KiddLattimer
Footballguy
We certainly meddle in other countries elections, but this definitely is not it
Yes, but he admitted and apologized for the groping incident and it appears to have gone away. Probably better off just admitting and confronting the situation and having it go away. If he denied it would go on and on.I have no problem with it, but isn`t Trudeau the guy who groped the female reporter? The Me-Too Movement and left women may not approve at all.
I wouldn’t say it’s jumping down Joe’s throat... I do think it’s fair to point out how this literally plays into the hands of those who purposefully look to confuse, conflate and misdirect, though.I agree with everyone else that this is fine.
I'm not sure why so many people are jumping down Joe's throat for posing the question. It's good to occasionally remind ourselves of what's okay and what's not okay and why.
This.But I do think many of us are sick of the whataboutism, not saying this was that, but I can understand the view that it is.
Accepting or requesting things of value without paying for them for help in an election from a foreign national is a crime. Or offering to change foreign policy for that help. Interestingly, if he'd paid foreign nationals to help influence opinion, that probably wouldn't be a crime. Because it's not having a foreign national donate to a campaign.I figure that countries involve themselves in campaigns to influence opinion all the time. I'm sure the CIA has done this countless times over the past decades. I have no doubts that Russia is going to be trying to do it in 2020. To me, attempts to influence public opinion are part of the status quo. It's why I've always thought it was laughable when the "TRUMP TRIED TO UNDERMINE THE 2016 ELECTIONS!!!" arguments came out. No...he tried to influence public opinion. The elections happen on a specific date and are comprised of adults casting their own votes. As far as I know, that process was never compromised.
Instead of focusing on that, focus on his crimes. Was Trump responsible for hacking a DNC server? If so, yes that is a crime. Fake facebook ads? Not really a crime, though extremely unethical.
Now if it could be proven that Trump paid Russia to influence opinion for him, you may have a different argument. But then, I'd imagine that also has gone on for years and is another dirty little secret of Washington. I mean we are talking about a government where it's legal for lobbyists to pay government officials for their votes in certain areas. To think that politicians aren't compromised is the height of absurdity. These guys make all sorts of wink-wink deals so that they will get support of others for elections, and I'm going to assume that in this connected world, that extends outside of the country to.
That's always been my opinion at least. I've never bought into the "influencing elections" hype, and taken quite a bit of heat over it through the years.
BUT, that story quickly changes if a country tried to actually influence the elections by hacking the election machines or changing the votes somehow. That would be undermining elections and would be a grave and potentially fatal threat to any democracy.
I heard that. The blatant out in the open braggadocio of these criminals is amazing. Lock them all up.And...
“Get over it: there’s going to be political influence in foreign policy,” Mulvaney says. “Obama did it in one way,” we do it “a different way,” and there’s no problem.
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1184878319608750080
Feels like this could just be the tip of the iceberg on possible meddling, but since he is no longer president no one will dig into this.From President Obama https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/1184528998669389824?s=20
Quick defense from journalist B. Allen-Ebrahimian https://twitter.com/BethanyAllenEbr/status/1184529874377236481?s=20
What do you guys think?
dot dot dotWe know that stuff like this is absolutely going to be brought up by Trump and his supporters from now on as "whataboutism". It's as predictable as the sun rising and setting every single day
Feels like this could just be the tip of the iceberg on possible meddling, but since he is no longer president no one will dig into this.
Don't stress it Joe. You just experienced what anyone with an unpopular opinion goes through.Joe Bryant said:Thank you @IvanKaramazov , that's what disappointed me. I asked what you guys thought and received a pretty clear answer. I'll bow out now. Rock on.
1. In no way shape or form does this even hint at meddling. If Jim Kelly says he hopes the Bills beat the Dolphins on Sunday is this "meddling" as well?Feels like this could just be the tip of the iceberg on possible meddling, but since he is no longer president no one will dig into this.
Well, at the very least he should hit the campaign trail in the run up to election day. The man is popular and smart and he influences people.Obama should just run for President again. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, anyway.
Obama should just run for President again. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, anyway.
Announce it via twitter pointing out that he has 50% more followers than Trump and that might just cause Trump quit.![]()
This would be nothing short of AWESOME!
Obama should just announce it and watch GOP heads explode. Then Dems ride the wave with no GOP opposition.
He would probably be out of office again by the time it works thru the courts.Obama should just run for President again. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, anyway.
He could pull a George Wallace and have Michelle run in his place. Or just run as Biden's VP running mate with the understanding that Biden would resign shortly after inauguration day.Obama should just run for President again. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, anyway.![]()
This would be nothing short of AWESOME!
Obama should just announce it and watch GOP heads explode. Then Dems ride the wave with no GOP opposition.
I agree, no party should be able to change the constitution. Hopefully the next Dem POTUS will make sure of that.Obama should just run for President again. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, anyway.
This thread, after reading the PSF for the day, has immediately turned me off again and it's the usual suspects doing the collectivist throat punch.I agree with everyone else that this is fine.
I'm not sure why so many people are jumping down Joe's throat for posing the question. It's good to occasionally remind ourselves of what's okay and what's not okay and why.