Jeff Pasquino
Footballguy
Pre-game discussions can begin right here. Enjoy.

The run defense has been shocking of late. NT Edwards and ILB Belcher are simply awful players, and both get pushed around very easily. I expect the Ravens to run Rice right up the gut early and often.The OL is generally decent, but it's undersized and gets manhandled by bigger, physical fronts. The Raiders showed that yesterday, and I have NO idea how the Chiefs are going to block Haloti Ngata. None. I expect him to COMPLETELY dominate the game. The pass rush outside of Hali (14.5 sacks) is spotty. If the Ravens can gameplan to quiet Hali as much as possible, I think they'll protect Flacco OK and move the chains.The offense overall simply hasn't proven able over 16 games to come back; if Baltimore gets any sort of lead, I think the Chiefs are done. 100% finished. So I think the Ravens coming out very aggressively will be a key thing to watch. WR depth is a major problem. Bowe is great, but like the pass rush, if you can gameplan to limit his effectiveness, the other WRs won't beat you, and Cassel simply doesn't trust them and flat-out can't get the ball to them. Distraction would be another possible weakness. I'm not buying that this Weis thing won't cause at least some distraction; it sure did yesterday, where they played their worst offensive game of the season, and the play-calling was the worst of the year.Lastly, inexperience. Cassel's never started a playoff game, and only a handful of guys on the roster have. None of the key skill players and none of the main secondary players, which includes 3 rookie starters (2 rookie safeties!). *NOTE* Yes, that is a long list of weaknesses. The Chiefs were a nice story and are definitely on a good path going forward, but they're definitely not your typical playoff team; they've got a lot of work to do.PREDICTION: The Ravens offense has been a bit inconsistent of late, and I expect the crowd to be very, very loud (and I just hope they're not dejected after yesterday's stinker), but the Chiefs aren't great on defense. I'm up in the air about how many the Ravens score, but with some good field position and turnovers, I'll guess around 24-27. It's the other side of the ball which I think I can forecast better: the Ravens should completely dominate the LOS, which will stop the KC running game. I think Ngata has a game for the ages and completely clowns whoever he lines up against. In turn I don't think the passing game will be able to get ANYTHING going; Cassel has not yet proven that he can take over a game. I think the Chiefs' only hope is to get some big plays out of their stars, Charles and Bowe. Maybe something in the return game from McCluster/Arenas, but they've been awful lately. And as the game goes on, and the Chiefs have to press more, I think that's when you see the Ravens' experience take over. I hope I'm wrong, but I'll say-FINAL SCORE: Baltimore 27 KC 13What are their weaknesses?
Thanks, TJ. Two kinda-secret weapons that Ravens have are P Sam Koch and PK Billy Cundiff. Cundiff leads the world in touchbacks on kickoffs and has been really solid on FGs. Koch is great at pinning teams deep. While it's misleading to make too much of the advantage the Ravens have over most teams with their kickers, it's an edge that helps them and maybe gives them a win or two a year in some of the close games.The run defense has been shocking of late. NT Edwards and ILB Belcher are simply awful players, and both get pushed around very easily. I expect the Ravens to run Rice right up the gut early and often.The OL is generally decent, but it's undersized and gets manhandled by bigger, physical fronts. The Raiders showed that yesterday, and I have NO idea how the Chiefs are going to block Haloti Ngata. None. I expect him to COMPLETELY dominate the game. The pass rush outside of Hali (14.5 sacks) is spotty. If the Ravens can gameplan to quiet Hali as much as possible, I think they'll protect Flacco OK and move the chains.The offense overall simply hasn't proven able over 16 games to come back; if Baltimore gets any sort of lead, I think the Chiefs are done. 100% finished. So I think the Ravens coming out very aggressively will be a key thing to watch. WR depth is a major problem. Bowe is great, but like the pass rush, if you can gameplan to limit his effectiveness, the other WRs won't beat you, and Cassel simply doesn't trust them and flat-out can't get the ball to them. Distraction would be another possible weakness. I'm not buying that this Weis thing won't cause at least some distraction; it sure did yesterday, where they played their worst offensive game of the season, and the play-calling was the worst of the year.Lastly, inexperience. Cassel's never started a playoff game, and only a handful of guys on the roster have. None of the key skill players and none of the main secondary players, which includes 3 rookie starters (2 rookie safeties!). *NOTE* Yes, that is a long list of weaknesses. The Chiefs were a nice story and are definitely on a good path going forward, but they're definitely not your typical playoff team; they've got a lot of work to do.PREDICTION: The Ravens offense has been a bit inconsistent of late, and I expect the crowd to be very, very loud (and I just hope they're not dejected after yesterday's stinker), but the Chiefs aren't great on defense. I'm up in the air about how many the Ravens score, but with some good field position and turnovers, I'll guess around 24-27. It's the other side of the ball which I think I can forecast better: the Ravens should completely dominate the LOS, which will stop the KC running game. I think Ngata has a game for the ages and completely clowns whoever he lines up against. In turn I don't think the passing game will be able to get ANYTHING going; Cassel has not yet proven that he can take over a game. I think the Chiefs' only hope is to get some big plays out of their stars, Charles and Bowe. Maybe something in the return game from McCluster/Arenas, but they've been awful lately. And as the game goes on, and the Chiefs have to press more, I think that's when you see the Ravens' experience take over. I hope I'm wrong, but I'll say-FINAL SCORE: Baltimore 27 KC 13What are their weaknesses?
