What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Presidential Debate Thread - Obama vs. Romney (2 Viewers)

Why does Obama insist on saying Pahckeystahn?
Because that's the way it's pronouncedJust like Iraq is ee-Rack, not I-Rack
ee-Rack? Uh, no. And it's only pronounced Pahckeystahn by people who have Pakstani accents.
Or people who deal with Pakistan representatives and get used to pronouncing it that way. Like one would as President.
Oh, that's right, I forgot that his accent comes and goes based on his audience.
 
Seriously, I was in Ohio for two nights recently and those damn commercials were one after the other after the other.

I really feel sorry for those living in those states, terrible.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does Obama insist on saying Pahckeystahn?
Because that's the way it's pronouncedJust like Iraq is ee-Rack, not I-Rack
ee-Rack? Uh, no. And it's only pronounced Pahckeystahn by people who have Pakstani accents.
Or people who deal with Pakistan representatives and get used to pronouncing it that way. Like one would as President.
Oh, that's right, I forgot that his accent comes and goes based on his audience.
Did you also forget that he's a politician?
 
Barak's problem is he thinks he's the smartest guy in the room but against Mitt he just not up to par
Umm, Obama is clearly smarter.
Not on creating jobs.
How many jobs (net) has Mitt Romney created in his career as a businessman, then governor, then as a candidate for POTUS the past eight years? A serious question. And I mean American jobs...not including the jobs his actions/investments/decisions created overseas. :popcorn:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously, I was in Ohio for two nights recently and those damn commercials were one after the other after the other. I really feel sorry for those living in those states, terrible.
This is the one thing that makes me thankful for the Electoral College. I've not seen a single ad yet.
 
Seriously, I was in Ohio for two nights recently and those damn commercials were one after the other after the other. I really feel sorry for those living in those states, terrible.
try living in MA with back to back Brown/Warren commercials & then Romney/Obamama ads intended for NH residents :wall:
 
I don't think there's enough difference in either man's ability to handle foreign policy to make a big difference. For most people this is way down the list of concerns. It's the economy, and I think when people go to the polls they'll realize that Mitt is more qualified and Obama's policies aren't working.
Only in America can a man get rich by gutting companies for profit, provide exactly zero details on how he would do anything, and "be more qualified" to deal with the economy than the President of the United States. That statement is ludicrous.
So someone who cut overhead and waste in companies he took over is not qualified, but 4 years ago a 1st term US Senator, previously new IL State Senator, and community organizer was an expert in macroeconomics? Got it. I realize many want to focus on the shutdowns or failures from Bain investments but you never bat 1.000 in business. It's just that simple.
Really? So Obama's failed investments in energy companies aren't as bad as Romney makes them out to be?
I said you'll never bat 1.000, that's not a defense for batting .000 or .025 or whatever the case may be. You really want to compare the "success rate" of those green energy investments to Bain acquisitions? I don't pretend to know every success/failure of Bain, but given their success I feel pretty safe in wagering they had a greater success rate than those energy companies. I'm game if you are.
Well, considering Bain was only really concerned about taking more money out of the company than it put in, they had a very large success rate - much higher than the rate of companies they bought that actually turned around.
A buisness that was interested in earning more money then they spend? You don't say..? Must have been full of evil republicans.. We should not stand for this..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top