst-kept secret in the NFL that ownership wants to make the offense a little sexier to bump up ticket sales. Peyton would do that.

Pros: South Beach, where Manning has a condo, is very nice this time of year, provided "this time of year" means "always." The Dolphins have one of the best left tackles in the game in Jake Long to shore up Manning's blindside. Brandon Marshall and Davonne Bess, with the addition of Reggie Wayne and/or Pierre Garcon is a filthy receiving corps. Reggie Bush was a feature back last year, somehow, but would be even more effective playing out of a Peyton-styled offense. They have lots of talent on the defense and could compete right away with Manning. There is no quarterback to worry about replacing. They play the Dolphins in South Beach.

Cons: The division is one of the toughest in the NFL. Peyton would have to play Tom Brady twice a year (although that's awesome for the rest of us). Joe Philbin, the new head coach, comes from Green Bay which means he could be in love with Matt Flynn. That could potentially make it awkward for Manning if owner Stephen Ross is set on Manning and Philbin is not. The media is not afraid to swarm on people who move to South Beach -- just ask LeBron James.

Seattle Seahawks

Since Pete Carroll arrived in Seattle, it's been assumed that at some point he'd make a play for a franchise quarterback. Thus far, the only plays he'd made are trading for Charlie Whitehurst and signing Tarvaris Jackson. Seattle still a "sleeper" for Manning, but landing him would absolutely represent the final piece in Carroll's "master plan."

Pros: The Seahawks need to improve a little at guard, but they've got a lot invested in an offensive line that played well late last year and could keep Manning on his feet. A Manning-less Cardinals team means the Seahawks would absolutely challenge for the division title. There is only Tarvaris Jackson to unseat. The Seahawks have a better defense than a lot of people want to give them credit for, particularly the secondary. Carroll and GM John Schneider are not afraid to be aggressive. Or enthusiastic. So that's a plus.

Cons: The offense weapons are not great. Sidney Rice is the top receiver. Marshawn Lynch just signed a big deal, although he'd theoretically be more effective with Peyton under center. Obviously Wayne/Garcon would be nice additions. Weather and the outdoors of Seattle are not a plus.

Washington Redskins

Peyton's been attached to the Redskins because Daniel Snyder likes to spend money on shiny things with big names. And he's got at doing it, so regardless of whether or not the marriage makes sense, it's entirely possible.

Pros: Straight cash, homey: if Peyton wants to make the most money without worrying about incentives, I gotta think Washington's his spot. Mike Shanahan is desperate, so he'd probably be willing to cede some control to Peyton. This Skins defense would've been much better if they hadn't had to deal with the anemic offense Washington trotted out last year. The running game is fungible, thanks to Shanahan and would help Peyton.

Cons: The Redskins lack offensive weapons, but could bring in Wayne and Garcon if they wanted to keep playing with Peyton. Does Shanahan's system, which involves rolling out quarterbacks, really fit Manning? I say no. The media scene in Washington, with all due respect to my colleagues, can be a bit of a trainwreck. There is tons of coverage of the tiniest stories there. Peyton will have to play his little brother Eli Manning twice a year. He can't possibly want to do that and/or compete with Eli for a division title annually. What happens if Robert Griffin III blows up and Peyton struggles -- will people question the decision not to trade up? That's a serious question.

New York Jets

Rex Ryan and Mike Tannenbaum refused to kill off the rumors about Manning heading to New York and thusly, these rumors live on.

Pros: The Jets are seen as a contender, even if their defense took steps back last year. There are weapons: Santonio Holmes, Dustin Keller and Shonn Greene are decent enough. Reports indicate the Jets might be willing to dump Holmes to land Wayne. The offensive line has some legit talent on it; center Nick Mangold particularly stands out. The Jets have gone the big-name veteran route before, trading for Brett Favre. The Super Bowl will be in New York in 2014.