I believe that was the year they went 11-5 and missed the playoffs.In his post of the Chiefs weaknesses The Jacket mentioned that Cassel had not started a playoff game. Didn't Cassel start a playoff game for New England the year that Brady went down for the season and Cassel took over the job?
2. Ravens overrated secondary.
Sorry, and not trying to single you out, but againThe Ravens defense is as good as they've ever been against the run
Third time's the charm, I guess, but.....And the Ravens just have an anemic offense. Boldin has 5 catches in the last 3 games.Worst offense in the AFC playoffs, for sure.
This sounds about right, except that the Chiefs played an incredibly soft schedule this year. Their only opponent that finished with a winning record was San Diego - the Chiefs got them early in the season, then got killed by them 31-0 a couple of weeks ago. The Ravens played 7 teams that finished with winning records - split a couple of wars with Pittsburgh, led the Pats by 10 in the fourth quarter before losing in OT, led at Atlanta in the final seconds (a trip made tougher by having to go on the road for a Thursday night game), beat the Jets, Saints and Tampa.I think the Ravens' run D is a little overrated right now and their pass D is a little under-rated, in large part because the nation saw Schaub torch them on MNF. Charles is just the kind of runner to give them trouble - the strength of the Ravens run D is on the inside, but the inside guys are too slow to get to the edges, and the secondary - especially the safeties - are horrible tacklers. It will be hugely important for Baltimore's outside LBs to set the edge vs. Charles - Jarrett Johnson is excellent at this; Suggs is incredible at it when he puts his mind to it, but too often gives up the edge to chase the QB or pursue what he thinks are runs away from him, only to find himself out of position. Baltimore's pass D #2 in the NFL in fewest yards per attempt allowed and #5 in opposing QB rating.The Ravens have played extremely well on the road in the last two post-seasons, winning at New England last year, and winning at Miami and then #1 seed Tennessee the year before. This game kind of reminds me of the Miami game, with the Chiefs playing the role of a team completing a huge turnaround against a fairly soft schedule and securing a surprise playoff berth, only to have its shortcomings revealed in the post-season. I think that Miami team had only 13 turnovers all season, then turned the ball over 5 times vs. the Ravens. Ed Reed has 8 INTs in 10 games this season, and Cassel looked a little shaky yesterday.The Ravens have kind of crapped the bed the last couple of weeks vs. divisional opponents after their big win over the Saints, but they also haven't had a whole lot to play for. Sure, there was a chance the Steelers could lose to the Panthers or Browns, but not really. My biggest concern about the Ravens is that they think they're still a running team, but they're really not. They're one of the very bottom teams in the NFL in yards per carry, and their O Line just isn't good enough to change that. If the Ravens would use play action to set up early-down passing, instead of running the ball unsuccessfully on first and second downs and forcing Flacco into third-and-long, they would be much more successful. Protection in passing situations has gotten terrible lately.Chiefs played a fairly soft schedule this year. The Ravens played some very good teams.Ravens win 23-10
Read this, young grasshoppers, for a nice State Of The Ravens.This sounds about right, except that the Chiefs played an incredibly soft schedule this year. Their only opponent that finished with a winning record was San Diego - the Chiefs got them early in the season, then got killed by them 31-0 a couple of weeks ago. The Ravens played 7 teams that finished with winning records - split a couple of wars with Pittsburgh, led the Pats by 10 in the fourth quarter before losing in OT, led at Atlanta in the final seconds (a trip made tougher by having to go on the road for a Thursday night game), beat the Jets, Saints and Tampa.I think the Ravens' run D is a little overrated right now and their pass D is a little under-rated, in large part because the nation saw Schaub torch them on MNF. Charles is just the kind of runner to give them trouble - the strength of the Ravens run D is on the inside, but the inside guys are too slow to get to the edges, and the secondary - especially the safeties - are horrible tacklers. It will be hugely important for Baltimore's outside LBs to set the edge vs. Charles - Jarrett Johnson is excellent at this; Suggs is incredible at it when he puts his mind to it, but too often gives up the edge to chase the QB or pursue what he thinks are runs away from him, only to find himself out of position. Baltimore's pass D #2 in the NFL in fewest yards per attempt allowed and #5 in opposing QB rating.The Ravens have played extremely well