Practice rules, new CBA, followup (1 Viewer)

[Bri]

Here is but one link to an article http://www.nfl.com/trainingcamp/story/09000d5d8215c8ab/printable/how-practice-changes-could-negatively-impact-nfl-games

from a while back. There's tons.

I thought Bucky Brooks' point about linemen seemed like a valid one now. I haven't looked at stats, but feel like they're not performing as well across the league.

Does anyone notice any changes?

Had another Q-

I don't wholly understand the injury report due to this rule.

In the Nicks thread, folks are talking about whether he fully participated in practice or not. (makes total sense last year) In the new CBA, they only have 14 full-tilt practices during the year. Surely the Giants didn't have four full tilt ones this week, so how do we digest Nicks' workout then?

How do we know if it was a full-tilt practice? Do we care if he takes it easy during a glorified walk-through?

Please feel free to use any player or team, just wanted some clarification as you guys see the rules applying to FF and the injury reports now.

Thanks

 

[Bri]

The recently signed collective bargaining agreement means more than labor peace for the next 10 years. The NFL game is undergoing a subtle makeover because of the new CBA that will not only change the quality of play in the preseason, but also impact the way the regular-season game is played.

That statement isn't designed to set off alarms, but new rules have modified practice schedules and forced coaches to adjust their preparation, specifically in these two ways:

» Gone are the grueling two-a-day practices that have long been a staple of training camps. In their place, teams are able to conduct one full-contact padded practice per day accompanied by a walkthrough period.

» The league has also placed limits on the number of full-contact padded practices during the regular season. Teams are permitted a total of 14 for the year with 11 of those practices conducted during the first 11 weeks of the season (a maximum of one per week).

For teams like the Steelers, Ravens and Jets, these changes threaten to change their identities as teams built on physicality and aggressiveness. The loss of full-contact practices could rob them of the edginess that allows them to bully opponents.

Coaches are having difficulty melding their long-held philosophies with the league's new approach. Proponents of hard-hitting football cultivated by rugged practices are upset with the mandated scaled-back approach. They assert the lack of contact will leave their squads unprepared for the intensity and physicality of the game.

How else will these rule changes affect teams? Here are three possibilities:

1. Tackling could suffer. Defensive coaches are worried about the prospect of shoddy tackling without full-speed contact drills on a consistent basis. Although defenders have spent years crafting their skills, the frenetic pace of the game requires players to work on proper angles and tackling fundamentals regularly. Granted, some defenses have been able to flourish without banging daily, but it's hard to replicate the tempo, aggressiveness and angle discipline needed without contact.

2. Running game will feel a pinch. From an offensive standpoint, the lack of hitting could hurt run-heavy attacks without the benefit of intense nine-on-seven drills that focus on execution. To be successful on the ground, offenses must own the line of scrimmage and generate consistent push. This requires the offensive line to move defenders off the ball. While elements can be simulated without pads, the best rushing attacks sharpen timing and execution by pummeling scout team defenders in a series of brutal team sessions.

3. The reduction of full-contact practices will also impact the passing game. Teams will find it challenging to refine pass protection under the current circumstances. Offenses will have limited opportunities to work against pressures in live contact blitz periods. This will lead to more miscues and blown assignments in protection, which could result in quarterbacks taking a pounding. With blockers unable to learn how to handle the speed, strength and power of attacking defenders through repetition, building up the necessary toughness to win physical confrontations could become an issue. That fortitude is only developed in pads.

The league has modified the practice rules to provide a safer environment for players, but the changes are certain to have a significant impact on the game. How well coaches adjust will ultimately determine which teams emerge as contenders this season.

Follow Bucky

Brooks on Twitter @BuckyBrooks

Article I linked above

 

[GregR]

Here is but one link to an article http://www.nfl.com/trainingcamp/story/09000d5d8215c8ab/printable/how-practice-changes-could-negatively-impact-nfl-games

from a while back. There's tons.

I thought Bucky Brooks' point about linemen seemed like a valid one now. I haven't looked at stats, but feel like they're not performing as well across the league.

Does anyone notice any changes?

Had another Q-

I don't wholly understand the injury report due to this rule.

In the Nicks thread, folks are talking about whether he fully participated in practice or not. (makes total sense last year) In the new CBA, they only have 14 full-tilt practices during the year. Surely the Giants didn't have four full tilt ones this week, so how do we digest Nicks' workout then?

How do we know if it was a full-tilt practice? Do we care if he takes it easy during a glorified walk-through?

Please feel free to use any player or team, just wanted some clarification as you guys see the rules applying to FF and the injury reports now.

Thanks

Players can do a lot in practice without it being full contact. Most all of the Texans training camp sessions I've gone to over the years were not full contact despite predating the CBA rules.Yet injured players don't take part in those drills. So I personally wouldn't treat the NFL injury report differently because of the changed CBA rule, unless there are actual NFL personnel saying something to make me think otherwise.

 

[Bri]

Players can do a lot in practice without it being full contact. Most all of the Texans training camp sessions I've gone to over the years were not full contact despite predating the CBA rules.Yet injured players don't take part in those drills. So I personally wouldn't treat the NFL injury report differently because of the changed CBA rule, unless there are actual NFL personnel saying something to make me think otherwise.

thanks for the reply Greg. I understand what you're saying, but it's supposed to be even easier this year in practice. I remember a while back a quip that it was like 4 saturday practices. That stuck with me and I haven't followed up on it. Saturday was the biggest joke of a practice more like a scripted walk-thru. Again, it's my fault- I didn't follow up. I have personally reworked things (being a single dad now) and haven't been to any practices this year. I was hoping someone here went to a practice in 2011.