Cons: It's New York, which means the scrutiny on Manning is going to be amplified a billion times more than anywhere else. Manning is not a "spotlight" guy. Peyton would have to share the city with his brother; though that might be OK from a "having enough space" perspective, do you really think that either one of them wants to hear a million questions about each other at every press conference. The Jets locker room was a disaster last year and there's no guarantee (none, says Rex Ryan!) that it'll be better this year. The Jets play the Patriots twice a year. The Jets don't have the greatest setup for weather/stadium when it comes to helping Peyton.



Kansas City Chiefs

This is where we go from "sleeper" status to "darkhorse" candidate; the Chiefs actually make a lot of sense from a personnel and situational perspective, but is it really a fit? I'm not so sure.

Pros: The Chiefs are a bounceback candidate in 2012, thanks to guys like Eric Berry, Tony Moeaki and Jamaal Charles returning from injury. Charles, Moeaki, Dwayne Bowe and Steve Breaston create a formidable set of offensive weapons. They play the Colts in Arrowhead. Matt Cassel is the primary competition, but he's not a tremendous salary-cap burden in 2012.

Cons: Scott Pioli and Romeo Crennel are Patriots guys. Is that considered the dark side? That's serious: could Peyton play for Patriots midwest or whatever you want to call the Chiefs? It really seems like a long shot. Crennel might actually have tampering charges filed against him.

San Francisco 49ers

If any team is "one guy away," it's the 49ers. And that's why you can't count them out. Plus, Peyton Manning replaced Jim Harbaugh in Indy, and Peyton Manning's getting replaced by Andrew Luck, who was coached by ... Jim Harbaugh. Stew on that one for a minute.

Pros: The 49ers are a stacked team, outside of quarterback and wide receiver. Vernon Davis is a freakshow target and this team has room for Wayne/Garcon. Their defense is one of the best in the NFL. They were a Kyle Williams fumble away from making the Super Bowl. They have no quarterback: Alex Smith is going to be a free agent too.

Cons: Harbaugh's gotten behind Smith the whole way and he seems genuinely convinced that Smith can be his guy long term. The 49ers would be throwing a lot of progress away if they went after Manning and he wasn't healthy, so there is a lot of risk here.



Houston Texans

Yeah, we're getting nuts. The Texans are a real long shot, especially with Matt Schaub under center. But Schaub's closing in on the end of his deal

Pros: This offense is loaded obviously. Andre Johnson, Arian Foster, one of the best offensive lines in the league, Owen Daniels, Ben Tate -- a lot of talent here. They get to play the Colts twice a year and this would be the ultimate spite move.

Cons: There's so much risk involved in doing this for the Texans, it's just too hard to fathom. They have T.J. Yates if Manning doesn't pan out, but they definitely thought they could win the Super Bowl had Schaub stayed healthy last year. No cap room.

Denver Broncos

Again, we are deep here people. Don't judge me. You know John Elway wants a "real" quarterback. And there are probably only one or two that could actually take the wind out of Tim Tebow's sails. Peyton is one of them.

Pros: See above; the Broncos want an under-center QB and Peyton would trump Tebowmania. (I think.) They have a talented defense. They play in a weak division.

Cons: The Broncos have an OK offense, with Willis McGahee, Demaryius Thomas, Eric Decker and Knowshon Moreno.
 
The Dolphins feel the same way. And Miami owner Stephen Ross will do anything to get Manning. Hes tried everything to sellout games so far and bringing in Manning would do just that. I think if it comes down to money, Miami will offer the most. But ultimately it will be up to Manning and he will choose between AZ and Miami IMO.
Not singling you out, but at this point, money should be way down the list.
 
Houston. Trade Shaub. Get picks. Win superbowl and build for the future. Win all the way around.
That would be rediculously sick...would love to see them bring him in and stick it to the Colts in route to a SB (yeah, I understand its business but its hard for me to see Manning on another team..if it has to happen, make it a success story).My opinion: Its going to be 'Zona.