on the road in the last two post-seasons, winning at New England last year, and winning at Miami and then #1 seed Tennessee the year before. This game kind of reminds me of the Miami game, with the Chiefs playing the role of a team completing a huge turnaround against a fairly soft schedule and securing a surprise playoff berth, only to have its shortcomings revealed in the post-season. I think that Miami team had only 13 turnovers all season, then turned the ball over 5 times vs. the Ravens. Ed Reed has 8 INTs in 10 games this season, and Cassel looked a little shaky yesterday.The Ravens have kind of crapped the bed the last couple of weeks vs. divisional opponents after their big win over the Saints, but they also haven't had a whole lot to play for. Sure, there was a chance the Steelers could lose to the Panthers or Browns, but not really. My biggest concern about the Ravens is that they think they're still a running team, but they're really not. They're one of the very bottom teams in the NFL in yards per carry, and their O Line just isn't good enough to change that. If the Ravens would use play action to set up early-down passing, instead of running the ball unsuccessfully on first and second downs and forcing Flacco into third-and-long, they would be much more successful. Protection in passing situations has gotten terrible lately.Chiefs played a fairly soft schedule this year. The Ravens played some very good teams.Ravens win 23-10
Agreed. Great post.Ravens will win this game. And start throwing it to your studs in Boldin and Mason early and often to set up Ray Rice and McGahee. A healthy Todd Heap is key too. Their defense is built for the playoffs. They come up big in the post season and Ray Lewis and Ed Reed win big games and make big plays in the big games. If the Ravens are geting points....take them with confidence.Read this, young grasshoppers, for a nice State Of The Ravens.This sounds about right, except that the Chiefs played an incredibly soft schedule this year. Their only opponent that finished with a winning record was San Diego - the Chiefs got them early in the season, then got killed by them 31-0 a couple of weeks ago. The Ravens played 7 teams that finished with winning records - split a couple of wars with Pittsburgh, led the Pats by 10 in the fourth quarter before losing in OT, led at Atlanta in the final seconds (a trip made tougher by having to go on the road for a Thursday night game), beat the Jets, Saints and Tampa.I think the Ravens' run D is a little overrated right now and their pass D is a little under-rated, in large part because the nation saw Schaub torch them on MNF. Charles is just the kind of runner to give them trouble - the strength of the Ravens run D is on the inside, but the inside guys are too slow to get to the edges, and the secondary - especially the safeties - are horrible tacklers. It will be hugely important for Baltimore's outside LBs to set the edge vs. Charles - Jarrett Johnson is excellent at this; Suggs is incredible at it when he puts his mind to it, but too often gives up the edge to chase the QB or pursue what he thinks are runs away from him, only to find himself out of position. Baltimore's pass D #2 in the NFL in fewest yards per attempt allowed and #5 in opposing QB rating.The Ravens have played extremely well on the road in the last two post-seasons, winning at New England last year, and winning at Miami and then #1 seed Tennessee the year before. This game kind of reminds me of the Miami game, with the Chiefs playing the role of a team completing a huge turnaround against a fairly soft schedule and securing a surprise playoff berth, only to have its shortcomings revealed in the post-season. I think that Miami team had only 13 turnovers all season, then turned the ball over 5 times vs. the Ravens. Ed Reed has 8 INTs in 10 games this season, and Cassel looked a little shaky yesterday.The Ravens have kind of crapped the bed the last couple of weeks vs. divisional opponents after their big win over the Saints, but they also haven't had a whole lot to play for. Sure, there was a chance the Steelers could lose to the Panthers or Browns, but not really. My biggest concern about the Ravens is that they think they're still a running team, but they're really not. They're one of the very bottom teams in the NFL in yards per carry, and their O Line just isn't good enough to change that. If the Ravens would use play action to set up early-down passing, instead of running the ball unsuccessfully on first and second downs and forcing Flacco into third-and-long, they would be much more successful. Protection in passing situations has gotten terrible lately.Chiefs played a fairly soft schedule this year. The Ravens played some very good teams.Ravens win 23-10
This sounds about right, except that the Chiefs played an incredibly soft schedule this year. Their only opponent that finished with a winning record was San Diego.
