El Floppo
Footballguy
#metooThey keep referring to "she". It's not a "she" or a "he". It's a machine.
- perseverance
#metooThey keep referring to "she". It's not a "she" or a "he". It's a machine.
They have to be being pushed by Space X, right? Now we just need to get Blue Origin up to snuff.They absolutely nailed it. NASA is doing a bang up job lately IMO.
They got pictures literally within a minute or two of that thing sticking the landing.when do we get to see pictures and drone videos and stuff?
We broke the speed of light!?!*They got pictures literally within a minute or two of that thing sticking the landing.

Brains, meet Brad.We broke the speed of light!?!*
*Mars is three light minutes away, so at least that.
or it was faked![]()
Can't spend time to look now, but I bet those pics are up somewhere...sorry I didn't link them.They got pictures literally within a minute or two of that thing sticking the landing.when do we get to see pictures and drone videos and stuff?
No, not a thing. This is a very different technology than a rocket.They have to be being pushed by Space X, right?
Not the tech of rocket vs lander, just the advancement of the overall tech and pushing limits. Listening to Jim Green today and him breaking down how they had to decide how to land a much larger rover made me think of SpaceX.No, not a thing. This is a very different technology than a rocket.
Kudos to NASA and APL. Nailed it!
About 11 mins right now actually*Mars is three light minutes away, so at least that.
It's the other way around. In general, SpaceX leveraged NASA technology much more than the other way around. The heatshield technology is all NASA. The retro rocket landing is likely inspired by SpeceX, though. They've done good work there.Not the tech of rocket vs lander, just the advancement of the overall tech and pushing limits. Listening to Jim Green today and him breaking down how they had to decide how to land a much larger rover made me think of SpaceX.
That’s pretty cool, thanks for link.It's the other way around. In general, SpaceX leveraged NASA technology much more than the other way around. The heatshield technology is all NASA. The retro rocket landing is likely inspired by SpeceX, though. They've done good work there.
Mars is a tough place to land. Enough atmosphere to heat the crap out of stuff, but not enough to slow things down. Right now we can't slow down enough to land at higher altitudes with most payloads. I'm hoping one day to see them use HIAD technology when we start landing really big stuff. I worked on that a few years back - really cool stuff.
It's cold up there on mars. Mittens required.That thread has some pretty funny edits, too lol
You're telling me you had two pair of gloves this whole time?It's cold up there on mars. Mittens required.
where are you listening to Jim Green? podcast?Not the tech of rocket vs lander, just the advancement of the overall tech and pushing limits. Listening to Jim Green today and him breaking down how they had to decide how to land a much larger rover made me think of SpaceX.
StarTalk Radio podcast.where are you listening to Jim Green? podcast?
Those were photos from the engineering cameras -- used for navigation. Hi-Res pics from the "real" cameras will come after diagnostic tests and other stuff apparently.They got pictures literally within a minute or two of that thing sticking the landing.
They'll supposedly be releasing video of the landing soon.
Today at 2pm on nasa tv.El Floppo said:They'll supposedly be releasing video of the landing soon.
It flew away toward the north to crash not anywhere near the rover. It was always design to fly north regardless of terrain after the cables detached.El Floppo said:They'll supposedly be releasing video of the landing soon.
That pic is absolutely amazing!
Does anybody know where the sky crane flew off to after dropping the rover? Did it just bounce somewhere and crash-land to not hit or get in the rovers way...or is it safely landed somewhere for reuse?
Thanks!It flew away toward the north to crash not anywhere near the rover. It was always design to fly north regardless of terrain after the cables detached.
Don't kid yourself, that's to blow up the aliens when they realize the jig is up.i didn't realize Perseverance had a RTG in it for power. Plutonium 238. cool.
As long as Mark Watney can find it when he needs it.Thanks!
Was just reading up on it too...turns out my old neighbor and school mate Adam Steltzner was in charge of all of that.
It makes perfect sense, but I still hoped it was designed to fly off and land somewhere, to be salvaged or used as a relay or antenna booster or something.
I think that's because of the issues that Opportunity had with solar panel charging and the dust storm that finally killed it. Those rovers had some nuke thermal power as well, but not enough to run the whole thing.i didn't realize Perseverance had a RTG in it for power. Plutonium 238. cool.
Thanks!Just saw the landing footage. man that's awesome
https://twitter.com/NASAPersevere/status/1363929492138254340?s=20
dopeJust saw the landing footage. man that's awesome
https://twitter.com/NASAPersevere/status/1363929492138254340?s=20
Freakin' radJust saw the landing footage. man that's awesome
https://twitter.com/NASAPersevere/status/1363929492138254340?s=20
Link don't work. Extra nasa at the start, but I figured it out.
This is really cool. It's going to make me listen to the 13 Minutes to the Moon again. Check out that podcast if you haven't before.Just saw the landing footage. man that's awesome
https://twitter.com/NASAPersevere/status/1363929492138254340?s=20