Cap room +1

Need +1

Dome +1

Team can contend +1

Fitz +2

May bring Reggie with them +1

 
All the places he mentioned have a zero chance of happening, SF, BAL, NE, DAL. Zero.
I'm trolling because I think those would be good landing spots for him and those teams SHOULD look at him?
I should be king of the world too, but it's not going to happen so it's pointless talking about it. These teams have no interest in Manning and your opinion that they should is irrelevant. The OP wants to know where he could go. He likely goes to MIA, ARI, NYJ, KC, WAS, SEA. A few others are long shots. Teams like SF, BAL and DAL have made it crystal clear they aren't moving from their current guy. And mentioning someone like NE is, pardon me, simply stupid or trolling.
Adam Schefter and other writers have now mentioned teams like SF and DEN as dark horse candidates for Manning, but I guess they are STUPID or TROLLING according to you, huh? Pathetic.
 
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Are-the-Cardinals-really-the-favorite-to-land-Peyton-Manning.html

Here's the rundown:

Arizona Cardinals: 17% (a $100 bet wins $250)

Miami Dolphins: 14.5% (a $100 bet wins $300)

Washington Redskins: 11.5% (a $100 bet wins $400)

Retire: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)

New York Jets: 8.5% (a $100 bet wins $600)

Kansas City Chiefs: 6.5% (a $100 bet wins $800)

Seattle Seahawks: 5% (a $100 bet wins $1,000)

Houston Texans: 3.5% (a $100 bet wins $1,500)

San Francisco 49ers: 3% (a $100 bet wins $2,000)

Denver Broncos: 2% (a $100 bet wins $3,000)

Tennessee Titans: 1.5% (a $100 bet wins $4,000)

Other Team: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)
I can say that I am surprised at the Arizona odds. Then I looked at Kolbs contract: (per rotoworld)
7/29/2011: Signed a six-year, $65 million contract. The deal contains $12 million guaranteed, including a $10 million signing bonus and Kolb's first-year base salary. Annual $500,000 workout bonuses are available throughout the contract's life. 2012: $1 million (+ $7 million option bonus due 3/17), 2013: $9 million (+ $2 million roster bonus due in March), 2014-2016: $10 million, 2017: Free Agent
It makes a little more sense knowing that Arizona doesn't have to pick up the 7 M option bonus on Kolb.
:goodposting: Doesn't hurt that Peyton recently had a nice luncheon with Fitz. Weaker division and conference than the Dolphins would be. Better shot at playoffs IMO. Fitz seems like the kind of player Peyton would want a fresh start with, not head case Brandon Marshall. Also, plenty of room to bring Wayne along. Just my 2 cents which are virtually worthless.
Weaker division, yes.Weaker conference, no.

The NFC easily has the two best teams in GB and NO.

 
San Francisco would be a better team with Manning.
If Manning returns 100% SF would be a Super Bowl team with Manning.The issue is here is that Harbaugh calls all the plays and does not want to give that up to Manning. Manning likes to run the game in the no huddle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with the posters saying this has nothing to do with money. Peyton is going to play where he's comfortable and has the best chance to win. So, the burning question where does he want to play?

NY Jets? No way Manning wants to be a part of this circus.

Miami? #1 WR is a prima donna knucklehead. Brand new head coach with zero experience in that role. Nah.

Washington? Please. Nobody to throw to. Constant o-line woes. Cold weather winters.

Seattle? See above.

Arizona? :yes: #1 target is consummate professional and top 2 WR in the game. Head coach has SB experience. Decent defense. Dome team on natural grass. Young team on the rise that ended 2011 strong.

It's hard to imagine Manning would pass up the opportunity (assuming Arizona wants him) to throw to Larry Fitzgerald for the last few years of his career. What more could you ask for as a QB?

 
- Miami made a big splash in the off-season a few years ago when they made a trade for troubled WR Brandon Marshall, a big name star caliber player and it has worked out for them.

- Last year they made a big name signing with RB Reggie Bush. To the shock and amazement of many Reggie tore it up.

- Miami hasn't had a big name star at QB since Dan Marino.

- They have one of the best blind side protectors in ALL-PRO Jake Long.

- They have a stud #1 WR in Brandon Marshall.

- They have a playmaking RB who can catch passes out of the backfield.

- Miami has a stout defense, possibly the best of any of the contending teams for his services.