My bad. At the time they played, the Colts were 2-2 - I mixed up in looking for teams that finished with a winning record vs. teams that had a winning record when they played.I totally agree that KC didn't ask for the schedule. My point is that they're not nearly as battle-tested as the Ravens, and that the Chiefs' good record is in part a result of beating inferior teams. My thinking is that some of their flaws that weren't exposed by the weaker teams they played will now be revealed.This sounds about right, except that the Chiefs played an incredibly soft schedule this year. Their only opponent that finished with a winning record was San Diego.Colts in Week 4Not like KC asked for that schedule.
In three games against "good" opponents, the Chiefs split with the Chargers and played the Colts tight but lost by 10 in the end. If you can remember back to the Colts game, I think the general public started giving them more respect after the Colts loss than any of their early wins. The SD game in Arrowhead in Week 1 was a fluky rainstorm and I wouldn't put that much stock in that game. The other SD game was a 31-0 blowout w/o Cassel, so I wouldn't put much stock in that one either. This game will hinge on the Ravens' O. If the Chiefs get behind, I think the Ravens will be able to tee off with blitzes, and double Bowe, and this could turn into a rout. If the Ravens can't score over 20 points this game, they can still obviously win, but the Cheifs will be in it til the end.My bad. At the time they played, the Colts were 2-2 - I mixed up in looking for teams that finished with a winning record vs. teams that had a winning record when they played.I totally agree that KC didn't ask for the schedule. My point is that they're not nearly as battle-tested as the Ravens, and that the Chiefs' good record is in part a result of beating inferior teams. My thinking is that some of their flaws that weren't exposed by the weaker teams they played will now be revealed.This sounds about right, except that the Chiefs played an incredibly soft schedule this year. Their only opponent that finished with a winning record was San Diego.Colts in Week 4Not like KC asked for that schedule.
Reed hardly practices at all at this point. He's no more dinged up than usual. I don't think the Suggs thing is anything at all - he's totally healthy - just wasn't at the media portion of practice.But, Ngata.... the Ravens have been keeping this very quiet. He left the Bengals game after recovering a fumble along the sideline in the 3rd quarter and never returned. I thought it was very interesting that the Ravens didn't say anything about that after the game and now he's not practicing. I will be very interested to hear what Harbaugh says about his absence.The thought of the Ravens having to play the KC running game without Ngata just made me throw up in my mouth a little bit.5 Pro Bowlers not practicing during the media session of practice today:BoweWatersSuggsNgataReed![]()
This whole "Doubtful" business started confusing people a couple of years ago when the NFL made teams link a player's status at practice with "Doubtful," "Questionable," etc.Now, if a guy misses practice he has to be listed as Doubtful, even if he just has the flu and will definitely be ready to play by Sunday.So if Haley is saying it's illness, then I'm going to chalk up the "Doubtful" to his absence from practice, and not to the fact that he really is doubtful.I've heard that Ngata's injury is a hamstring. I think he would play with that, but it's still worrisome. There is no replacing him - the Ravens have some decent depth on the D line (Terrence Cody got his most extended time of the season vs. Cincy) and would rotate through tons of guys, but none of them is remotely comparable to Ngata.Haley just said Waters and Bowe would be listed as "illness"But many people calling Bowe doubtful. Does Haley/Pioli really think we all buy it? Geez
So you believe "many people" (which includes exactly no one worth a dime) over the team?La Canfora confirms Bowe is simply sick and will play, BTW. And he carries more weight in his stubby toe than any of those "many people." Game's on the board and line is unchanged.But many people calling Bowe doubtful. Does Haley/Pioli really think we all buy it? Geez
I was only quoting Wright's twitter comments....seems he was wrong, as he is most of the time. Reading on ChiefsPlanet, it seems that it may indeed just be sickness. I concur on taking the word of a La Canfora over anyone in KC.As for the Ravens, this doesn't sound good for Reed.So you believe "many people" (which includes exactly no one worth a dime) over the team?La Canfora confirms Bowe is simply sick and will play, BTW. And he carries more weight in his stubby toe than any of those "many people."But many people calling Bowe doubtful.
Does Haley/Pioli really think we all buy it? Geez
Game's on the board and line is unchanged.
Todd Heap had a charity function tonite and Ed was supposed to be there to receive an honor. He didn't show up because (according to Todd who told some people) "he can't stand, sit or lay down - he's in a lot of pain".
They would only go to Pitt if the Jets win. If the colts win, BAL would to NE.I can't get a read from anywhere if Reed will be playing now or not. I think a tradegy like this for one of the teams best players can be a big motivator.If he doesn't play they still have a good chance of winning, they did alright the beginning of the season when he was out with an injury. Shut down the run and double Bowe and you're on to Pitt.
with the Jets win, I officially rescind this comment. CHEFS!I feel dirty saying this, but "go Baltimore".![]()
with the Jets win, I officially rescind this comment. CHEFS!I feel dirty saying this, but "go Baltimore".![]()