Drifter, on 05 Dec 2014 - 11:21 AM, said:
I mentioned that I have an informal internal interview on Monday. Have a question to throw out for everybody on a strategy for that. This requires a little bit of background.
When I started in my area, myself and a peer were essentially hired as individual contributors for a specific program. That individual left (read: was fired) two years ago and at that time we split that program into two sub programs. Since that time, I gained another sub program and developed some other so that essentially I manage 4 distinct functions in this space with a decent sized team. The other sub program that split has also developed a little bit and a 3rd area has been created. Currently in my areas, I'm the decision maker and usually I just inform my boss of the decisions I'm making. Of course, he has his opinions and may contradict me but this doesn't happen very often. I've done well and built my program up pretty impressively from a number of different standpoints and was promoted last year to a level considered to be part of the senior management team in our org. I've expressed multiple times that I want to take back the original sub program that was split off, giving me 5 functional areas but haven't gotten any traction.
The organization has been looking for a new position above me that would essentially wrap up all 6 functional areas under one person. The people who are being interviewed for this are pretty heavy hitters from large orgs like Target, etc. I anticipate that when this person comes on, they will likely take away from my 4 current areas of responsibility leaving me anywhere from 1-3 of them. Additionally, I won't be the decision maker any longer, I will be an influencer. I'll also be less likely to be brought into the strategic discussions and meetings than I am today. My tenure probably will keep me somewhat in those circles but my responsibilities no longer will dictate that I have to be.
Now, my salary will remain the same and my workload will go down and I'm sure I could learn from the caliber of person who would get hired into the role, but it's not something I can easily swallow and doesn't do any thing to advance my career. In fact, it can be argued that it's a bit of a setback. As a result, I'm looking around internally for something that will give me the level of ownership that I want. The individual I'm meeting with Monday whose role this is, is a very long term person - 16 years - which is a rare breed around here so that also presents some opportunity for future growth here for me. Should I list the above as my primary reason for looking around? I don't want to come across as disgruntled and I'm hoping it appears more as a "I don't want an easy job, I want to build and own something". Thoughts?
On another note, I expect the org will attempt to retain me when they find out I'm looking to jump ship but I don't think they'd give me the ownership level I want. They might try and see if there's somewhere else in the org I want to go.