- They have cap room to sign guys like WR Reggie Wayne and C Jeff Saturday (the Dolphins could move Pouncey to OG to boost the strength of their offensive line) and those two guys could help Peyton assimilate to a new team.

- Peyton already owns a home in Miami (I think this is a big plus).

- Miami has excellent weather for any QB.

- Miami has a game scheduled againt the Colts this year.

If he's healthy he could instantly make Miami a contender. The upside outweighs the risk IMHO. I think Miami makes the most sense to me.

 
All the places he mentioned have a zero chance of happening, SF, BAL, NE, DAL. Zero.
I'm trolling because I think those would be good landing spots for him and those teams SHOULD look at him?
I should be king of the world too, but it's not going to happen so it's pointless talking about it. These teams have no interest in Manning and your opinion that they should is irrelevant. The OP wants to know where he could go. He likely goes to MIA, ARI, NYJ, KC, WAS, SEA. A few others are long shots. Teams like SF, BAL and DAL have made it crystal clear they aren't moving from their current guy. And mentioning someone like NE is, pardon me, simply stupid or trolling.
Adam Schefter and other writers have now mentioned teams like SF and DEN as dark horse candidates for Manning, but I guess they are STUPID or TROLLING according to you, huh? Pathetic.
I listened to Shefter this morning, and he specifically said SF isn't happening. He said it will be one of 4 teams: MIA, ARI, WAS, NYJ. As for "other writers," I've got news. Writers can write whatever they want for funzies (like Silver predicting HOU), but that doesn't mean there's a snowball's chance it's happening. You call me pathetic all you want. I'm right, you're wrong, that's that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
like mark messier before him

pmanning will bring the jets to the promised land, and fulfill the 96 draft where he should have been snagged over kj

it was meant to be this way...

 
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Are-the-Cardinals-really-the-favorite-to-land-Peyton-Manning.html

Here's the rundown:

Arizona Cardinals: 17% (a $100 bet wins $250)

Miami Dolphins: 14.5% (a $100 bet wins $300)

Washington Redskins: 11.5% (a $100 bet wins $400)

Retire: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)

New York Jets: 8.5% (a $100 bet wins $600)

Kansas City Chiefs: 6.5% (a $100 bet wins $800)

Seattle Seahawks: 5% (a $100 bet wins $1,000)

Houston Texans: 3.5% (a $100 bet wins $1,500)

San Francisco 49ers: 3% (a $100 bet wins $2,000)

Denver Broncos: 2% (a $100 bet wins $3,000)

Tennessee Titans: 1.5% (a $100 bet wins $4,000)

Other Team: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)
I can say that I am surprised at the Arizona odds. Then I looked at Kolbs contract: (per rotoworld)
7/29/2011: Signed a six-year, $65 million contract. The deal contains $12 million guaranteed, including a $10 million signing bonus and Kolb's first-year base salary. Annual $500,000 workout bonuses are available throughout the contract's life. 2012: $1 million (+ $7 million option bonus due 3/17), 2013: $9 million (+ $2 million roster bonus due in March), 2014-2016: $10 million, 2017: Free Agent
It makes a little more sense knowing that Arizona doesn't have to pick up the 7 M option bonus on Kolb.
:goodposting: Doesn't hurt that Peyton recently had a nice luncheon with Fitz. Weaker division and conference than the Dolphins would be. Better shot at playoffs IMO. Fitz seems like the kind of player Peyton would want a fresh start with, not head case Brandon Marshall. Also, plenty of room to bring Wayne along. Just my 2 cents which are virtually worthless.
Weaker division, yes.Weaker conference, no.

The NFC easily has the two best teams in GB and NO.
and yet neither team made the superbowl. hmm
 
I am in agreement with Jason Wood. If Manning is throwing in Durham, NC and his teammates are down there working with him, it is going to be tough for Irsay to set him free if he is cleared to play. What is so wrong with keeping him AND drafting Luck and letting Luck learn under the great Manning? Or, if they want, why not try and package the #1 overall and patch other areas of need? While Luck may be one of the best QB prospects to come along in years, if Manning can play another 2-3 years why not try and do massive upgrade in areas that need it by trading away #1 for a bounty and make a SB run with Peyton and improved team?
This makes the most sense IF Peyton is deemed healthy but they got rid of the GM who drafted him and the coaches he felt comfortable with, not to mention the statements made by Manning to the press and the tweets by the owner but I do agree that it makes the most sense to simply just pay Manning and then trade that #1 pick for a bounty.They could get three number-one draft picks plus a couple of other high picks and two young starting caliber players.

Long before the Colts made those moves that appear to sever ties with Manning, firing the GM, the HC, his strength coach, the tweets, etc. And before Peyton took to discussing his displeasure in the media I felt resigning Manning and then trading the #1 pick made the most sense. It still makes the most sense to me because the team and Peyton could get-past any differences and rebuild the team overnight if they got two number-one picks and a high second round pick this year along with two young starting players.

I proposed a deal where the Browns would ship their two number-one draft picks this year along with their number two pick this year and SS T.J. Ward and OG/OT Jason Pinkston. Ward is a hard hitting young recent high second round draft pick who is a bigger and healthier version of Bob Sanders. Pinkston is a high third round pick from last year who has a full season of starting experience and he really started to come on strong late last year. The Brown could also add QB Colt McCoy as a back-up/bridge till they drafted another QB. Colt McCoy is better than people think.

The Colts would get the Browns first round pick next year and also get some other picks to boot. A HUGE windfall for Luck and if Manning is healthy they would be an instant contender this year. The extra future picks could be packaged for a young QB prospect next year as insurance.

But that was before the Colts fired the GM and HC and those other things. I think they have moved on but I agree with you that it makes the most sense if Peyton Manning is healthy to trade the rights for the #1 pick and reap a huge windfall.

 
San Francisco would be a better team with Manning.
If Manning returns 100% SF would be a Super Bowl team with Manning.

The issue is here is that Harbaugh calls all the plays and does not want to give that up to Manning. Manning likes to run the game in the no huddle.
SF is a Super Bowl team without Manning. Or did you miss last year?

He would of course be an improvement over Alex Smith...but I don't that one happening. I'd be shocked if SF chased after him. I think they're more likely to beef up Smith's weapons. But they do have the money and Alex is not yet under contract.

 
I like him going to Houston, his best shot at a Sb (weak division, dome, great weapons and defense).

The texans then trade Shaub to Washington (Kyle Shanahan ties) for a 3rd.

 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.

There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.

HOU is pretty intriguing though, if they could find a way to trade Schaub and make it work financially. I assume that got a bit tougher with the money they just pissed away on Foster.

On a similar note, I wouldn't completely disregard Dallas. I'd have to think Jones would love to immediately make Dallas THE national story.

If HOU or DAL could turn their current solid, but aging QBs into assets while bringing in Manning, that's certainly something to consider They are still young enough to get something valuable in return, but not so young that feel like you're mortgaging the future to bring in Manning.

HOU's just probably the far more attractive option of those 2 for Manning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Are-the-Cardinals-really-the-favorite-to-land-Peyton-Manning.html

Here's the rundown:

Arizona Cardinals: 17% (a $100 bet wins $250)

Miami Dolphins: 14.5% (a $100 bet wins $300)

Washington Redskins: 11.5% (a $100 bet wins $400)

Retire: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)

New York Jets: 8.5% (a $100 bet wins $600)

Kansas City Chiefs: 6.5% (a $100 bet wins $800)

Seattle Seahawks: 5% (a $100 bet wins $1,000)

Houston Texans: 3.5% (a $100 bet wins $1,500)

San Francisco 49ers: 3% (a $100 bet wins $2,000)

Denver Broncos: 2% (a $100 bet wins $3,000)

Tennessee Titans: 1.5% (a $100 bet wins $4,000)

Other Team: 10% (a $100 bet wins $500)
I can say that I am surprised at the Arizona odds. Then I looked at Kolbs contract: (per rotoworld)
7/29/2011: Signed a six-year, $65 million contract. The deal contains $12 million guaranteed, including a $10 million signing bonus and Kolb's first-year base salary. Annual $500,000 workout bonuses are available throughout the contract's life. 2012: $1 million (+ $7 million option bonus due 3/17), 2013: $9 million (+ $2 million roster bonus due in March), 2014-2016: $10 million, 2017: Free Agent
It makes a little more sense knowing that Arizona doesn't have to pick up the 7 M option bonus on Kolb.
:goodposting: Doesn't hurt that Peyton recently had a nice luncheon with Fitz. Weaker division and conference than the Dolphins would be. Better shot at playoffs IMO. Fitz seems like the kind of player Peyton would want a fresh start with, not head case Brandon Marshall. Also, plenty of room to bring Wayne along. Just my 2 cents which are virtually worthless.
NFC weaker than the AFC? No way.
 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
Manning would be fine with a bunch of FBGs playing offensive line. His quick release and decision making is what keeps him out of harms way, not his blocking.
 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
I agree with the thought about the line; plus, while Fitz is the best playmaker any of these teams have to offer, the cupboard is pretty bare after him. Beanie is fine, and maybe Williams comes back OK, but they have no TE, and Doucet and Roberts are pretty inconsistent.
 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
I agree with the thought about the line; plus, while Fitz is the best playmaker any of these teams have to offer, the cupboard is pretty bare after him. Beanie is fine, and maybe Williams comes back OK, but they have no TE, and Doucet and Roberts are pretty inconsistent.
Sacks Allowed last year.AZ: 54Miami: 52QB hitsAZ: 86Miami: 95
 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.

There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
I agree with the thought about the line; plus, while Fitz is the best playmaker any of these teams have to offer, the cupboard is pretty bare after him. Beanie is fine, and maybe Williams comes back OK, but they have no TE, and Doucet and Roberts are pretty inconsistent.
Austin Collie looked below average without Peyton Manning.
 
San Francisco would be a better team with Manning.
If Manning returns 100% SF would be a Super Bowl team with Manning.

The issue is here is that Harbaugh calls all the plays and does not want to give that up to Manning. Manning likes to run the game in the no huddle.
SF is a Super Bowl team without Manning. Or did you miss last year? He would of course be an improvement over Alex Smith...but I don't that one happening. I'd be shocked if SF chased after him. I think they're more likely to beef up Smith's weapons. But they do have the money and Alex is not yet under contract.
They fell short last year, they have a Super Bowl calibur defense no doubt, but they do not have an offense to match. A healthy Manning would make them odds on favorites.Harbaughs ego may be a bit too big to let Manning take over the offense.

 
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
I agree with the thought about the line; plus, while Fitz is the best playmaker any of these teams have to offer, the cupboard is pretty bare after him. Beanie is fine, and maybe Williams comes back OK, but they have no TE, and Doucet and Roberts are pretty inconsistent.
Meh. Weapons on offense are fine in Arizona. (With or without Reggie Wayne) They're certainly no worse than Miami. And better than the other favorites for his services.Great QB's make good WR's great, average one's good.------------I think it's a two team race for Manning. (Arizona & Miami) I think Washington's fooling themselves if they think they have a shot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do some of you continue to insist on SF as a possibility when they've consistently said they are not in play? Just the other day GM Baalke said on KNBR radio they are not even thinking about Manning and have already made an offer to Smith. Again, who gives a dang where anyone THINKS Manning ought to go if it isn't a possibility. Get beyond this 49er talk, please!

 
Citing a person with knowledge of the Redskins' planning, the Washington Post reports the team will go after Peyton Manning "aggressively" before turning to the Rams for the No. 2 overall pick. Several sources assure the Post that the Redskins are "comfortable with the risks associated with signing Manning" and will "pursue him intently." NFL Network's Michael Lombardi lists the Redskins as his favorites to land Manning, though the Post concedes the Dolphins, Cardinals, and Jets may have a better shot.

 
1) Arizona2) Miami3) Seattle (if Peyton didn't have a Miami home / Wayne from the U, I'd bump them ahead)......Jets....Washington........JacksonvilleRotoworld.com

Tania Ganguli of the Florida Times-Union thinks Jaguars decision makers will consider the addition of Peyton Manning, but his recent injury will be the major concern.This statement is more of an opinion than a report, but adds another team into the mix. Unless teams are very confident in their quarterback situation, expect them to discuss the possible addition of Manning. Blaine Gabbert did little to secure the position during his rookie year.
:lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Paul Allen worth 13.5 billionStephen Ross worth 3 billionnuff said.
That would matter if they were at an auction buying something for a billion bucks, but that's flawed logic when it comes to someone who is able to choose where he goes and money isn't his only consideration. Also, neither owner's total wealth really matters once you're beyond a certain point. There's a salary cap involved, and Allen couldn't offer Manning an amount that would kill them with the cap even if he had 50 billion or a hundred billion more than Ross. Your 'nuff said' is so simplistic it's funny.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with many here, I'd bet on AZ.

There are legitimate reasons not to go every other team, but AZ seems perfect.
Except for the offensive line that would be blocking for Manning. Center Lyle Sendlein is considered a solid player, but Saturday will follow Manning if needed. For potential landing spots, look at the oline more than all the other variables you are reading above. Manning does not want to get hammered. This is why I think Miami is the best fit.
I agree with the thought about the line; plus, while Fitz is the best playmaker any of these teams have to offer, the cupboard is pretty bare after him. Beanie is fine, and maybe Williams comes back OK, but they have no TE, and Doucet and Roberts are pretty inconsistent.
Austin Collie looked below average without Peyton Manning.
That is true, but I am not sure Austin Collie even knows where he is right now.I am not saying AZ is a terrible place, just not the best. You want to go through the NFC with GB, Det, SF, NYG, NO and the Eagles?? I would much rather take my chances in the AFC with the Pats, Hou, Balt and Pitt...and I am a Jets fan saying this. Only a fool would go to the NFC to try to win something (unless he goes to SF...which is literally one of the ten teams he has not been rumored to go to).

 
Why do some of you continue to insist on SF as a possibility when they've consistently said they are not in play? Just the other day GM Baalke said on KNBR radio they are not even thinking about Manning and have already made an offer to Smith. Again, who gives a dang where anyone THINKS Manning ought to go if it isn't a possibility. Get beyond this 49er talk, please!
You may be right because it makes too much sense..too perfect of a scenerio. The Tigers said all along they were not interested in siging a high profile FA..them bam in one morning Prince Fielder was signed,sealed and delivered. So I take what a team says with a grain of salt.
 
Why do some of you continue to insist on SF as a possibility when they've consistently said they are not in play? Just the other day GM Baalke said on KNBR radio they are not even thinking about Manning and have already made an offer to Smith. Again, who gives a dang where anyone THINKS Manning ought to go if it isn't a possibility. Get beyond this 49er talk, please!
Is Alex Smith under contract, or did I miss something? Fact is, right now, Alex Smith is an unrestricted free agent and until he is actually signed, everything else is just talk. So Baalke and company tendered him an offer. Baalke is just saying what he has to say. What else is he going to say? "We think QBs like Smith are pretty common and have made a token gesture to sign him, but we're really hoping that he lets us off the hook by signing elsewhere so we can go after Peyton." I agree that it's likely that Smith is back, but completely discounting Peyton going to SF, who, by the way, are building a new stadium and something really splashy like a Manning signing would definitely help with PSL sales, because a GM (How do you know when a GM is lying?) says so isn't paying attention. You think if SEA whiffs on Peyton, they wouldn't take a shot at Smith, who would be an immediate upgrade over TJack while bringing valuable playbook knowledge from a division opponent? Or ARI for that matter if they're already ready to abandon the Kolb experiment? Smith is arguably the second best UFA QB available (apologies to Flynn supporters, but I did say arguably). I could see Niners signing Peyton to start and Josh Johnson as a high priced insurance policy. Do I think it will happen? No. But that's the point of odds. I guarantee that the niners are talking about it despite Baalke's protestations to the contrary.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top